This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - challengerX
Pages: 1 ... 116911701171 11721173 ... 1397
35101
« on: January 13, 2015, 02:48:18 PM »
If we didn't discuss politics at all I probably would've liked him a lot more.
Same here actually. Regardless, I liked him a lot better on here than back on B.net.
Indeed.
35102
« on: January 13, 2015, 02:44:08 PM »
If we didn't discuss politics at all I probably would've liked him a lot more.
35103
« on: January 13, 2015, 02:40:52 PM »
Fuck off Kiyo I was making a joke. Terrorist.
35104
« on: January 13, 2015, 02:03:49 PM »
Trying to shrug it off lol.
Youre the same as Ele.
Would you rather I be my old self and start a 20 page flame war? No?
WELL DEN SHADDUP
You're still as equally annoying, only now it's cringey
>No longer arrogant
>No longer a troll
>No longer a shockposter
>No longer threatens this site on a monthly basis
>No longer verbally abuses this site and its users
I've actually mellowed out quite a bit.
Yeah but you're still tricking yourself into thinking you're not gay.
35105
« on: January 13, 2015, 02:02:30 PM »
Hopefully you get cancer.
35106
« on: January 13, 2015, 02:01:37 PM »
Nope.
35107
« on: January 13, 2015, 01:27:11 PM »
Holy shit this thread is so dank.
35108
« on: January 13, 2015, 01:17:32 PM »
[SIZE=DANK]THE MEME LIFE CHOSE ME[/SIZE]
35109
« on: January 13, 2015, 12:57:44 PM »
This thread is on a fine line.
One could almost say it's on a highway to hell.
I wouldn't exactly call the Flood hell, hell has interesting people after all.
Way to ruin the joke you fucking terrorist.
35110
« on: January 13, 2015, 12:56:15 PM »
2 > 1
35111
« on: January 13, 2015, 12:55:30 PM »
This thread is on a fine line.
One could almost say it's on a highway to hell.
35112
« on: January 13, 2015, 12:54:33 PM »
Well given how people have received the homosexual community lately, there's a social evolution.
<___________________________<
It's only evolution if it helps society survive better.
It does help society survive better though. You don't have people living in fear of the gay boogie monster and resorting to going out and beating someone to death for being gay.
Thus less chaos, less death, less stupidity.
Okay, so evolving a tolerance of homosexuality is beneficial. I agree completely. But evolving homosexuality in the first place still doesn't make any sense.
Which is why I'm arguing that homosexuality is non-genetic and came about with our uber-liberal western cultural.
Well considering the Romans, Greeks and Spartans were active in, and encouraged, gay relationships as a way to bond together as a society...
Yeah humans have been pretty gay. Not just in the past 100 years.
For genetic evolution to take place you need at least 10,000 years MINIMUM
There really just isn't any room to argue that homosexuality is genetic without evidence to back it up.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22429963.700-gay-gene-discovery-has-good-and-bad-implications.html
35113
« on: January 13, 2015, 12:52:58 PM »
That has nothing to do with it being natural. There are plenty of natural things which are useless or even negative like homosexuality.
All genetic traits in all living things have an evolutionary purpose, so that's honestly just flat out wrong.
That's just blatantly and scientifically untrue.
Just stop
Proving you wrong?
Me: "2+2=4"
You: "No it doesn't"
Me: "Shut up"
You: "Haha I just proved you wrong!"
If you'd like to provide a source for your claims I'll gladly provide my own and then continue proving you wrong.
35114
« on: January 13, 2015, 12:28:14 PM »
That has nothing to do with it being natural. There are plenty of natural things which are useless or even negative like homosexuality.
All genetic traits in all living things have an evolutionary purpose, so that's honestly just flat out wrong.
That's just blatantly and scientifically untrue.
Just stop
Proving you wrong?
35115
« on: January 13, 2015, 12:21:30 PM »
That has nothing to do with it being natural. There are plenty of natural things which are useless or even negative like homosexuality.
All genetic traits in all living things have an evolutionary purpose, so that's honestly just flat out wrong.
That's just blatantly and scientifically untrue.
35116
« on: January 13, 2015, 12:15:10 PM »
That has nothing to do with it being natural. There are plenty of natural things which are useless or even negative like homosexuality.
35117
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:59:44 AM »
Show me a quote where he has said they we're not allowed to be silent. I really think you're misreading the thread.
Doesn't need to be said with those exact words. Not that you would care, you've been throwing around strawmen left and right in this thread.
See here:
Because these people you're defending would not hesitate one second in giving you a gruesome death simply for being homosexual. I understand you think criticizing them means you're stooping to their level (you're wrong, because we're criticizing them not gunning them down) but in the interest of self preservation you'd think you wouldn't have this mentality.
What place does ad hominem have in this discussion? What does someone's orientation (or any other personal circumstance) have to do with anything?
