This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - challengerX
Pages: 1 ... 128012811282 12831284 ... 1397
38431
« on: October 29, 2014, 11:50:55 AM »
challenger is an autistic nigger
at least I'm not A FUCKING HOMOSEXUAL FAGGOT
38432
« on: October 29, 2014, 11:49:18 AM »
FFS Kinder.
No one is actually targeting you.
Calm down.
DIE IN A FUCKING CAR CRASH GET TARGETED SON GET FUCKING TARGETED
38433
« on: October 29, 2014, 11:47:38 AM »
inb4 gorilla
38434
« on: October 29, 2014, 11:46:59 AM »
Yup. 
38435
« on: October 29, 2014, 11:36:08 AM »
COÑO MANG NO ESTOY HECHO DE DINERO
38436
« on: October 29, 2014, 11:34:47 AM »
Am I seriously the only one that laughed his ass off at the guy silently walking next to her for 5 minutes? LOL How can you guys talk about anything else when that happened.
I'm still cracking up. I'm watching that again.
It's a good thing there was a camera rolling, I'll just leave it at that .-.
Yeah that was getting pretty rapetastic. But god damn that was funny.
38437
« on: October 29, 2014, 11:33:35 AM »
Gonna go buy some chips. You beaners want anything?
38438
« on: October 29, 2014, 11:30:29 AM »
BYE YOU FUCKING FAGGOT HAVE A SAFE TRIP YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT
38439
« on: October 29, 2014, 11:25:53 AM »
Am I seriously the only one that laughed his ass off at the guy silently walking next to her for 5 minutes? LOL How can you guys talk about anything else when that happened.
I'm still cracking up. I'm watching that again.
38440
« on: October 29, 2014, 10:21:59 AM »
I got grabbed by Interpol for online harassment and I'm writing this from a jail cell.
38441
« on: October 29, 2014, 09:44:14 AM »
Here's my rule: Stop being a butthurt crybaby.
The hilarious thing is you've admitted to "baiting" this forum (never successfully) and you're here complaining that people laugh at your idiocy or call you out on your bullshit.
Grow a pair of balls.
38442
« on: October 29, 2014, 08:48:23 AM »
FUCKING LOL 5 MINUTES ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS
38443
« on: October 29, 2014, 08:44:31 AM »
Reported for continuing to make threads on already locked topics.
Did you win court by getting the last word? We all know whoever speaks the last wins, of course.
38444
« on: October 29, 2014, 07:59:38 AM »
I sued him in court the other day for harassing me on this forum, and he hasn't payed me any money yet.
what the fuck m8
38445
« on: October 29, 2014, 05:19:40 AM »
That's fucking disgusting.
Honestly I'd murder it. It's an abomination.
38446
« on: October 29, 2014, 05:03:07 AM »
FUCKING STRAYA MATE
38447
« on: October 29, 2014, 04:56:59 AM »
Seriously the pictures got edited?
So when are you going to fuck off to Tumblr, Kinder?
Edit: Almost forgot: #triggerwarning4sensitivefaggots
38448
« on: October 29, 2014, 04:28:57 AM »
When somebody is actually intelligent and knows that religion is a joke and that god is not real, and somebody calls them "edgy" or says something equally retarded like that, they are actually just trolling, right?
Intelligent? Lol what? What intelligence do you have other than allowing your mind to be limited by the words of scientists.
There's a difference in believing in science and limiting your mind by it.
>thinking science requires belief >thinking science limits your mind 
38449
« on: October 29, 2014, 04:24:31 AM »
When somebody is actually intelligent and knows that religion is a joke and that god is not real, and somebody calls them "edgy" or says something equally retarded like that, they are actually just trolling, right?
Intelligent? Lol what? What intelligence do you have other than allowing your mind to be limited by the words of scientists.
38450
« on: October 28, 2014, 08:13:23 PM »
If you think it's impossible for humanity to progress at a rate fast enough to automate the majority of jobs way before a thousand years time
a thousand years
Nope.
Compare 100 years ago to today and we're going at a pace that's almost unprecedented.
And again, it will slow down. How hard is that to understand? Even Moore's Law is expected to die in a few decades.
Technology hasn't slowed down significantly for a hundred years and progress shows no signs of slowing down. If anything it might be going too fast for the economy to handle. Where something becomes stale, something else rises up to take its place.
38451
« on: October 28, 2014, 08:01:53 PM »
If you think it's impossible for humanity to progress at a rate fast enough to automate the majority of jobs way before a thousand years time
a thousand years
Nope. Compare 100 years ago to today and we're going at a pace that's almost unprecedented.
38452
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:55:02 PM »
That progress will all but stop completely because "trends flat off".
Not completely, but close.
Exponential trends don't last forever in real life, everything eventually slows down. You're welcome to "prove me wrong" and find me exponential trend that lasts forever. Good luck, even the size of the universe will eventually slow and retract.
>cherry picking
It's not going to take anywhere close to a thousand years for the majority of jobs to be automated. 500 years is a ridiculous amount of time. It doesn't take humanity that long to progress. And the more time goes on, the less conflicts there are, the more advanced people get, progress is even more. Save your graphs. The future is unknown and the speed at which we reach thee unknowns is astonishingly fast. The breakthroughs we've made over the course of history would defy any graph detailing the slowing of progress. To even look at the progress of our species like that is closed minded.
Again, you're welcome to show me an exponential trend that doesn't slow down. Otherwise you're just assuming an impossible scenario.
