This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - challengerX
Pages: 1 ... 129212931294 12951296 ... 1397
38791
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:49:57 PM »
Guys seriously that picture is creeping me out. Is it a young boy (NSA pls go) or Ellen Page?
Plot twist: they're the same thing
38792
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:44:09 PM »
Guys seriously that picture is creeping me out. Is it a young boy (NSA pls go) or Ellen Page?
38793
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:40:38 PM »
op is just mad because he doesn't find small chests attractive like a normal human
I am indifferent to boob size. But she has no ass and her face looks like the face of a little boy.
I dunno about you guys, but I'm not physically attracted to young boys.
You must be a fgt then. Ellen is a beautiful woman no matter how she dresses or cuts her hair.
Is that Ellen Page or a 12 year old boy? I legitimately can't tell.
38794
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:39:14 PM »
op is just mad because he doesn't find small chests attractive like a normal human
I am indifferent to boob size. But she has no ass and her face looks like the face of a little boy.
I dunno about you guys, but I'm not physically attracted to young boys.
Nice try, lonepaul.
I didn't say ANYTHING about little girls
NSA DISCLAIMER: I am not actually a pedo
You didn't have to. :^)
38795
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:38:05 PM »
Anyone who isn't sexually attracted to her is a confirmed fgt.
10/10, would picture as my crying daughter
 Interpolitis is spreading.
38796
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:36:13 PM »
Can't a guy have some fun without everybody hating on him?
38797
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:35:11 PM »
OT: *mandatory penis joke*
38798
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:34:01 PM »
op is just mad because he doesn't find small chests attractive like a normal human
I am indifferent to boob size. But she has no ass and her face looks like the face of a little boy.
I dunno about you guys, but I'm not physically attracted to young boys.
Nice try, lonepaul.
38799
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:31:53 PM »
And what of the million+ whites that were enslaved along North Africa?
Arabs aren't white.
......
White people were enslaved by the peoples along North Africa
Wait, are you saying whites enslaved by Arabs in North Africa?
I think he's referring to the moors who came up from Morocco and took over Spain and parts of France.
No, I'm referencing the Barbary Slave Trade that flourished between the 16th and 19th centuries in places like Libya, Algiers, and Tunisia. Local Barbary pirates would capture Europeans that were primarily traveling in the Med.
Yes, but most weren't captured in North Africa. They were primarily grabbed from coastal towns and villages of European nations. Although a good amount of sailors traveling near North Africa were converted to slaves.
A lot of slaves were taken by the Moors from Spain in raids which were part of the Barbary Slavs trade too.
I know they weren't captured in Africa. They were taken from shipping routes, coastal areas, and even went up north to Iceland and Scotland
That's why I was confused as to what you were talking about when you said "along North Africa".
Ah. My fault for that
No problem.
38800
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:30:40 PM »
Does chopping off a foot and a half of hair count?
Fir a second there I thought you said you chopped off your foot.
This is why we use the metric system people.
frack that. Metric is the gateway to communism.
38801
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:28:14 PM »
Does chopping off a foot and a half of hair count?
For a second there I thought you said you chopped off your foot. This is why we use the metric system people.
38802
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:25:43 PM »
And what of the million+ whites that were enslaved along North Africa?
Arabs aren't white.
......
White people were enslaved by the peoples along North Africa
Wait, are you saying whites enslaved by Arabs in North Africa?
I think he's referring to the moors who came up from Morocco and took over Spain and parts of France.
No, I'm referencing the Barbary Slave Trade that flourished between the 16th and 19th centuries in places like Libya, Algiers, and Tunisia. Local Barbary pirates would capture Europeans that were primarily traveling in the Med.
Yes, but most weren't captured in North Africa. They were primarily grabbed from coastal towns and villages of European nations. Although a good amount of sailors traveling near North Africa were converted to slaves.
A lot of slaves were taken by the Moors from Spain in raids which were part of the Barbary Slavs trade too.
I know they weren't captured in Africa. They were taken from shipping routes, coastal areas, and even went up north to Iceland and Scotland
That's why I was confused as to what you were talking about when you said "along North Africa".
38803
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:18:10 PM »
And what of the million+ whites that were enslaved along North Africa?
Arabs aren't white.
......
White people were enslaved by the peoples along North Africa
Wait, are you saying whites enslaved by Arabs in North Africa?
I think he's referring to the moors who came up from Morocco and took over Spain and parts of France.
No, I'm referencing the Barbary Slave Trade that flourished between the 16th and 19th centuries in places like Libya, Algiers, and Tunisia. Local Barbary pirates would capture Europeans that were primarily traveling in the Med.
Yes, but most weren't captured in North Africa. They were primarily grabbed from coastal towns and villages of European nations. Although a good amount of sailors traveling near North Africa were converted to slaves. A lot of slaves were taken by the Moors from Spain in raids which were part of the Barbary Slave trade too.
38804
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:07:15 PM »
And what of the million+ whites that were enslaved along North Africa?
Arabs aren't white.
......
White people were enslaved by the peoples along North Africa
Wait, are you saying whites enslaved by Arabs in North Africa?
