Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Mr. Psychologist

Pages: 1 ... 261262263 264265 ... 569
7861
The Flood / Re: Describe other users with mental illnesses
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:54:53 PM »
I said it in the one thread and I'll say it again...

You fuckers need sectioning.

7862
The Flood / Re: Describe other users with mental illnesses
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:53:50 PM »
I'm actually interested now as to whether I'm more narcissistic, or more antisocial.

*zoidberg*

Afaik the two aren't mutually exclusive.

7863
The Flood / Re: Favourite sub-reddit [NSFW]
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:51:50 PM »
Omfg das
That is fucked even by my standards
... God that must be quite... fubar ._.

7864
The Flood / Re: Describe other users with mental illnesses
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:50:50 PM »
Mr Histrionic PD.
Histrionic my ass.

Fucking kill yourself.

lolmadcuzgirlpersonalitydisorder

7865
The Flood / Re: Describe other users with mental illnesses
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:50:11 PM »
Quote
Mr P - Avoidant Personality Disorder
*cries*
*screams*
*hides*
*denies*

7866
The Flood / Re: Favourite sub-reddit [NSFW]
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:49:21 PM »
Fuckin psychos.
Stop oppressing me with your neurotypical expectations.

Psychopathy is just socially constructed.

I won't be oppressing you, but boris the orderly certainly will be if you don't take these pills <_<

7868
The Flood / Re: Describe other users with mental illnesses
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:47:33 PM »
Somebody fucking do me too.

Too easy tho, Mr Histrionic PD.

7870
The Flood / Re: Favourite sub-reddit [NSFW]
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:46:11 PM »
detain them in a hospital for psychological/psychiatrict treatment against their will <_<
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
You're not in kansas anymore <_<

But seriously, when I qualify I'm coming back here and carting a fair few of you off to the nearest hospital >_>

Fuckin psychos.

And then I'll probably have to join you all myself but we'll keep that a secret until I get the badge.

7871
The Flood / Re: Favourite sub-reddit [NSFW]
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:40:20 PM »
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/12/contents

<____________________<
At least direct me to the relevant part.
If it was the old one I could but I haven't read the amended one I was just counting on it still including section 12 or 24 or something. It's been a while >.>

Short version is that it's the bit that gives an approved mental healthcare professional the power to 'section someone' or detain them in a hospital for psychological/psychiatrict treatment against their will <_<

7872
The Flood / Re: Favourite sub-reddit [NSFW]
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:35:56 PM »
you find the real shit on dark web, i won't post links obvs but yeah dat shit is crazy

pls just for a lil bit
no

and jesus christ das go and see a counsellor.
What's your hourly rate?
I'm not qualified yet <_<

but then it will be free because >socialist

god help me ;-;

You too.
Now.
>.>
<.<

You can't make me.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/12/contents

<____________________<

7873
The Flood / Re: Favourite sub-reddit [NSFW]
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:33:28 PM »
and jesus christ das go and see a counsellor.
Don't judge. That's a quality sub-reddit.

You too.
Now.

7874
The Flood / Re: Favourite sub-reddit [NSFW]
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:31:44 PM »
you find the real shit on dark web, i won't post links obvs but yeah dat shit is crazy

pls just for a lil bit
no

and jesus christ das go and see a counsellor.

7875
The Flood / Re: Favourite sub-reddit [NSFW]
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:22:33 PM »
you find the real shit on dark web, i won't post links obvs but yeah dat shit is crazy

7876
The Flood / Re: Favourite sub-reddit [NSFW]
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:19:50 PM »
Sankyu berry much

7877
The Flood / Re: Favourite sub-reddit [NSFW]
« on: June 03, 2015, 06:17:56 PM »
Could you spoiler the link >.>

It's just good form to do so with NSFW content like... that...

