This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - challengerX
Pages: 1 ... 777879 8081 ... 1397
2341
« on: March 01, 2018, 02:34:12 PM »
Most criminals don't use guns to randomly slaughter people just walking around or kids in a school. It's always the law abiding citizen with his AR-15 and 1,000 rounds in a backpack. If you don't see how stricter regulations wouldn't help with this issue, there's nothing to discuss.
It's not easy to make your own gun. It's not easy for these socially awkward kids who who shoot up schools to acquire a firearm illegally. Just look at Sandy Hook. Do you really think that dude, in that area, would be able to meet some crooks who would sell him a rifle? No, he wouldn't. But since his mom had a fucking arsenal in her house, it was as simple as grabbing one from the comfort of his home then going to a school and slaughtering toddlers.
At the very, very least, there needs to be more screening for psychological issues, more in depth background checks, and rigorous training courses.
2342
« on: March 01, 2018, 11:16:29 AM »
"Ban all guns"
You fucking can't, because anyone with ill intent can get a gun illegally even with the 2nd amendment abolished.
but less of them would happen, which is the whole point
nobody would be so retarded to argue that "banning all guns" would stop every shooting ever
the point is that it becomes much more difficult for shooters, which is better than absolutely nothing
It would be like Mexico where only criminals and cops have guns.
good
Have you actually seen Mexico? It looks like shit.
damn that's racist
2343
« on: March 01, 2018, 10:36:09 AM »
People who will want to commit a mass shooting will still do it, and it will happen a lot more than it does now. its called the flea market and the black market. No background checks, no test. Just pay cash, and you own a fucking AR-15 or AK47 or hell even a .22 Glock, illegally, and its incredibly easy to do if you have no guilty conscience or morals )
Deci much like these shooters you're the type of person to ask directions for the black market. Also a flea market is like a swapmeet lmao it's not the same thing as the black market.
2344
« on: March 01, 2018, 10:30:18 AM »
Tea drinkers BTFO
2345
« on: March 01, 2018, 06:19:26 AM »
Get a job.
Did you just not read anything but the thread title and then rushed in to post this so you can feel superior?
2346
« on: February 28, 2018, 07:31:26 PM »
owo whats this
You registered in 2016
What an astute observation
I just want you both to know I'd pistol whip the shit out of you both and you wouldn't do shit about it because you're bitchesπ«ππ serio pedo
2347
« on: February 28, 2018, 05:54:32 PM »
it really seems like you haven't spent any time reading about this subject at all, and are just talking shit like always
It seems like you have no rebuttal at all. There's nothing to read. It's a bullshit term being used by leftists, and it's the same shit "colored" used to be. That was the politically correct term st the time to label all races who are not white. That way of thinking should be obsolete by now.
and it is
because PoC isn't a revival of it, it's an active indictment of it
How is it an indictment when it's the exact same thought process?
how is it the exact same thought process when it is not the exact same thought process
It's just another way to say nonwhite. In what world is using a term like that NOT racist? Just use the person's race. Why is white the standard?
because they're the majority
it's not really a "standard," it just is what it is, i didn't decide that fact
the term obviously doesn't have the same gravitas outside of densely white countries
How does that make lumping everyone together a good thing?
it's not good or bad
its bad bro
yeah america is ruined
why are you so in the closet about supporting him
I think it's sad how you didn't get the joke.
2348
« on: February 28, 2018, 04:49:22 PM »
All day every day
yo I need to finish this game
2349
« on: February 28, 2018, 04:41:59 PM »
it really seems like you haven't spent any time reading about this subject at all, and are just talking shit like always
It seems like you have no rebuttal at all. There's nothing to read. It's a bullshit term being used by leftists, and it's the same shit "colored" used to be. That was the politically correct term st the time to label all races who are not white. That way of thinking should be obsolete by now.
and it is
because PoC isn't a revival of it, it's an active indictment of it
How is it an indictment when it's the exact same thought process?
how is it the exact same thought process when it is not the exact same thought process
It's just another way to say nonwhite. In what world is using a term like that NOT racist? Just use the person's race. Why is white the standard?
because they're the majority
it's not really a "standard," it just is what it is, i didn't decide that fact
the term obviously doesn't have the same gravitas outside of densely white countries
How does that make lumping everyone together a good thing?
