8521
The Flood / Re: NAZI MODS ARE DELETING THE TRUTH
« on: April 21, 2015, 06:08:06 PM »If by deleting the truth you mean merging the spam, sure <.<
Where'd my thread go?
I think it might have been put in with the other ones <.<
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 8521
The Flood / Re: NAZI MODS ARE DELETING THE TRUTH« on: April 21, 2015, 06:08:06 PM »If by deleting the truth you mean merging the spam, sure <.< I think it might have been put in with the other ones <.< 8522
The Flood / Re: NAZI MODS ARE DELETING THE TRUTH« on: April 21, 2015, 06:03:22 PM »
If by deleting the truth you mean merging the spam, sure <.<
8524
Serious / Re: National Self-Determination« on: April 21, 2015, 03:10:45 PM »
It doesn't just cause bullshit though, look at what those trogs in Argentina tried to pull over the falklands. People do have the right to self determination, even if said self determination leads to clusterfucks.
8525
Gaming / Re: Should I trade in my Xbox 360 for an Xbox One at Gamestop?« on: April 21, 2015, 01:41:22 PM »Well that I could understand but for games too? <_<That sounds like some mighty fine lawmaking right there <.<Fingerprinting people por trade ins 8526
Gaming / Re: Should I trade in my Xbox 360 for an Xbox One at Gamestop?« on: April 21, 2015, 12:50:13 PM »That sounds like some mighty fine lawmaking right there <.<Fingerprinting people por trade ins I mean the premise is fine but do you actually need to be fingerprinted to trade in some old 360 games? 8528
Serious / Re: Every Islamic State execution video I can find (obviously extremely NSFW)« on: April 21, 2015, 11:51:07 AM »Ah right, fair enough.This is pretty tenuous but it's at least formatted properly for including NSFW links.No, I mean that he could be perceived as guilty in the eyes of IS as he directly bombed them. The journalists, Christians, and humanitarian workers did nothing which could even be remotely interpreted as being against IS. 8529
Gaming / Re: Should I trade in my Xbox 360 for an Xbox One at Gamestop?« on: April 21, 2015, 03:20:43 AM »Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehaw!wait aren't you able to just buy guns from walmart thereFingerprinting people por trade ins 8530
Gaming / Re: Should I trade in my Xbox 360 for an Xbox One at Gamestop?« on: April 21, 2015, 03:04:16 AM »Fingerprinting people por trade ins Hahahahahaha seriously? 8532
Serious / Re: People who believe that Authorianism is good...« on: April 20, 2015, 07:14:25 PM »Spoken like a true communist.Wait people actually support that?Mentally retarded people do, yes. 8533
Serious / Re: Why is foreign policy such an unpopular topic in Sep7agon?« on: April 20, 2015, 06:58:58 PM »I'm just waiting for the Serbs to start removing kebab againEven that has grown stale, the clangers were interesting but then it just went into another messy eastern european clusterfuck.It's probably because there isn't anything new going on in the world, more Jihad in the middle east and russia swinging it's chinchin around.But ceasefire in Ukraine though... ![]() 8534
Serious / Re: Why is foreign policy such an unpopular topic in Sep7agon?« on: April 20, 2015, 06:48:50 PM »Even that has grown stale, the clangers were interesting but then it just went into another messy eastern european clusterfuck.It's probably because there isn't anything new going on in the world, more Jihad in the middle east and russia swinging it's chinchin around.But ceasefire in Ukraine though... What we need is another war! Haven't had custard like this since the last one. 8535
The Flood / Re: You have three choices« on: April 20, 2015, 06:45:29 PM »Blood for the Blood God.Open the baby.A satanic demon comes out of it and brutally tears your throat out with its teeth 8537
Serious / Re: Why is foreign policy such an unpopular topic in Sep7agon?« on: April 20, 2015, 06:42:42 PM »
It's probably because there isn't anything new going on in the world, more Jihad in the middle east and russia swinging it's chinchin around.
