This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - challengerX
Pages: 1 ... 123012311232 12331234 ... 1397
36931
« on: December 04, 2014, 04:41:54 AM »
Posting this here because I'm buttmad the thread got locked.
I'm going to put this in simple terms.
You feel less. You lose 70,000 nerve endings. You last longer because your penis is less sensitive thus you feel far less pleasure.
Rub your finger slowly across your palm. That's what a normal penis feels. Now do the same to the top of your hand. That's what you feel. There is no need for circumcision. We have clean water.
Understand yet?
Are you purposely ignoring me or are you legitimately this disengaged in the argument that you think repeating the same false statistic over and over again is going to be any more convincing than the last time? And yes I mean what I say when I say false statistic. An uncircumcised penis has at most 20,000 nerve endings. How are you supposed to lose 70,000 of them by cutting off the foreskin? Please cite your sources because none of what you're saying seems to hold true.
Scroll down to the bottom of page 866 (http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/bju_6685.pdf). That is the difference between the feeling of a circumcised penis and an uncircumcised penis. Not only is the difference small and negligible, but because psychology is relative and not numerical, the difference is yet even less than that (and feel free to argue with me on that instead of just repeating the same defeated argument for the fourth time now).
http://thecircumcisiondecision.com/20000-nerve-endings/Enjoy being a dickless Jew. There's nothing relative about this, you guys are in denial because 1. You've never had an uncircumcised penis 2. You don't want to accept the fact that you enjoy sex far less Up to 70,000 nerve endings can be lost, according to recent and more valid studies not conducted by Jews in denial. Good day.
36932
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:53:29 PM »
Because you're not on an iPhone.
36933
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:41:12 PM »
Oh, also, Three Men in a Boat.
36934
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:39:11 PM »
If you've reached the bottom of the barrel with the "why should we let people give birth without consent" in a circumcision debate, you know you're on the wrong side. Why? Because you... can't argue against the logic?...
I think having kids is wrong, for the same exact reason you seem to think circumcision is wrong. You think it should be up to the patient. I think it should be up to the patient.
You just seem to think that circumcision is a lot worse than, you know, life itself. I think that's petty.
You realize a patient can be asked if he wants to be mutilated where as you can't talk to a guy's balls and ask the sperm if they want to be made into a baby, right? "LISTEN UP SPERM. SOME OF YOU WONT MAKE IT TODAY, BUT ITS THE PRICE WE HAVE TO PAY TO MAKE A BABY. POLLS CLOSE AT 8PM SO GET YOUR VOTES IN." You're a lunatic.
36935
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:35:51 PM »
Just because you don't see it as a problem doesn't mean it's not a problem. No shit. Do not patronize me.
Kindly demonstrate why it's a problem.
Because it's a loss of sexual nerves, basically genital mutilation without consent, and it can make erections painful for circumcised men since the skin can be cut very tight.
I remember reading you lose upwards of 50,000 nerve endings when the foreskin is removed.
Basically, slowly rub your finger across your palm, then do the same to the top of your hand. The former being normal, the latter being a circumcised penis.
Holy fuck, I'm actually really glad I'm cut then. I am way too fucking sensitive to touch so as it is.
People don't seem to understand the psychology behind it. You're not experiencing any less of a feeling after you're circumcised, the feeling is relative not numerical. And even if it does have a small effect I don't see how that's a bad thing. Who doesn't want to last longer in bed?
Up to 70,000 nerve endings can be lost. You last longer because it's like you're wearing a thick tin foil condom.
You literally just repeated the same argument I just countered. Unless you have anything to say about my rebuttal, don't bother wasting time repeating the same argument I just read.
Right, and you keep ignoring my argument and science in favor of ignorance and the failure to understand you don't feel half the pleasure people with normal penises do.
It's actually pretty funny how in denial you guys are.
Look back and read what I wrote:
"People don't seem to understand the psychology behind it. You're not experiencing any less of a feeling after you're circumcised, the feeling is relative not numerical."
Tell me what you think my argument is in your own words.
I'm going to put this in simple terms.
You feel less. You lose 70,000 nerve endings. You last longer because your penis is less sensitive thus you feel far less pleasure.
Rub your finger slowly across your palm. That's what a normal penis feels. Now do the same to the top of your hand. That's what you feel. There is no need for circumcision. We have clean water.
Understand yet?
