2041
The Flood / Re: Fruit, Cindy, Tru, Class.
« on: October 29, 2015, 09:31:02 PM »
I've seen this before.
It hurts my private parts.
It hurts my private parts.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 2041
The Flood / Re: Fruit, Cindy, Tru, Class.« on: October 29, 2015, 09:31:02 PM »
I've seen this before.
It hurts my private parts. 2043
Gaming / Re: I have Halo 5. Screw this thread :^) | Halo 5 mega thread« on: October 28, 2015, 11:43:19 PM »
Onyx in FFA
![]() 2044
The Flood / Re: Things other people care about that you don't.« on: October 28, 2015, 08:41:43 PM »
You know what I really don't care about?
French girls. 2045
The Flood / Re: if you don't know what to say to a girl« on: October 27, 2015, 11:19:31 PM »Destroyed.Shut the fuck up. 2046
The Flood / Re: Going down« on: October 27, 2015, 10:40:54 PM »
I mean, my girlfriend loves it, but vagina has a weird... Aftertaste.
Like... Watered down, metallic milk- and salt. 2047
The Flood / Re: How do you break up with somebody and stay friends?« on: October 27, 2015, 07:30:38 PM »
Good luck.
2048
The Flood / Re: Question to the people here who hate anime« on: October 26, 2015, 09:22:31 PM »
I went through an anime period over the course of like six months two years ago, and I loved it. Really, I did. I'm actually pretty nostalgic about it, because I can honestly say it was a very happy time of my life. But I just grew out of it, unfortunately.
2049
Serious / Re: Mike Tython Endorthes a Prethidenthal candidate« on: October 26, 2015, 08:47:42 PM »
Thath's ridiculouth.
2050
The Flood / Re: You have become a Sith Lord« on: October 26, 2015, 06:52:05 PM »
Can I be Darth Sprinkles?
2051
Serious / Re: Why should transgenderism be something we "accept"?« on: October 26, 2015, 06:29:59 PM »Why should we accept transgenders if they can't even accept themselves?Because the reason that transgender people generally can't accept who they are is the result of people shunning them? 2052
Serious / Re: Why should transgenderism be something we "accept"?« on: October 26, 2015, 06:26:27 PM »
I guess I don't really know enough about the arguments to see where logical aspects and emotional aspects mix or don't mix.
2053
Serious / Re: Why should transgenderism be something we "accept"?« on: October 26, 2015, 06:20:25 PM »I don't think I'm viewing the question the same way you are. I don't see it as impossible to make a logical analysis and argument for something, even if the topic you're arguing for involves emotion."Nobody's getting hurt and gender dysphoric people are less likely to off themselves."Depression and many of the effects of gender dysphoria deal with emotion, and that opinion is, thus, answering the question based on a certain emotional standpoint. "Sally will be sad if you take her cookie" is a logical statement that deals with someone's emotions. In the case of people with gender dysphoria, you're providing insight to the causes and results and demonstrating that they have a right to pursue what makes them feel happier, more productive, and giving more people a sense of acceptance. "Logically," I'd consider the spreading or furthering of those things to be "Good." 2054
Serious / Re: Why should transgenderism be something we "accept"?« on: October 26, 2015, 05:52:56 PM »I disagree.That's not for, fam, that's just not against"Nobody's getting hurt."Pls make me a case for trans people without factoring emotions into the equation whatsoeverI love how people act like "logic" is some big trump card and that emotions should have no play in anything. "HURR DURR WELL YOU CAN ONLY JUSTIFY THIS FROM AN EMOTIONAL STANDPOINT AND NOT A PURELY LOGICAL ONE SO IT DOESN'T EXIST AND I'M GONNA KEEP BEING AN ASSHOLE." Sorry, is the human race populated entirely full of sociopaths? It isn't, since that was a rhetorical question, and trying to act like emotion doesn't play a roll in anything we do and that it excuses you being a bigoted cuntbag just because it's not a purely logical action - especially in the realm of MENTAL DISEASES THAT ARE HEAVILY EFFECTED BY A PERSON'S EMOTIONS - is just fucking stupid, narrow-minded, and a poor justification for hatespeech, as most other things revolving around transphobia are.I wouldn't even say there's a need to get defensive whens someone makes a logic-based attack against gender dysphoria, because I don't see that as an honest means of taking arguments down. You can make 100% logic-based arguments for trans people. 2055
