This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - challengerX
Pages: 1 ... 126127128 129130 ... 1397
3811
« on: September 24, 2017, 03:57:41 PM »
If you're dumb enough to be tricked by some dude in drag and you fuck him, then realize he's male afterwards, you're not gay. You're gay if you do it again and don't violently beat the freak within an inch of his life.
This sounds emotionally charged, speaking from experience?
Not at all, I simply believe the most effective way to cure humanity of these illnesses is to throw these "people" off the nearest roof.
This sounds emotionally charged, speaking from experience?
You're one of them
3812
« on: September 24, 2017, 03:31:08 PM »
If you're dumb enough to be tricked by some dude in drag and you fuck him, then realize he's male afterwards, you're not gay. You're gay if you do it again and don't violently beat the freak within an inch of his life.
This sounds emotionally charged, speaking from experience?
Not at all, I simply believe the most effective way to cure humanity of these illnesses is to throw these "people" off the nearest roof.
3813
« on: September 24, 2017, 02:53:21 PM »
If you're dumb enough to be tricked by some dude in drag and you fuck him, then realize he's male afterwards, you're not gay. You're gay if you do it again and don't violently beat the freak within an inch of his life.
3814
« on: September 24, 2017, 02:47:27 PM »
Whoever wants to play let's see if we can nail a specific day and time down.
3815
« on: September 23, 2017, 05:55:43 PM »
What are you carrying that much cash for? Just suck dick for the drugs like secondclass.
3816
« on: September 23, 2017, 05:47:31 PM »
wow apparently we even have to blacklist challenger and ryle now
*nuzzles*
*liicks*
3817
« on: September 23, 2017, 03:55:48 PM »
It looks like you photoshopped your name in
all the names were photoshopped in you dumb fuck
boy you mad as hell 😂
His name looks different from all the others. Upgrade your reading comprehension, get hooked on phonics etc.
looks like there's only 15 people in the image too even though there are 16 names on there
someone gotta take the photo yo
yo🙀
3818
« on: September 23, 2017, 03:40:15 PM »
An hour with Desty's mom, she only costs $30 an hour.
man you're unfunny
3819
« on: September 23, 2017, 03:09:21 PM »
There's nothing wrong with emulating old games
Yes there is, especially if they were just rereleased (like Pokémon Gold/Silver).
Why should you buy the remaster (or whatever this is I don't care about Pokémon) instead of emulating it?
Because then you'd be a thief and a bad person. You're not supporting the company that produced the game, and you no longer have the excuse of "it's an old game that they're not profiting from anymore."
But they're just rehashing an old game. I don't really see how they deserve the money that badly.
They're not just rehashing an old game. They're putting it on a modern device with newer and more reliable technology that's less likely to fail on you. The games I'm talking about are so old, they were on these big cartridges that had little batteries inside of them that are only designed to last a few years before they burn out. Once it burns out, you can no longer save your game anymore and it's basically just worthless.
Replacing these batteries is expensive and dangerous, because it requires you to know how to use a soldering iron if you want to do the job right, and even if you still have a working battery, it's gonna die again eventually and there's no way to transfer your Pokémon to newer generations like you can with every subsequent game. Gold/Silver were the only generation of Pokémon games up until now that didn't let you do that, because there wasn't a way to connect a Game Boy to a Game Boy Advance.
Re-releasing the games on 3DS solves all of these problems.
They're also only $10 and if you can't spare that much for such an excellent game, you're really just a pathetic waste of skin.
So after paying for the game and being boned by substandard technology, you're gonna buy it again? Why not emulate it?
Not "substandard" technology, outdated technology.
Because it's a fucking amazing game that Game Freak deserves billions of dollars for making.
I'd buy both versions 30 more times.
I don't emulate games ever because I'm not a piece of shit.
Seems like a lot of fanboying tbb. It's substandard technology to have it run on batteries that aren't easily replaceable.
Not if they last nearly a decade. People weren't even 100% sure video games would still be around in that long.
I know you're slightly stupid, but come on.
So they planned for failure and the industry collapsing within a decade?
Welcome to reality.
And yes, they do deserve money. I'll buy 100 copies every day.
