Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Mr. Psychologist

Pages: 1 ... 646566 6768 ... 569
1951
The Flood / Re: Motherfucking DEAD forum
« on: May 08, 2016, 07:17:48 AM »

1952
The Flood / Re: Motherfucking DEAD forum
« on: May 08, 2016, 06:13:06 AM »

1953
The Flood / Re: Motherfucking DEAD forum
« on: May 07, 2016, 07:24:37 PM »

1954
The Flood / Re: Motherfucking DEAD forum
« on: May 07, 2016, 07:22:18 PM »

1955
The Flood / Re: Motherfucking DEAD forum
« on: May 07, 2016, 07:20:34 PM »
real pajeet hours


1956
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 07, 2016, 05:46:20 PM »
Heh. GG CoD.

Only about 49K more dislikes until Infinite Warfare is the most disliked video on Youtube. More than the new Ghostbusters and Justin Beiber. How embarrassing.
As in most disliked video of all time kind of disliked?
No, just video games. Nothing touches Friday or Justin Beiber's "Baby".
Yeah I was gonna say

it'd be doing well to top the billion view videos

1957
How does the damage model feel? I've got another week before I can get my teeth into survival mode and I'd like to know how it feels.

Can you give a few examples of how much killing your average raider requires?
One that's appropriately scaled to your level and you aren't using a trash-gun or a baton etc

It'd be nice if a headshot feels like a headshot, because even with the multipliers and the like it pisses me off to nail someone in the eyesocket with a .50 and have them laugh it off <_<
If you shoot a leveled Raider anywhere but the head once, even the torso, they're nearly dead. Like, 80% of their health gone. If you have something like a shotgun at close range or a high-power rifle, even that alone will kill them. With a headshot, pretty much any gun in the game will one shot a raider. Things like Super Mutants are different, they take three or four body shots to bring down. A headshot with a decent rifle (or any headshot with a sneak attack) will one shot them, though.

But on the other side, you can take maybe three direct hits before you die. If you're unprepared and you zip around a corner, just to see a room with three raiders in it, you're dead. You can pop all the jet/psycho/stims you want in that situation, but you're still going to die. It makes combat a lot more stealth oriented of course, but also puts a LOT more emphasis on positioning, drawing out enemies, and avoiding fights altogether.
That sounds perfect

How are you finding adjusting to the sleep-saving and have you had any crashes fuck you over notably yet?
A lot of people took issue with the whole sleep to save thing, but I love it. It's the only real way to give death meaning. In the vanilla game, if you see a big fire and activity in the distance, you can quicksave and check it out. If it turns out to be a big Gunner base and they shoot you down, no big deal, you just reload. In survival, you have to make tactical choices like whether or not to investigate the camp, how to do so, whether to just scout it out or attack it, and such, because you're fearing for your life. And when you narrowly escape the clutches of death, it feels so much more rewarding than in the base game. It's definitely a big change, and I've had to repeat several parts upwards of four times (getting Reba II was so hard), but in general, sleep to save makes everything more dramatic and meaningful.

As for glitches, I never had any game-stopping bugs when I even played F4 the first time. So far, so good.
Ah good, I would be fine with the sleep-save system as long as the game is stable. I had a few crashes a little while back, nothing major but it would steam my jimmies to have to redo a long quest because of a bluescreen.

1958
How does the damage model feel? I've got another week before I can get my teeth into survival mode and I'd like to know how it feels.

Can you give a few examples of how much killing your average raider requires?
One that's appropriately scaled to your level and you aren't using a trash-gun or a baton etc

It'd be nice if a headshot feels like a headshot, because even with the multipliers and the like it pisses me off to nail someone in the eyesocket with a .50 and have them laugh it off <_<
If you shoot a leveled Raider anywhere but the head once, even the torso, they're nearly dead. Like, 80% of their health gone. If you have something like a shotgun at close range or a high-power rifle, even that alone will kill them. With a headshot, pretty much any gun in the game will one shot a raider. Things like Super Mutants are different, they take three or four body shots to bring down. A headshot with a decent rifle (or any headshot with a sneak attack) will one shot them, though.

But on the other side, you can take maybe three direct hits before you die. If you're unprepared and you zip around a corner, just to see a room with three raiders in it, you're dead. You can pop all the jet/psycho/stims you want in that situation, but you're still going to die. It makes combat a lot more stealth oriented of course, but also puts a LOT more emphasis on positioning, drawing out enemies, and avoiding fights altogether.
That sounds perfect

How are you finding adjusting to the sleep-saving and have you had any crashes fuck you over notably yet?

1959
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 07, 2016, 03:33:23 PM »
Heh. GG CoD.