7878
The Flood / Re: TIL hugbox
« on: June 03, 2015, 05:15:31 PM »
I ran afoul of this a while ago on here when talking to verbatim iirc, kinda blindsided me too and after a brief bit of digging it wasn't a claimed word or something but yup, straight up made to taunt people with autism. Kinda shitty because it's a good word for tumblr but eh, Echo Chamber fills the same void and I swear to god if that's been made up to taunt the deaf I might hit someone <_<

7879


The face of deja vu <_<

7880
The Flood / Re: What would be the opposite of kill yourself?
« on: June 03, 2015, 02:10:50 PM »
Enhance your calm.

7881
Gaming / Re: So now that the dust has settled
« on: June 03, 2015, 02:07:05 PM »
I really hope that the voicing stuff is purely promotional <.<

It's hard to market a faceless customising screen in trailers that are trying to be cinematic rather than gameplay heavy. It might just be that this guy is the Lone Wanderer/Courier and then they open up the character to the player. Hopefully the worst case scenario is a bioware scheme (Shepard) and not a 'here we made this guy for you' <_<

I'm interested to see what people can identify of the thing shown shortly after the deathclaw/protectotron bit >.>
Looked like a crab of some sort.

7882
Gaming / Re: Would you be up for a Reach Xbox One port?
« on: June 03, 2015, 11:37:07 AM »
Pre-TU reach? Fuck Yeah.
Post-TU reach? Fuck No.

In the event of a port it'd be done by 343 of course, so naturally they'd have that abomination taped onto it so I think I'll just let Reach rest in piece in pieces on my shelf >.>
This is such a bad opinion.
Pre-TU was broken as fuck and filled with complete bullshit. The TU made Reach somewhat good.

Adapt.
Shouldn't have to adapt to bullshit
Beyond Armerlawk and Bloom, what was really that bad?
Bloom itself isn't even an issue if you don't spray and pray like a twelve year old.
Problems with Reach:
Bloom
Armour Lock
Active camo
Sword block
No bleedthrough
Paper vehicles (wasn't changed, still a problem)
Health/shields were tied to vehicle damage (wasn't changed, still a problem)

TU Reach is objectively better, sorry.
Bloom is a non-issue though, weapons shouldn't be perfectly accurate when you are going full retard with them.

Active Camo was in previous halos, the invisibility it offered in reach was pisspoor which left radar jamming as the only decent bit about it. Not exactly a big issue.

Sword block is fair enough but I think it was fine, rather than the sword being a 10 kill grapetrain it could be checked.

Bleedthrough is ehh, again I don't really mind it but I do find it generally annoying to do X amount of damage to a shield and not affect the health so fair enough >.>

Paper vehicles, vaguely. I blame the DMR for that though, that fucking rifle ruined BTB <_<

Vehicle/Health tie in is a vaguer one, it's a bit stupid but at the same time combat vehicles were normally a one way ticket and the warthog was a death sentence <.<

It wasn't perfect, but it was fun. The TU took that away.

7883
Gaming / Re: Would you be up for a Reach Xbox One port?
« on: June 03, 2015, 11:31:17 AM »
Pre-TU reach? Fuck Yeah.
Post-TU reach? Fuck No.

In the event of a port it'd be done by 343 of course, so naturally they'd have that abomination taped onto it so I think I'll just let Reach rest in piece in pieces on my shelf >.>
This is such a bad opinion.
Pre-TU was broken as fuck and filled with complete bullshit. The TU made Reach somewhat good.

Adapt.

Pre-TU reach? Fuck Yeah.
Post-TU reach? Fuck No.

In the event of a port it'd be done by 343 of course, so naturally they'd have that abomination taped onto it so I think I'll just let Reach rest in piece in pieces on my shelf >.>
What was so bad about 343's update? They fixed Bungie's stupidity and made it playable.

They butchered custom games and zombies <_<
What did they do to butcher custom games and zombies in Reacharound?
The changes to infection modes with the shields/health/maps etc killed off the fun of it. Custom Games was halo 4, which was my bad. It's been so long since I've given a shit about halo that the reasons why I gave up on it kind of blur together.

If this was 2012 I could probably give a better answer.

The population tanked though, the changes they brought in were too late for the whiners and spoiled the game for the people who still enjoyed it.

7884
Gaming / Re: Would you be up for a Reach Xbox One port?
« on: June 03, 2015, 11:16:27 AM »
Pre-TU reach? Fuck Yeah.
Post-TU reach? Fuck No.

