39631
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama
« on: October 04, 2014, 04:44:50 PM »Blue Dream, K.C.K.C., Presidential OG (By far my favorite) and various others I purchased and forgot the names of.Awesome.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 39631
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama« on: October 04, 2014, 04:44:50 PM »Blue Dream, K.C.K.C., Presidential OG (By far my favorite) and various others I purchased and forgot the names of.Awesome. 39632
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama« on: October 04, 2014, 04:10:22 PM »Strain names?Which cannabis strains did you grow, I mean?It takes 8 years to fully go off the grid. 39633
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama« on: October 04, 2014, 04:06:28 PM »Which cannabis strains did you grow, I mean?It takes 8 years to fully go off the grid. 39634
Serious / Re: Yes, this is funny, but does anybody else find it morally disagreeable?« on: October 04, 2014, 04:02:46 PM »Fuçk kids. Other than physically hurting them, doing any "wrong" thing against them is justifiable. 39635
Serious / Re: Employment report« on: October 04, 2014, 03:58:33 PM »I don't understand how you can post factual evidence that is against your argument and act like you're right.I agree, facts are facts. Facts here is that the number of jobs "created" includes people who have to get a second and third job because of the inflated and unproductive economy. Other fact is that the unemployment number in your source is the one that's being twistedAnd how many of those jobs "created" are people that got a second and third job? Oh, and that unemployment number is only those that are unemployed while trying to find jobs. The actual unemployment rate is far higher>rt Why do you think the government uses U3? A giant conspiracy to trick everybody and take their freedom? Would you like to post actual evidence supporting your argument that every single one of these new jobs created are taken by people as second and third jobs? Do people take second jobs? Absolutely, minimum wage is garbage and if you live in a city like LA you won't live outside the ghetto on it. But to say the majority or even all these jobs are taken by people getting second and third jobs is bullshit unless you provide a valid source. Provide a source that these jobs are taken by people with part time jobs or simply people already employed, and you may have a point. Fact of the matter is you don't want to see the economy get better under Obama because you hate him. U3, U6, doesn't matter. You just don't want to accept it. Unemployment has gone down accounting for U6 and U3. You're arguing a non issue. 39636
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama« on: October 04, 2014, 01:39:43 PM »It takes 8 years to fully go off the grid.Couldn't stick it out for the 8 years huh? So much for going off the grid. What'd you grow? 39637
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama« on: October 04, 2014, 01:32:52 PM »Couldn't stick it out for the 8 years huh? So much for going off the grid.Okay if you're the real Camnator send me a friend request on Xbox. 39638
Serious / Re: Employment report« on: October 04, 2014, 01:30:01 PM »And how many of those jobs "created" are people that got a second and third job? Oh, and that unemployment number is only those that are unemployed while trying to find jobs. The actual unemployment rate is far higher>rt >2012 You'd think every American would be happy unemployment is down at a percentage that was said would not be reached for years. Unemployment is down, tons of jobs have been created. You can put any twist on that you like, but facts are facts. http://portalseven.com/employment/unemployment_rate.jsp 39639
Serious / Employment report« on: October 04, 2014, 01:11:59 PM »
http://www.whitehouse.gov/share/share-news-our-economy-making-incredible-progress?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=email378-text1&utm_campaign=economy
Quote Each month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics puts out a report called the "Employment Situation." It's what tells us how many jobs were created in the past month, and what the unemployment rate is. 39640
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne alpha gameplay« on: October 04, 2014, 07:38:58 AM »
Looks like a boring Dark Souls.
39642
Serious / Re: Well, turns out I can't get married in an Anglican church« on: October 04, 2014, 07:29:12 AM »
You really want that daughter huh? :^)
39643
Serious / Re: Bohemian Rhapsody« on: October 04, 2014, 04:42:34 AM »
You're completely correct, don't listen to these dumbasses. It's exactly what the song is about. If you go to lyrics pages for the song, you can see people incorrectly put "it's my law" instead of bismillah.
So yeah, don't even bother with ignorant people like this. Unlike how many people think, their songs do have a lot of meaning and aren't just mindless words with no meaning. But the average person isn't intelligent enough to notice or even care in the first place, as you can see with the first and third poster in this thread. 39645
Serious / Re: "Don't judge a religion by its fundamentalists"« on: October 04, 2014, 03:25:39 AM »And she was ugly.I legit don't understand how you could have a problem with mother Theresa.i stopped reading there by the way. 39646
The Flood / Re: >be me« on: October 03, 2014, 07:37:39 PM »
I lose it every time I get to the "mom gets scared, bel air, etc" part. That coupled with your avatar cracks me up.
