I know, boobs are so scary. We must keep them covered up in order to protect the children.

No. I just don't want to see boobs, pussy, testicles, or penises while I'm walking down the street.

And yes, actually. Kids who are exposed to a lot of nude people who touch them affectionately become sexually awkward. It's called indecent exposure for a reason. Men don't feed babies with their chest, women do. There's a huge emphasis put on women's breasts because they're different from men, and that's a good thing.

Yeah, you didn't even read what I said

Here it goes again. How about using your context clues from kindergarten to better analyze my words

Let's closely examine. Anybody get sick, doesn't matter if you're white, black, mentally handicap, good moral person, bad moral person, murderer, priest, etc. It remains that disease and sickness can infect ANYBODY and EVERYBODY

Now for the next part. However, terrorism isn't a disease, thus not able to infect people. It's a idea that people simply choose to understand. Therefor not everybody can be a terrorist because of a person's choice

If you seriously can't get that through your mentally challenged skull, then that's not my fault, It's yours

I love how he originally said "anybody" and now he thinks he can trick us by saying "everybody".

Lols
On top of
Lols

Traveling to a country that is known to have a deadly, contagious disease going around is much different than traveling to a country with intense terrorism. There is a much more likely chance that you're going to bring home a disease, than there is that you're going to bring home a bomb. You can't "catch" terrorism.

As for the easier methods, I already partially laid that out in my previous post. It's as simple as putting more suspicion on people returning from Iraq and Syria, investigating them more, asking them why they went, etc. Arresting anyone who goes to a specific country is idiotic, IMO, and that's why I've always been against travel embargoes.

Terrorism isn't a disease? Whoda thunk.

You don't seem to understand. A lot of Brits are going to fight in Syria and Iraq. They need to do something. I find it funny that you say "put more suspicion" when that would mean following, bugging, and monitoring that person as a suspected terrorist when they probably went over to visit family 

If you seriously think increasing the monitoring of people is better than signing some paperwork and stating your reason to travel to the country, then it would seem you've done a 180 and are now in love with the NSA.

Wow what the fuck guys.

And even after this people who say that assimilation is the only practical course of action when dealing with immigrants will still be called racist.

P.S. before someone says they weren't pakis understand that "Asian" is newspeak for predominantly Muslim countries in the middle of shitholeistan. e.g. Bangladesh and Pakistan are "Asians" but turkey is not.

What the hell are you even talking about?

I'd take it from you.

I don't give a shit. I wish women would respect themselves a little more and dress a little more decently but whatever.

These things are beyond retarded.

You say that when we have a fairly similar post count.

Look, whatever kid.
You can have your delusions and be angry over nothing all you want. I really don't give a damn.

When did I say anything about post count? I said you play forum cop.

Sheesh you're really insecure.

They have to do something. There are a shit ton of Brits fighting for ISIS.

YouTube

Enjoy.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You do a good job of living up to the "dumb" in your name.

Man you are such an uptight little faggot. You WOULD be one of the only people in The Flood to dislike Door.

Sorry, I asked for hard evidence and you replied with conjecture.

Not seeing what's so uncivil about trusting the facts over baseless speculation.

Because unlike your lazy begging ass I did a Google search before posting and didn't like the fact that some said there was correlation and some said there weren't. So I gave my opinion on it after saying I don't know if there is a valid and trustworthy statistic that isn't just pushing some agenda.

It's a forum. People come here to talk. We're not your servants and we're not here to make your life easy. Do some research or accept the fact that I have my opinion to give because you brought it up. I didn't even state it as if it were fact, I just said what I thought was most logical.

So yes, you're being an asshole. You were being hostile the entire thread, and you're hostile in most every other thread. You're incredibly arrogant. Take a step back and shut the fuck up if you don't have anything important to say. Don't ask us something while we're having a friendly discussion then go postal on somebody who says they don't know if there's a statistic but they assume such and such. If you don't want a conversation in the first place, why ask the question? Why not look it up?

Then I'm not interested in your anecdote.

Woah, this dude is so badass.

He keeps being a butthurt asshole even though everybody else is being civil.

That said, if anyone has any credible statistical evidence that alcohol plays a role in the majority of sexual assault cases, I'd like to see it.

I'd say its one of the biggest causes. Look at college rapes.  I don't know if there is a statistic or how someone would go about gathering the data and compiling it into a statistic, but it seems to me that alcohol being an easily accessible and normalized drug allows people to use it in excess and for women to be taken advantage of when they pass out drunk.