Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - challengerX

Pages: 1 ... 132013211322 13231324 ... 1397
39631
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama
« on: October 04, 2014, 04:44:50 PM »
Blue Dream, K.C.K.C., Presidential OG (By far my favorite) and various others I purchased and forgot the names of.
Awesome.

39632
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama
« on: October 04, 2014, 04:10:22 PM »
It takes 8 years to fully go off the grid.

What'd you grow?

Why 8 years? I grew many things actually. Tomatoes, cannabis, bell peppers, green beans and a variety of other things. I can't wait to get an even better yield next year.
Which cannabis strains did you grow, I mean?

Ahh, plenty of both Sativa and Indica, I haven't tried any hybrids. I also had some crops keep the male plants for edible oil I make myself.
Strain names?

39633
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama
« on: October 04, 2014, 04:06:28 PM »
It takes 8 years to fully go off the grid.

What'd you grow?

Why 8 years? I grew many things actually. Tomatoes, cannabis, bell peppers, green beans and a variety of other things. I can't wait to get an even better yield next year.
Which cannabis strains did you grow, I mean?

39634
Fuçk kids. Other than physically hurting them, doing any "wrong" thing against them is justifiable.

39635
Serious / Re: Employment report
« on: October 04, 2014, 03:58:33 PM »
And how many of those jobs "created" are people that got a second and third job? Oh, and that unemployment number is only those that are unemployed while trying to find jobs. The actual unemployment rate is far higher

http://rt.com/usa/us-unemployment-rate-percent-808/
This is 2012 but:
Quote
The US government’s official unemployment rate, now at 8.3 percent, only takes into consideration those who have no job and are looking for work. This number is called a “U-3” rate. It does not count those who have stopped looking for work or who are working part-time.

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics takes these other factors into consideration for data it calls the “U-6” – and these numbers are shockingly higher.

U-6 data includes “discouraged workers,” which the Bureau defines as people not in the labor force, but want and are available for work and had looked for a job in the prior year.

Those who have not looked for work in the prior month are not included in the U-3 unemployment rate.
>rt
>2012

You'd think every American would be happy unemployment is down at a percentage that was said would not be reached for years. Unemployment is down, tons of jobs have been created. You can put any twist on that you like, but facts are facts. http://portalseven.com/employment/unemployment_rate.jsp
I agree, facts are facts. Facts here is that the number of jobs "created" includes people who have to get a second and third job because of the inflated and unproductive economy. Other fact is that the unemployment number in your source is the one that's being twisted

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm
Straight from the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

Measure:
U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force

NOTE: Persons marginally attached to the labor force are those who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the past 12 months. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not currently looking for work. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

Sept. 2014:
11.8% unemployment

I seriously love that because something factually contradicts what you said, you try to play it off as incredibly or whatever.

Go on, try to twist the facts once again
I don't understand how you can post factual evidence that is against your argument and act like you're right.

Why do you think the government uses U3? A giant conspiracy to trick everybody and take their freedom?

Would you like to post actual evidence supporting your argument that every single one of these new jobs created are taken by people as second and third jobs? Do people take second jobs? Absolutely, minimum wage is garbage and if you live in a city like LA you won't live outside the ghetto on it. But to say the majority or even all these jobs are taken by people getting second and third jobs is bullshit unless you provide a valid source. Provide a source that these jobs are taken by people with part time jobs or simply people already employed, and you may have a point.

Fact of the matter is you don't want to see the economy get better under Obama because you hate him. U3, U6, doesn't matter. You just don't want to accept it. Unemployment has gone down accounting for U6 and U3. You're arguing a non issue.

39636
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama
« on: October 04, 2014, 01:39:43 PM »
Couldn't stick it out for the 8 years huh? So much for going off the grid.

8 years? I am still off the grid, just hanging around my center with sattelite internet now that I'm done growing for the year.
It takes 8 years to fully go off the grid.

What'd you grow?

39637
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama
« on: October 04, 2014, 01:32:52 PM »
Okay if you're the real Camnator send me a friend request on Xbox.

GT is the same as my username

Sent, and admit it. You just wanted to be my friend! ;)
Couldn't stick it out for the 8 years huh? So much for going off the grid.

39638
Serious / Re: Employment report
« on: October 04, 2014, 01:30:01 PM »
And how many of those jobs "created" are people that got a second and third job? Oh, and that unemployment number is only those that are unemployed while trying to find jobs. The actual unemployment rate is far higher

http://rt.com/usa/us-unemployment-rate-percent-808/
This is 2012 but:
Quote
The US government’s official unemployment rate, now at 8.3 percent, only takes into consideration those who have no job and are looking for work. This number is called a “U-3” rate. It does not count those who have stopped looking for work or who are working part-time.

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics takes these other factors into consideration for data it calls the “U-6” – and these numbers are shockingly higher.

U-6 data includes “discouraged workers,” which the Bureau defines as people not in the labor force, but want and are available for work and had looked for a job in the prior year.

