Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Mr. Psychologist

Pages: 1 ... 283284285 286287 ... 569
8521
The Flood / Re: NAZI MODS ARE DELETING THE TRUTH
« on: April 21, 2015, 06:08:06 PM »
If by deleting the truth you mean merging the spam, sure <.<

Where'd my thread go?

I think it might have been put in with the other ones <.<

8522
The Flood / Re: NAZI MODS ARE DELETING THE TRUTH
« on: April 21, 2015, 06:03:22 PM »
If by deleting the truth you mean merging the spam, sure <.<

8523
The Flood / Re: why
« on: April 21, 2015, 03:59:16 PM »
There we go, cleaned up the mess ITT <_<

8524
Serious / Re: National Self-Determination
« on: April 21, 2015, 03:10:45 PM »
It doesn't just cause bullshit though, look at what those trogs in Argentina tried to pull over the falklands. People do have the right to self determination, even if said self determination leads to clusterfucks.

8525
Fingerprinting people por trade ins

Hahahahahaha seriously?


You realize that they're required by law to do this due to the fact that they're classified as a pawn shop right?
That sounds like some mighty fine lawmaking right there <.<

I mean the premise is fine but do you actually need to be fingerprinted to trade in some old 360 games?

They also buy consoles and phones. When people steal that shit they head to places like GameStop to sell them.
Well that I could understand but for games too? <_<

8526
Fingerprinting people por trade ins

Hahahahahaha seriously?


You realize that they're required by law to do this due to the fact that they're classified as a pawn shop right?
That sounds like some mighty fine lawmaking right there <.<

I mean the premise is fine but do you actually need to be fingerprinted to trade in some old 360 games?

8527
The Flood / Re: the power of memes
« on: April 21, 2015, 11:59:15 AM »
... Burn them all.

8528
This is pretty tenuous but it's at least formatted properly for including NSFW links.

One thing piqued my interest though, why do you say the Jordanian pilot wasn't innocent? I'd hardly say bombing ISIS makes him guilty of anything at all.
No, I mean that he could be perceived as guilty in the eyes of IS as he directly bombed them. The journalists, Christians, and humanitarian workers did nothing which could even be remotely interpreted as being against IS.
Ah right, fair enough.

8529
Fingerprinting people por trade ins

Hahahahahaha seriously?
wait aren't you able to just buy guns from walmart there
and then they go that serious for game trade ins
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehaw!

8530
Fingerprinting people por trade ins

Hahahahahaha seriously?

8531
The Flood / Re: Which Soundtrack are You?
« on: April 21, 2015, 02:55:15 AM »
YouTube

8532
Serious / Re: People who believe that Authorianism is good...
« on: April 20, 2015, 07:14:25 PM »
Wait people actually support that?
Mentally retarded people do, yes.
Spoken like a true communist.


8533
It's probably because there isn't anything new going on in the world, more Jihad in the middle east and russia swinging it's chinchin around.
But ceasefire in Ukraine though...

If there were more Ukraine shit going down, I'd make some threads about that, but that conflict is pretty stagnant currently.
Even that has grown stale, the clangers were interesting but then it just went into another messy eastern european clusterfuck.

What we need is another war!
Haven't had custard like this since the last one.
I'm just waiting for the Serbs to start removing kebab again

8534
It's probably because there isn't anything new going on in the world, more Jihad in the middle east and russia swinging it's chinchin around.
But ceasefire in Ukraine though...

If there were more Ukraine shit going down, I'd make some threads about that, but that conflict is pretty stagnant currently.
Even that has grown stale, the clangers were interesting but then it just went into another messy eastern european clusterfuck.

What we need is another war!
Haven't had custard like this since the last one.

8535
The Flood / Re: You have three choices
« on: April 20, 2015, 06:45:29 PM »
Open the baby.
A satanic demon comes out of it and brutally tears your throat out with its teeth
Blood for the Blood God.

8536
The Flood / Re: You have three choices
« on: April 20, 2015, 06:43:38 PM »
Open the baby.

8537
It's probably because there isn't anything new going on in the world, more Jihad in the middle east and russia swinging it's chinchin around.