History proves you wrong. If you think it's impossible for humanity to progress at a rate fast enough to automate the majority of jobs way before a thousand years time, when compared to 50 years ago we've automated a shit ton of jobs already, you're just plain wrong. We keep getting smarter and smarter, and now that the foundation for automation is there progress is even quicker. It might slow down due to people opposing automation, but not because "trends flat off".
38453
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:46:46 PM »
Fucking good job man.
Don't pay attention to these losers, they'll do anything to try and put a frown on your face.
Thanks, and it's fine. I know why Casper is how he is to me, and I sort of understand it. But I want to know why Based Love has an issue with me
Who cares. You've never been confrontational with anybody here. You don't do anything wrong. It's them.
38454
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:44:07 PM »
That progress will all but stop completely because "trends flat off".
Not completely, but close.
Exponential trends don't last forever in real life, everything eventually slows down. You're welcome to "prove me wrong" and find me exponential trend that lasts forever. Good luck, even the size of the universe will eventually slow and retract.
>cherry picking It's not going to take anywhere close to a thousand years for the majority of jobs to be automated. 500 years is a ridiculous amount of time. It doesn't take humanity that long to progress. And the more time goes on, the less conflicts there are, the more advanced people get, progress is even more. Save your graphs. The future is unknown and the speed at which we reach thee unknowns is astonishingly fast. The breakthroughs we've made over the course of history would defy any graph detailing the slowing of progress. To even look at the progress of our species like that is closed minded.
38455
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:38:44 PM »
So, we have...
Russia in 2018, with their archaic homosexuality beliefs and laws, and an imperialist president, followed by Qatar in 2022, with their archaic laws in general.
What's next, Cuba 2026 and North Korea 2030?
The dream team. Well more like nightmare.
38456
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:37:06 PM »
Fucking good job man.
Don't pay attention to these losers, they'll do anything to try and put a frown on your face.
38457
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:28:39 PM »
You linked me to a forum post by a user named SoulSkill.
Which follows quite easily to this:
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/519241/report-suggests-nearly-half-of-us-jobs-are-vulnerable-to-computerization/
I saw, but the fact that challenger thinks he's proving me wrong (even though all I said was merely an estimation, not even a claim) is still stunning. Firstly, there is no concrete time line we're dealing with. Just because half of all US jobs are vulnerable doesn't mean we're going to lose half of all US jobs. Secondly, we're looking at a logarithmic pattern (really a bell shape if you include the first half) where the rate of automation of jobs will slow down as you begin to deal with harder and more complex jobs. You can't honestly believe we'll hit a point where we'll only have a small percentage left any time in the next one hundred years. Technology may be speeding up, but society still always overestimates how fast technology is actually developing. Thirdly, you need more than one study to validate something as ground shaking as that. I'm not saying it isn't reliable, but large claims need larger evidence.
>A THOUSAND YEARS
>half of US jobs are vulnerable to automation
I'll let you do the math.
1. *a few hundred to a thousand years
2. Do you know what a log function looks like? The rate decays over time. If you lose 50% in 30 years, that doesn't mean you'll lose another 50% the next 30 years.
3. Again, being vulnerable to automation =/= becoming automated
4. Again, you need more than one study to validate a large claim
You can't just blow past everything I say and repeat your previous point.
If 50% of jobs are vulnerable now, it's not going to take anywhere close to a thousand years to automate the majority of jobs.
*sigh*
It's ok, I know you don't understand.
Take a look at 50 years ago, or even a hundred.
Exponential trends (in real life) flat off, challenger. They don't just fly up with no end, generally they turn into logs as the rate continuously slows down.
Right. From thousands of years ago where the bow and arrow was the pinnacle of weaponry, where a few hundred years ago flying machines were completely ridiculous, where decades ago there were no treatments for certain diseases, you have the audacity to say humanity will come to a standstill? That progress will all but stop completely because "trends flat off".
38458
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:22:48 PM »
Well after they did such a fantastic job with the Winter Olympics.
38459
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:18:50 PM »
You linked me to a forum post by a user named SoulSkill.
Which follows quite easily to this:
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/519241/report-suggests-nearly-half-of-us-jobs-are-vulnerable-to-computerization/
I saw, but the fact that challenger thinks he's proving me wrong (even though all I said was merely an estimation, not even a claim) is still stunning. Firstly, there is no concrete time line we're dealing with. Just because half of all US jobs are vulnerable doesn't mean we're going to lose half of all US jobs. Secondly, we're looking at a logarithmic pattern (really a bell shape if you include the first half) where the rate of automation of jobs will slow down as you begin to deal with harder and more complex jobs. You can't honestly believe we'll hit a point where we'll only have a small percentage left any time in the next one hundred years. Technology may be speeding up, but society still always overestimates how fast technology is actually developing. Thirdly, you need more than one study to validate something as ground shaking as that. I'm not saying it isn't reliable, but large claims need larger evidence.
>A THOUSAND YEARS
>half of US jobs are vulnerable to automation
I'll let you do the math.
1. *a few hundred to a thousand years
2. Do you know what a log function looks like? The rate decays over time. If you lose 50% in 30 years, that doesn't mean you'll lose another 50% the next 30 years.
3. Again, being vulnerable to automation =/= becoming automated
4. Again, you need more than one study to validate a large claim
You can't just blow past everything I say and repeat your previous point.
If 50% of jobs are vulnerable now, it's not going to take anywhere close to a thousand years to automate the majority of jobs.
*sigh*
It's ok, I know you don't understand. Take a look at 50 years ago, or even a hundred.
38460
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:16:12 PM »
Pages: 1 ... 128012811282 12831284 ... 1397
|
Show Posts