39647
Serious / Re: I don't know what I'm doing anymore.« on: October 03, 2014, 06:06:48 PM »Can't you just move?Dude you're in LA. One of the best cities on the planet. Move to a different area of you don't like it, but it's pretty damn good.What the hell? You're right in LA. I'd kill to live there.What city in socal? 39648
Gaming / Re: >BFBC2« on: October 03, 2014, 05:07:36 PM »
It's taking forever to download for some reason. Better be kind of fun at least.
39649
Serious / Re: I don't know what I'm doing anymore.« on: October 03, 2014, 04:57:43 PM »Dude you're in LA. One of the best cities on the planet. Move to a different area of you don't like it, but it's pretty damn good.What the hell? You're right in LA. I'd kill to live there.What city in socal? You closer to the hills or what? 39650
Gaming / Re: So I wrote a mission for bungie, since theirs suck.« on: October 03, 2014, 04:48:47 PM »The fanboys make my head hurt. How can they just so blatantly love a shitty product.upvote4upvote 39651
Gaming / Re: So I wrote a mission for bungie, since theirs suck.« on: October 03, 2014, 04:48:17 PM »
Damn, good work.
39652
Serious / Re: Alan Henning Beheaded by ISIS - American Hostage Next« on: October 03, 2014, 04:41:53 PM »
They're going to execute an Army Ranger?
Napalm bomb these degenerates. 39653
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama« on: October 03, 2014, 04:36:04 PM »
Gotta love when shitstains like this call themselves patriots. Dumbasses like this have really stained that word.
I sincerely hope they get shot, executed, or jailed for life. 39654
Serious / Re: Moms Demand SWATing« on: October 03, 2014, 04:32:08 PM »That's the thing. You can't easily find this stuff, and the little of it these sites found are all just talk for the time being.Of course they're going to be more right-wing. You seriously expect left-wing sources to display information against their supporters? Of course not. You can easily go onto any anti-gun groups social media account and see the people that display these feelingsThese sites are extremely right wing and incredibly biased, as well as unprofessional. And it seems to me a few Twitter comments of people talking shit doesn't exactly corroborate with your supposed claim of widespread usage of what would appear almost as a terror tactic.How about a few primary sources, straight from people like these?So nothing other than an extremely pro gun website? If you don't think that's biased, you're wrong.Apart from a website called "bearingarms.com" which is clearly biased, do you have any other sources proving this? Any proof at all of a large amount of people making false calls to the police specifically to scare or endanger gun owners?I do have proof, look at the website I posted. This site is well known for accuracy of knowledge of firearms because it is being operated by firearms owners. Want bias? Go to CNN, MSNBC, and HuffPost If this actually starts happening, then it is indeed a problem. But for now, it's exaggeration and fear mongering. The one guy that got shot in Walmart is not indicative of anything, mostly because he wasn't open carrying, he was holding a toy rifle or airsoft rifle, or a BB gun I believe. Can't remember. 39655
Serious / Re: Piers Morgan attacks Obama« on: October 03, 2014, 02:18:58 PM »
Firstly, he's wrong.
Secondly, lolPiersMorgan. 39656
Serious / Re: Moms Demand SWATing« on: October 03, 2014, 01:46:37 PM »These sites are extremely right wing and incredibly biased, as well as unprofessional. And it seems to me a few Twitter comments of people talking shit doesn't exactly corroborate with your supposed claim of widespread usage of what would appear almost as a terror tactic.How about a few primary sources, straight from people like these?So nothing other than an extremely pro gun website? If you don't think that's biased, you're wrong.Apart from a website called "bearingarms.com" which is clearly biased, do you have any other sources proving this? Any proof at all of a large amount of people making false calls to the police specifically to scare or endanger gun owners?I do have proof, look at the website I posted. This site is well known for accuracy of knowledge of firearms because it is being operated by firearms owners. Want bias? Go to CNN, MSNBC, and HuffPost It's being exaggerated. If people really do this and there's actual proof apart from the one pussy who got the man in Walmart killed, I'll believe it. For now it's distortion of the truth, misinformation, and fear mongering. 39657
Serious / Re: Moms Demand SWATing« on: October 03, 2014, 07:53:25 AM »So nothing other than an extremely pro gun website? If you don't think that's biased, you're wrong.Apart from a website called "bearingarms.com" which is clearly biased, do you have any other sources proving this? Any proof at all of a large amount of people making false calls to the police specifically to scare or endanger gun owners?I do have proof, look at the website I posted. This site is well known for accuracy of knowledge of firearms because it is being operated by firearms owners. Want bias? Go to CNN, MSNBC, and HuffPost A couple of sources and stories proving this is real and I'll believe it, for now it's about as credible as a supermarket tabloid. 39658
The Flood / Re: Today I didn't lose a dog, I lost so much more :'(« on: October 03, 2014, 07:51:03 AM »
May he rest in peace. You made him happy, and that's all that matters.
39659
The Flood / Re: Do you think we will ever be as good as the flood's golden age?« on: October 03, 2014, 07:43:50 AM »
No.
|