I think he's referring to the moors who came up from Morocco and took over Spain and parts of France.
But then why did he say "along North Africa"? That's what's confusing me. I think he's talking he's talking about the Moors though, yeah.
38805
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:01:46 PM »
And what of the million+ whites that were enslaved along North Africa?
Arabs aren't white.
......
White people were enslaved by the peoples along North Africa
Wait, are you saying whites enslaved by Arabs in North Africa?
38806
« on: October 21, 2014, 05:57:55 PM »
And what of the million+ whites that were enslaved along North Africa?
Arabs aren't white.
38807
« on: October 21, 2014, 05:51:39 PM »
3) doesn't matter. You can raise as much awareness for suicide as you want. The dead really dont care.
Awareness and help isn't for the dead.
so? You think you're going raise an emotionally and spiritually dead person from the metaphorical grave? Some people have already attempted it and failed. What would stop them from trying again the next time things are just as bad?
Proper support and psychiatric level help.
i don't believe you can help someone if they don't want help. If the person is well enough to seek help then I'm not entirely sure if they really were at risk of going through with their suicide threats.
Your posts reek of misinformation and lack of education on the topic.
mhmmm anything else? Not sure if you're going to actually discuss/explain anything or try to put me down for not knowing as much as you.
Considering how the rest of this thread has gone, it's generally advised that if you don't know what you're talking about, don't make such grand statements.
why? I'm more than welcome to people correcting me or telling when I'm wrong. There's no need to be an ass about it.
I've seen other people ITT thread say that awareness and help doesn't seem to be making much of an impact either which is what I said. I'm sorry if I they sounded more scientific when they said it and I didn't.
It's not about how you say it, it's about what you said. The awareness, treatment, accessibility, cost, etc, are barriers that prevent people from getting the help they need. "If they want to kill themselves, they're going to kill themselves" shouldn't be an accepted outcome. We should be trying to avoid that outcome.
If people want to kill themselves they won't seek help though. Depressed people will and I can see how that fits in with what you just said, but if you made up your mind right now to kill yourself this Friday, why would you seek help?
That just isn't how it works. "Hmm, yes. I believe Friday will be an excellent day to take my life, doesn't mess with my schedule."
If help were readily available more people would go. As it stands now it's a hassle and expensive. Would a psychiatrist help really? I don't know. It depends on the individual.
You don't think thats how it works and yet people plan out their deaths. They make YouTube videos, or find out how they are going to do it. It's definitely not a spontaneous decision.
Those people are the minority. Majority of people think about doing it and end up doing it because their life doesn't improve/gets worse or all sorts of other things. That's where family and friends come in.
38808
« on: October 21, 2014, 05:13:30 PM »
3) doesn't matter. You can raise as much awareness for suicide as you want. The dead really dont care.
Awareness and help isn't for the dead.
so? You think you're going raise an emotionally and spiritually dead person from the metaphorical grave? Some people have already attempted it and failed. What would stop them from trying again the next time things are just as bad?
Proper support and psychiatric level help.
i don't believe you can help someone if they don't want help. If the person is well enough to seek help then I'm not entirely sure if they really were at risk of going through with their suicide threats.
Your posts reek of misinformation and lack of education on the topic.
mhmmm anything else? Not sure if you're going to actually discuss/explain anything or try to put me down for not knowing as much as you.
Considering how the rest of this thread has gone, it's generally advised that if you don't know what you're talking about, don't make such grand statements.
why? I'm more than welcome to people correcting me or telling when I'm wrong. There's no need to be an ass about it.
I've seen other people ITT thread say that awareness and help doesn't seem to be making much of an impact either which is what I said. I'm sorry if I they sounded more scientific when they said it and I didn't.
It's not about how you say it, it's about what you said. The awareness, treatment, accessibility, cost, etc, are barriers that prevent people from getting the help they need. "If they want to kill themselves, they're going to kill themselves" shouldn't be an accepted outcome. We should be trying to avoid that outcome.
If people want to kill themselves they won't seek help though. Depressed people will and I can see how that fits in with what you just said, but if you made up your mind right now to kill yourself this Friday, why would you seek help?
That just isn't how it works. "Hmm, yes. I believe Friday will be an excellent day to take my life, doesn't mess with my schedule." If help were readily available more people would go. As it stands now it's a hassle and expensive. Would a psychiatrist help really? I don't know. It depends on the individual.
38809
« on: October 21, 2014, 05:10:54 PM »
Raw Sugar is right tho.
If someone wants to kill them self, it doesn't matter how many shrinks they talk to, they're gonna do it.
Shrinks are rarely the answer to anything. What those people need is support from friends and family.
There needs to be a joint effort between family support and therapeutic aid.
Eh, I guess. I wouldn't really like to visit a shrink if I felt suicidal.
38810
« on: October 21, 2014, 05:05:28 PM »
Raw Sugar is right tho.
If someone wants to kill them self, it doesn't matter how many shrinks they talk to, they're gonna do it.
Shrinks are rarely the answer to anything. What those people need is support from friends and family.