8538
The Flood / Re: Anime
« on: April 20, 2015, 06:26:54 PM »
Why do you watch bad shows against advice and complain about them?

Spoiler
ʕっ•ᴥ•ʔっ
(っಠ‿ಠ)っ
(っ◕‿◕)っ

this isn't about me in particular, it's about anime in general
Well then the generalisation is incorrect <.<
*Most* anime is filler, but not all of it.

8539
The Flood / Re: Anime
« on: April 20, 2015, 06:25:07 PM »
Filler for the empty lives of the sad sacks of shit that watch it.
Hey I have a lif-

...

Okay I don't, this is an apt observation <_<
be a dear and fix my typo

lol, I edited the wrong post but still did the right thing. GG psy, I should go to bed.

8540
The Flood / Re: Anime
« on: April 20, 2015, 06:21:41 PM »
Filler for the empty lives of the sad sacks of shit that watch it.
Hey I have a lif-

...

Okay I don't, this is an apt observation <_<

8541
The Flood / Re: Anime
« on: April 20, 2015, 06:20:50 PM »
Why do you watch bad shows against advice and complain about them?

Spoiler
ʕっ•ᴥ•ʔっ
(っಠ‿ಠ)っ
(っ◕‿◕)っ

8542
As I said the other day >.>

Recreational use I don't think I can condone, but that's hardly something exclusive to DMT. Not condoning =/= Condemning before I get the muh freedoms crowd trying to crawl down my oesophagus.

In proper clinical trials if it's shown to be safe enough for use and has demonstrable benefits then there is no reason to not allow medical usage of said drug.

You would have to be careful though, same with the overeager charge to legalise cannabis everywhere when they are overlooking/ignoring/denying the whole schizophrenia inducing effect it can have on vulnerable individuals.*

*
To head this off beforehand, I'm going to take the word of a clinical textbook and longitudinal studies over d4nkw33dnm3m3s.blogspot's ranting. People who aren't vulnerable to schizophrenia aren't going to develop it from 420blazingit but people who are significantly increase their chances of developing positive symptoms by overstimulating the dopamine centres in the brain >.>
So why don't you support the recreational use of psychoactives? In my personal experience and the experiences of a lot of people it's nearly impossible to get addicted to them.
It's a 50/50 split for me, the first part is the personal objection to recreational use of substances.
I don't think that using mind altering substances, even if harmless, is something to be encouraged >.> To be more specific, it's to do with clarity of thought. If your mind is clouded/tripping then it's not going to be operating in an optimal state. So a drug which improves concentration I find less repelling than a dissociative because it's enhancing your mind rather than obfuscating it <.<

The other half is the concern part, substance usage involves a lot of unknowns. I know the example here is DMT but I can't say I know much about the supply chains of it, but typically something being run through a dealer isn't going to be anywhere near as safety controlled as something distributed by a licensed pharmacist. The effects drugs can have on people's minds in a negative manner either by addiction or less visible damage/changes to the neurology are hard to measure because it's not a properly studied substance in the way that an SSRI would be. If they are determined to be harmless by large scale clinical trials and show a positive effect after the initial clouding, I could see a more justified reason for using them.

8543
The Flood / Re: Jessica the Feminazi [Trigger Warning]
« on: April 20, 2015, 05:59:23 PM »
Didn't even smirk

Try harder fag
I cry evrytiem

8544
The Flood / Re: Jessica the Feminazi [Trigger Warning]
« on: April 20, 2015, 05:56:08 PM »

8545
The Flood / Jessica the Feminazi [Trigger Warning]
« on: April 20, 2015, 05:53:20 PM »
Warning the following video may trigger certain types of people and may also cause you to nearly choke on some pineapple that you foolishly were eating whilst watching a flashgitz video.

YouTube

8546
As I said the other day >.>

Recreational use I don't think I can condone, but that's hardly something exclusive to DMT. Not condoning =/= Condemning before I get the muh freedoms crowd trying to crawl down my oesophagus.

