This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - challengerX
Pages: 1 ... 117711781179 11801181 ... 1397
35341
« on: January 08, 2015, 04:25:20 PM »
Easy now people.
FUCK YOUR COUCH
What the hell does that saying mean? My roommates use it all the time, and I'd never heard it until just a few weeks ago. Is this some new thing?
It's from the Chapelle show. It's like "fuck your shit/belongings".
35342
« on: January 08, 2015, 04:23:38 PM »
I was being serious then, but saying outlandish statements like you use the euro or nobody cares about a certain individual is indicative of trying get a response
. . .
Saying anything on a forum is indicative of trying to get a response.
You see, son, that's how conversations work.
. . .
I meant response in the manner of people getting all upset
You're bad at this game, daddy, mommy is better than you
I hope you're ready to give him head because...
35343
« on: January 08, 2015, 04:22:40 PM »
OP is certified dank.
35344
« on: January 08, 2015, 04:21:09 PM »
constitution is a piece of paper that still exists. the guy is just dirt now
>as if the same doesn't hold for Humean ideas
You ought to think things through before you speak.
35345
« on: January 08, 2015, 04:12:01 PM »
35346
« on: January 08, 2015, 04:08:54 PM »
>caring what some old dead guy thinks
Okay then, I'll just sit here and wait for you to repudiate the Constitution of America. . .
Go ahead.
You're about to end his whole career.
35347
« on: January 08, 2015, 04:08:00 PM »
Easy now people.
FUCK YOUR COUCH
35348
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:49:58 PM »
GET SCREENCAPPED NIGGA WHATS UP
IMGUR BITCH
35349
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:47:06 PM »
Yeah, you're totes legit mad
He isn't mad, he's just surprised you haven't got any better at damage-control.
He is mad because and you all fell for an obvious troll. Not my fault many of you are so gullible
You're getting screencapped this time. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
35350
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:45:40 PM »
>10 euros
>writing an essay i have no idea what the subject is on
Mate, you're looking at $40
Pounds you dip.
>calling me out for damage control when you feel for a pretty easy troll
If anybody is doing damage control, it's you. So continue to stay mad
HOLY FUCKING SHIT LOL
GUYS WE GOT TROLLED
HE PURPOSEFULLY SAID 10 EUROS BECAUSE HE'S A MASTER RUSEMAN
Oh god. Please stop, my stomach hurts. I can't laugh this hard right now.
Yeah, you're totes legit mad
I'm suing you for millions if not billions of dollars if my stomach ruptures.
35351
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:43:48 PM »
LOL
Oh man this thread.
No trolling in serious pls
Then take your one sided biased thread to The Flood where it belongs.
Lol, you're mad
Why on Earth would anything going on here make me mad?
Because you're acting all pissy
Not at all. Your thread is just incredibly one sided, biased, and doesn't encourage discussion of any kind.
35352
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:42:31 PM »
>10 euros
>writing an essay i have no idea what the subject is on
Mate, you're looking at $40
Pounds you dip.
>calling me out for damage control when you feel for a pretty easy troll
If anybody is doing damage control, it's you. So continue to stay mad
HOLY FUCKING SHIT LOL GUYS WE GOT TROLLED HE PURPOSEFULLY SAID 10 EUROS BECAUSE HE'S A MASTER RUSEMAN Oh god. Please stop, my stomach hurts. I can't laugh this hard right now.
35353
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:40:01 PM »
>10 euros
>writing an essay i have no idea what the subject is on
Mate, you're looking at $40
Pounds you dip.
35354
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:39:00 PM »
LOL
Oh man this thread.
No trolling in serious pls
Then take your one sided biased thread to The Flood where it belongs.
Lol, you're mad
Why on Earth would anything going on here make me mad?
35355
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:37:29 PM »
LOL
Oh man this thread.
No trolling in serious pls
Then take your one sided biased thread to The Flood where it belongs.
35356
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:36:46 PM »
>10 euros
>writing an essay i have no idea what the subject is on
Mate, you're looking at $40
Pounds you dip.