it's not good or bad
its bad bro
yeah america is ruined
2350
« on: February 28, 2018, 03:39:59 PM »
it really seems like you haven't spent any time reading about this subject at all, and are just talking shit like always
It seems like you have no rebuttal at all. There's nothing to read. It's a bullshit term being used by leftists, and it's the same shit "colored" used to be. That was the politically correct term st the time to label all races who are not white. That way of thinking should be obsolete by now.
and it is
because PoC isn't a revival of it, it's an active indictment of it
How is it an indictment when it's the exact same thought process?
how is it the exact same thought process when it is not the exact same thought process
It's just another way to say nonwhite. In what world is using a term like that NOT racist? Just use the person's race. Why is white the standard?
because they're the majority
it's not really a "standard," it just is what it is, i didn't decide that fact
the term obviously doesn't have the same gravitas outside of densely white countries
How does that make lumping everyone together a good thing?
it's not good or bad
its bad bro
2351
« on: February 28, 2018, 03:03:32 PM »
it really seems like you haven't spent any time reading about this subject at all, and are just talking shit like always
It seems like you have no rebuttal at all. There's nothing to read. It's a bullshit term being used by leftists, and it's the same shit "colored" used to be. That was the politically correct term st the time to label all races who are not white. That way of thinking should be obsolete by now.
and it is
because PoC isn't a revival of it, it's an active indictment of it
How is it an indictment when it's the exact same thought process?
how is it the exact same thought process when it is not the exact same thought process
It's just another way to say nonwhite. In what world is using a term like that NOT racist? Just use the person's race. Why is white the standard?
because they're the majority
it's not really a "standard," it just is what it is, i didn't decide that fact
the term obviously doesn't have the same gravitas outside of densely white countries
How does that make lumping everyone together a good thing?
2352
« on: February 28, 2018, 01:39:32 PM »
GMOs are unironically great
2353
« on: February 28, 2018, 01:36:54 PM »
pretty cool
people tend to mistake the shitcuntery of humanity as an inherent flaw of communism, and not, you know, humanity
which is kinda funny in a sad way
lmao
2354
« on: February 28, 2018, 01:34:52 PM »
it really seems like you haven't spent any time reading about this subject at all, and are just talking shit like always
It seems like you have no rebuttal at all. There's nothing to read. It's a bullshit term being used by leftists, and it's the same shit "colored" used to be. That was the politically correct term st the time to label all races who are not white. That way of thinking should be obsolete by now.
and it is
because PoC isn't a revival of it, it's an active indictment of it
How is it an indictment when it's the exact same thought process?
how is it the exact same thought process when it is not the exact same thought process
It's just another way to say nonwhite. In what world is using a term like that NOT racist? Just use the person's race. Why is white the standard?
2355
« on: February 28, 2018, 01:28:39 PM »
it really seems like you haven't spent any time reading about this subject at all, and are just talking shit like always
It seems like you have no rebuttal at all. There's nothing to read. It's a bullshit term being used by leftists, and it's the same shit "colored" used to be. That was the politically correct term st the time to label all races who are not white. That way of thinking should be obsolete by now.
and it is
because PoC isn't a revival of it, it's an active indictment of it
How is it an indictment when it's the exact same thought process?
2356
« on: February 28, 2018, 01:27:44 PM »
It's totally reaching. "Colored" and "people of color" are literally the same thing. learn what a connotation is, and maybe i'll take the time to read the rest of your post
>knows he's wrong so doesn't even read my post OH NO NO NO NOπππππππππππ
2357
« on: February 28, 2018, 01:24:29 PM »
it really seems like you haven't spent any time reading about this subject at all, and are just talking shit like always
It seems like you have no rebuttal at all. There's nothing to read. It's a bullshit term being used by leftists, and it's the same shit "colored" used to be. That was the politically correct term st the time to label all races who are not white. That way of thinking should be obsolete by now.
