Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - challengerX

Pages: 1 ... 160161162 163164 ... 1397
4831
When are you gonna man up Deci

I'm legit gonna use aimbot if I have to 1v1 you. What makes you think I'm gonna play fair? Lol fuck that.
Wow, what would your dad think?

4832
The Flood / Re: Mayweather vs McGregor press conference LOS ANGELES
« on: July 15, 2017, 11:29:44 AM »
Because it involves someone they actually care about on the other side, UFC. Same when Mayweather and Pacquiao fought. The two most prolific/high tier boxers FINALLY going head to head after years of shit talking. Basically to put it in easier terms for you, it's like the Super Bowl of boxing really. Many don't give a shit about normal games, just the insanely high steak ones.
i don't even think these people watch UFC
MR TAPOUT SHUT THE FUCK UP
HARD WORK

4833
The Flood / Re: Do you care that much about being wealthy?
« on: July 15, 2017, 11:28:56 AM »
I'd certainly like to be comfortable but wealth isn't really a life goal.

4834
When are you gonna man up Deci

4835
The Flood / Re: Is this for real?
« on: July 15, 2017, 10:56:14 AM »
themelaninman. net

Hmm

4836
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 15, 2017, 08:46:23 AM »
i wish you were the type of user that's actually difficult and challenging to argue with, but you're just not

everything you say is just so easy to smack down with no effort

my responses are almost automatic, because you're just that easy
I wish you were actually intelligent and didn't resort to personal attacks the second your ego the size of a zeppelin is attacked.

4837
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 15, 2017, 08:45:40 AM »
Eating shit is a bad thing. Swimming through an ocean of diarrhea is a bad thing. Using heroin is a bad thing.

Doing it to save someone doesn't make it a good thing. That's why somebody has to force you at gun point to do it lmao you just keep proving me right.
and the fact that it's unhealthy, repulsive, and there's no immediate practical purpose for it doesn't make it a bad thing either

it just means you have a small brain
It does though. That's literally what "bad" means hahahaha. You always back yourself into a corner like this.
that's not what bad means at all

by this logic, i could say that saving your friend is the definition of good, therefore anything that would allow you to save your friend is also good

objectively bad means i literally can't come up with any extreme examples that would prove that it's actually good in that one instance, and i already have

some animals survive by eating shit, so there, i proved you wrong for the 7024th time
Your friend could be a piece of shit not worth saving, though.

Poop will always be disgusting. I don't care what animals live off of, I'm talking about people and eating shit.

4838
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 15, 2017, 08:25:34 AM »
Eating shit is a bad thing. Swimming through an ocean of diarrhea is a bad thing. Using heroin is a bad thing.

Doing it to save someone doesn't make it a good thing. That's why somebody has to force you at gun point to do it lmao you just keep proving me right.
and the fact that it's unhealthy, repulsive, and there's no immediate practical purpose for it doesn't make it a bad thing either

it just means you have a small brain
It does though. That's literally what "bad" means hahahaha. You always back yourself into a corner like this.

4839
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 15, 2017, 07:02:16 AM »
It's hilarious how you're always trying to bring me down to your level. I already explained why your hypothetical is a dumb and unrealistic scenario.
but you don't have to because i already know that it is

but that's not the point of a hypothetical

Quote
Those are descriptors, not modifiers.
they're modifiers

Quote
Eating shit is unhealthy and serves no purpose. Just like doing heroin to save your friend would be a bad thing. If you save your friend you save your friend, the act of using heroin is still a bad thing you're doing to try and reach a positive outcome of saving your friend. The act alone of using heroin will never ever be a good thing.
wow stop using modifiers or i'm gonna declare victory
Eating shit is a bad thing. Swimming through an ocean of diarrhea is a bad thing. Using heroin is a bad thing.

Doing it to save someone doesn't make it a good thing. That's why somebody has to force you at gun point to do it lmao you just keep proving me right.

4840
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 15, 2017, 06:48:59 AM »
so you wouldn't try to save your friend

okay, that's your prerogative

kinda makes you a bad person, but you know, to each his own
It's hilarious how you're always trying to bring me down to your level. I already explained why your hypothetical is a dumb and unrealistic scenario.

