This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - CK97
Pages: 1 ... 104105106 107108 ... 117
3151
« on: February 25, 2015, 05:48:33 PM »
Congrats!
3152
« on: February 25, 2015, 05:47:31 PM »
Alright, 2 games left.
I reckon you just battled someone, got the replays?
3153
« on: February 25, 2015, 05:37:16 PM »
I'm just gonna go ahead and bump this.
3154
« on: February 25, 2015, 04:36:57 PM »
"What if you miss?"
"I won't."
3155
« on: February 25, 2015, 04:35:48 PM »
*sees Rayman Legends*
Finally, a decent game.
3156
« on: February 25, 2015, 03:36:53 PM »
Hatred.
3157
« on: February 25, 2015, 03:35:55 PM »
Is it PS4 exclusive?
Uh...No
Thank God (it had only the PS4 logo at the beginning so that's why I thought that).
3158
« on: February 25, 2015, 02:11:28 PM »
Is it PS4 exclusive?
3159
« on: February 25, 2015, 01:33:06 PM »
April 18.
3160
« on: February 25, 2015, 01:30:08 PM »
I'm planning on streaming it via Twitch using sep7agongaming on Friday or Saturday.
3161
« on: February 25, 2015, 11:28:46 AM »
Because it gives me terrible anxiety attacks and hallucinations after two hits and it literally has the capacity to give me a permanent mental illness. Stop advocating it, it is a recreational drug and it shouldn't be promoted.
What mental illness are you talking about?
3162
« on: February 25, 2015, 09:56:17 AM »
3163
« on: February 25, 2015, 09:44:14 AM »
3164
« on: February 25, 2015, 09:37:11 AM »
That's just something ugly people say.
3165
« on: February 25, 2015, 09:21:59 AM »
Faggot.
3166
« on: February 25, 2015, 09:14:17 AM »
Because it smells awful and I'm not interested.
3167
« on: February 25, 2015, 07:20:02 AM »
Guys, OP already lost the battle. I saw him playing Destiny a couple days ago.
I was playing the trial. It's what's been giving me Destiny withdrawal recently.
But you were level 29...
3168
« on: February 24, 2015, 02:17:13 PM »
Chally is a weeb.
3169
« on: February 24, 2015, 02:16:41 PM »
lolno
3170
« on: February 24, 2015, 02:06:52 PM »
I asked "do cops 'shoot to kill' or 'shoot to stop?'" His response is this: Thank you for asking and sharing his reply. It's a careful distinction and a fine line, but one that he clearly understands.
As I said, shooting to stop does risk the death of the subject, but the intent is to stop them, if they die while being stopped? Well, that is an outcome, but not the specifically intended one.
If their intended goal was to kill, then they would walk up to the person on the ground and put one into their skull "just to make sure".
I get what you're saying now. I also have to admit that I explained my point rather poorly now that I read it again.
3171
« on: February 24, 2015, 02:00:25 PM »
Right, and by "stop" you should mean "kill." A citizen can legally sue a cop for bodily injury if the person shot were to survive, which is why cops are trained to use their gun only if their life or someone else's life is in danger.
My dad's a cop, in fact, that's how I know this. No, by stop, I mean stop. Not "shoot to kill" and not "shoot to wound". Stop. End the threat. An individual's intent when they pull the trigger (civilian or LEO) is critical, especially when the case is reviewed by prosecutors or ends up in court.
Feel free to ask your dad if he is trained to "shoot to kill" and has he ever given such a reply when testifying or in court.
"Shoot to stop" is about targeting/hitting center-mass until the target is no longer a threat. That is stop. Yes, death can occur in that situation, but it not the explicit goal.
"Shoot to kill" would mean that the goal is to not stop, but to immediately end the life of the subject and the target would then change from center-mass to their core-nervous system (aka head). If an officer were to testify that they aimed and fired with an intended goal of killing the subject, they would likely be charged with homicide. They wouldn't be cops, they would be executioners.
No LEO that I know would EVER say "I shoot to kill". So please, double-check with your dad.
I asked "do cops 'shoot to kill' or 'shoot to stop?'" His response is this:
3172
« on: February 24, 2015, 01:53:46 PM »
o bby yeah give it to me (so I can buy a Philly Cheesesteak).
3173
« on: February 24, 2015, 01:42:13 PM »
Golden Age of the Roman Empire.
3174
« on: February 24, 2015, 01:40:55 PM »
Damn. Shooting him did seem right in this situation, but 4 times?! That seem like a bit much to me. What happened to cops using tasers?
Cops are trained to shoot to kill.
Shoot to stop actually. Stop the life-threatening crime that the target individual is committing. Once the individual stops (and the threat is no longer present) then they are trained/obligated to cease fire, assess the situation, restrain the threat and render aid (in a reasonable and safe manner). Killing the subject can be the outcome, but it is not the goal.
Right, and by "stop" you should mean "kill." A citizen can legally sue a cop for bodily injury if the person shot were to survive, which is why cops are trained to use their gun only if their life or someone else's life is in danger.
My dad's a cop, in fact, that's how I know this.
I think shoot to neutralize is a better term. The threat is stopped and either the perp is wounded or dead, but you don't know which he'll be after you're done neutralizing him. If it was shoot to kill, they'd make sure he's dead, but that's not the case, is it?
They do make sure, that's why they shoot 3-4 times and then clear the area and mark it with "POLICE LINE DO NOT CROSS." If the person miraculously survived being shot 3-4 times, I'm not sure what they do after that so I can't help you there.
3175
« on: February 24, 2015, 01:05:13 PM »
Damn. Shooting him did seem right in this situation, but 4 times?! That seem like a bit much to me. What happened to cops using tasers?
Cops are trained to shoot to kill.
Shoot to stop actually. Stop the life-threatening crime that the target individual is committing. Once the individual stops (and the threat is no longer present) then they are trained/obligated to cease fire, assess the situation, restrain the threat and render aid (in a reasonable and safe manner). Killing the subject can be the outcome, but it is not the goal.
Right, and by "stop" you should mean "kill." A citizen can legally sue a cop for bodily injury if the person shot were to survive, which is why cops are trained to use their gun only if their life or someone else's life is in danger. My dad's a cop, in fact, that's how I know this.
3176
« on: February 24, 2015, 10:23:54 AM »
Damn. Shooting him did seem right in this situation, but 4 times?! That seem like a bit much to me. What happened to cops using tasers?
Cops are trained to shoot to kill.
3177
« on: February 24, 2015, 10:21:48 AM »
Guys, OP already lost the battle. I saw him playing Destiny a couple days ago.
3178
« on: February 24, 2015, 06:34:28 AM »
Fire Emblem: Awakening is apparently one of the best 3DS games.
3179
« on: February 23, 2015, 08:00:52 PM »
3180
« on: February 23, 2015, 05:09:37 PM »
I'd say they need more work. I did this workout every other day for a month and saw results: http://youtu.be/vkKCVCZe474Move on to level 2 when you think you're ready. It's a killer though.
Pages: 1 ... 104105106 107108 ... 117
|
Show Posts