But the video game industry is thriving and my Sega Dreamcast and all my old games still work perfectly.
woah and y2k didn't happen to
sometimes people are wrong
woah
Like you right now? Lmao I would've emulated it all these years and probably bought it now if I was such a fan. You probably consider that a crime too.
3820
« on: September 23, 2017, 03:05:07 PM »
There's nothing wrong with emulating old games
Yes there is, especially if they were just rereleased (like Pokémon Gold/Silver).
Why should you buy the remaster (or whatever this is I don't care about Pokémon) instead of emulating it?
Because then you'd be a thief and a bad person. You're not supporting the company that produced the game, and you no longer have the excuse of "it's an old game that they're not profiting from anymore."
But they're just rehashing an old game. I don't really see how they deserve the money that badly.
They're not just rehashing an old game. They're putting it on a modern device with newer and more reliable technology that's less likely to fail on you. The games I'm talking about are so old, they were on these big cartridges that had little batteries inside of them that are only designed to last a few years before they burn out. Once it burns out, you can no longer save your game anymore and it's basically just worthless.
Replacing these batteries is expensive and dangerous, because it requires you to know how to use a soldering iron if you want to do the job right, and even if you still have a working battery, it's gonna die again eventually and there's no way to transfer your Pokémon to newer generations like you can with every subsequent game. Gold/Silver were the only generation of Pokémon games up until now that didn't let you do that, because there wasn't a way to connect a Game Boy to a Game Boy Advance.
Re-releasing the games on 3DS solves all of these problems.
They're also only $10 and if you can't spare that much for such an excellent game, you're really just a pathetic waste of skin.
So after paying for the game and being boned by substandard technology, you're gonna buy it again? Why not emulate it?
Not "substandard" technology, outdated technology.
Because it's a fucking amazing game that Game Freak deserves billions of dollars for making.
I'd buy both versions 30 more times.
I don't emulate games ever because I'm not a piece of shit.
Seems like a lot of fanboying tbb. It's substandard technology to have it run on batteries that aren't easily replaceable.
Not if they last nearly a decade. People weren't even 100% sure video games would still be around in that long.
I know you're slightly stupid, but come on.
So they planned for failure and the industry collapsing within a decade?
Welcome to reality.
And yes, they do deserve money. I'll buy 100 copies every day.
But the video game industry is thriving and my Sega Dreamcast and all my old games still work perfectly.
3821
« on: September 23, 2017, 02:45:33 PM »
There's nothing wrong with emulating old games
Yes there is, especially if they were just rereleased (like Pokémon Gold/Silver).
Why should you buy the remaster (or whatever this is I don't care about Pokémon) instead of emulating it?
Because then you'd be a thief and a bad person. You're not supporting the company that produced the game, and you no longer have the excuse of "it's an old game that they're not profiting from anymore."
But they're just rehashing an old game. I don't really see how they deserve the money that badly.
They're not just rehashing an old game. They're putting it on a modern device with newer and more reliable technology that's less likely to fail on you. The games I'm talking about are so old, they were on these big cartridges that had little batteries inside of them that are only designed to last a few years before they burn out. Once it burns out, you can no longer save your game anymore and it's basically just worthless.
Replacing these batteries is expensive and dangerous, because it requires you to know how to use a soldering iron if you want to do the job right, and even if you still have a working battery, it's gonna die again eventually and there's no way to transfer your Pokémon to newer generations like you can with every subsequent game. Gold/Silver were the only generation of Pokémon games up until now that didn't let you do that, because there wasn't a way to connect a Game Boy to a Game Boy Advance.
Re-releasing the games on 3DS solves all of these problems.
They're also only $10 and if you can't spare that much for such an excellent game, you're really just a pathetic waste of skin.
So after paying for the game and being boned by substandard technology, you're gonna buy it again? Why not emulate it?
Not "substandard" technology, outdated technology.
Because it's a fucking amazing game that Game Freak deserves billions of dollars for making.
I'd buy both versions 30 more times.
I don't emulate games ever because I'm not a piece of shit.
Seems like a lot of fanboying tbb. It's substandard technology to have it run on batteries that aren't easily replaceable.
Not if they last nearly a decade. People weren't even 100% sure video games would still be around in that long.