Honestly, that sounds like torture for me.
Yeah, all the pleasure you feel from that sensitivity is terrible, really. Whatever lets you guys sleep at night.
36936
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:32:16 PM »
Just because you don't see it as a problem doesn't mean it's not a problem. No shit. Do not patronize me.
Kindly demonstrate why it's a problem.
Because it's a loss of sexual nerves, basically genital mutilation without consent, and it can make erections painful for circumcised men since the skin can be cut very tight.
I remember reading you lose upwards of 50,000 nerve endings when the foreskin is removed.
Basically, slowly rub your finger across your palm, then do the same to the top of your hand. The former being normal, the latter being a circumcised penis.
Holy fuck, I'm actually really glad I'm cut then. I am way too fucking sensitive to touch so as it is.
People don't seem to understand the psychology behind it. You're not experiencing any less of a feeling after you're circumcised, the feeling is relative not numerical. And even if it does have a small effect I don't see how that's a bad thing. Who doesn't want to last longer in bed?
Up to 70,000 nerve endings can be lost. You last longer because it's like you're wearing a thick tin foil condom.
You literally just repeated the same argument I just countered. Unless you have anything to say about my rebuttal, don't bother wasting time repeating the same argument I just read.
Right, and you keep ignoring my argument and science in favor of ignorance and the failure to understand you don't feel half the pleasure people with normal penises do.
It's actually pretty funny how in denial you guys are.
Look back and read what I wrote:
"People don't seem to understand the psychology behind it. You're not experiencing any less of a feeling after you're circumcised, the feeling is relative not numerical."
Tell me what you think my argument is in your own words.
I'm going to put this in simple terms. You feel less. You lose 70,000 nerve endings. You last longer because your penis is less sensitive thus you feel far less pleasure. Rub your finger slowly across your palm. That's what a normal penis feels. Now do the same to the top of your hand. That's what you feel. There is no need for circumcision. We have clean water. Understand yet?
36937
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:27:33 PM »
Just because you don't see it as a problem doesn't mean it's not a problem. No shit. Do not patronize me.
Kindly demonstrate why it's a problem.
Because it's a loss of sexual nerves, basically genital mutilation without consent, and it can make erections painful for circumcised men since the skin can be cut very tight.
I remember reading you lose upwards of 50,000 nerve endings when the foreskin is removed.
Basically, slowly rub your finger across your palm, then do the same to the top of your hand. The former being normal, the latter being a circumcised penis.
Holy fuck, I'm actually really glad I'm cut then. I am way too fucking sensitive to touch so as it is.
People don't seem to understand the psychology behind it. You're not experiencing any less of a feeling after you're circumcised, the feeling is relative not numerical. And even if it does have a small effect I don't see how that's a bad thing. Who doesn't want to last longer in bed?
Up to 70,000 nerve endings can be lost. You last longer because it's like you're wearing a thick tin foil condom.
You literally just repeated the same argument I just countered. Unless you have anything to say about my rebuttal, don't bother wasting time repeating the same argument I just read.
Right, and you keep ignoring my argument and science in favor of ignorance and the failure to understand you don't feel half the pleasure people with normal penises do. It's actually pretty funny how in denial you guys are.
36938
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:23:50 PM »
Just because you don't see it as a problem doesn't mean it's not a problem. No shit. Do not patronize me.
Kindly demonstrate why it's a problem.
Because it's a loss of sexual nerves, basically genital mutilation without consent, and it can make erections painful for circumcised men since the skin can be cut very tight.
I remember reading you lose upwards of 50,000 nerve endings when the foreskin is removed.
Basically, slowly rub your finger across your palm, then do the same to the top of your hand. The former being normal, the latter being a circumcised penis.
Holy fuck, I'm actually really glad I'm cut then. I am way too fucking sensitive to touch so as it is.
People don't seem to understand the psychology behind it. You're not experiencing any less of a feeling after you're circumcised, the feeling is relative not numerical. And even if it does have a small effect I don't see how that's a bad thing. Who doesn't want to last longer in bed?
Up to 70,000 nerve endings can be lost. You last longer because it's like you're wearing a thick tin foil condom.
36939
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:21:25 PM »
Just because you don't see it as a problem doesn't mean it's not a problem. No shit. Do not patronize me.
Kindly demonstrate why it's a problem.