Serious / Re: Why should transgenderism be something we "accept"?« on: October 26, 2015, 05:27:01 PM »"Nobody's getting hurt."Pls make me a case for trans people without factoring emotions into the equation whatsoeverI love how people act like "logic" is some big trump card and that emotions should have no play in anything. "HURR DURR WELL YOU CAN ONLY JUSTIFY THIS FROM AN EMOTIONAL STANDPOINT AND NOT A PURELY LOGICAL ONE SO IT DOESN'T EXIST AND I'M GONNA KEEP BEING AN ASSHOLE." Sorry, is the human race populated entirely full of sociopaths? It isn't, since that was a rhetorical question, and trying to act like emotion doesn't play a roll in anything we do and that it excuses you being a bigoted cuntbag just because it's not a purely logical action - especially in the realm of MENTAL DISEASES THAT ARE HEAVILY EFFECTED BY A PERSON'S EMOTIONS - is just fucking stupid, narrow-minded, and a poor justification for hatespeech, as most other things revolving around transphobia are.I wouldn't even say there's a need to get defensive whens someone makes a logic-based attack against gender dysphoria, because I don't see that as an honest means of taking arguments down. You can make 100% logic-based arguments for trans people. There? 2056
Serious / Re: Why should transgenderism be something we "accept"?« on: October 26, 2015, 05:05:25 PM »I love how people act like "logic" is some big trump card and that emotions should have no play in anything. "HURR DURR WELL YOU CAN ONLY JUSTIFY THIS FROM AN EMOTIONAL STANDPOINT AND NOT A PURELY LOGICAL ONE SO IT DOESN'T EXIST AND I'M GONNA KEEP BEING AN ASSHOLE." Sorry, is the human race populated entirely full of sociopaths? It isn't, since that was a rhetorical question, and trying to act like emotion doesn't play a roll in anything we do and that it excuses you being a bigoted cuntbag just because it's not a purely logical action - especially in the realm of MENTAL DISEASES THAT ARE HEAVILY EFFECTED BY A PERSON'S EMOTIONS - is just fucking stupid, narrow-minded, and a poor justification for hatespeech, as most other things revolving around transphobia are.I wouldn't even say there's a need to get defensive whens someone makes a logic-based attack against gender dysphoria, because I don't see that as an honest means of taking arguments down. You can make 100% logic-based arguments for trans people. 2057
The Flood / Re: Imperial Center: The Star Wars Megathread (No spoilers) - UPDATED« on: October 26, 2015, 04:56:17 PM »I mean, Maul fucking hates Sidious, I'm sure he'd want to try to kill him or help destroy the Empire somehow.Folini said a huge character will come back at the end of Season 2. 2058
The Flood / Re: You have become a Sith Lord« on: October 26, 2015, 02:48:57 PM »Darth Cold Steel"Nothin' personal, youngling." 2059
The Flood / Re: Why are there so many trannys?« on: October 26, 2015, 01:51:12 PM »That's any forum, though.There's a higher concentration of people who feel like outcasts to society on the internet, because they can escape from normal social pressures and talk to like-minded people with less chance of consequences (Like harassment or bullying).Also 90% of this forum is made up of social rejects. 2060
The Flood / Re: Imperial Center: The Star Wars Megathread (No spoilers) - UPDATED« on: October 26, 2015, 01:44:51 PM »
Son of Dathomir is just asking for it.
2061
The Flood / Re: Imperial Center: The Star Wars Megathread (No spoilers) - UPDATED« on: October 26, 2015, 01:44:26 PM »
Folini said a huge character will come back at the end of Season 2.
Pls be Maul I want him to be old, decrepit, and fed up with Sith shit. 2062
Serious / Re: Convince me not to double major in BA Theatre and Arts Administration« on: October 26, 2015, 01:17:55 PM »why not get a degree in something actually useful?Maybe he wants to do what he loves? 2063
Serious / Re: World Health Organization confirms link between red meat and colon cancer« on: October 26, 2015, 12:53:32 PM »
Good thing I cut down on my red meat consumption for environmental purposes, anyway.
I just did a project in my Sustainability course about water usage in the food industry. Do you know how much water goes into producing beef? Fucking TOO MUCH. 2064
The Flood / Re: Part 4: Rename my dog you fucks« on: October 26, 2015, 12:49:29 PM »You're right.Sep7agon's fuck toyI think that's a bit too lengthy. "Fuck Toy," then. 2065
The Flood / Re: Why are there so many trannys?« on: October 26, 2015, 12:30:45 PM »
There's a higher concentration of people who feel like outcasts to society on the internet, because they can escape from normal social pressures and talk to like-minded people with less chance of consequences (Like harassment or bullying).
2067
Serious / Re: SQM: Is it worth arguing with random people on the Internet?« on: October 26, 2015, 12:28:03 PM »
Discussing things on the internet is how like 80% of my views were determined, so I'd say it definitely has value.
2069
The Flood / Re: courage the cowardly dog writers were low key ripping« on: October 25, 2015, 10:22:28 PM »
"You're not perfect."
FUCK that thing. 2070
The Flood / Re: courage the cowardly dog writers were low key ripping« on: October 25, 2015, 09:54:36 PM »I don't remember that one too well, what happened at the end of it?Oh man, I think the one with the sand whale fucked my life up at the end as a kid.This episode disturbed me when I was younger. |