This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - challengerX
Pages: 1 ... 117211731174 11751176 ... 1397
35191
« on: January 11, 2015, 10:26:22 AM »
So is Flee actually a brony?
If I am, I'm not a very good one. I'm about two or three seasons behind and it's been a year or two since I last watched anything MLP related. It's just good fun rustling jimmies with it.
Oh thank god (doesn't exist).
35192
« on: January 11, 2015, 10:14:19 AM »
So is Flee actually a brony?
He draws MLP porn while moderating.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
35193
« on: January 11, 2015, 10:12:49 AM »
Already made a thread about this. But watch out, people will say you're being biased and one-sided though. Better watch out
Actually this thread is presented in a far less biased manner.
35194
« on: January 11, 2015, 10:10:39 AM »
So is Flee actually a brony?
35195
« on: January 11, 2015, 10:08:48 AM »
Come on guys. Serious board is for serious discussions, not bickering. Either have a genuine conversation about the topic at hand, or don't post in this thread.
Tell it to Kinder. I've asked him twice now to get back on topic. It's my thread after all. I'm not going to stop posting.
35196
« on: January 11, 2015, 10:04:58 AM »
Nope
>asks a question
>gives a response
>gives negative feedback
This logic is absurd.......oh wait, this is Challenger we're talking about. Go to the Flood if you're going to be this much of a man-child
You could make an actual reply with something to back up your side of the argument and then I'll take you seriously.
Either way you'd be wrong, because it is torture and causes insanity. But you could at least present your point intelligently.
>asks an open-ended question
Not exactly, no. I'm asking if you agree. If you don't, though, at least explain your position.
>all answers that are not yes are incorrect Indeed.
Again, go back to the Flood if you're going to be this biased and one-sided It's a fact that it's torture. I just want to see what people have to say, and what people who are wrong think.
And why should I bother giving out a thought out response when you will just completely ignore it and say I'm wrong? Because that's what you do in ever single thread. It's either something you want or you totally disregard it
Nope. Make an actual reply and I'll take it seriously. Instead of whining and crying, either act like an adult or stop posting in the thread.
My fucking sides have reached Pluto
I doubt it, because it seems to me you're angry again. "Do you agree solitary confinement is torture?"
I seriously don't know where you went to school, but that is an open ended question. It's obvious as daylight and denying that is ludicrous "In a conversation, when completing a research survey, being interviewed for a job or working on a homework assignment, you might find yourself presented with a series of closed-ended or open-ended questions. Close-ended questions are those which can be answered by a simple "yes" or "no," while open-ended questions are those which require more thought and more than a simple one-word answer." http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-open-ended-and-closed-ended-questions.htmlOh my. How embarrassing for you. Now you're just proving my point of how much a narrow-minded, biased, and ego-eccentric individual you really are. What logic is there to debate a person like that? There isn't any Really, get a dictionary. No, it's not a fact. Again, where did you go to school? A fact is something that is in universal acceptance. People denying that it's torture therefore means that saying it's torture is an opinionated statement. You once again prove my point on the type of person you are People deny the Holocaust happened and all sorts of things, doesn't make them opinions. They're still facts. This is where it gets fucking hilarious. I made an actual reply with the simple term of "nope" I don't need to give out a complicated response, especially to you when you have a history of refusing to acknowledge the points of a person's argument and instead give out a response like "No, you're wrong". You're the one not acting like an adult here, not me
Not at all. I always debate every point and make a civil rebuttal, unlike you.
35197
« on: January 11, 2015, 09:51:33 AM »
Nope
>asks a question
>gives a response
>gives negative feedback
This logic is absurd.......oh wait, this is Challenger we're talking about. Go to the Flood if you're going to be this much of a man-child
You could make an actual reply with something to back up your side of the argument and then I'll take you seriously.
Either way you'd be wrong, because it is torture and causes insanity. But you could at least present your point intelligently.