35357
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:33:48 PM »
LOL
Oh man this thread.
35358
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:31:37 PM »
"Hey wife wanna fuck?"
"Nah."
"I'll take that as a yes 😏"
35359
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:16:28 PM »
>islamic extremists threatening Ireland, home of IRA
dis gun be gud
>implying the IRA are any good at anything
They're drug smuggling thugs. IRA are a fucking joke. As insane as Muslim extremists are, at least they have an ideology to hold to, instead of "aye m8 oi fokken h8 brits".
Then you clearly don't know much about the IRA
>Kiyo
35360
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:12:39 PM »
I would like to add this to the thread
Before we get the troll who says to just nuke all of the Middle East after this.
It isn't difficult to condemn people like this; even al-Qaeda doesn't like ISIS.
A few Muslim "leaders" in the Western world are so unbelievably inconsequential in the grand scheme of things.
First off - is there evidence to show the trio are from ISIS and not another terror organization, like Al-Qaeda?
Second off - At this point, I don't know what Muslim leaders could do to make you happy. They constantly issue statements denouncing these attacks, saying it does not represent the entirety of the Muslim people, etc - these statements include remarks from top Western allies, including Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Egypt. Short of them getting involved in conflicts like Syria, where they cannot, they are doing what they can. You constantly ignore that in anything, including your OP, and only cite examples of other extremist Muslims supporting the attackers.
Yes, there are a lot of shitty Islamist fundamentalists. We know you don't like it.
Denouncing doesn't do anything. Censoring hate speech in the mosques and launching some sort of peace campaign or some shit is better that what they're doing now.
35361
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:08:53 PM »
Seriously (lel) though, you should call social services.
35362
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:08:15 PM »
So, the baby's about two weeks old now. Lovely little thing. . . I imagine, I haven't met it.
Is it daughter material?
Dude, come on, it's two weeks old.
I don't go for mature ladies. . .
35363
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:05:48 PM »
So, the baby's about two weeks old now. Lovely little thing. . . I imagine, I haven't met it.
Is it daughter material?
35364
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:03:29 PM »
The "Freedom of Speech" thing is blown out of so many proportions. If I recall correctly (I'll look it up later, I've got morning chores to do) it was initially installed in our Government so that a person could freely express themselves in council chambers without the wrath of the Government falling on them.
That does not mean, however, you can shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater and cause a panic.
Same goes for hate speech. What "muh free speeches" people fail to realize is the emotional trauma, harm, and social discord that comes from people like the WBC. As you probably saw in that thread, a man attacked a church member during his soldier brother's funeral because the protestor was mocking his brother, discrediting his service, and saying, "I'm glad the stupid faggot is dead." The soldier got soundly punished while the protestor got to walk away laughing.
This article is a nice thing to read through, especially the parts from the Fordham Law Professor: While free speech protects people from harm, it allows unlimited emotional harm.
So basically what your argument boils down to is "delicate sensibilities take precedence over what you can and cannot say"
Yeah no. I personally do not give two shits if you become "emotionally traumatised " as a result of what I said. I do not, and never will recognise it as a justification to curtail mine, or anyone else's speech.
Yelling fire in a crowded vicinity isn't even a relevant analogy either.
I'd really like to see you not lose your shit when somebody protests your brother's funeral.
Yeah, and I'd lose my shit if some guy fucked my girlfriend, but that doesn't mean we should make fucking illegal.
Are you seriously equating sex with calling someone's deceased relative "a stupid faggot"?
If somebody fucked your girlfriend, you'd be pretty fucking upset, right?
And if somebody called your dead brother a stupid faggot, you'd be pretty upset, right?
The thing is, though, you cannot run a country based on feels, because that's fucking retarded.
You're running a country based on respect and morality.
Sleeping with someone's spouse is not the same as protesting a funeral, first of all. Secondly, it's wrong to protest a funeral, it's not always wrong to fuck somebody's girlfriend. And thirdly, not allowing shit like that to happen at a funeral should be law.
1) Morality is entirely subjective.
2) What if it's a Nazi funeral?
