Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - challengerX

Pages: 1 ... 123412351236 12371238 ... 1397
37051
Serious / Re: Student Killed defending teen girls from harassment
« on: December 02, 2014, 03:38:51 AM »
Quote
that two teenage girls were being harassed by three grown men.

That statement is severely lacking context. The guy who violently hit Albayrak was only 18.

I'm assuming the "teenage girls" are probably 16-17. Hell 18-19 could still be considered a teenager.

Anyway the girls and the guys were probably part of the same group and they came to the McDonalds together. I can't say what the girls did but I know they probably instigated the incident in the bathroom.
What the fuck?

You fucking degenerate piece of trash. How fucking dare you talk shit about this woman who saved 2 girls from 3 men? They INSTIGATED IT? You KNOW this? Get the fuck outta here you limp dick faggot.

Only a basement dwelling loser would complain and argue about somebody doing something heroic. Go back to posting about how you don't give a fuck because when you do give a fuck you're retarded beyond all belief. You fucking sissy piece of shit. A girl died helping people and you're in here arguing.

lolumad?
I'm disgusted.

37052
The Flood / Re: British food >>>>
« on: December 02, 2014, 03:30:27 AM »
You done trying to make me vomit?

37053
Serious / Re: Is the Israeli State tantamount to Middle Eastern Stability?
« on: December 02, 2014, 03:24:20 AM »
Nah

Just after Israel formed, issues began to rise and have continued to this day. Israel is counter-productive to Middle-Eastern stability and a catalyst of aggression by many others. Nations like Turkey, UAE, Qatar, and a lesser extent of Saudi Arabia and Egypt (though African) are the better alternatives
>Saudi Arabia
>a positive example ever

You just compared one of the worst regimes for human rights to Turkey.
I did say to a lesser extent. It's not a pretty place for many things, but there are other things it is good at. At least its not Iraq and Syria with blood-crazed killers on the loose
Because blood crazed killers with power and millions of dollars is far better.

37054
Serious / Re: Student Killed defending teen girls from harassment
« on: December 02, 2014, 03:21:08 AM »
Quote
that two teenage girls were being harassed by three grown men.

That statement is severely lacking context. The guy who violently hit Albayrak was only 18.

I'm assuming the "teenage girls" are probably 16-17. Hell 18-19 could still be considered a teenager.

Anyway the girls and the guys were probably part of the same group and they came to the McDonalds together. I can't say what the girls did but I know they probably instigated the incident in the bathroom.
What the fuck?

You fucking degenerate piece of trash. How fucking dare you talk shit about this woman who saved 2 girls from 3 men? They INSTIGATED IT? You KNOW this? Get the fuck outta here you limp dick faggot.

Only a basement dwelling loser would complain and argue about somebody doing something heroic. Go back to posting about how you don't give a fuck because when you do give a fuck you're retarded beyond all belief. You fucking sissy piece of shit. A girl died helping people and you're in here arguing.

37056
Serious / Re: Religion and it's place in classrooms
« on: December 01, 2014, 06:25:20 PM »
It has no place in the classroom.

37057
The Flood / Re: Nuka is a nuke.
« on: December 01, 2014, 05:32:49 PM »
Nukes aren't canon.

37058
The Flood / Re: Feminism isn't canoes
« on: December 01, 2014, 05:31:27 PM »
But will it blend

37059
Serious / Re: It's ogre. Bongistanople has fallen to the SJW.
« on: December 01, 2014, 05:29:25 PM »
What always kills me about these public discussions is that the typical SJW-types just say stuff that is essentially clap-bait. From this video:

Middle guy: "Well it's uncomfortable but here are some statistics and conclusions that we can draw about Muslim men and rape proclivity"

*crowd boos and women on panel act disgusted"

Guy on left: "It doesn't matter who rapes, what really matters is that we all know that rape is bad. I think we can all agree that rape is completely unacceptable."

*Crowd goes wild with applause*

Yeah, no shit. Rape is bad. Jerking each other off while parroting that back and forth isn't solving jack shit.

37060
Serious / Re: Something I need to get off my chest
« on: December 01, 2014, 05:24:22 PM »
I'm glad you're open about it.

Anybody who does think differently was never worth being friends with anyway.

37061
The Flood / Re: The Liberals are being retarded again...
« on: December 01, 2014, 05:05:19 PM »
How does this have anything to do with politics?

None of this is canon anyway.

37062
The Flood / Re: The plane scene was non-canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 05:02:39 PM »
Perhaps he's wondering why you would kill a man before telling him it isn't canon.

37063
The Flood / Re: parody threads aren't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:43:51 PM »
Actually if they draw from the original thread it can be considered canon, but it's not a "concrete rule" so to speak.

This post isn't canon.
Actually explaining if something is or isn't canon is always canon.

That rule isn't canon.
It was declared canon 30 years ago so it's canon for all of us under 30 years old.

You can't declare something canon, that makes it non-canon.
I didn't declare it. It was declared, and I'm exposing that it was declared canon so my post is canon because it pertains to the fact that I'm providing an explanation of what is and isn't canon.

That isn't canon though, you can't make non-canon into canon. It cannot be changed. But that isn't canon either.
It was already canon.