2358
« on: February 28, 2018, 01:21:16 PM »
>reaching this hard
By this logic saying "black people" is racist because you say people second and the color first. Fucking lol, the point is to not refer to people like this at all. Unless it's official documentation or a description for a suspect or some shit, what the hell? Why is "nonwhite" even a term? It implies white is the base, default, correct. It's all racist. There's nothing progressive or tolerant about any of this terminology. It's an outdated way of thinking about people.
not reaching at all actually, this is pretty basic stuff
nobody is saying the term "black people" is racist, it's just falling by the wayside as a politically correct term
i'd still use it because that's what i'm used to, but if it stops being used that way it's not a big deal to me
>unless it's official documentation or a description
>unless it's being used the way it's always been used
well at least you see where you messed up now
It's totally reaching. "Colored" and "people of color" are literally the same thing. Except official usage isn't relevant here. Cops aren't going to say "we got a person of color, possibly male but he might not identify as that gender!" lmao come on dude. I'm talking about how white leftists seem to think "people of color" is a very progressive way to label what they still see as those who are not equal to them. Deep down all of these people are racist. Otherwise, you wouldn't make the distinction because it's completely unnecessary. Why is there a need to lump all the other races in America under one banner?
2359
« on: February 28, 2018, 01:16:37 PM »
I love u Big Bobesπ
2360
« on: February 28, 2018, 01:10:58 PM »
there's also a rather obvious difference between using a word like "nigger," which has a lot of baggage
and saying "color" which has no baggage and is relatively benign
"colored" is different because it sounds like an affliction, but "color" is just a benign description of someone's complexion
No shit. The thing is you might as well just call everybody who isn't white niggers if you're just gonna lump everybody together for no reason other than the fact that they aren't white.
"you might as well say nigger because they're the same exact word i mean come on guys"
the difference is that there are good reasons to be offended by words like "nigger" and "colored"
there's no good or sensible reason to be offended by "people of color" because the term was come up with specifically to solve that problem, and if you're genuinely offended by it, then you deserve to be offended by it
Please explain how it's different. It isn't. The intention and thought process is EXACTLY the same. "Nonwhite". Grouping everybody who isn't white together. It's just beating around the bush and sugar coating.
i already explained how it's different, and i shouldn't have to explain why using "nigger" is bad
"nigger" doesn't just mean "nonwhite"
"colored" doesn't just mean "nonwhite"
and there's nothing wrong with being nonwhite, so i'm not sure what your problem is
there's nothing wrong with being nonblack, either, and if "nonblack" became a widespread term i wouldn't care either
Nigger is just a messed up way of saying negro which is black. My problem lies with whites grouping everybody else as "colored" like it's the 1960's and then acting like it's cool and "progressive".
but they're not doing that, because "colored" and "color" fundamentally connote different things, because words are more than what they mean
colorED makes it sound like being nonwhite is some kind of affliction or disability, that's what it sounds like
"color" connotes nothing, it's just an acknowledgement that people of different races tend to have different skin complexions, but it doesn't have a negative connotation because, again, you're referring to them as people first, and their race second
if the two words meant the same exact thing, and had the same exact connotations, then everybody would be on your side
your choice to be offended by the term doesn't make the term offensive
>reaching this hard By this logic saying "black people" is racist because you say people second and the color first. Fucking lol, the point is to not refer to people like this at all. Unless it's official documentation or a description for a suspect or some shit, what the hell? Why is "nonwhite" even a term? It implies white is the base, default, correct. It's all racist. There's nothing progressive or tolerant about any of this terminology. It's an outdated way of thinking about people.
2361
« on: February 28, 2018, 09:36:06 AM »
there's also a rather obvious difference between using a word like "nigger," which has a lot of baggage
and saying "color" which has no baggage and is relatively benign
"colored" is different because it sounds like an affliction, but "color" is just a benign description of someone's complexion
No shit. The thing is you might as well just call everybody who isn't white niggers if you're just gonna lump everybody together for no reason other than the fact that they aren't white.
"you might as well say nigger because they're the same exact word i mean come on guys"
the difference is that there are good reasons to be offended by words like "nigger" and "colored"
there's no good or sensible reason to be offended by "people of color" because the term was come up with specifically to solve that problem, and if you're genuinely offended by it, then you deserve to be offended by it
Please explain how it's different. It isn't. The intention and thought process is EXACTLY the same. "Nonwhite". Grouping everybody who isn't white together. It's just beating around the bush and sugar coating.
i already explained how it's different, and i shouldn't have to explain why using "nigger" is bad
"nigger" doesn't just mean "nonwhite"
"colored" doesn't just mean "nonwhite"
and there's nothing wrong with being nonwhite, so i'm not sure what your problem is
there's nothing wrong with being nonblack, either, and if "nonblack" became a widespread term i wouldn't care either
Nigger is just a messed up way of saying negro which is black. My problem lies with whites grouping everybody else as "colored" like it's the 1960's and then acting like it's cool and "progressive".