I've never said they should be forced to adhere to the minute of silence. I'M JUST SAYING THEY'RE A BUNCH OF ASSHOLES. STOP FUCKING TWISTING WHAT I'M SAYING. Ad hominem? Is this some sort of joke? I'm saying what he's doing is like a Jew saying "Wow you're a bigot for saying the Nazis were assholes. Shame on you".
35118
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:45:49 AM »
This really is incredible. We criticize these people for their barbarism - and immediately users who know we value free speech treat us like xenophobic bigots.
Nobody says they can't disrespect the dead. We're saying they SHOULD NOT disrespect the dead.
I'm concerned about the consequences that will come from this sort of rhetoric, this thread being evidence of that. 'If God forbid you take issue with our popular consensus, you're part of the problem' is essentially what's being said here.
Not at all. You're twisting what I say, dreaming up some slippery slope, and interpreting for hostility.
35119
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:26:18 AM »
Because these people you're defending would not hesitate one second in giving you a gruesome death simply for being homosexual. I understand you think criticizing them means you're stooping to their level (you're wrong, because we're criticizing them not gunning them down) but in the interest of self preservation you'd think you wouldn't have this mentality.
You're agreeing with the terrorists with that sort of logic.
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it
I would point out for the millionth time that no one is arguing against their right to not be silent, but somehow it feels like a waste of time.
Tell that to Challenger.
I don't remember saying they should lose certain rights a single time this thread. I've been criticizing them for their actions.
35120
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:24:42 AM »
Mildly criticizing people for supporting terrorists and murderes is now a witch hunt and trampling on their rights.
ffs really?
'mild criticism'
More like fueling the fires of civil unrest. History tells us that things like this can get out of hand.
It has absolutely nothing to do with loyalty. It's about respecting people who were murdered by fascists for drawing a fucking cartoon.
The reactions to this event prove that it has a lot to do with loyalty.
Please explain how a minute of silence has something to do with loyalty to France and not respecting the dead.
If it wasn't, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Please explain how any of this has a single motherfucking thing to do with loyalty to France, please.
Human nature.
Last I looked I'm not French. Now explain how any of this has anything to do with loyalty to France and not respecting those killed in a terrorist attack.
35121
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:23:29 AM »
This really is incredible. We criticize these people for their barbarism - and immediately users who know we value free speech treat us like xenophobic bigots.
Nobody says they can't disrespect the dead. We're saying they SHOULD NOT disrespect the dead.
35122
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:20:59 AM »
Mildly criticizing people for supporting terrorists and murderes is now a witch hunt and trampling on their rights.
ffs really?
'mild criticism'
More like fueling the fires of civil unrest. History tells us that things like this can get out of hand.
It has absolutely nothing to do with loyalty. It's about respecting people who were murdered by fascists for drawing a fucking cartoon.
The reactions to this event prove that it has a lot to do with loyalty.
Please explain how a minute of silence has something to do with loyalty to France and not respecting the dead.
If it wasn't, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Please explain how any of this has a single motherfucking thing to do with loyalty to France, please.
35123
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:20:05 AM »
Because these people you're defending would not hesitate one second in giving you a gruesome death simply for being homosexual. I understand you think criticizing them means you're stooping to their level (you're wrong, because we're criticizing them not gunning them down) but in the interest of self preservation you'd think you wouldn't have this mentality.
You're agreeing with the terrorists right with that sort of logic.
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it
I disapprove of their actions. Like killing dozens of people for a drawing then people from the same group who are supposedly a cult of peace won't even respect the minute of silence. They can be as bigoted as they like, but we all know they act on their bigotry.
35124
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:17:03 AM »
Mildly criticizing people for supporting terrorists and murderes is now a witch hunt and trampling on their rights.
ffs really?
'mild criticism'
More like fueling the fires of civil unrest. History tells us that things like this can get out of hand.
It has absolutely nothing to do with loyalty. It's about respecting people who were murdered by fascists for drawing a fucking cartoon.
The reactions to this event prove that it has a lot to do with loyalty.
Please explain how a minute of silence has something to do with loyalty to France and not respecting the dead.
35125
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:14:03 AM »
As disrespectful as it may be, they have the right not to stand up.
Forcing them to pay respects really doesn't make us any better than the terrorists, as ironic as it may be.
I'm saying they're cunts for not respecting the people who died in the name of the very freedom they're exercising. They can refuse to stand, or speak during a minute's silence, all they like--but I won't sit idly by at such flagrant hypocrisy and moral insanity.
You know, this is the same type of argument Conservatives use to bitch out people who won't stand for the Pledge of Allegiance/National Anthem over here.
No it fucking isn't. People have died.
You do realize that many people here associate the Pledge/Anthem with out military, correct? Many see it as saluting them, as well as the country - including those that died.
But this discussion has already been done, so unless there's something new to add other than "Fucking PC Liberal", I'll take my leave.
makes you look like a Muslim apologist?
So be it.
Now I've seen it all. A gay dude who's a Muslim apologist.
An oxymoron if I ever saw one.
Why is that?