>asks an open-ended question
Not exactly, no. I'm asking if you agree. If you don't, though, at least explain your position. >all answers that are not yes are incorrect Indeed. Again, go back to the Flood if you're going to be this biased and one-sided It's a fact that it's torture. I just want to see what people have to say, and what people who are wrong think. And why should I bother giving out a thought out response when you will just completely ignore it and say I'm wrong? Because that's what you do in ever single thread. It's either something you want or you totally disregard it
Nope. Make an actual reply and I'll take it seriously. Instead of whining and crying, either act like an adult or stop posting in the thread.
35198
« on: January 11, 2015, 09:47:01 AM »
He didn't. It's just a visual glitch.
35199
« on: January 11, 2015, 09:46:09 AM »
Nope
>asks a question
>gives a response
>gives negative feedback
This logic is absurd.......oh wait, this is Challenger we're talking about. Go to the Flood if you're going to be this much of a man-child
You could make an actual reply with something to back up your side of the argument and then I'll take you seriously. Either way you'd be wrong, because it is torture and causes insanity. But you could at least present your point intelligently.
35200
« on: January 11, 2015, 09:42:22 AM »
Nope
35201
« on: January 11, 2015, 08:53:40 AM »
Says who? Fine. Let's all kill each other, because BritishLemon doesn't see a reason not to.
Do you want to die? No?
Then you have no right to take it away from someone or something else that doesn't want it taken away.
Why? Members of the Taliban don't want to be killed, but we kill them anyway because they put other people in danger. What is it with you and begging for permission for every little thing? If I want to kill a cow, I'm going to kill a cow. I don't give a fuck what its wants are.
35202
« on: January 11, 2015, 08:45:30 AM »
A slab of meat doesn't feel, either. It used to. Did you know that when things die, they used to be alive? Did you know that?
A banana has never felt. It has NEVER been alive.
I'm not going to sit here and let you insult bananas like this. Reported.
35203
« on: January 11, 2015, 07:56:50 AM »
Um, I like, dunno. Maybe because IT'S A FREAKING GUN?
But a PS4 or even a PC would be made out of components that probably cost more.
Can you empty a magazine into a crowd using a PS4?
I'm sure you can make your own concealed gun that's in the case of one.
That wouldn't be a PS4 then, would it.
With transgender logic it would.
35204
« on: January 11, 2015, 07:55:18 AM »
But you see, they'd still have different brains from us. No, they wouldn't. A brain is a brain. Do you understand biology? At all?
Actually their brains could be incredibly different from ours. Not to mention their environment, culture, society. Even if they were humanoids with similar brains they'd be extremely different.
35205
« on: January 11, 2015, 07:53:59 AM »
I wouldn't kill a chimp and eat him, but I'd kill a cow. That's about as humane and respectful killing gets, because at the end of the day I'm ending a creature's life to extend my own. Well, it would be great if someone else killed you, ate you, just to extend their own life. And they would be well within their right to do that, wouldn't they?
If they could kill me, sure. I wouldn't call it their right, but if they have the power to do so, tough cookie.
35206
« on: January 11, 2015, 07:48:34 AM »
35207
« on: January 11, 2015, 07:44:56 AM »
It kind of eliminates the possibility. An organism from another planet, another planet would be so drastically different that we couldn't even begin to imagine it. It would have evolved (or maybe even something else) completely separate from us. So I fail to see why it would even entertain the thought of consuming organisms from another planet. 1. You're evading the point again.
2. You have no evidence that that would be the case.There's nothing wrong with it. Do what you like. But I'm going to keep eating animals. The only wrong thing is you think you're right and we're scumbags for eating food. Get over it. Like I said a couple pages ago when this all began. You can eat meat--just don't act like that's a good thing to do, and don't advocate that future generations do it. That's all I ask. And don't be a gluttonous piece of shit about it, either. Have an appreciation or a level of accounting for the sacrifice.Right, but they're not heartless. In fact, rarely does an animal kill another animal if isn't for food or territory. I classify that as heartless, unethical behavior. If carnivores had functioning brains capable of rationality, they'd recognize that killing things is bad, and they'd probably feel remorse over their kills.