Only about 49K more dislikes until Infinite Warfare is the most disliked video on Youtube. More than the new Ghostbusters and Justin Beiber. How embarrassing.
As in most disliked video of all time kind of disliked?

1960
Gaming / Re: Why is Fighting super effective against Steel?
« on: May 07, 2016, 03:32:24 PM »
It's a bit like how rock is weak to grass

you ever see what happens to a flower that has a brick dropped on it?

1961
How does the damage model feel? I've got another week before I can get my teeth into survival mode and I'd like to know how it feels.

Can you give a few examples of how much killing your average raider requires?
One that's appropriately scaled to your level and you aren't using a trash-gun or a baton etc

It'd be nice if a headshot feels like a headshot, because even with the multipliers and the like it pisses me off to nail someone in the eyesocket with a .50 and have them laugh it off <_<

1962
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 07, 2016, 01:43:20 PM »
Experience the authentic realism of trench foot only on xbox one.

but that's the only system WITHOUT VR
You don't need VR to get trench foot

just a pair of shoes, a big bucket of water and a spade full of compost

1963
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 07, 2016, 12:36:24 PM »
Experience the authentic realism of trench foot only on xbox one.

1964
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 07, 2016, 11:04:42 AM »
YouTube


bewp

1965
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 07, 2016, 07:32:00 AM »
JSDF needs a new name, Psy
Hmm, maybe a new name but the acronym works perfectly <_<

Either that or we go with 731B e.e

1966
Gaming / Re: PC stuff round 2
« on: May 06, 2016, 06:16:41 PM »
Hurry up so we can play
soon my brother
but even at top speed it will likely be a few weeks

1967
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 06, 2016, 05:56:39 PM »
4 did it way too much (I mean, you could probably have three sniper rifles and you'd have all the major differences you can get), but the variety in sights is particularly nice to suit weapon to play style and whatnot.
no

Maybe it's because sniping is my laifu, but they each have very distinct characteristics barring one.

CSLR4 - Easy 100m sniping (there is a reason why it's the intro rifle)
Scout Elite - Doubletapping at short-mid range, if you aren't a headshotter then it's for you
M40a5 - Rapid headshot chaining at mid
.338 recon - running and gunning at short-mid
L96 - solid midrange rifle with the bonus of firing two shots in a steadied breath*
FYJS - max agility countersniper rifle
M98baller - Extreme range countersniper or bipod support rifle
SRR-61 - trickshotter trashgun
CS5 - suppressed with no penalty (within a certain range)
SV-98 - ironsighting or free equivalent of the L96
SR338 - dmr hybrid but shit because of spread

only clone rifle is the
Jng-90 - M98baller but for turkroaches

*forgot the asterisk
this might be down to the squad perk or have been removed but I remember playing with it doing this for a long ass time.

oh

I really hate sniping in battlefield (I'm not good or patient enough to fuck around with drop and travel times) so to me it's pretty much M40, M98B and the semi auto one.

I only ever use recon with carbines so I can have the radio beacon and stuff. I prefer to be more front lines/ support than a coward in the back.
Yeah I mean it's down to how much you enjoy it really, but sniping in battlefield 4 is hands down the best sniping in any FPS I've played

Learning the bullet drops, velocities and damage models was a bit of a curve at first but now (or at least when i still played it for hours each day) I could pick up any sniper rifle and I'd know how it worked flawlessly. Which of course made me really popular on servers after a few rounds of facerape :| but that's par for the course.

Hardline tho
they gave me god's gift to snipers in that game
the trayvon
the threehunna knockout
the OHK sniper rifle at any distance within 50m

Round after round of endless killing with that beautiful bastard gun ;-;7

I ended up stopping because I felt like I was worse than the M16A3 cancer doing that

(reminisce o' clock for psy apparently)

yeah, I can't deny that the sniping mechanics really do require a lot of skill on the part of the player.

I just don't have the patience to learn any of that (Kind of like jets). If I'm just sitting on a roof not really contributing anything to the team I tend to get annoyed because then I feel that I'm doing exactly what I find annoying with others, where they just sit there and never push for objectives or whatever. Same in a jet, I don't feel that flying round in circles for the entire match is beneficial in any way to the team when I could be going to get a capture point or arm a bomb or something.
Rooftops can be a real tactical advantage for your team, but if you have a squad sat up on one it's a waste of manpower.

Flyboys are utter cancer and every aircraft that I shoot down is god's work.

1968
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 06, 2016, 05:38:03 PM »
4 did it way too much (I mean, you could probably have three sniper rifles and you'd have all the major differences you can get), but the variety in sights is particularly nice to suit weapon to play style and whatnot.
no

Maybe it's because sniping is my laifu, but they each have very distinct characteristics barring one.