I know you're slightly stupid, but come on.
So they planned for failure and the industry collapsing within a decade? Boy, these people definitely deserve money.
3822
« on: September 23, 2017, 02:03:47 PM »
It looks like you photoshopped your name in
all the names were photoshopped in you dumb fuck
boy you mad as hell 😂
His name looks different from all the others. Upgrade your reading comprehension, get hooked on phonics etc.
i comprehended your retarded post just as well as you articulated it
graduate from the 2nd grade, etc.
don't infer what was not implied
3823
« on: September 23, 2017, 02:02:24 PM »
There's nothing wrong with emulating old games
Yes there is, especially if they were just rereleased (like Pokémon Gold/Silver).
Why should you buy the remaster (or whatever this is I don't care about Pokémon) instead of emulating it?
Because then you'd be a thief and a bad person. You're not supporting the company that produced the game, and you no longer have the excuse of "it's an old game that they're not profiting from anymore."
But they're just rehashing an old game. I don't really see how they deserve the money that badly.
They're not just rehashing an old game. They're putting it on a modern device with newer and more reliable technology that's less likely to fail on you. The games I'm talking about are so old, they were on these big cartridges that had little batteries inside of them that are only designed to last a few years before they burn out. Once it burns out, you can no longer save your game anymore and it's basically just worthless.
Replacing these batteries is expensive and dangerous, because it requires you to know how to use a soldering iron if you want to do the job right, and even if you still have a working battery, it's gonna die again eventually and there's no way to transfer your Pokémon to newer generations like you can with every subsequent game. Gold/Silver were the only generation of Pokémon games up until now that didn't let you do that, because there wasn't a way to connect a Game Boy to a Game Boy Advance.
Re-releasing the games on 3DS solves all of these problems.
They're also only $10 and if you can't spare that much for such an excellent game, you're really just a pathetic waste of skin.
So after paying for the game and being boned by substandard technology, you're gonna buy it again? Why not emulate it?
Not "substandard" technology, outdated technology.
Because it's a fucking amazing game that Game Freak deserves billions of dollars for making.
I'd buy both versions 30 more times.
I don't emulate games ever because I'm not a piece of shit.
Seems like a lot of fanboying tbb. It's substandard technology to have it run on batteries that aren't easily replaceable.
3824
« on: September 23, 2017, 01:42:55 PM »
There's nothing wrong with emulating old games
Yes there is, especially if they were just rereleased (like Pokémon Gold/Silver).
Why should you buy the remaster (or whatever this is I don't care about Pokémon) instead of emulating it?
Because then you'd be a thief and a bad person. You're not supporting the company that produced the game, and you no longer have the excuse of "it's an old game that they're not profiting from anymore."
But they're just rehashing an old game. I don't really see how they deserve the money that badly.
They're not just rehashing an old game. They're putting it on a modern device with newer and more reliable technology that's less likely to fail on you. The games I'm talking about are so old, they were on these big cartridges that had little batteries inside of them that are only designed to last a few years before they burn out. Once it burns out, you can no longer save your game anymore and it's basically just worthless.
Replacing these batteries is expensive and dangerous, because it requires you to know how to use a soldering iron if you want to do the job right, and even if you still have a working battery, it's gonna die again eventually and there's no way to transfer your Pokémon to newer generations like you can with every subsequent game. Gold/Silver were the only generation of Pokémon games up until now that didn't let you do that, because there wasn't a way to connect a Game Boy to a Game Boy Advance.
Re-releasing the games on 3DS solves all of these problems.
They're also only $10 and if you can't spare that much for such an excellent game, you're really just a pathetic waste of skin.
So after paying for the game and being boned by substandard technology, you're gonna buy it again? Why not emulate it?
3825
« on: September 23, 2017, 01:40:01 PM »
single player game, then
is it wrong to play a single player game at a friend's house No, he's just sharing the game with you/letting you borrow it. i said they're owed money
compensation
there is a difference
Money is what changes hands during a sale.
3826
« on: September 23, 2017, 01:30:11 PM »
is it also immoral to head over to a friend's house and play split-screen halo with them if only one person owns the game No, because Bungie added split screen to Halo on purpose. It's playing a game with friends, not charging people to use a section of your TV to play Halo. which is why i didn't
i never said they were owed sales
You did, but whatever.