38811
« on: October 21, 2014, 03:43:01 PM »
It's the permanent solution my brother took for bullying he was dealing with, constant attacks for no rhyme or reason besides his weight and that we were adopted. it pushed him into depression, and he took his life.
Damn. Sorry about that man.
38812
« on: October 21, 2014, 03:34:40 PM »
YES
HELL YES
THE FUTURE IS NAO
38813
« on: October 21, 2014, 03:29:20 PM »
Sup nigga.
EW EW EW EW EW EW
IT'S THE N TO THE IZH DOUBLE OD C TO THE R I TO THE P I TO THE NG LE TO THE DUB DOUBLE OD SHOWIN ENEMIGOS NO LOVE
38814
« on: October 21, 2014, 03:09:13 PM »
I've been working all day.
38815
« on: October 21, 2014, 02:59:20 PM »
38816
« on: October 21, 2014, 02:54:56 PM »
>doctors
Yeah, pot is a remedy that can fix many medical problems. The fact that it's a weed and it can grow anywhere would make doctors go broke. It's rather obvious this is the reason they don't support it
Well, it's not a weed. It's a plant with flowers.
But the problem is not that they couldn't make a profit, it's that legalizing cannabis and really taking advantage of all its uses (including hemp) would destroy the oil industry, the lumber industry, and big pharmaceutical companies which sell more expensive medicine and treatment. Curing cancer doesn't generate as much money as "treating" it.
. Hemp has been legal here in canada since 1998. Nothing major has happened. Get over yourself stoners, you're overselling weed.
>calling me a stoner
There are literally 100 uses with hemp. Wood, paper, fuel. Educate yourself.
. In canada, they didn't find it as useful as you seem to. Also, weed doesn't cure cancer, one of my parents works in medical marijuana research. The isolated compound cannabidiol is where most of the cancer research on weeds medicinal properties occurs. Cannabidiol is the component in weed that doesn't get you high.
I've seen people have their cancer cured with cannabis. Mostly cancer with a cannabis skin cream. There are 85 active cannabinoids. CBD is is one of the top medicinal cannabinoids, but THC has medicinal properties too. Getting "high" helps with PTSD, and with anorexia as it opens your appetite, among other things. They don't take advantage of hemp, but it has a shit ton of uses. http://www.voteindustrialhemp.com/?m=1
38817
« on: October 21, 2014, 02:39:53 PM »
Sup nigga.
Just rolling through Chiraq trapping and listening to chief keef.
LOL
I'm not black man I was just playing. And since you're from Chicago, what's the deal there? Why are the gangs so hellbent on wiping each other out?
I don't know really why so many people bang. I don't actually live in the Chicago hood but I guess it's just one of those cycles where you just grow up around people gang banging and you just follow suit. Plus if you're poor you don t have many options.
Oh I know why people bang. I'm from LA, from Inglewood. I mean the reasons are stupid most of the time, and a lot of times it's just that their friends have died and you know, people are always in the middle of everything so why not just get involved. I'm just saying I don't understand why the so called "beef" runs so deep. I mean it's double digit killings every weekend. I was just wondering.
38818
« on: October 21, 2014, 02:08:05 PM »
>doctors
Yeah, pot is a remedy that can fix many medical problems. The fact that it's a weed and it can grow anywhere would make doctors go broke. It's rather obvious this is the reason they don't support it
Well, it's not a weed. It's a plant with flowers.
But the problem is not that they couldn't make a profit, it's that legalizing cannabis and really taking advantage of all its uses (including hemp) would destroy the oil industry, the lumber industry, and big pharmaceutical companies which sell more expensive medicine and treatment. Curing cancer doesn't generate as much money as "treating" it.
. Hemp has been legal here in canada since 1998. Nothing major has happened. Get over yourself stoners, you're overselling weed.
>calling me a stoner There are literally 100 uses with hemp. Wood, paper, fuel. Educate yourself.
38819
« on: October 21, 2014, 02:02:23 PM »
>doctors
Yeah, pot is a remedy that can fix many medical problems. The fact that it's a weed and it can grow anywhere would make doctors go broke. It's rather obvious this is the reason they don't support it
Well, it's not a weed. It's a plant with flowers.
But the problem is not that they couldn't make a profit, it's that legalizing cannabis and really taking advantage of all its uses (including hemp) would destroy the oil industry, the lumber industry, and big pharmaceutical companies which sell more expensive medicine and treatment. Curing cancer doesn't generate as much money as "treating" it.
Are we, for once, in agreement with something?
Strangely enough.
38820
« on: October 21, 2014, 01:57:32 PM »
No, weed has a ton of carcinogens in it, and you can't standardize its dosage by smoking it, this is why you can't use it as medicine. The whole foundation of medicinal chemistry is to isolate the medicinal properties of marijuana and make it into a form where you can standardize its dosage. This is what they are doing right now, putting millions of dollars into cannabis derived medication that is non smokable
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Oh lord. I don't know what's worse, that you think vaporized weed has carcinogens, or the fact you're saying this shit on a role playing account.
Pages: 1 ... 129212931294 12951296 ... 1397
|
Show Posts