1. Not when it comes to funerals. 2. Everybody has the right to bury their dead with dignity and honor their memory.
35365
« on: January 08, 2015, 02:59:32 PM »
The "Freedom of Speech" thing is blown out of so many proportions. If I recall correctly (I'll look it up later, I've got morning chores to do) it was initially installed in our Government so that a person could freely express themselves in council chambers without the wrath of the Government falling on them.
That does not mean, however, you can shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater and cause a panic.
Same goes for hate speech. What "muh free speeches" people fail to realize is the emotional trauma, harm, and social discord that comes from people like the WBC. As you probably saw in that thread, a man attacked a church member during his soldier brother's funeral because the protestor was mocking his brother, discrediting his service, and saying, "I'm glad the stupid faggot is dead." The soldier got soundly punished while the protestor got to walk away laughing.
This article is a nice thing to read through, especially the parts from the Fordham Law Professor: While free speech protects people from harm, it allows unlimited emotional harm.
So basically what your argument boils down to is "delicate sensibilities take precedence over what you can and cannot say"
Yeah no. I personally do not give two shits if you become "emotionally traumatised " as a result of what I said. I do not, and never will recognise it as a justification to curtail mine, or anyone else's speech.
Yelling fire in a crowded vicinity isn't even a relevant analogy either.
I'd really like to see you not lose your shit when somebody protests your brother's funeral.
Yeah, and I'd lose my shit if some guy fucked my girlfriend, but that doesn't mean we should make fucking illegal.
Are you seriously equating sex with calling someone's deceased relative "a stupid faggot"?
If somebody fucked your girlfriend, you'd be pretty fucking upset, right?
And if somebody called your dead brother a stupid faggot, you'd be pretty upset, right?
The thing is, though, you cannot run a country based on feels, because that's fucking retarded.
You're running a country based on respect and morality. Sleeping with someone's spouse is not the same as protesting a funeral, first of all. Secondly, it's wrong to protest a funeral, it's not always wrong to fuck somebody's girlfriend. And thirdly, not allowing shit like that to happen at a funeral should be law.
35366
« on: January 08, 2015, 01:13:45 PM »
Calling someone a stupid faggot is an ideology?
Is it a "dissenting" point of view when a person from the Westroll Baptist Church goes to a funeral for the purpose of starting a social fire, or is it shit being stirred up to intentionally cause trouble, entrap people, and wait for them to retaliate? It seems you take issue with how they express their speech, not the actual speech itself. My solution to that would be to extend picket distances, not fucking outlaw an ideology.
Alright, I myself am growing tired of the dead soldier argument since you're resorting to only calling it a strawman. Let's use a different example: I'm calling it what it is broseph. You're trying to paint me out to be this pro WBC advocate when all I'm really trying do is discourage the idea of censorship.
Decimator Omega.
Yes. Him. Remember that sperglord? A few weeks ago, a few members strolled onto one of his sites and began to harass him there. They knew how emotionally unstable Decimator was, yet continued to harass him until he finally exploded and went into a borderline-suicide mode. Icy eventually managed to get him to calm down. I'm not sure what you're getting at. Someone as emotionally unstable as that shouldn't be on the internet in the first place. What's your point? We should curtail speech because of mental illness?
Now let's look at this from a real-life point of view, but leave someone like Icy out of the situation. People harass a mentally unstable person, then said person ends up either taking their own life or causes a violent incident due being mentally harassed. Is your precious free speech still protected, or is it a mental assault? So again, you want to restrict speech because mentally ill people might hear it?
Like I said in my previous post: I have nothing against speaking your mind, but when you intentionally egg people on at funerals, laughing and mocking someone's deceased family member or causing emotional trauma via my Decimator example, then that's where your free speech ends. It's no longer free speech, it's asking for a fight and a public incident to take place, which ends up being costly on society in general.
Again, repeated point. See above.
35367
« on: January 08, 2015, 01:05:56 PM »
35368
« on: January 08, 2015, 01:05:20 PM »
The "Freedom of Speech" thing is blown out of so many proportions. If I recall correctly (I'll look it up later, I've got morning chores to do) it was initially installed in our Government so that a person could freely express themselves in council chambers without the wrath of the Government falling on them.