Because it's a loss of sexual nerves
Fewer nerves = less sensitivity. I'm okay with that. I don't want to get a stiffy from a soft spring breeze.
basically genital mutilation without consent until you're 18, your parents are in charge of your medical choices and it can make erections painful for circumcised men since the skin can be cut very tight. Yes, it's possible.
Just because they can make the decision does not hide the fact from what it really is.
Mutilation? Everything still works as designed.
The human penis was designed with a foreskin. It's like saying a car missing a steering wheel still works as designed. It was not designed that way.
No, it would be like if you took off the entirely-unnecessary spoiler on your grocery-getter hatchback.
Who are you to decide what's necessary or unnecessary?
I'm not anyone to decide. I'm not having kids so it's not a decision I'll ever have to make. If I were, I'd leave it up to them.
Would you like to provide some sources? Because not only are you wrong, you're being really ignorant about this. Any doctor worth a damn would agree with me. There is factual evidence proving me right. There is absolutely no need to mutilate a baby and ruin his future sex life because off the ridiculous notion that you can't keep your penis clean without cutting off the foreskin.
36940
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:16:31 PM »
Basically you enjoy sex a lot less having a circumcised penis. Thankfully you don't know what you're missing so I'll leave you to delude yourself into thinking you're better off than I am.  This is how you argue with everyone, isn't it? So obnoxious.
No, you're gonna have to provide hard evidence for your claims. I really don't buy the idea that foreskin makes sex better. That, to me, seems ludicrous. It's fucking... what is it? It's protective skin. Itch skin. It's not sensual skin. It has absolutely nothing to do with good sex. It's to prevent your cock from getting pricked by pricker bushes and shit--you know, the kind of stuff you're not running around in anymore? So we should KEEP artifacts for no reason?
Calm down. http://thecircumcisiondecision.com/20000-nerve-endings/
36941
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:12:08 PM »
Just because you don't see it as a problem doesn't mean it's not a problem. No shit. Do not patronize me.
Kindly demonstrate why it's a problem.
Because it's a loss of sexual nerves, basically genital mutilation without consent, and it can make erections painful for circumcised men since the skin can be cut very tight.
I remember reading you lose upwards of 50,000 nerve endings when the foreskin is removed.
Basically, slowly rub your finger across your palm, then do the same to the top of your hand. The former being normal, the latter being a circumcised penis.
BUT MUH NIRVES!
Basically you enjoy sex a lot less having a circumcised penis. Thankfully you don't know what you're missing so I'll leave you to delude yourself into thinking you're better off than I am.
#sickburn
Really though, I'd be fucked if my dick was more sensitive. I wouldn't last a minute.
That's your problem. Doesn't mean we should mutilate babies' genitals. I know that it needs to be done at infancy for best results, but it's really barbaric and extremely unnecessary.
36942
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:08:15 PM »
Just because you don't see it as a problem doesn't mean it's not a problem. No shit. Do not patronize me.
Kindly demonstrate why it's a problem.
Because it's a loss of sexual nerves, basically genital mutilation without consent, and it can make erections painful for circumcised men since the skin can be cut very tight.
I remember reading you lose upwards of 50,000 nerve endings when the foreskin is removed.
Basically, slowly rub your finger across your palm, then do the same to the top of your hand. The former being normal, the latter being a circumcised penis.
BUT MUH NIRVES!
Basically you enjoy sex a lot less having a circumcised penis. Thankfully you don't know what you're missing so I'll leave you to delude yourself into thinking you're better off than I am.
36943
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:05:57 PM »
Just because you don't see it as a problem doesn't mean it's not a problem. No shit. Do not patronize me.
Kindly demonstrate why it's a problem.
Because it's a loss of sexual nerves, basically genital mutilation without consent, and it can make erections painful for circumcised men since the skin can be cut very tight.
I remember reading you lose upwards of 50,000 nerve endings when the foreskin is removed. Basically, slowly rub your finger across your palm, then do the same to the top of your hand. The former being normal, the latter being a circumcised penis.
36944
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:01:53 PM »
I put this in serious because I want an actual serious discussion about this.
God damn it... most of my rebuttals against it are comical in nature. Like, they look better and don't make cheese. You don't have to put them in your mouth, so why do you care?
Everything else just comes across as poorly as trying to defend New Earth Creationism via appeal to tradition.
