Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - challengerX

Pages: 1 ... 228229230 231232 ... 1397
6871
Serious / Re: Snap general election in the UK in six weeks
« on: April 18, 2017, 11:03:17 AM »
Let's do a kickstarter to get the Meme Party registered and shit it'll be worth it I promise.
How much is required?
£150 to register the party with the Electoral Commission
£500 deposit per MP to stand in the election

Any money required to create and print logos, manifestos, etc.

Also money to rent out Woking Mosque as our headquarters.
is there a plausibility you could be in some sort of televised debate
yeah but i'll need lots of money and to do a lot of dicksucking
I'd pay the 150 tbh
tbh we can just use the power of social media and millennials' love for memes to drum up support so we don't even need much money for advertising
If drumpf can be president you can be PM

6872
Serious / Re: Snap general election in the UK in six weeks
« on: April 18, 2017, 09:09:21 AM »
Let's do a kickstarter to get the Meme Party registered and shit it'll be worth it I promise.
How much is required?
£150 to register the party with the Electoral Commission
£500 deposit per MP to stand in the election

Any money required to create and print logos, manifestos, etc.

Also money to rent out Woking Mosque as our headquarters.
is there a plausibility you could be in some sort of televised debate
yeah but i'll need lots of money and to do a lot of dicksucking
I'd pay the 150 tbh

6873
Serious / Re: Snap general election in the UK in six weeks
« on: April 18, 2017, 08:49:42 AM »
Let's do a kickstarter to get the Meme Party registered and shit it'll be worth it I promise.
How much is required?
£150 to register the party with the Electoral Commission
£500 deposit per MP to stand in the election

Any money required to create and print logos, manifestos, etc.

Also money to rent out Woking Mosque as our headquarters.
is there a plausibility you could be in some sort of televised debate

6874
Serious / Re: Snap general election in the UK in six weeks
« on: April 18, 2017, 08:27:09 AM »
Let's do a kickstarter to get the Meme Party registered and shit it'll be worth it I promise.
How much is required?

6875
Serious / Re: Snap general election in the UK in six weeks
« on: April 18, 2017, 07:14:11 AM »
Corbyn has this in the bag

6876
The Flood / Re: New Best Friend
« on: April 17, 2017, 03:16:24 PM »

6878
Serious / Re: Brawl at Berkeley
« on: April 17, 2017, 03:12:12 PM »

6879
The Flood / Re: Verb gives his shitty opinions on anime.
« on: April 17, 2017, 02:22:47 PM »
I'm pretty sure I recommended Grave of the Fireflies. I recommend it to everybody, especially people that dislike anime.

Either way, many of us here have shilled for Studio Ghibli, so you should've watched all those movies first.

6880
The Flood / Re: Favorite guitarists
« on: April 17, 2017, 02:12:16 PM »
Chuck Berry

6881
The Flood / Re: cheat your shit site just raped me with ads thrice
« on: April 17, 2017, 12:16:22 PM »
Can I have the second gift card

6882
Serious / Re: The paradox of serious
« on: April 17, 2017, 11:59:44 AM »
You seem very happy.
It's a function of being depressed for four years and then realising life can indeed be different.

Me being capable of appreciating what I have and thinking life is worth living is such a cognitive shift that it would be downright weird if I weren't so happy.
I guess

6883
Serious / Re: The paradox of serious
« on: April 17, 2017, 11:31:35 AM »
Quote
Tangent: How've you been lately, Meta?
Very well, thanks.

Kicking drugs and going on SSRIs is quickly shaping up to be the best decision of my life.
You seem very happy. I'll admit I'm rather envious.

6884
Serious / Re: The paradox of serious
« on: April 17, 2017, 09:18:06 AM »
I consider this a very redpilled online community. That said, there's something all of you don't quite understand.

Every time you try to "red pill" a woman about rapefugees by pointing out the fact that they are, in fact, violent rapists, it falls on deaf ears. Why? Women don't care.

They don't care? Nope. This statement probably confuses even the most hardcore of redpilled misogynists, "But women are always going on and on about rape and rape culture!" That's just an extension of their rape fantasies. You're probably clued in on female masochism by now but few of you actually realize it seeps into politics. Women use the made-up concept of "rape culture" to talk about their #1 fantasy, rape. It's like if a guy who you know has a femdom fetish talks about the "epidemic" of women going around kicking guys in the balls and spitting on them. "Yeah OK, Rick. That's nice, you weird perverted asshole."