8538
Well then the generalisation is incorrect <.<Why do you watch bad shows against advice and complain about them? *Most* anime is filler, but not all of it. 8539
be a dear and fix my typoFiller for the empty lives of the sad sacks of shit that watch it.Hey I have a lif- lol, I edited the wrong post but still did the right thing. GG psy, I should go to bed. 8540
Filler for the empty lives of the sad sacks of shit that watch it.Hey I have a lif- ... Okay I don't, this is an apt observation <_< 8542
Serious / Re: Opinions on the use of psychoactive substances as treatments« on: April 20, 2015, 06:17:57 PM »It's a 50/50 split for me, the first part is the personal objection to recreational use of substances.As I said the other day >.>So why don't you support the recreational use of psychoactives? In my personal experience and the experiences of a lot of people it's nearly impossible to get addicted to them. I don't think that using mind altering substances, even if harmless, is something to be encouraged >.> To be more specific, it's to do with clarity of thought. If your mind is clouded/tripping then it's not going to be operating in an optimal state. So a drug which improves concentration I find less repelling than a dissociative because it's enhancing your mind rather than obfuscating it <.< The other half is the concern part, substance usage involves a lot of unknowns. I know the example here is DMT but I can't say I know much about the supply chains of it, but typically something being run through a dealer isn't going to be anywhere near as safety controlled as something distributed by a licensed pharmacist. The effects drugs can have on people's minds in a negative manner either by addiction or less visible damage/changes to the neurology are hard to measure because it's not a properly studied substance in the way that an SSRI would be. If they are determined to be harmless by large scale clinical trials and show a positive effect after the initial clouding, I could see a more justified reason for using them. 8543
The Flood / Re: Jessica the Feminazi [Trigger Warning]« on: April 20, 2015, 05:59:23 PM »Didn't even smirkI cry evrytiem 8544
The Flood / Re: Jessica the Feminazi [Trigger Warning]« on: April 20, 2015, 05:56:08 PM »mango*I don't read chinese cartoons. 8545
The Flood / Jessica the Feminazi [Trigger Warning]« on: April 20, 2015, 05:53:20 PM »
Warning the following video may trigger certain types of people and may also cause you to nearly choke on some pineapple that you foolishly were eating whilst watching a flashgitz video.
YouTube 8546
Serious / Re: Opinions on the use of psychoactive substances as treatments« on: April 20, 2015, 05:13:09 PM »
As I said the other day >.>
Recreational use I don't think I can condone, but that's hardly something exclusive to DMT. Not condoning =/= Condemning before I get the muh freedoms crowd trying to crawl down my oesophagus. In proper clinical trials if it's shown to be safe enough for use and has demonstrable benefits then there is no reason to not allow medical usage of said drug. You would have to be careful though, same with the overeager charge to legalise cannabis everywhere when they are overlooking/ignoring/denying the whole schizophrenia inducing effect it can have on vulnerable individuals.* * To head this off beforehand, I'm going to take the word of a clinical textbook and longitudinal studies over d4nkw33dnm3m3s.blogspot's ranting. People who aren't vulnerable to schizophrenia aren't going to develop it from 420blazingit but people who are significantly increase their chances of developing positive symptoms by overstimulating the dopamine centres in the brain >.> 8547
Serious / Re: A pro-choice medical student witnesses an abortion« on: April 20, 2015, 05:02:44 PM »A logical statement by tenuous means, sure.So are you saying your opinion on life in general is different in some way? Or are you just assuming that my opinion on life only extends to myself? You can't have it both ways there.Same here. This is the philosophy. It's not a discussion of our individual lives. That's anecdotal and generally useless. The philosophy is about the human condition as a whole. It's not a personal decision not to have kids--it's the logical statement that having children is wrong. Quote
Spoiler ![]() Make whatever analogies you please but choosing absurd ones or incomparable ones doesn't help your argument as much as you think it does. Quote Yes, it is equatable. PERFECTLY equatable. But only in the sense that they both represent a VAST and controversial outlook on life. Yes, the idea of freeing the slaves used to be extremely controversial. Just as the notion of voluntary human extinction is today. The fact that you think I'm trying to say that slavery = natalism is so obnoxiously fucking stupid.That fact that you think that's what I'm getting at is rather amusing, my point was that you drew a silly analogy when a more suitable one would have sufficed instead of something that's bordering on an appeal to emotions. Quote I wonder why. Quote No, suicide is not an easy option, you dumb CUNT. By the time people can even make the rational decision to kill themselves, they've already likely grown highly attached to everyone in their lives, and even though they want to kill themselves, now they have a ton of pressure to live, simply because it would be a goddamn tragedy. It would fuck up the lives of everyone who cared about them. So no, it's not an easy fucking option.No fucking shit, talk about preaching to the choir there. People who make the decision to end their lives are either A) Mentally Ill or B) Have a set of life circumstances that causes them to make said decision, either to escape shame or debt or whatever myriad cause it can be. My point there was that no person of sound mind is going to want to kill themselves simply because they hate the fact that they were born, if they do then there is something wrong with their psychology and they need treatment. Quote Not to mention, euthanasia is ILLEGAL