Those who have not looked for work in the prior month are not included in the U-3 unemployment rate.
>rt
>2012

You'd think every American would be happy unemployment is down at a percentage that was said would not be reached for years. Unemployment is down, tons of jobs have been created. You can put any twist on that you like, but facts are facts. http://portalseven.com/employment/unemployment_rate.jsp

39639
Serious / Employment report
« on: October 04, 2014, 01:11:59 PM »
http://www.whitehouse.gov/share/share-news-our-economy-making-incredible-progress?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=email378-text1&utm_campaign=economy

Quote
Each month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics puts out a report called the "Employment Situation." It's what tells us how many jobs were created in the past month, and what the unemployment rate is.

This month's report is in, and the numbers are strong:

The economy created 248,000 jobs in September. And the unemployment rate dropped to 5.9 percent, the lowest rate since July 2008.

And while we don't put too much stock in any one report, there's a clear trend here.

This month's report was a clear indication of how far we’ve come since the recession, but we've still got more to do. We know that many Americans aren't feeling enough of the benefits of this recovery. That's something President Obama addressed yesterday, when he laid out his plan for a new foundation for America's 21st century economy.

Thanks to the determination of the American people and the decisions of President Obama's administration, our economy is stronger than it's been in years: Businesses have added 10.3 million jobs over 55 straight months, the longest streak on record.

The unemployment rate has fallen to 5.9 percent. That's a number many economists didn't think we'd see for years.

We've still got more to do, but this is news worth sharing: new jobs, a lower unemployment rate, and historic progress.

39640
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne alpha gameplay
« on: October 04, 2014, 07:38:58 AM »
Looks like a boring Dark Souls.

39641
Gaming / Re: >BFBC2
« on: October 04, 2014, 07:33:44 AM »
Campaign is actually really fun.

39642
Serious / Re: Well, turns out I can't get married in an Anglican church
« on: October 04, 2014, 07:29:12 AM »
You really want that daughter huh? :^)

39643
Serious / Re: Bohemian Rhapsody
« on: October 04, 2014, 04:42:34 AM »
You're completely correct, don't listen to these dumbasses. It's exactly what the song is about. If you go to lyrics pages for the song, you can see people incorrectly put "it's my law" instead of bismillah.

So yeah, don't even bother with ignorant people like this. Unlike how many people think, their songs do have a lot of meaning and aren't just mindless words with no meaning. But the average person isn't intelligent enough to notice or even care in the first place, as you can see with the first and third poster in this thread.

39644
Gaming / Re: Destiny in a nutshell.
« on: October 04, 2014, 03:49:33 AM »
LOL

39645
Serious / Re: "Don't judge a religion by its fundamentalists"
« on: October 04, 2014, 03:25:39 AM »
I legit don't understand how you could have a problem with mother Theresa.i stopped reading there by the way.

She thought abortion was the biggest threat to peace on Earth.

She supported Indira Gandhi.

She didn't discriminate between people who could be cured or not, thought poverty and suffering brought people closer to religion, encouraged her sisters to rely largely on faith instead of medicine and forcefully baptised the dying.

She also accepted stolen money from Charles Keating and refused to return it.

To name but a few.
And she was ugly.

39646
The Flood / Re: >be me
« on: October 03, 2014, 07:37:39 PM »
I lose it every time I get to the "mom gets scared, bel air, etc" part. That coupled with your avatar cracks me up.

39647
Serious / Re: I don't know what I'm doing anymore.
« on: October 03, 2014, 06:06:48 PM »
What city in socal?

Glendale.
What the hell? You're right in LA. I'd kill to live there.

I hate it here. It sucks. Trust me there is nothing fun about it. I want to leave.
Dude you're in LA. One of the best cities on the planet. Move to a different area of you don't like it, but it's pretty damn good.

You closer to the hills or what?

For the record I don't live in LA. Glendale may fall under LA county, but it's still it's own city.
Can't you just move?

39648
Gaming / Re: >BFBC2
« on: October 03, 2014, 05:07:36 PM »
It's taking forever to download for some reason. Better be kind of fun at least.

39649
Serious / Re: I don't know what I'm doing anymore.
« on: October 03, 2014, 04:57:43 PM »
What city in socal?

Glendale.
What the hell? You're right in LA. I'd kill to live there.

I hate it here. It sucks. Trust me there is nothing fun about it. I want to leave.
Dude you're in LA. One of the best cities on the planet. Move to a different area of you don't like it, but it's pretty damn good.

You closer to the hills or what?

39650
Gaming / Re: So I wrote a mission for bungie, since theirs suck.
« on: October 03, 2014, 04:48:47 PM »
The fanboys make my head hurt. How can they just so blatantly love a shitty product.



AWWWW SHITTT NIGGA LEGENDARYYYYYY^
upvote4upvote

39651
Gaming / Re: So I wrote a mission for bungie, since theirs suck.
« on: October 03, 2014, 04:48:17 PM »
Damn, good work.

39652
Serious / Re: Alan Henning Beheaded by ISIS - American Hostage Next
« on: October 03, 2014, 04:41:53 PM »
They're going to execute an Army Ranger?