In proper clinical trials if it's shown to be safe enough for use and has demonstrable benefits then there is no reason to not allow medical usage of said drug.

You would have to be careful though, same with the overeager charge to legalise cannabis everywhere when they are overlooking/ignoring/denying the whole schizophrenia inducing effect it can have on vulnerable individuals.*

*
To head this off beforehand, I'm going to take the word of a clinical textbook and longitudinal studies over d4nkw33dnm3m3s.blogspot's ranting. People who aren't vulnerable to schizophrenia aren't going to develop it from 420blazingit but people who are significantly increase their chances of developing positive symptoms by overstimulating the dopamine centres in the brain >.>

8547
Serious / Re: A pro-choice medical student witnesses an abortion
« on: April 20, 2015, 05:02:44 PM »
So are you saying your opinion on life in general is different in some way? Or are you just assuming that my opinion on life only extends to myself? You can't have it both ways there.

For one, my opinions on how I live my life vary significantly from how I view life in general or the lives of others.
Same here. This is the philosophy. It's not a discussion of our individual lives. That's anecdotal and generally useless. The philosophy is about the human condition as a whole. It's not a personal decision not to have kids--it's the logical statement that having children is wrong.
A logical statement by tenuous means, sure.


Quote
Quote
Of course because the idea that an entire species will voluntarily wipe itself out is equatable to the prospect of treating all men equally.
http://sep7agon.net/index.php?topic=34821.0
Spoiler


Make whatever analogies you please but choosing absurd ones or incomparable ones doesn't help your argument as much as you think it does.

Quote
Yes, it is equatable. PERFECTLY equatable. But only in the sense that they both represent a VAST and controversial outlook on life. Yes, the idea of freeing the slaves used to be extremely controversial. Just as the notion of voluntary human extinction is today. The fact that you think I'm trying to say that slavery = natalism is so obnoxiously fucking stupid.
That fact that you think that's what I'm getting at is rather amusing, my point was that you drew a silly analogy when a more suitable one would have sufficed instead of something that's bordering on an appeal to emotions.

Quote
Quote
Imposing something that can be taken away easily is hardly that great of an imposition, if someone grows up to find themselves wishing they were never born and that said thoughts aren't simply the result of mental illness then they can always find a way to exit this plane of existence.
Fuck. You.

I've had this fucking argument so many goddamn times, and you're going to pull this WEAK shit.
I wonder why.

Quote
No, suicide is not an easy option, you dumb CUNT. By the time people can even make the rational decision to kill themselves, they've already likely grown highly attached to everyone in their lives, and even though they want to kill themselves, now they have a ton of pressure to live, simply because it would be a goddamn tragedy. It would fuck up the lives of everyone who cared about them. So no, it's not an easy fucking option.
No fucking shit, talk about preaching to the choir there. People who make the decision to end their lives are either A) Mentally Ill or B) Have a set of life circumstances that causes them to make said decision, either to escape shame or debt or whatever myriad cause it can be.

My point there was that no person of sound mind is going to want to kill themselves simply because they hate the fact that they were born, if they do then there is something wrong with their psychology and they need treatment.

Quote
Not to mention, euthanasia is ILLEGAL basically everywhere. You can't just walk into a clinic and ask for suicide pills, it doesn't fucking work like that.
For good reason, with a shift towards humanitarian euthanasia in recent years too. People who wish to end their lives must be of a sound mind and not afflicted with delusions or mental illness. Hating the idea that they were born without consent isn't sufficient grounds to end your life unless they have another affliction that is tainting their mind.

Quote
People resort to gruesome, grotesque, painful, inhumane methods when they could instead opt for a graceful exit. Except the state won't allow for it. So we have all these fucking hoops we have to jump over. And for you to be this moderator of a forum, standing above everyone else, being this "model citizen" of the forum, and this is the shit you SPEW on the fucking Internet? "Don't like life? Just kill yourself. It's that easy."
Nice to see your reading comprehension goes down as your blood pressure goes up. To spell it out, read the above again.

