This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - CK97
Pages: 1 ... 666768 6970 ... 117
2011
« on: May 17, 2015, 10:16:37 PM »
Pls no
2012
« on: May 17, 2015, 10:13:57 PM »
And a space command too.
2013
« on: May 17, 2015, 10:04:20 PM »
She's chubby anyway forget about her.
2014
« on: May 17, 2015, 09:26:48 PM »
Some anti-sex mod locked my hbb wow 
You have great taste in women.
2015
« on: May 17, 2015, 09:18:06 PM »
*movies
2016
« on: May 17, 2015, 08:30:48 PM »
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
Ah the age old "prevention of tyranny" excuse. Applicable to the old times, perhaps. But not now. It's a quaint little thing, those arguments. Fully fledged circles. Round and round it goes.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
Ah the age old "prevention of tyranny" excuse. Applicable to the old times, perhaps. But not now. It's a quaint little thing, those arguments. Fully fledged circles. Round and round it goes.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
Are you both that fucking dumb as to deny North Korea as a tyrannical country
Holy shit LOOOOOOOL
No. I'm just stating that this a circular argument.
Present anything even remotely suggesting that guns can be an issue + a patriot = Denial, the 2nd amendment excuse, and shifting the subject matter.
AKA the subject going from the 2nd amendment and its outdated practice in the modern age in concerns to how much power the US Government could exert with military force over the civilian populace, shifting to all the way overseas to North Korea.
Circular argument.
It'll just keep going round and round.
Here's the thing, I never said gun violence wasn't an issue. It definitely is. The point I'm making is that tyranny is possible because there are a few countries in the world that have a tyrannical government. Yes, we have a Constitution to protect our rights, but to say that the U.S. couldn't fall into tyrannical hands is absurd. Corruption will never go away. I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
Ah the age old "prevention of tyranny" excuse. Applicable to the old times, perhaps. But not now. It's a quaint little thing, those arguments. Fully fledged circles. Round and round it goes.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
Ah the age old "prevention of tyranny" excuse. Applicable to the old times, perhaps. But not now. It's a quaint little thing, those arguments. Fully fledged circles. Round and round it goes.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
Are you both that fucking dumb as to deny North Korea as a tyrannical country
Holy shit LOOOOOOOL
To sum it up better than I did. The second amendment was primarily made to give the civilian populace the power to overthrow their government if they deemed it a tyrannical one.
This, was a fair policy a few hundred years ago when their was only guns.
Now, the civilian populace would have to go up against artillery, attack choppers, jets, drones, tanks, and of course, infantry with better equipment.
The second amendment's true purpose is often forgotten about and simplified down to, "Everybody gets guns just because." As such, the second amendment is out of date. It no longer applies to its original meaning. And it's just used as a scapegoat and an excuse to have guns.
Which, to be fair, the problem can no longer be fixed.
You take away the guns by introducing stricter gun laws and the civilian populace will be harmed greatly because of the staggering number of gun related crime and criminals.
As such.
Like I said. Everybody's played their hand. And all we can do is sit back and see what happens.
Of course, but that's going off of the assumption that everyone in the military would follow the government. Also, refer to DAS's latest post. To say the 2nd Amendment is out of date would be the same as saying the 1st Amendment is out of date because there was only quill & ink with parchment paper and speeches made in front of the town hall.
2017
« on: May 17, 2015, 08:23:01 PM »
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
Are you both that fucking dumb as to deny North Korea as a tyrannical country
Holy shit LOOOOOOOL
>implying that North Korea and the US are related at all
Except I never said that. You said tyranny isn't relevant, I completely refuted your point by saying that North Korea exists. Lmao you act like you're so smart but you're seriously just a dumbass, I can't even tell you how many people think that of you and it's pathetic. There's no point in even trying to talk sense into that thick skull of yours. Bye.