Because these people you're defending would not hesitate one second in giving you a gruesome death simply for being homosexual. I understand you think criticizing them means you're stooping to their level (you're wrong, because we're criticizing them not gunning them down) but in the interest of self preservation you'd think you wouldn't have this mentality.
35126
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:11:11 AM »
As disrespectful as it may be, they have the right not to stand up.
Forcing them to pay respects really doesn't make us any better than the terrorists, as ironic as it may be.
I'm saying they're cunts for not respecting the people who died in the name of the very freedom they're exercising. They can refuse to stand, or speak during a minute's silence, all they like--but I won't sit idly by at such flagrant hypocrisy and moral insanity.
You know, this is the same type of argument Conservatives use to bitch out people who won't stand for the Pledge of Allegiance/National Anthem over here.
No it fucking isn't. People have died.
I am so sick of you fucking PC liberals.
Let's not forget the old Bellamy salute here in the states:
The pledge is idolatry in the name of "patriotism"
The fuck does this have to do with anything?
I was proving Icy's point.
Icy has no point as the first page has already shown. 
I don't know how people are still bringing up the pledge as if it has anything to do with this thread.
I don't see how it isn't relevant. "Here's something to prove you're loyal, and we're going on a witch hunt against everyone who doesn't comply."
It has absolutely nothing to do with loyalty. It's about respecting people who were murdered by fascists for drawing a fucking cartoon.
35127
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:09:51 AM »
As disrespectful as it may be, they have the right not to stand up.
Forcing them to pay respects really doesn't make us any better than the terrorists, as ironic as it may be.
I'm saying they're cunts for not respecting the people who died in the name of the very freedom they're exercising. They can refuse to stand, or speak during a minute's silence, all they like--but I won't sit idly by at such flagrant hypocrisy and moral insanity.
You know, this is the same type of argument Conservatives use to bitch out people who won't stand for the Pledge of Allegiance/National Anthem over here.
No it fucking isn't. People have died.
I am so sick of you fucking PC liberals.
Let's not forget the old Bellamy salute here in the states:
The pledge is idolatry in the name of "patriotism"
The fuck does this have to do with anything?
I was proving Icy's point.
He has no point. Pledging loyalty =/= Minute of silence Not to mention I don't see what was wrong with the old salute to bring it up in a negative light.
35128
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:08:43 AM »
As disrespectful as it may be, they have the right not to stand up.
Forcing them to pay respects really doesn't make us any better than the terrorists, as ironic as it may be.
I'm saying they're cunts for not respecting the people who died in the name of the very freedom they're exercising. They can refuse to stand, or speak during a minute's silence, all they like--but I won't sit idly by at such flagrant hypocrisy and moral insanity.
You know, this is the same type of argument Conservatives use to bitch out people who won't stand for the Pledge of Allegiance/National Anthem over here.
No it fucking isn't. People have died.
You do realize that many people here associate the Pledge/Anthem with out military, correct? Many see it as saluting them, as well as the country - including those that died.
But this discussion has already been done, so unless there's something new to add other than "Fucking PC Liberal", I'll take my leave.
makes you look like a Muslim apologist?
So be it.
Now I've seen it all. A gay dude who's a Muslim apologist.
35129
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:00:20 AM »
As disrespectful as it may be, they have the right not to stand up.
Forcing them to pay respects really doesn't make us any better than the terrorists, as ironic as it may be.
I'm saying they're cunts for not respecting the people who died in the name of the very freedom they're exercising. They can refuse to stand, or speak during a minute's silence, all they like--but I won't sit idly by at such flagrant hypocrisy and moral insanity.
You know, this is the same type of argument Conservatives use to bitch out people who won't stand for the Pledge of Allegiance/National Anthem over here.
No it fucking isn't. People have died.
You do realize that many people here associate the Pledge/Anthem with out military, correct? Many see it as saluting them, as well as the country - including those that died.
But this discussion has already been done, so unless there's something new to add other than "Fucking PC Liberal", I'll take my leave.
You do realize this has nothing to do with loyalty and it's a minute of silence for those who died in a terrorist attack and cherry picking how some people view the pledge of allegiance makes you look like a Muslim apologist?
35130
« on: January 13, 2015, 10:56:31 AM »
As disrespectful as it may be, they have the right not to stand up.
Forcing them to pay respects really doesn't make us any better than the terrorists, as ironic as it may be.
I'm saying they're cunts for not respecting the people who died in the name of the very freedom they're exercising. They can refuse to stand, or speak during a minute's silence, all they like--but I won't sit idly by at such flagrant hypocrisy and moral insanity.
You know, this is the same type of argument Conservatives use to bitch out people who won't stand for the Pledge of Allegiance/National Anthem over here.
No it fucking isn't. People have died.
I am so sick of you fucking PC liberals.
Let's not forget the old Bellamy salute here in the states:
The pledge is idolatry in the name of "patriotism"
The fuck does this have to do with anything?
Pages: 1 ... 116911701171 11721173 ... 1397
|
Show Posts