basically everywhere. You can't just walk into a clinic and ask for suicide pills, it doesn't fucking work like that.For good reason, with a shift towards humanitarian euthanasia in recent years too. People who wish to end their lives must be of a sound mind and not afflicted with delusions or mental illness. Hating the idea that they were born without consent isn't sufficient grounds to end your life unless they have another affliction that is tainting their mind. Quote People resort to gruesome, grotesque, painful, inhumane methods when they could instead opt for a graceful exit. Except the state won't allow for it. So we have all these fucking hoops we have to jump over. And for you to be this moderator of a forum, standing above everyone else, being this "model citizen" of the forum, and this is the shit you SPEW on the fucking Internet? "Don't like life? Just kill yourself. It's that easy."Nice to see your reading comprehension goes down as your blood pressure goes up. To spell it out, read the above again. Quote Fuck you, you glib cunt. FUCK you. Spoiler ![]() Also: Quote Oh, and I'd just like to thank you, Sandtrap, for not only having the patience to take a discussion like this seriously, but for presenting a wonderful example of how to converse with me. Not through slander or insults, but through rational insight. Thank you for that. The irony is delicious Quote You act like there is something I need to get over here, when in fact I'd say the one flaming away with allcaps and profanity might need to get over something. Quote
Spoiler ![]() Quote A slave who commits suicide will never end slavery. You can't end slavery if you're fucking DEAD.A fair enough point but again comparing childbirth to slavery. The analogy simply doesn't match up beyond 'being forced to do something' Enslavement of free sentient beings to exploit for free labour =/= The horrors of conception, gestation and birth. Which you aren't consciously aware of. Quote Again with the platinum mad, this is really rather tiresome. Quote Once again getting too wound up over some simple questions, the purpose isn't to determine whether you believe what you spout which you clearly do, but to follow through with the logic of whether you question your own beliefs, which thankfully you claim to do so. Anyway, good lord you get so emotional over a simple discussion on a forum. I know that expressing your emotions is healthy and all but there are limits to where you should take it. +++ Once more for highlighting it Hypocrisy stage 1 by the way, way to blame me for bringing the subject up when it actually wasn't me at all Hypocrisy stage 2 Oh, and I'd just like to thank you, Sandtrap, for not only having the patience to take a discussion like this seriously, but for presenting a wonderful example of how to converse with me. Not through slander or insults, but through rational insight. Thank you for that. One fiiiiiiinal note before I post this Quote you're basically telling me that i should have never stated my opinion in this threadThe mental gymnastics it must have taken for you to get me telling you that you should have never posted your opinion in this thread are astounding. My original query with you was regarding your apparently dour view of the lives of the disabled to which you of course started on about anti-natalism, hence this little chitchat. Have a pleasant evening. 8548
The Flood / Re: So, today is my birthday« on: April 20, 2015, 12:04:53 PM »![]() Found a pic of OP on his 10th birthday. 8549
The Flood / Re: I have an interview for my first proper job tomorrow >.>« on: April 20, 2015, 11:47:11 AM »Just really simple stuff;Welp, got back from the interview and it went well >.>What did they ask you? What grades did you get at GCSE/A Level? What are you doing at the moment? (Follow up question about 'what is the psych degree for?') Previous experience working? And then a few questions about where I lived because I live literally next door to the shop lol. Welp, got back from the interview and it went well >.>Did you wear your horse mask? Yes. 8550
Serious / Re: A pro-choice medical student witnesses an abortion« on: April 20, 2015, 11:43:19 AM »So are you saying your opinion on life in general is different in some way? Or are you just assuming that my opinion on life only extends to myself? You can't have it both ways there.From your perspective, and as you've already said ' I don't give a fuck about what your own personal opinion on life is.' so why on earth should anyone give a fuck about yours?Wrong. I don't give a fuck about what your own personal opinion on your life is. For one, my opinions on how I live my life vary significantly from how I view life in general or the lives of others. Quote
Of course because the idea that an entire species will voluntarily wipe itself out is equatable to the prospect of treating all men equally. Quote Imposing something that can be taken away easily is hardly that great of an imposition, if someone grows up to find themselves wishing they were never born and that said thoughts aren't simply the result of mental illness then they can always find a way to exit this plane of existence. Quote
Impose, read the second definition. A clear discussion about antinatalism is fine, it's whenever you drag it up in unrelated topics that it becomes tiresome. That is banging on about it. Well duh, it doesn't shove you back up into your mother's womb and shrink you down into less and less cells but it results in the same thing, you are no longer conscious/aware of your existence instead you get to swim around in the void. Quote It's not slander, it's an accurate label. A set of beliefs that is firmly entrenched in an individual who will not accept any flaws pointed out or concede them, you don't believe they are flaws so you don't see them as flaws. That's dogmatic. There is a nice easy litmus test for this though. 1. Do you think your philosophy is correct? 2. Why do you think it is correct? 3. Do you think it could be wrong? 4. If not, why not? |