2018
« on: May 17, 2015, 07:57:05 PM »
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
Ah the age old "prevention of tyranny" excuse. Applicable to the old times, perhaps. But not now. It's a quaint little thing, those arguments. Fully fledged circles. Round and round it goes.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
Ah the age old "prevention of tyranny" excuse. Applicable to the old times, perhaps. But not now. It's a quaint little thing, those arguments. Fully fledged circles. Round and round it goes.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
Are you both that fucking dumb as to deny North Korea as a tyrannical country Holy shit LOOOOOOOL
2019
« on: May 17, 2015, 07:52:50 PM »
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
Ah the age old "prevention of tyranny" excuse. Applicable to the old times, perhaps. But not now. It's a quaint little thing, those arguments. Fully fledged circles. Round and round it goes.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant" >North Korea exists LOOOOOOOL
2020
« on: May 17, 2015, 07:38:16 PM »
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
2021
« on: May 17, 2015, 07:31:45 PM »
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
2022
« on: May 17, 2015, 07:21:10 PM »
2023
« on: May 17, 2015, 03:58:25 PM »
Have you ever seen Bush and 9/11 in the same room?
2024
« on: May 17, 2015, 02:30:12 PM »
Thank you.
2025
« on: May 17, 2015, 08:42:39 AM »
I don't think I even have the qualifications anyway.
2026
« on: May 16, 2015, 11:37:04 PM »
2027
« on: May 16, 2015, 11:23:19 PM »
stop
2028
« on: May 16, 2015, 11:16:38 PM »
Running gives you a great ass.
Hell yeah it does.
2029
« on: May 16, 2015, 11:09:18 PM »
Damn, why so many haters on here? Yall jelly?
Good shit roman. Do work on her.
She's chubby.
Nothing wrong with that.
Big girls need love too.
They're easy.
2030
« on: May 16, 2015, 11:03:41 PM »
Only reason I still go there is the groups.
Pretty much this.
2031
« on: May 16, 2015, 10:46:31 PM »
Damn, why so many haters on here? Yall jelly?
Good shit roman. Do work on her.
She's chubby.
2032
« on: May 16, 2015, 07:32:41 PM »
Anarchy is bad.
2033
« on: May 16, 2015, 07:27:41 PM »
Better get your gun ready, OP.
2034
« on: May 16, 2015, 07:23:25 PM »
This fucking thread lmao
2035
« on: May 16, 2015, 07:19:49 PM »
There is the threat of killing off native species of the modified plant if it "escaped" into the wild, but most companies have covered that by making the plants sterile.
Of course, that brings up a problem of a reliance on the company to produce the GMO plants every time, and could enforce a monopoly.
Otherwise, they're great.
So why is it that organic foods are always advertising that they're GMO-free? Is it just a marketing ploy or is there something about GMOs that make them bad?
Some people just like to eat all-natural foods.
2036
« on: May 16, 2015, 04:45:03 PM »
Rotom-W negates all his weaknesses except for Psychic.
Blaziken
Ability: Speed Boost
Nature: Adamant
-Protect/Swords Dance
-Flare Blitz
-Knock Off
-High Jump Kick
Is there anything else I an use instead that doesn't look stupid, I really hate Rotom-W
Ferrothorn. A Ferrothorn-Rotom W core is very good with Blaziken and it can setup hazards for you.
O I have one of those. Named it Microsoft.
m8 when we gonna battle I don't even have your friend code
2037
« on: May 16, 2015, 04:42:41 PM »
Work on them gains.
2038
« on: May 16, 2015, 04:41:31 PM »
Around 4 months ago.
2039
« on: May 16, 2015, 08:18:55 AM »
Well if my thoughts aren't included then I'm okay.
2040
« on: May 16, 2015, 08:16:02 AM »
Rotom-W negates all his weaknesses except for Psychic.
Blaziken
Ability: Speed Boost
Nature: Adamant
-Protect/Swords Dance
-Flare Blitz
-Knock Off
-High Jump Kick
Is there anything else I an use instead that doesn't look stupid, I really hate Rotom-W
Ferrothorn. A Ferrothorn-Rotom W core is very good with Blaziken and it can setup hazards for you.
Pages: 1 ... 666768 6970 ... 117
|
Show Posts