Quote
Fuck you, you glib cunt. FUCK you.
Spoiler


Also:
Quote
Oh, and I'd just like to thank you, Sandtrap, for not only having the patience to take a discussion like this seriously, but for presenting a wonderful example of how to converse with me. Not through slander or insults, but through rational insight. Thank you for that.

The irony is delicious

Quote
Quote
Impose, read the second definition. A clear discussion about antinatalism is fine, it's whenever you drag it up in unrelated topics that it becomes tiresome. That is banging on about it.
Abortion is huge. Of COURSE my CORE FUCKING PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF is going to be brought up.

Get the FUCK over it.
You act like there is something I need to get over here, when in fact I'd say the one flaming away with allcaps and profanity might need to get over something.

Quote
Quote
Well duh, it doesn't shove you back up into your mother's womb
And unless it does that, suicide isn't a good option. It doesn't solve the problem. At all.

At.

All.
Spoiler

Quote
A slave who commits suicide will never end slavery. You can't end slavery if you're fucking DEAD.
A fair enough point but again comparing childbirth to slavery. The analogy simply doesn't match up beyond 'being forced to do something' Enslavement of free sentient beings to exploit for free labour =/= The horrors of conception, gestation and birth. Which you aren't consciously aware of.

Quote
Quote
It's not slander, it's an accurate label.
Then "worthless cunt" would be an accurate label for you.
Again with the platinum mad, this is really rather tiresome.

Quote
Quote
A set of beliefs that is firmly entrenched in an individual who will not accept any flaws pointed out or concede them, you don't believe they are flaws so you don't see them as flaws. That's dogmatic.

There is a nice easy litmus test for this though.

1. Do you think your philosophy is correct?
2. Why do you think it is correct?
3. Do you think it could be wrong?
4. If not, why not?
1. Yes, obviously. I wouldn't fucking believe in it if I thought it was wrong, would I? Could you be more inarticulate?
2. Because I have been presented with no better alternatives.
3. It's possible. Hence why I have discussions.
4. If I didn't think I could be wrong, I would never have discussions about it.

Why would I waste time trying to prove people wrong if I knew that I was right?
Once again getting too wound up over some simple questions, the purpose isn't to determine whether you believe what you spout which you clearly do, but to follow through with the logic of whether you question your own beliefs, which thankfully you claim to do so.

Anyway, good lord you get so emotional over a simple discussion on a forum. I know that expressing your emotions is healthy and all but there are limits to where you should take it.

+++

Once more for highlighting it
Hypocrisy stage 1
by the way, way to blame me for bringing the subject up when it actually wasn't me at all

i stated my opinion on the subject, which indeed was rooted in my philosophy, because why the fuck wouldn't it be
and then people started asking me questions about it

so i answered them
which sort of requires that i bring up anti-natalism

you're basically telling me that i should have never stated my opinion in this thread
to which i say, go fuck yourself, you totalitarian piece of shit
Hypocrisy stage 2
Oh, and I'd just like to thank you, Sandtrap, for not only having the patience to take a discussion like this seriously, but for presenting a wonderful example of how to converse with me. Not through slander or insults, but through rational insight. Thank you for that.

One fiiiiiiinal note before I post this
Quote
you're basically telling me that i should have never stated my opinion in this thread
to which i say, go fuck yourself, you totalitarian piece of shit
The mental gymnastics it must have taken for you to get me telling you that you should have never posted your opinion in this thread are astounding.

My original query with you was regarding your apparently dour view of the lives of the disabled to which you of course started on about anti-natalism, hence this little chitchat.

Have a pleasant evening.

8548
The Flood / Re: So, today is my birthday
« on: April 20, 2015, 12:04:53 PM »


Found a pic of OP on his 10th birthday.

8549
Welp, got back from the interview and it went well >.>

I should hear back in the next couple of weeks if I have got it <.<
Thanks for all the tips people.
What did they ask you?
Just really simple stuff;
What grades did you get at GCSE/A Level?
What are you doing at the moment? (Follow up question about 'what is the psych degree for?')
Previous experience working?
And then a few questions about where I lived because I live literally next door to the shop lol.