Uh... since you brought it up, what is that stuff that grows in the "ridge" so to speak? Mold or something?
36945
« on: December 03, 2014, 05:56:55 PM »
It's always the people I don't know that make these threads.
He is rich, lives in Florida, drives a lambo, and is like seventeen. Now humor him.
Nothing about his personality? Seems like a dull guy.
Laidback guy who just likes to have pleasant conversations and talk about cars, pretty much.
36946
« on: December 03, 2014, 05:55:13 PM »
It's always the people I don't know that make these threads.
He is rich, lives in Florida, drives a lambo, and is like seventeen. Now humor him.
He is also a cool guy, likes cars, doesn't see himself as rich even though he has wealth, and is overall a good member.
No, he is not going to sleep with you and give you money.
36947
« on: December 03, 2014, 05:53:42 PM »
It's always the people I don't know that make these threads.
He is rich, lives in Florida, drives a lambo, and is like seventeen. Now humor him.
And a McLaren P1.
36948
« on: December 03, 2014, 05:40:40 PM »
Yeah I like you.
36949
« on: December 03, 2014, 05:11:44 PM »
I've only ever had Wendy's, so I'm not voting.
Was it any good? I used to eat burgers there once in a while. Mostly breakfast though.
36950
« on: December 03, 2014, 05:04:53 PM »
It's my dog.
36951
« on: December 03, 2014, 03:17:56 PM »
I hope you make it buddy.
36952
« on: December 03, 2014, 03:00:25 PM »
KILL HIM
36953
« on: December 03, 2014, 02:05:11 PM »
Guys... can we not instigate an argument about how it seems to some people that others are trying to instigate arguments? As long as challengerX is still here, he's going to be on my ass about literally everything that I say, and it's really fair, because people tend to suffer from confirmation bias. If you didn't already like me, his incessant scrutiny over my posts will prevent them from ever coming to terms with me. He's a child.
Well maybe if you stopped bullshitting people and sticker to what you said you were going to do, I wouldn't say a god damn thing. But you posted 5 or 6 times trying to get people to argue with you. Everybody ignored you in the other thread, but to do it in another thread is very indicative of how you no real intention of delivering on your promises. It's not about confirmation bias, it's the fact that we all noticed what you were doing. I hope to be proven wrong, but I seriously doubt it.
36954
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:56:09 PM »
But you know damn well what I mean and I'm not talking about Star Wars, I'm talking about your attitude. No, you're talking about my personality. If you expect someone to be able to change their personality at the flip of a switch, I'm sorry, but you're dumb. And trying to incite an argument. Drop it.
I'm not arguing.
No, you're arguing, because I'm saying that you're wrong, but then you maintain that you're right. That's basically what an argument is, and that's basically what you say you don't want to happen, but you're causing it. You're a hypocrite. I'm done with you.
I am right. You're the one thinking this is an argument. It isn't. You're just too stubborn to really change your ways and you're still the sensitive little bitch you always have been.
36955
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:52:01 PM »
But you know damn well what I mean and I'm not talking about Star Wars, I'm talking about your attitude. No, you're talking about my personality. If you expect someone to be able to change their personality at the flip of a switch, I'm sorry, but you're dumb. And trying to incite an argument. Drop it.
I'm not arguing. I'm trying to remind you that you said certain things and seem to be acting like you always have. Which I knew you would do. Frankly, I wouldn't have allowed you back here.
36956
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:49:30 PM »
I would but you aren't canon.
36957
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:48:47 PM »
"Change your attitude and start hating the prequels like everyone else."
You're completely welcome to your opinions. I don't understand the prequel hatred myself, I enjoyed them. But you know damn well what I mean and I'm not talking about Star Wars, I'm talking about your attitude.
36958
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:46:34 PM »
If your idea of fun is to instigate arguments Again, not what I was doing. Be delusional.
Don't fall off your bike doing all that back pedaling. Seriously. You apologized, people accepted it. Change your attitude and improve your life.
36959
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:39:47 PM »
NO FUN ALLOWED. kk
If your idea of fun is to instigate arguments after promising not to and "apologizing" to people you were unnecessarily hostile towards, then hey, you're on your way to getting permabanned again. I knew you were full of shit.
36960
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:32:10 PM »
This is what happens when we allow communists in our forum.
Pages: 1 ... 123012311232 12331234 ... 1397
|
Show Posts