However, it isn't subconscious desire to fuck Arab rapists that leads to women's apathy regarding rapefugees. It's a lot more subtle. Think about your reaction to hearing about a 12 year old boy who scored with a hot MILF teacher. It's probably not one of disgust. But you probably condemn male pedophiles all the time. Why? Your sexual fetish has left you in a state of moral ambivalence. Instead of judging with your mind, you judge with your dick. If you had low testosterone, you might view the situation differently.

Women know importing tens of thousands of inbred rapists is a bad idea on a logical level but seldom do women use logic when making decisions as I'm sure you all know. On the surface they will condemn any rape, but in their heart they don't give a shit about the victim. They think about the rape and self-insert, to feel warm and cuddly for one quick moment at the thought of being ravaged by a hairy, villainous sultan. It feels good, feels feminine. Then they put down the newspaper.

And they think, "It will never ACTUALLY happen to me. It's just a fantasy."
I dissagree OP. I doubt the main reason that females support refugees is because they have rape fantasies, and if they do they arent about harry goat fuckers who reek of curry. I think the main reason is the title of "refugee". Their nurturing nature leads them to think the best of humans and the west shelters women to the degree that they feel untouchable. That's probably why they hate rapists so much. A rapist can knock them off their ivory tower of invulnerable delusion. They get a chemical rush from helping people beneath them. That's why they are so quick to call nationalists racists. They are projecting. They believe themselves to be better than the browns so they want a chance to indulge in demonstrating how much better they are by letting them in and sheltering them. Natural female drug abuse at its worst.
Such drastic measures are only necessary to get back onto the correct path of civility. It should not, however, extend indefinitely else we're basically niggers in every sense.

Once women are put back into the place and role they belong, all that is required is the firm hand, and legal leverage allowing punishment for infidelity. Thus, we become civilized again. This is the difference between civilized men and niggers.

6885
Serious / Re: The paradox of serious
« on: April 17, 2017, 09:14:47 AM »
I consider this a very redpilled online community. That said, there's something all of you don't quite understand.

Every time you try to "red pill" a woman about rapefugees by pointing out the fact that they are, in fact, violent rapists, it falls on deaf ears. Why? Women don't care.

They don't care? Nope. This statement probably confuses even the most hardcore of redpilled misogynists, "But women are always going on and on about rape and rape culture!" That's just an extension of their rape fantasies. You're probably clued in on female masochism by now but few of you actually realize it seeps into politics. Women use the made-up concept of "rape culture" to talk about their #1 fantasy, rape. It's like if a guy who you know has a femdom fetish talks about the "epidemic" of women going around kicking guys in the balls and spitting on them. "Yeah OK, Rick. That's nice, you weird perverted asshole."

However, it isn't subconscious desire to fuck Arab rapists that leads to women's apathy regarding rapefugees. It's a lot more subtle. Think about your reaction to hearing about a 12 year old boy who scored with a hot MILF teacher. It's probably not one of disgust. But you probably condemn male pedophiles all the time. Why? Your sexual fetish has left you in a state of moral ambivalence. Instead of judging with your mind, you judge with your dick. If you had low testosterone, you might view the situation differently.

Women know importing tens of thousands of inbred rapists is a bad idea on a logical level but seldom do women use logic when making decisions as I'm sure you all know. On the surface they will condemn any rape, but in their heart they don't give a shit about the victim. They think about the rape and self-insert, to feel warm and cuddly for one quick moment at the thought of being ravaged by a hairy, villainous sultan. It feels good, feels feminine. Then they put down the newspaper.

And they think, "It will never ACTUALLY happen to me. It's just a fantasy."
I dissagree OP. I doubt the main reason that females support refugees is because they have rape fantasies, and if they do they arent about harry goat fuckers who reek of curry. I think the main reason is the title of "refugee". Their nurturing nature leads them to think the best of humans and the west shelters women to the degree that they feel untouchable. That's probably why they hate rapists so much. A rapist can knock them off their ivory tower of invulnerable delusion. They get a chemical rush from helping people beneath them. That's why they are so quick to call nationalists racists. They are projecting. They believe themselves to be better than the browns so they want a chance to indulge in demonstrating how much better they are by letting them in and sheltering them. Natural female drug abuse at its worst.

6886
The Flood / Re: Anyone have an invite to empornium?
« on: April 17, 2017, 09:11:57 AM »
Ok I sent you an email

6887
Serious / Re: The paradox of serious
« on: April 17, 2017, 09:08:22 AM »
I consider this a very redpilled online community. That said, there's something all of you don't quite understand.

Every time you try to "red pill" a woman about rapefugees by pointing out the fact that they are, in fact, violent rapists, it falls on deaf ears. Why? Women don't care.