2362
« on: February 28, 2018, 08:38:30 AM »
there's also a rather obvious difference between using a word like "nigger," which has a lot of baggage
and saying "color" which has no baggage and is relatively benign
"colored" is different because it sounds like an affliction, but "color" is just a benign description of someone's complexion
No shit. The thing is you might as well just call everybody who isn't white niggers if you're just gonna lump everybody together for no reason other than the fact that they aren't white.
"you might as well say nigger because they're the same exact word i mean come on guys"
the difference is that there are good reasons to be offended by words like "nigger" and "colored"
there's no good or sensible reason to be offended by "people of color" because the term was come up with specifically to solve that problem, and if you're genuinely offended by it, then you deserve to be offended by it
Please explain how it's different. It isn't. The intention and thought process is EXACTLY the same. "Nonwhite". Grouping everybody who isn't white together. It's just beating around the bush and sugar coating.
2363
« on: February 28, 2018, 05:34:22 AM »
colords
What did I just say?
Generally, I enjoy talking or associating with everyone and am not actually racist myself. However, POC, non-whites and colords all mean the same thing and I had to use one of those labels instead of naming every race and ethnicity. I can get away with it here as well and being adapted to chan culture really didn't help.
Whatever. I'll edit it.
I think it's sad you missed my point twice now and went on a rant about how you're not racist.
I can't disagree with you there. I'm a bit sick and was posting while half asleep so I wasn't thinking properly, stupid mistake. But I get your point. It's kind of racist that the PC crowd uses a terms such as "POC" to lump in people who aren't white, implying they're different or maybe even inferior.
Why not just say "people"?
Why are we separating people like that in the first place is my point.
2364
« on: February 28, 2018, 05:25:19 AM »
China being the one actually hacking the US and stealing designs for military vehicles/weapons, I sleep
Russia being blamed for literally everything even though there's no evidence, REAL SHIT
There's a shit ton of evidence. The FBI just indicted a bunch of Russians with ties to trumps campaign. Why do you support trump and this alt right narrative so much? Do you have any idea how much propaganda the Russians are pushing on you and people like you? They have literal factories with dudes trolling online feeding you misinformation.
2365
« on: February 28, 2018, 05:10:51 AM »
there's also a rather obvious difference between using a word like "nigger," which has a lot of baggage
and saying "color" which has no baggage and is relatively benign
"colored" is different because it sounds like an affliction, but "color" is just a benign description of someone's complexion
No shit. The thing is you might as well just call everybody who isn't white niggers if you're just gonna lump everybody together for no reason other than the fact that they aren't white.
2366
« on: February 28, 2018, 05:09:12 AM »
colords
What did I just say?
Generally, I enjoy talking or associating with everyone and am not actually racist myself. However, POC, non-whites and colords all mean the same thing and I had to use one of those labels instead of naming every race and ethnicity. I can get away with it here as well and being adapted to chan culture really didn't help.
Whatever. I'll edit it.
I think it's sad you missed my point twice now and went on a rant about how you're not racist.
2367
« on: February 28, 2018, 05:04:33 AM »
trying to come up with a term that'll make everyone happy is a fool's errand anyway
people will choose to be offended no matter what you say
i say, fuck anyone who is unable to view the expression "people of color" as the gesture of respect and politeness that it is
i don't personally use the term because i find it cumbersome, but see no real issue with those who do
That's my point. There shouldn't even be a term for this. In what way do we benefit by separating whites and then lumping blacks, browns, reds, and yellows together?
2368
« on: February 27, 2018, 09:44:12 PM »
it's because the word "people" is being used first and foremost
that's literally the reason
Oh cool I guess I'll just say "nigger people" when I see a group of black people. That makes it ok
no, the word people is being used first
so a better analogy would be "people of nigger" if you were gonna make that point
It's a stupid point to make. It doesn't matter if "people" is before or after. You're just grouping people as "colored".
2369
« on: February 27, 2018, 09:42:41 PM »
Beaner peopleπ¨π½βπΎ
2370
« on: February 27, 2018, 09:40:54 PM »
is this the first thread you've ever made
holy moly
Fuck you guys respond to the thread. Also I've made a lot of threads.
anything beyond the meme thread i cant remember
I don't really remember too many but they're around
Pages: 1 ... 777879 8081 ... 1397
|
Show Posts