It's a great thing to do and if I ever have kids I hope our world hasn't gone down the shitter so they can enjoy the delicious animals on this planet. Again, you have absolutely no respect for predatory animals and keep calling them heartless killing machines. If you ask me, it's a disgusting thing to kill a crocodile which has been on this planet for far longer than our species than it is to kill a cow or goat. I wouldn't kill a chimp and eat him, but I'd kill a cow. That's about as humane and respectful killing gets, because at the end of the day I'm ending a creature's life to extend my own.
35208
« on: January 11, 2015, 07:37:43 AM »
Seeing how Bush drove America into the ground and Obama is fixing the country
I'm pretty sure the majority of us could agree that's probably one of the stupidest things you've ever said.
I'm 100% sure you're wrong. America is in a far better state than it was under Bush. If you had the ability to understand simple statistics I'm sure you'd agree too. Anyway, you're far too violent to have a rational discussion with, and I doubt you'd understand even if you wanted to. Which is of course a joke, because you would never want to. Who knew people could be violent on the Internet? If you can find one intelligent person on the forum who thinks democracy even exists in this country Pretty much every intelligent user here does know we live in a democracy. I'll stop replying and allow you to have the last post, which according to you is what defines who wins an argument and who doesn't.
The person who "wins" the argument is the one that's right. You aren't right, because you live in a democracy where you vote for people and you have different outcomes. Like Obama didn't start two wars for no reason and cut spending on important things while spending a shit ton on the military. But you can't back your position with anything but petty insults, so I'll leave you to reply with some butthurt nonsensical post about how ignorant and deluded everybody is in comparison with you.
35209
« on: January 11, 2015, 07:31:53 AM »
"Design" implies there's a designer. Well, that's obviously not what I meant. I'm sorry, but I didn't invent the language. When I use words like "design," I mean to imply that they've underwent a series of complex changes throughout their evolutionary history such that they'd most efficiently be able to kill other animals without remorse for their own gain, so they can be the #1 predatory threat in their area. Because they fuck, but they're mammals, so they can't fuck too often to survive--they have to be carnivorous, heartless killing machines to be able to propagate and sustain their own species. They're not like frogs, giving birth to a hundred or so of their offspring. They've evolved with a different ecological strategy. That's what I'm talking about when I'm talking about design.
And still, I would argue that "evolution" is the "designer". It's not a person, it's a force of nature, but really, what difference does that make? It's a metaphor, for all intents and purposes.
Right, but they're not heartless. In fact, rarely does an animal kill another animal if isn't for food or territory.
35210
« on: January 11, 2015, 07:29:32 AM »
I don't care if somebody kills a cow I've never even seen that provides me with something to eat. Had I known the cow, I'd obviously feel different. If I had to kill animals myself every day to eat, I don't know if I could. I'd probably end up getting attached to all of them and wind up eating nuts, fruits, and vegetables. See? There you go. That's a good... well, it's not a GREAT mentality, but it's a good mentality to be in. If you have to have familial attachments to animals to feel any empathy towards them, I think that's a problem, but at least you're capable of thinking, "Yeah, maybe this isn't right." I'm glad.
The difference between you and me here lies only with empathy. It doesn't matter to me if I don't know the animal personally--I still can't justify killing it if I have all the resources in the world. That's why I say, if you're okay with killing an animal for food, you should be okay with someone killing you for food. And I get so angry about it because I look around and all I see are people who are proud of their lack of empathy. And it disgusts me. It's revolting.
It's like when you see or hear about people dying and suffering across the world. You care, but you don't spend the rest of the day crying about it. Right. So what's your point? I mean, I don't spend my time crying about the suffering of humans or animals, but I do speak up about it. I'm the only one who's really accounting for it. What's wrong with that?
I can justify killing an animal if I'm going to eat or it's in self defense. There's nothing wrong with it. Do what you like. But I'm going to keep eating animals. The only wrong thing is you think you're right and we're scumbags for eating food. Get over it.
35211
« on: January 11, 2015, 06:19:17 AM »
Well that explains why your sorry ass is over here. I thought you weren't going back because you didn't want people knowing that you aren't dead.
play nice pls
He doesn't know how to. He has to have the spotlight to receive the maximum amount of sympathy possible so that when he writes up another post about how he needs more money we'll still be gullible enough to give him some.
Man you're really butthurt about that.