They don't care? Nope. This statement probably confuses even the most hardcore of redpilled misogynists, "But women are always going on and on about rape and rape culture!" That's just an extension of their rape fantasies. You're probably clued in on female masochism by now but few of you actually realize it seeps into politics. Women use the made-up concept of "rape culture" to talk about their #1 fantasy, rape. It's like if a guy who you know has a femdom fetish talks about the "epidemic" of women going around kicking guys in the balls and spitting on them. "Yeah OK, Rick. That's nice, you weird perverted asshole."

However, it isn't subconscious desire to fuck Arab rapists that leads to women's apathy regarding rapefugees. It's a lot more subtle. Think about your reaction to hearing about a 12 year old boy who scored with a hot MILF teacher. It's probably not one of disgust. But you probably condemn male pedophiles all the time. Why? Your sexual fetish has left you in a state of moral ambivalence. Instead of judging with your mind, you judge with your dick. If you had low testosterone, you might view the situation differently.

Women know importing tens of thousands of inbred rapists is a bad idea on a logical level but seldom do women use logic when making decisions as I'm sure you all know. On the surface they will condemn any rape, but in their heart they don't give a shit about the victim. They think about the rape and self-insert, to feel warm and cuddly for one quick moment at the thought of being ravaged by a hairy, villainous sultan. It feels good, feels feminine. Then they put down the newspaper.

And they think, "It will never ACTUALLY happen to me. It's just a fantasy."

6888
Serious / Re: The paradox of serious
« on: April 17, 2017, 08:38:17 AM »
It's like we all said before, we all already know most of each other's opinions on issues. I think that's why people don't talk. Also people are afraid to argue and hold grudges, they get too emotional.

6889
The Flood / Re: Quin's Memorial Service (Updates Coming)
« on: April 17, 2017, 07:06:48 AM »
Take some pictures I guess.

6890
Serious / Re: Brawl at Berkeley
« on: April 17, 2017, 07:06:07 AM »
I hope America partitions.
your mom partitioned her legs for me last night

6891
The Flood / Re: New Best Friend
« on: April 16, 2017, 07:38:28 PM »
I love this fucking meme

6894
Gaming / Re: Made an ESO guild
« on: April 16, 2017, 12:52:48 PM »
Only Verb could manage to start an argument about water being wet in a fucking Elder Scrolls thread.
it was actually challenger but okay

apparently i start every argument i participate in
actually it was Ender
actually it was me
all bitches rattle

6895
The Flood / Re: Tell me about yourself
« on: April 16, 2017, 12:45:36 PM »
Hey I'm the admin of this site
unban my friends please
I won't warn you again, stop posting memes immediately.

6896
The Flood / Re: Tell me about yourself
« on: April 16, 2017, 12:43:39 PM »
Hey I'm the admin of this site

6897
Gaming / Re: Made an ESO guild
« on: April 16, 2017, 12:26:55 PM »
Only Verb could manage to start an argument about water being wet in a fucking Elder Scrolls thread.
it was actually challenger but okay

apparently i start every argument i participate in
actually it was Ender

6898
support it without a single word

shoot both if she gets pregnant
You're right, as long there is no race mixing it isn't completely evil. This is the true redpill.

6899
Gaming / Re: Made an ESO guild
« on: April 16, 2017, 10:16:44 AM »
how is water not wet?
Water can't be wet. It can wet things, but it's water. You can't wet water. It's already water.
add more water to water

you have just wetted water
it's just a higher volume of water
hence, it's wetter
it's water

You can get wet from water, you can't wet water. It's already water.
water is covered in water and is therefore wet by definition

if you're talking about a single H2O molecule, then sure, that's not wet
it just mixes; doesn't get wet
that it mixes proves that it gets wet
it's a liquid; its moisture remains the same if you keep adding more from the same source
that doesn't mean it's not wet
bro if there was a way to make water wetter and stay wetter for a longer time I would've found it because watering those pots was a bitch and a half

6900
Gaming / Re: Made an ESO guild
« on: April 16, 2017, 10:12:49 AM »
how is water not wet?
Water can't be wet. It can wet things, but it's water. You can't wet water. It's already water.
add more water to water

you have just wetted water
it's just a higher volume of water
hence, it's wetter
it's water

You can get wet from water, you can't wet water. It's already water.
water is covered in water and is therefore wet by definition

if you're talking about a single H2O molecule, then sure, that's not wet
it just mixes; doesn't get wet
that it mixes proves that it gets wet
it's a liquid; its moisture remains the same if you keep adding more from the same source

Pages: 1 ... 228229230 231232 ... 1397