But we're not talking about that. We're talking about how eating shot is objectively bad. Not if eating shit will save the president or wha better dumb situation you need to come up with to try and find an exception to the rule. Won't happen. Eating shit is bad.

Quote
so why is it objectively bad

don't use any modifiers like "it's gross and unhealthy" because those are modifiers

you're so fucking dumb dude
Those are descriptors, not modifiers. Are you drunk? High?

Eating shit is unhealthy and serves no purpose. Just like doing heroin to save your friend would be a bad thing. If you save your friend you save your friend, the act of using heroin is still a bad thing you're doing to try and reach a positive outcome of saving your friend. The act alone of using heroin will never ever be a good thing.

How does it feel to be wrong all the time and resorting to personal attacks because you're bitter and have nothing better to do? Why not do something productive with your time. Learn something, humble yourself a little bit. You're very ignorant.

4841
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 15, 2017, 06:14:21 AM »
this isn't your hypothetical

this is also you saying that you shouldn't even try, which is pretty funny
I'm explaining how real life works.

Try what? If you're ever in that situation you're fucked. Either try to take the gun or tell the dude to go fuck himself and die like a man.

Quote
why
Because it's a modifier. Which means the base act (eating shit) is a negative.

4842
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 15, 2017, 06:08:22 AM »
The only people that are  gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.

Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake

why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying

that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily

i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"

Hahahaha this guy is great
in what world does "don't give a shit" mean "like"

that said, yeah, i'm sure some people DO like longer loading times

maybe i do

what of it
And some people like eating shit, that doesn't make it a good thing.
doesn't make it a bad thing either
Eating shit is objectively bad.
it's actually not
Really? Why?
someone puts a gun to your best friend's head and tells you if you don't eat shit, he dies
LOL

How the hell is that a good thing? You're being forced at gunpoint to do something bad. It doesn't magically turn into a good thing and eating shit in that situation is even worse than people who have a shit eating fetish and at least enjoy themselves. That's not a good thing. A good thing is something you do of your own free will and enjoy which doesn't harm you. Torture isn't a good thing.

Not to mention there'd be no point because you're both gonna get shot anyways. Is that seriously the best you can come up with? That was the worst fucking example I've ever seen in my life lmao holy fucking shit did Deci hack your account or something?
why is it not good to save your friend, i don't get it
Because you're not going to save your friend. Anybody who dislikes you enough to point not only a gun at you but then at a friend of yours so he can watch you eat shit either hates your fucking guts and is going to kill you or is a fucking psycho and is going to kill you.

Even if you do save your friend in this magical hypothetical situation that would never play out like this in real life, you were still forced to do a bad thing. Eating shit is objectively bad. Adding the modifier of saving your friend doesn't make it a good thing. The act of eating shit is still a bad experience.

Don't move the goalpost. Eating shit is bad. Mixing it into some situation "if you eat shit you can save an orphanage from burning" isn't realistic so it's irrelevant, and furthermore proves you're going to extremes to find a way doing something negative can result in a positive. In which case you admit it's a bad thing.

4843
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 15, 2017, 05:59:18 AM »
The only people that are  gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.

Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake

why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying

that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily

i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"

Hahahaha this guy is great
in what world does "don't give a shit" mean "like"

that said, yeah, i'm sure some people DO like longer loading times

maybe i do

what of it
And some people like eating shit, that doesn't make it a good thing.
doesn't make it a bad thing either
Eating shit is objectively bad.
it's actually not
Really? Why?
someone puts a gun to your best friend's head and tells you if you don't eat shit, he dies
LOL

How the hell is that a good thing? You're being forced at gunpoint to do something bad. It doesn't magically turn into a good thing and eating shit in that situation is even worse than people who have a shit eating fetish and at least enjoy themselves. That's not a good thing. A good thing is something you do of your own free will and enjoy which doesn't harm you. Torture isn't a good thing.

Not to mention there'd be no point because you're both gonna get shot anyways. Is that seriously the best you can come up with? That was the worst fucking example I've ever seen in my life lmao holy fucking shit did Deci hack your account or something?

4844
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 15, 2017, 05:30:48 AM »
The only people that are  gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.

Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake

why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying

that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily

i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"

Hahahaha this guy is great
in what world does "don't give a shit" mean "like"

that said, yeah, i'm sure some people DO like longer loading times

maybe i do

what of it
And some people like eating shit, that doesn't make it a good thing.
doesn't make it a bad thing either
Eating shit is objectively bad.
it's actually not
Really? Why?

4845
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 15, 2017, 05:27:27 AM »
The only people that are  gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.

Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake

why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying

that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily

i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"

Hahahaha this guy is great
in what world does "don't give a shit" mean "like"

that said, yeah, i'm sure some people DO like longer loading times

maybe i do

what of it
And some people like eating shit, that doesn't make it a good thing.
doesn't make it a bad thing either
Eating shit is objectively bad.

4846
reach had the best aesthetic
these nuts had the best aesthetic on your chin
Still better than halo 5
these nuts are better on your chin

4847
reach had the best aesthetic
these nuts had the best aesthetic on your chin

4848
The Flood / Re: My guide to dating women
« on: July 15, 2017, 05:05:56 AM »
What the fuck prompted you to even think of making a thread like this

And what the hell is "first and for most" "to put it forth this way". Hahahaha dude your post reads like it was written by a 2nd grader who was forced to write an essay for detention.

4849
The Flood / Re: Mayweather vs McGregor press conference LOS ANGELES
« on: July 15, 2017, 04:42:08 AM »
TORONTO FLAG

4850
WE ALL KNOW MR TAPOUT LIKE TO QUIT

4851
In reality, they didn't teleport any object at all and this is just a neat but relatively mundane example of using quantum entanglement to instantly send information.

Clickbait is bad.
Yeah ok MKUltra operative

4852
The Flood / Re: cheat make me legendary boy
« on: July 14, 2017, 08:44:12 PM »
cheat PLEASE give me custom text on my nameplate, PLEASE please I'll do anything just please please please please
lose weight and you can have it

4853
The Flood / Re: Punk ass trippin in the dead of night
« on: July 14, 2017, 08:42:18 PM »
Gimme a pizza pie over here tony

4854
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 14, 2017, 08:31:42 PM »
The only people that are  gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.

Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake

why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying

that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily

i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"

Hahahaha this guy is great
in what world does "don't give a shit" mean "like"

that said, yeah, i'm sure some people DO like longer loading times

maybe i do

what of it
And some people like eating shit, that doesn't make it a good thing.

4855
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 14, 2017, 07:49:09 PM »
The only people that are  gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.

Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake

why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying

that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily

i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"

Hahahaha this guy is great

4856
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 14, 2017, 07:32:26 PM »
The only people that are  gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.

Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake

why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying

that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse

4857
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 14, 2017, 07:25:05 PM »
The only people that are  gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.

Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake

why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want

4858
Deci you can spawn with a BR and I'll spawn with a plasma pistol

4859
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 14, 2017, 07:18:44 PM »
developers aren't gonna want to rebuild a game from the ground up just so people can play the originals anyway though
if they make the remakes functionally worse than the originals, they should be obligated to

who cares what they want to do. you think these devs give a shit about redoing someone elses work or do they care about getting paid. including the older games doesn't somehow mean less sales.
i don't know, if i spent a year composing a score for a remaster for some old game, and i learned that you can just revert back to the old score on a whim, i'd be pretty upset

i'd feel like i wasted my time
Why exactly are your feelings more important than what the consumer wants?
when exactly did i say that

video games are art, for one thing—the designers can put whatever they want in the game and they don't have to listen to fucking anybody, and you can eat shit for all i care

for another, that wasn't even the point i was trying to make
The only people that are  gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.

Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.

4860
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?
« on: July 14, 2017, 07:12:09 PM »
developers aren't gonna want to rebuild a game from the ground up just so people can play the originals anyway though
if they make the remakes functionally worse than the originals, they should be obligated to

who cares what they want to do. you think these devs give a shit about redoing someone elses work or do they care about getting paid. including the older games doesn't somehow mean less sales.
i don't know, if i spent a year composing a score for a remaster for some old game, and i learned that you can just revert back to the old score on a whim, i'd be pretty upset

i'd feel like i wasted my time
Why exactly are your feelings more important than what the consumer wants?

Pages: 1 ... 160161162 163164 ... 1397