That does not mean, however, you can shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater and cause a panic.
Same goes for hate speech. What "muh free speeches" people fail to realize is the emotional trauma, harm, and social discord that comes from people like the WBC. As you probably saw in that thread, a man attacked a church member during his soldier brother's funeral because the protestor was mocking his brother, discrediting his service, and saying, "I'm glad the stupid faggot is dead." The soldier got soundly punished while the protestor got to walk away laughing.
This article is a nice thing to read through, especially the parts from the Fordham Law Professor: While free speech protects people from harm, it allows unlimited emotional harm.
So basically what your argument boils down to is "delicate sensibilities take precedence over what you can and cannot say"
Yeah no. I personally do not give two shits if you become "emotionally traumatised " as a result of what I said. I do not, and never will recognise it as a justification to curtail mine, or anyone else's speech.
Yelling fire in a crowded vicinity isn't even a relevant analogy either.
I'd really like to see you not lose your shit when somebody protests your brother's funeral.
You know what? I actually wouldn't. I wouldn't give the fuckers the time of the day, because that's all they want. A reactionary response so they can be painted as the victims.
Pshht sure.
35369
« on: January 08, 2015, 12:46:08 PM »
The "Freedom of Speech" thing is blown out of so many proportions. If I recall correctly (I'll look it up later, I've got morning chores to do) it was initially installed in our Government so that a person could freely express themselves in council chambers without the wrath of the Government falling on them.
That does not mean, however, you can shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater and cause a panic.
Same goes for hate speech. What "muh free speeches" people fail to realize is the emotional trauma, harm, and social discord that comes from people like the WBC. As you probably saw in that thread, a man attacked a church member during his soldier brother's funeral because the protestor was mocking his brother, discrediting his service, and saying, "I'm glad the stupid faggot is dead." The soldier got soundly punished while the protestor got to walk away laughing.
This article is a nice thing to read through, especially the parts from the Fordham Law Professor: While free speech protects people from harm, it allows unlimited emotional harm.
So basically what your argument boils down to is "delicate sensibilities take precedence over what you can and cannot say"
Yeah no. I personally do not give two shits if you become "emotionally traumatised " as a result of what I said. I do not, and never will recognise it as a justification to curtail mine, or anyone else's speech.
Yelling fire in a crowded vicinity isn't even a relevant analogy either.
I'd really like to see you not lose your shit when somebody protests your brother's funeral.
Yeah, and I'd lose my shit if some guy fucked my girlfriend, but that doesn't mean we should make fucking illegal.
Are you seriously equating sex with calling someone's deceased relative "a stupid faggot"?
35370
« on: January 08, 2015, 12:11:26 PM »
The "Freedom of Speech" thing is blown out of so many proportions. If I recall correctly (I'll look it up later, I've got morning chores to do) it was initially installed in our Government so that a person could freely express themselves in council chambers without the wrath of the Government falling on them.
That does not mean, however, you can shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater and cause a panic.
Same goes for hate speech. What "muh free speeches" people fail to realize is the emotional trauma, harm, and social discord that comes from people like the WBC. As you probably saw in that thread, a man attacked a church member during his soldier brother's funeral because the protestor was mocking his brother, discrediting his service, and saying, "I'm glad the stupid faggot is dead." The soldier got soundly punished while the protestor got to walk away laughing.
This article is a nice thing to read through, especially the parts from the Fordham Law Professor: While free speech protects people from harm, it allows unlimited emotional harm.
So basically what your argument boils down to is "delicate sensibilities take precedence over what you can and cannot say"
Yeah no. I personally do not give two shits if you become "emotionally traumatised " as a result of what I said. I do not, and never will recognise it as a justification to curtail mine, or anyone else's speech.
Yelling fire in a crowded vicinity isn't even a relevant analogy either.
I'd really like to see you not lose your shit when somebody protests your brother's funeral.
Pages: 1 ... 117711781179 11801181 ... 1397
|
Show Posts