35212
« on: January 11, 2015, 06:17:49 AM »
Nothing. I'd probably ground him for being careless and subjecting me to such an awkward scenario.
35213
« on: January 11, 2015, 06:13:38 AM »
They're not "designed" to do anything. Yes, they are. Do you know what evolution is? Do you know what evolution has been doing?
"Design" implies there's a designer. Like I said, they're a product of their environment just like we are. You'd be hard pressed to find species that even come close to how violent we are. Fuck you for associating me with PETA.
Cry about it.
35214
« on: January 11, 2015, 06:11:45 AM »
Put it this way: I'd care if somebody killed and ate my dog. Because he's a family member.
I don't care if somebody kills a cow I've never even seen that provides me with something to eat. Had I known the cow, I'd obviously feel different. If I had to kill animals myself every day to eat, I don't know if I could. I'd probably end up getting attached to all of them and wind up eating nuts, fruits, and vegetables.
It's like when you see or hear about people dying and suffering across the world. You care, but you don't spend the rest of the day crying about it.
35215
« on: January 11, 2015, 06:08:08 AM »
Tigers are violent, heartless, monsters now? LOL ...Uhh... Yeah. Duh.
Have you fucking seen a tiger? Do you know what they're designed to do?
They're not "designed" to do anything. They're a product of their environment and only kill to eat. They don't kill other animals for no reason unless they're defending their territory or got into a fight, just like us. It's just funny to me how you're acting like somebody from PETA and then you call a tiger a "heartless, violent monster". It's an animal bro. Not a monster.
35216
« on: January 11, 2015, 05:41:28 AM »
Then you obviously don't know what it means to get violently killed.
Well no shit.
So I hope you get it. If you lack the empathy to understand that, "Yeah, I probably wouldn't like to get slaughtered and eaten," you should get slaughtered and eaten. That's my opinion.Pretty sure there aren't any tigers in America. Pretty sure that wasn't my point. I thought of the most violent, heartless, monstrous animal I could think of at the moment.
Tigers are violent, heartless, monsters now? LOL
35217
« on: January 11, 2015, 05:33:21 AM »
And yet I'm dead serious. I'd rather kill the animal myself. I'm going to get a hunting license as soon as possible and feast on my kills. I'd kill a cow no different than killing a deer. Then I hope you get eaten. I hope a tiger fucking just mauls you to death and eats you, and see how you like it.
I mean, what else can I say? I hope you get what you impose on other sentient beings.
Pretty sure there aren't any tigers in America. And we don't maul anything to death. We humanely kill an animal and eat it. We've been doing it since the beginning of our species.
35218
« on: January 11, 2015, 05:23:19 AM »
I'd cut the throat of the cow myself. Nothing would make it taste better than knowing I killed the thing myself. See, now you're just trying too hard. It doesn't help that you're aTALLmidget, so I don't take you seriously by default.
I'd just shoot the cow. Then send the video to you after editing it with MLG effects and dubstep.
35219
« on: January 11, 2015, 05:20:09 AM »
If you honestly wanted to piss off a vegan, challengerX, you went about the weakest and most pussy way to do it. You're posting reality. Even if you posted a video of yourself eating meat, I would applaud you for not wasting the suffering that the animal endured. The only execrable thing you've done is give your money to industries that slaughter and kill animals--the sort of thing you probably wouldn't do if you actually saw the cow you were about to eat getting brutally killed in front of you.
35220
« on: January 11, 2015, 05:13:36 AM »
And I'm not talking about shit like, "Hey man, have you tried that new sandwich that they have at Burger King?" I'm talking about instilling the notion of meat-eating into the minds of children. That's gonna have to stop happening. Because people who are addicted, like you, aren't going to be able to say goodbye to their meat (which is bullshit, by the way. I lived on an almost exclusive diet of animal products for my entire life until I just stopped a few months ago. If I could do it, you can too). So if people are going to act like they can't stop for their own selfish reasons, then fuck it, just start teaching kids not to do it, then. I think that's reasonable.
Maybe you're always so butthurt about everything because you stopped eating meat.
Pages: 1 ... 117211731174 11751176 ... 1397
|
Show Posts