It never was canon. This is canon.
It always has been canon.

No, it never was canon.
Yes it was.

No, it wasn't.
Yes, it was.

37064
The Flood / Re: parody threads aren't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:41:27 PM »
Actually if they draw from the original thread it can be considered canon, but it's not a "concrete rule" so to speak.

This post isn't canon.
Actually explaining if something is or isn't canon is always canon.

That rule isn't canon.
It was declared canon 30 years ago so it's canon for all of us under 30 years old.

You can't declare something canon, that makes it non-canon.
I didn't declare it. It was declared, and I'm exposing that it was declared canon so my post is canon because it pertains to the fact that I'm providing an explanation of what is and isn't canon.

That isn't canon though, you can't make non-canon into canon. It cannot be changed. But that isn't canon either.
It was already canon.

It never was canon. This is canon.
It always has been canon.

No, it never was canon.
Yes it was.

37065
The Flood / Re: parody threads aren't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:40:31 PM »
Actually if they draw from the original thread it can be considered canon, but it's not a "concrete rule" so to speak.

This post isn't canon.
Actually explaining if something is or isn't canon is always canon.

That rule isn't canon.
It was declared canon 30 years ago so it's canon for all of us under 30 years old.

You can't declare something canon, that makes it non-canon.
I didn't declare it. It was declared, and I'm exposing that it was declared canon so my post is canon because it pertains to the fact that I'm providing an explanation of what is and isn't canon.

That isn't canon though, you can't make non-canon into canon. It cannot be changed. But that isn't canon either.
It was already canon.

It never was canon. This is canon.
It always has been canon.

37066
The Flood / Re: This canoe is canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:39:59 PM »
It is.

37067
The Flood / Re: parody threads aren't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:39:25 PM »
Actually if they draw from the original thread it can be considered canon, but it's not a "concrete rule" so to speak.

This post isn't canon.
Actually explaining if something is or isn't canon is always canon.

That rule isn't canon.
It was declared canon 30 years ago so it's canon for all of us under 30 years old.

You can't declare something canon, that makes it non-canon.
I didn't declare it. It was declared, and I'm exposing that it was declared canon so my post is canon because it pertains to the fact that I'm providing an explanation of what is and isn't canon.

That isn't canon though, you can't make non-canon into canon. It cannot be changed. But that isn't canon either.
It was already canon.

37068
The Flood / Re: This isn't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:38:01 PM »
Actually it is.

37069
The Flood / Re: parody threads aren't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:37:29 PM »
Actually if they draw from the original thread it can be considered canon, but it's not a "concrete rule" so to speak.

This post isn't canon.
Actually explaining if something is or isn't canon is always canon.

That rule isn't canon.
It was declared canon 30 years ago so it's canon for all of us under 30 years old.

You can't declare something canon, that makes it non-canon.
I didn't declare it. It was declared, and I'm exposing that it was declared canon so my post is canon because it pertains to the fact that I'm providing an explanation of what is and isn't canon.

37070
The Flood / Re: forum moderation isn't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:36:15 PM »
Master Forum Ninjas are canon but the rest aren't. And Cheat is kind of in a grey area, but I'd say he's canon.

37071
The Flood / Re: parody threads aren't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:35:21 PM »
Actually if they draw from the original thread it can be considered canon, but it's not a "concrete rule" so to speak.

This post isn't canon.
Actually explaining if something is or isn't canon is always canon.

That rule isn't canon.
It was declared canon 30 years ago so it's canon for all of us under 30 years old.

37072
The Flood / Re: parody threads aren't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:34:11 PM »
Actually if they draw from the original thread it can be considered canon, but it's not a "concrete rule" so to speak.

This post isn't canon.
Actually explaining if something is or isn't canon is always canon.

37073
The Flood / Re: The universe isn't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:33:31 PM »
It's part of a larger extended universe so it is canon.

That's not canon, either.
It's canon because it's been around for 30 years. That's a long time and I'm not 30 so it's canon. If you're older than 30 it isn't canon. For you.

37074
The Flood / Re: parody threads aren't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:32:23 PM »
Actually if they draw from the original thread it can be considered canon, but it's not a "concrete rule" so to speak.

37075
The Flood / Re: The universe isn't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:31:35 PM »
It's part of a larger extended universe so it is canon.

37076
The Flood / Re: This Galaxy isn't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:31:03 PM »
But it contains the EU so technically it's canon when related to some human matters.

But yes, generally this galaxy isn't canon.

37077
The Flood / Re: This forum isn't canon.
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:29:01 PM »
considering the US invented the Internet I'd say only sites based in the US are canon and Disney created all the other sites to appeal to different nations
It's not part of the EU so it's not canon.

37078
The Flood / Re: Have anyone
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:28:13 PM »
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Is this English?
The important question here is if it's canon.

37079
The Flood / This forum isn't canon.
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:25:28 PM »
It's not based in the European Union so it's not canon.

37080
The Flood / Re: Having sex isn't canon
« on: December 01, 2014, 04:24:37 PM »
But if you don't use a rubber it's canon.

Pages: 1 ... 123412351236 12371238 ... 1397