3827
« on: September 23, 2017, 01:06:59 PM »
But the developer still isn't getting money and if anything game rentals do affect sales. Plenty of people used to rent short games instead of buying them. Pretty sure the developer never sees a dime from the multiple rentals.
i don't give a single fuck about what affects sales, at all
i don't care if it negatively affects sales or positively affects sales
i have no interest in that whatsoever, i just don't give a shit
what i care about is giving artists compensation for their work, and if you want to argue that renting games is immoral, then that's an idea that i'm open to
I believe the artist should get 100% of the money, but the world just doesn't work that way. Game rentals are absolutely immoral, the developer is definitely being cheated out of sales. Also you can't say you don't care about sales and then say the developer is owed sales.
3828
« on: September 23, 2017, 01:05:15 PM »
like anyone pirates games with the intent of spreading the good word about it anyway
get the FUCK out of here
game pirates are literal saints
it's okay to admit you're wrong
But it's you guys who are wrong.
Piracy isn't a bad thing.
is what what it looks like when challengerX completely gives up
That's all piracy is about. Sales. If it doesn't impact sales, where's the harm? It doesn't sit well with you morally? Who cares lmao
Intelligent people.
Don't you get tired of saying the same dumb shit every time you back yourself into a corner?
what corner am i backed into
your corner is "i don't care about morality because i'm a worthless nihilistic cunt"
my "corner" is "i care about morality because i actually consider myself slightly intelligent and i try to be a good person"
who wins
How is it immoral if it isn't harming anyone?
What gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for?
I asked first
Because nothing gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for.
Answer my question. What's immoral about pirating if no one is being harmed?
Because nothing gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for.
But you aren't doing anything wrong to anyone. It isn't theft. This is hilarious. As always you know you're wrong.
It's theft.
That 300 page study says otherwise.
Taking something that costs money without paying is still theft whether it affects sales or not.
It doesn't cost money.
So it's free?
So why the fuck would you pirate it?
It's not physical. It wasn't sold to gamestop for it to then be sold there etc.
This is the point. Piracy isn't destroying game sales like everybody (especially you) acts like it is.
It's either free or it isn't.
I've never once acted like piracy destroys sales and I've conceded several times over the past five years that it doesn't affect sales at all.
Because it doesn't fucking MATTER.
That's all that matters.
Nope. People should be directly compensated for their art if that's what they're asking for. You're a bad person.
I'm more than happy to pay the artist directly for their work, as well as producers and distributors.
If people want to download a game or a movie however, it's not the end of the world. Not even close.
Am I saying it's the end of the world, or am I saying it's wrong?
Did you just admit that it's wrong?
How is it wrong? The developer is still making fat stacks
Because they're still owed money regardless of how many fat stacks they're making.
If a developer doesn't give a shit, then that's big of them. But they're still owed money.
You could say the exact same about game rentals, yet you don't. You said you don't care about it being a crime, but now you do? Because game rental places are "legal"?
3829
« on: September 23, 2017, 01:03:48 PM »
There's nothing wrong with emulating old games
Yes there is, especially if they were just rereleased (like Pokémon Gold/Silver).
Why should you buy the remaster (or whatever this is I don't care about Pokémon) instead of emulating it?
Because then you'd be a thief and a bad person. You're not supporting the company that produced the game, and you no longer have the excuse of "it's an old game that they're not profiting from anymore."
But they're just rehashing an old game. I don't really see how they deserve the money that badly.
3830
« on: September 23, 2017, 01:02:28 PM »
You might as well say game rental places engage in daily theft.
Except that's completely different because game rental places are providing a legitimate service. They're a legal business. Pirates are not legal business owners.
Sounds like a racket to me. They buy a game once and then make profit off of that one copy multiple times?
If you think renting games should be illegal, that's fine—I don't see a problem with them, because someone bought one copy of a game to share with others for a limited time and fee. But someone paid for the one game.
Whereas pirates illegally produce more copies of the game and that's what makes them pieces of shit.
But the developer still isn't getting money and if anything game rentals do affect sales. Plenty of people used to rent short games instead of buying them. Pretty sure the developer never sees a dime from the multiple rentals.