Napalm bomb these degenerates.

39653
Serious / Re: Radical Offers Reward for Abducting President Obama
« on: October 03, 2014, 04:36:04 PM »
Gotta love when shitstains like this call themselves patriots. Dumbasses like this have really stained that word.

I sincerely hope they get shot, executed, or jailed for life.

39654
Serious / Re: Moms Demand SWATing
« on: October 03, 2014, 04:32:08 PM »
Apart from a website called "bearingarms.com" which is clearly biased, do you have any other sources proving this? Any proof at all of a large amount of people making false calls to the police specifically to scare or endanger gun owners?
I do have proof, look at the website I posted. This site is well known for accuracy of knowledge of firearms because it is being operated by firearms owners. Want bias? Go to CNN, MSNBC, and HuffPost
So nothing other than an extremely pro gun website? If you don't think that's biased, you're wrong.

A couple of sources and stories proving this is real and I'll believe it, for now it's about as credible as a supermarket tabloid.
How about a few primary sources, straight from people like these?


And you want other sources, here's a couple. Don't go moving the goal posts either. You wanted some, you got some

http://concealednation.org/2014/10/moms-demand-action-followers-are-violent-and-crazy-just-read-their-reaction-comments/

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/389441/moms-demand-swatting-charles-c-w-cooke

http://www.examiner.com/article/anti-gun-women-continue-to-corroborate-progressive-contradiction
These sites are extremely right wing and incredibly biased, as well as unprofessional. And it seems to me a few Twitter comments of people talking shit doesn't exactly corroborate with your supposed claim of widespread usage of what would appear almost as a terror tactic.

It's being exaggerated. If people really do this and there's actual proof apart from the one cat who got the man in Walmart killed, I'll believe it. For now it's distortion of the truth, misinformation, and fear mongering.
Of course they're going to be more right-wing. You seriously expect left-wing sources to display information against their supporters? Of course not. You can easily go onto any anti-gun groups social media account and see the people that display these feelings
That's the thing. You can't easily find this stuff, and the little of it these sites found are all just talk for the time being.

If this actually starts happening, then it is indeed a problem. But for now, it's exaggeration and fear mongering. The one guy that got shot in Walmart is not indicative of anything, mostly because he wasn't open carrying, he was holding a toy rifle or airsoft rifle, or a BB gun I believe. Can't remember.

39655
Serious / Re: Piers Morgan attacks Obama
« on: October 03, 2014, 02:18:58 PM »
Firstly, he's wrong.

Secondly, lolPiersMorgan.

39656
Serious / Re: Moms Demand SWATing
« on: October 03, 2014, 01:46:37 PM »
Apart from a website called "bearingarms.com" which is clearly biased, do you have any other sources proving this? Any proof at all of a large amount of people making false calls to the police specifically to scare or endanger gun owners?
I do have proof, look at the website I posted. This site is well known for accuracy of knowledge of firearms because it is being operated by firearms owners. Want bias? Go to CNN, MSNBC, and HuffPost
So nothing other than an extremely pro gun website? If you don't think that's biased, you're wrong.

A couple of sources and stories proving this is real and I'll believe it, for now it's about as credible as a supermarket tabloid.
How about a few primary sources, straight from people like these?


And you want other sources, here's a couple. Don't go moving the goal posts either. You wanted some, you got some

http://concealednation.org/2014/10/moms-demand-action-followers-are-violent-and-crazy-just-read-their-reaction-comments/

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/389441/moms-demand-swatting-charles-c-w-cooke

http://www.examiner.com/article/anti-gun-women-continue-to-corroborate-progressive-contradiction
These sites are extremely right wing and incredibly biased, as well as unprofessional. And it seems to me a few Twitter comments of people talking shit doesn't exactly corroborate with your supposed claim of widespread usage of what would appear almost as a terror tactic.

It's being exaggerated. If people really do this and there's actual proof apart from the one pussy who got the man in Walmart killed, I'll believe it. For now it's distortion of the truth, misinformation, and fear mongering.

39657
Serious / Re: Moms Demand SWATing
« on: October 03, 2014, 07:53:25 AM »
Apart from a website called "bearingarms.com" which is clearly biased, do you have any other sources proving this? Any proof at all of a large amount of people making false calls to the police specifically to scare or endanger gun owners?
I do have proof, look at the website I posted. This site is well known for accuracy of knowledge of firearms because it is being operated by firearms owners. Want bias? Go to CNN, MSNBC, and HuffPost
So nothing other than an extremely pro gun website? If you don't think that's biased, you're wrong.

A couple of sources and stories proving this is real and I'll believe it, for now it's about as credible as a supermarket tabloid.

39658
The Flood / Re: Today I didn't lose a dog, I lost so much more :'(
« on: October 03, 2014, 07:51:03 AM »
May he rest in peace. You made him happy, and that's all that matters.

39659
No.

39660
The Flood / Re: How Much Sleep Do You Usually Get?
« on: October 03, 2014, 07:17:23 AM »
10

Pages: 1 ... 132013211322 13231324 ... 1397