Welp, got back from the interview and it went well >.>

I should hear back in the next couple of weeks if I have got it <.<
Thanks for all the tips people.
Did you wear your horse mask?

Yes.

8550
Serious / Re: A pro-choice medical student witnesses an abortion
« on: April 20, 2015, 11:43:19 AM »
From your perspective, and as you've already said ' I don't give a fuck about what your own personal opinion on life is.' so why on earth should anyone give a fuck about yours?
Wrong. I don't give a fuck about what your own personal opinion on your life is.
People will often conflate their own opinion on their own life with their opinion on life in general, and that's bad.

Because not everyone lives your life. Which is my argument.
So are you saying your opinion on life in general is different in some way? Or are you just assuming that my opinion on life only extends to myself? You can't have it both ways there.

For one, my opinions on how I live my life vary significantly from how I view life in general or the lives of others.

Quote
Quote
People do things I find abhorrent every day, do I whop out the robes and start preaching about the evils of their actions? Nope, because it's a waste of time for all involved. Do you think you'll ever have the slightest chance in hell of convincing the human race to voluntarily wipe itself out when that runs against some of the most basic biological functions of a living thing? Because I really do admire that naivety.
I'm sure there was a time where people thought the abolition of slavery was a very idealistic prospect as well, and look where we're at now. You have no point.

Of course because the idea that an entire species will voluntarily wipe itself out is equatable to the prospect of treating all men equally.


Quote
Quote
Oh my that's quite amusing, you go from me saying loophole to equating that with rape and murder.
Imposing things on others is against anti-natalist ideology right?
No. Imposing LIFE on others is against anti-natalist ideology.

The only thing stated in the anti-natalist doctrine is don't have fucking kids.
That's it. Do I believe in a consent-based morality as well? Yes. But that's a much more nebulous philosophy.
Imposing something that can be taken away easily is hardly that great of an imposition, if someone grows up to find themselves wishing they were never born and that said thoughts aren't simply the result of mental illness then they can always find a way to exit this plane of existence.

Quote
Quote
So why do you keep on seeking to impose your philosophy on others, not at gun point but relentless carping on about it is a form of imposition because people who clearly don't want to hear it for the 300th time in a row are stuck with the choice of either A) Not bothering to continue the conversation or B) Putting up with yet another anti-natalist soapbox.
Because I'm not imposing my philosophy on anybody. You don't know what "impose" means, either. If I were imposing anti-natalism, I wouldn't be having the discussion with people. I'd be telling people that they're wrong, just wrong, without posing any rational argument. I'd probably support a cause to brainwash every human being involuntarily into becoming an antinatalist for the greater good. But that's not what I'm doing. I'm not imposing anything. If you aren't interested in having the discussion, then don't have the discussion. You can't say the same thing about life. Suicide doesn't literally undo your birth.

Impose, read the second definition. A clear discussion about antinatalism is fine, it's whenever you drag it up in unrelated topics that it becomes tiresome. That is banging on about it.

Well duh, it doesn't shove you back up into your mother's womb and shrink you down into less and less cells but it results in the same thing, you are no longer conscious/aware of your existence instead you get to swim around in the void.

Quote
Quote
And as for the dogma, your rigid adherence to anti-natalism and refusal to accept any flaws in the ideology (from what I have seen) would count as dogma.
I have never refused to accept any flaws in the ideology, because I have yet to be presented with any flaws. You can accuse me of being closed-minded, but to label it a dogma with no fundamental basis for that claim is just slander.
It's not slander, it's an accurate label.

A set of beliefs that is firmly entrenched in an individual who will not accept any flaws pointed out or concede them, you don't believe they are flaws so you don't see them as flaws. That's dogmatic.

There is a nice easy litmus test for this though.

1. Do you think your philosophy is correct?
2. Why do you think it is correct?
3. Do you think it could be wrong?
4. If not, why not?

Pages: 1 ... 283284285 286287 ... 569