3831
« on: September 23, 2017, 01:00:19 PM »
I'm gonna head off to the store and just shoplift a little bit. I wouldn't have paid for any of those goods anyway so it's not theft because it didn't affect their sales.
It's theft because the store paid for those goods from the producers of those goods and a lot of money has swapped hands.
This is digital.
And the digital copy costs money on digital distribution platforms.
I might be wrong but I'm pretty sure it only costs money when they make a sale, as in they sign a contract to sell it on Steam or whatever and then Steam collects their percentage on every sale of the game. Otherwise yeah it would be theft if the developers have to pay Steam upfront and then make their money back. It's pretty much no different than stealing a physical game from a store.
3832
« on: September 23, 2017, 12:57:58 PM »
There's nothing wrong with emulating old games
Yes there is, especially if they were just rereleased (like Pokémon Gold/Silver).
Why should you buy the remaster (or whatever this is I don't care about Pokémon) instead of emulating it?
3833
« on: September 23, 2017, 12:56:38 PM »
like anyone pirates games with the intent of spreading the good word about it anyway
get the FUCK out of here
game pirates are literal saints
it's okay to admit you're wrong
But it's you guys who are wrong.
Piracy isn't a bad thing.
is what what it looks like when challengerX completely gives up
That's all piracy is about. Sales. If it doesn't impact sales, where's the harm? It doesn't sit well with you morally? Who cares lmao
Intelligent people.
Don't you get tired of saying the same dumb shit every time you back yourself into a corner?
what corner am i backed into
your corner is "i don't care about morality because i'm a worthless nihilistic cunt"
my "corner" is "i care about morality because i actually consider myself slightly intelligent and i try to be a good person"
who wins
How is it immoral if it isn't harming anyone?
What gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for?
I asked first
Because nothing gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for.
Answer my question. What's immoral about pirating if no one is being harmed?
Because nothing gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for.
But you aren't doing anything wrong to anyone. It isn't theft. This is hilarious. As always you know you're wrong.
It's theft.
That 300 page study says otherwise.
Taking something that costs money without paying is still theft whether it affects sales or not.
It doesn't cost money.
So it's free?
So why the fuck would you pirate it?
It's not physical. It wasn't sold to gamestop for it to then be sold there etc.
This is the point. Piracy isn't destroying game sales like everybody (especially you) acts like it is.
It's either free or it isn't.
I've never once acted like piracy destroys sales and I've conceded several times over the past five years that it doesn't affect sales at all.
Because it doesn't fucking MATTER.
That's all that matters.
Nope. People should be directly compensated for their art if that's what they're asking for. You're a bad person.
I'm more than happy to pay the artist directly for their work, as well as producers and distributors.
If people want to download a game or a movie however, it's not the end of the world. Not even close.
Am I saying it's the end of the world, or am I saying it's wrong?
Did you just admit that it's wrong?
How is it wrong? The developer is still making fat stacks
3834
« on: September 23, 2017, 12:55:55 PM »
You might as well say game rental places engage in daily theft.
Except that's completely different because game rental places are providing a legitimate service. They're a legal business. Pirates are not legal business owners.
Sounds like a racket to me. They buy a game once and then make profit off of that one copy multiple times?
3835
« on: September 23, 2017, 12:54:45 PM »
"Who cares" is not an argument and if you keep saying it I'm just gonna use it against you too.
lmao why do you care if people pirate when it doesn't hurt the developers?
3836
« on: September 23, 2017, 12:54:10 PM »
like anyone pirates games with the intent of spreading the good word about it anyway
get the FUCK out of here
game pirates are literal saints
it's okay to admit you're wrong
But it's you guys who are wrong.
Piracy isn't a bad thing.
is what what it looks like when challengerX completely gives up
That's all piracy is about. Sales. If it doesn't impact sales, where's the harm? It doesn't sit well with you morally? Who cares lmao
Intelligent people.
Don't you get tired of saying the same dumb shit every time you back yourself into a corner?
what corner am i backed into
your corner is "i don't care about morality because i'm a worthless nihilistic cunt"
my "corner" is "i care about morality because i actually consider myself slightly intelligent and i try to be a good person"
who wins
How is it immoral if it isn't harming anyone?
What gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for?
I asked first
Because nothing gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for.
Answer my question. What's immoral about pirating if no one is being harmed?
Because nothing gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for.
But you aren't doing anything wrong to anyone. It isn't theft. This is hilarious. As always you know you're wrong.
It's theft.
That 300 page study says otherwise.
Taking something that costs money without paying is still theft whether it affects sales or not.
It doesn't cost money.
So it's free?
So why the fuck would you pirate it?
It's not physical. It wasn't sold to gamestop for it to then be sold there etc.
This is the point. Piracy isn't destroying game sales like everybody (especially you) acts like it is.
It's either free or it isn't.
I've never once acted like piracy destroys sales and I've conceded several times over the past five years that it doesn't affect sales at all.
Because it doesn't fucking MATTER.
That's all that matters.
Nope. People should be directly compensated for their art if that's what they're asking for. You're a bad person.
I'm more than happy to pay the artist directly for their work, as well as producers and distributors. If people want to download a game or a movie however, it's not the end of the world. Not even close.
3837
« on: September 23, 2017, 12:52:23 PM »
I'm gonna head off to the store and just shoplift a little bit. I wouldn't have paid for any of those goods anyway so it's not theft because it didn't affect their sales.
It's theft because the store paid for those goods from the producers of those goods and a lot of money has swapped hands.
This is digital.
But it doesn't affect their sales so it's okay.
It does in a myriad of ways.
I wouldn't have paid for it anyway!
The shampoo was produced, distributed, but not sold. You're fucking many people over, the store gets a bad reputation because thievery is common, and so on and so on. Downloading a game isn't harming anyone, so why make it such a big deal? You might as well say game rental places engage in daily theft.
3838
« on: September 23, 2017, 12:50:30 PM »
like anyone pirates games with the intent of spreading the good word about it anyway
get the FUCK out of here
game pirates are literal saints
it's okay to admit you're wrong
But it's you guys who are wrong.
Piracy isn't a bad thing.
is what what it looks like when challengerX completely gives up
That's all piracy is about. Sales. If it doesn't impact sales, where's the harm? It doesn't sit well with you morally? Who cares lmao
Intelligent people.
Don't you get tired of saying the same dumb shit every time you back yourself into a corner?
what corner am i backed into
your corner is "i don't care about morality because i'm a worthless nihilistic cunt"
my "corner" is "i care about morality because i actually consider myself slightly intelligent and i try to be a good person"
who wins
How is it immoral if it isn't harming anyone?
What gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for?
I asked first
Because nothing gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for.
Answer my question. What's immoral about pirating if no one is being harmed?
Because nothing gives you the moral right to use products that you haven't paid for.
But you aren't doing anything wrong to anyone. It isn't theft. This is hilarious. As always you know you're wrong.
It's theft.
That 300 page study says otherwise.
Taking something that costs money without paying is still theft whether it affects sales or not.
It doesn't cost money.
So it's free?
So why the fuck would you pirate it?
It's not physical. It wasn't sold to gamestop for it to then be sold there etc.
This is the point. Piracy isn't destroying game sales like everybody (especially you) acts like it is.
It's either free or it isn't.
I've never once acted like piracy destroys sales and I've conceded several times over the past five years that it doesn't affect sales at all.
Because it doesn't fucking MATTER.
That's all that matters. As long as it isn't impacting the industry in a negative way, who cares? If people want to "steal" shit, it doesn't really matter.
3839
« on: September 23, 2017, 12:49:12 PM »
It's like a food cart saying it specifically lost a certain amount of money because it didn't get the prime spot on the block to generate sales. It's irrelevant.
3840
« on: September 23, 2017, 12:47:57 PM »
I'm gonna head off to the store and just shoplift a little bit. I wouldn't have paid for any of those goods anyway so it's not theft because it didn't affect their sales.
It's theft because the store paid for those goods from the producers of those goods and a lot of money has swapped hands.
This is digital.
But it doesn't affect their sales so it's okay.
It does in a myriad of ways.
Pages: 1 ... 126127128 129130 ... 1397
|
Show Posts