In the event of a port it'd be done by 343 of course, so naturally they'd have that abomination taped onto it so I think I'll just let Reach rest in piece in pieces on my shelf >.>
This is such a bad opinion.
Pre-TU was broken as fuck and filled with complete bullshit. The TU made Reach somewhat good.

Adapt.
Shouldn't have to adapt to bullshit
Beyond Armerlawk and Bloom, what was really that bad?
Bloom itself isn't even an issue if you don't spray and pray like a twelve year old.

7885
Gaming / Re: >actually animated vertibirds
« on: June 03, 2015, 10:47:38 AM »
Clearly the trolley physics were the highlight of the trailer.
>when the ghouls throw the cart so you know it's not static
There were some interesting changes to those ghouls, the eyes seemed to glow and the general motion of the ones not flinging shopping carts was more like shuffler-zombies than the arms-raised-sprinting from FNV/3 <.<

7886
Gaming / Re: >actually animated vertibirds
« on: June 03, 2015, 10:36:53 AM »
Clearly the trolley physics were the highlight of the trailer.

7887
Gaming / Re: FALLOUT 4 TRAILER
« on: June 03, 2015, 09:51:50 AM »
It actually looks post apocalyptic this time.

unlike NV

And im pretty sure that looks like its still running on Gamebryo engine.
Yup, the bit with the ghouls and the trolley had Gamebryo written all over it <_<

But all the same, Atom be praised for we are delivered ;-;
Physics aside, those animations looked better than before. Hopefully they are improved overall.

But yeah, still would enjoy the fuck out of this game
Indeed, I imagine they've put a lot of work into it <.<

E3 pls come soon, I need a release date. Lawd I hope it's as good as it should be.

7888
Gaming / Re: FALLOUT 4 TRAILER
« on: June 03, 2015, 09:46:48 AM »
It actually looks post apocalyptic this time.

unlike NV

And im pretty sure that looks like its still running on Gamebryo engine.
Yup, the bit with the ghouls and the trolley had Gamebryo written all over it <_<

But all the same, Atom be praised for we are delivered ;-;

7889
Gaming / Re: Would you be up for a Reach Xbox One port?
« on: June 03, 2015, 09:45:03 AM »
Pre-TU reach? Fuck Yeah.
Post-TU reach? Fuck No.

In the event of a port it'd be done by 343 of course, so naturally they'd have that abomination taped onto it so I think I'll just let Reach rest in piece in pieces on my shelf >.>
This is such a bad opinion.
Pre-TU was broken as fuck and filled with complete bullshit. The TU made Reach somewhat good.

Adapt.

Pre-TU reach? Fuck Yeah.
Post-TU reach? Fuck No.

In the event of a port it'd be done by 343 of course, so naturally they'd have that abomination taped onto it so I think I'll just let Reach rest in piece in pieces on my shelf >.>
What was so bad about 343's update? They fixed Bungie's stupidity and made it playable.

They butchered custom games and zombies <_<

7890
The Flood / Re: Why are women's breasts considered NSFW?
« on: June 03, 2015, 09:43:27 AM »
I'll do the policy bit firsthand <.<

Quote
2. Graphic Content (Strict Moderation)

    Sexual/Shock/Gore images and videos must remain in Anarchy only.
   
    NSFW responses in safe-for-work (SFW) threads are not allowed, due to spoiler problems on Taptatalk
   
    NSFW threads (including sex role-plays, sex stories, Cheerio threads, etc.) that do not include photos or videos are allowed in The Flood, so long as the thread is distinguished as being NSFW. Responses in these threads do not need to be in spoiler tags.

So loosely put, a picture of bewbs isn't allowed because it's not safe for work. I think there is a caveat we've been operating with where you can link to it in a marked spoiler thus circumventing the NSFW issue and being able to make your point that way >.>

For the wider issue, I'm afraid the inclinations of meatbags over what is sexualised and why is kind of a blank spot for me. My best guess would be to call upon an old deceased foe for an explanation but really I can't say why.

I find all lewd things distasteful but that's because I'm a nutcase, but to hide behind the badge I just do the cleaning up >.>

Pages: 1 ... 261262263 264265 ... 569