CSLR4 - Easy 100m sniping (there is a reason why it's the intro rifle)
Scout Elite - Doubletapping at short-mid range, if you aren't a headshotter then it's for you
M40a5 - Rapid headshot chaining at mid
.338 recon - running and gunning at short-mid
L96 - solid midrange rifle with the bonus of firing two shots in a steadied breath*
FYJS - max agility countersniper rifle
M98baller - Extreme range countersniper or bipod support rifle
SRR-61 - trickshotter trashgun
CS5 - suppressed with no penalty (within a certain range)
SV-98 - ironsighting or free equivalent of the L96
SR338 - dmr hybrid but shit because of spread

only clone rifle is the
Jng-90 - M98baller but for turkroaches

*forgot the asterisk
this might be down to the squad perk or have been removed but I remember playing with it doing this for a long ass time.

oh

I really hate sniping in battlefield (I'm not good or patient enough to fuck around with drop and travel times) so to me it's pretty much M40, M98B and the semi auto one.

I only ever use recon with carbines so I can have the radio beacon and stuff. I prefer to be more front lines/ support than a coward in the back.
Yeah I mean it's down to how much you enjoy it really, but sniping in battlefield 4 is hands down the best sniping in any FPS I've played

Learning the bullet drops, velocities and damage models was a bit of a curve at first but now (or at least when i still played it for hours each day) I could pick up any sniper rifle and I'd know how it worked flawlessly. Which of course made me really popular on servers after a few rounds of facerape :| but that's par for the course.

Hardline tho
they gave me god's gift to snipers in that game
the trayvon
the threehunna knockout
the OHK sniper rifle at any distance within 50m

Round after round of endless killing with that beautiful bastard gun ;-;7

I ended up stopping because I felt like I was worse than the M16A3 cancer doing that

(reminisce o' clock for psy apparently)

1969
Gaming / Re: PC stuff round 2
« on: May 06, 2016, 05:18:36 PM »
yeah definitely get an i5 you wont notice a difference with the i7. And personally id go for an r9 390 over the 970. Same price but performs better and has more vram. if you wanna stick with nvidia tho I understand
hmm i mean it might not be noticeable now but i do want to keep it futureproofed for a few years at least

and i would want to stick with nvidia, i know and like their shit tbh
If future proofing is important to you then you should be spending more on the gpu and less on the cpu. An i5 with a gtx 980 would perform miles ahead of an i7 with a gtx 970 and would be roughly the same price.
It looks like an i5 would be around 150
an i7 around 200-250

whereas a 970 would be 250
and a 980 would be 400

so maybe i'm getting jewed but that's the price in sterling
i5+970 = 400
i5+980 = 550
i7+970 = 450
i7+980 = i don't shit money

I think a 980 is out of my price range really, 970 is the best i can afford to go for
but I can stretch the extra 50 quid for an i7 over an i5 >_>
You're right. 980 is a bit pricier than I thought. If it was me though I would still go for the i5. I just don't think the i7 is worth the extra cash. Just look at this video: https://youtu.be/Vvd_leZqSyA

The i7 (especially at this level) really only outperforms the i5 in video rendering. I personally think you'd be better off pocketing the money. You can't go wrong with either though.
Ye

I've been looking at a few options today though, I think i'll be fine to get a 980/i7 prebuilt fairly soon
that way it'll last me for a good few years to come <.<

1970
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 06, 2016, 05:15:33 PM »
4 did it way too much (I mean, you could probably have three sniper rifles and you'd have all the major differences you can get), but the variety in sights is particularly nice to suit weapon to play style and whatnot.
no

Maybe it's because sniping is my laifu, but they each have very distinct characteristics barring one.

CSLR4 - Easy 100m sniping (there is a reason why it's the intro rifle)
Scout Elite - Doubletapping at short-mid range, if you aren't a headshotter then it's for you
M40a5 - Rapid headshot chaining at mid
.338 recon - running and gunning at short-mid
L96 - solid midrange rifle with the bonus of firing two shots in a steadied breath*
FYJS - max agility countersniper rifle
M98baller - Extreme range countersniper or bipod support rifle
SRR-61 - trickshotter trashgun
CS5 - suppressed with no penalty (within a certain range)
SV-98 - ironsighting or free equivalent of the L96
SR338 - dmr hybrid but shit because of spread

only clone rifle is the
Jng-90 - M98baller but for turkroaches

*forgot the asterisk
this might be down to the squad perk or have been removed but I remember playing with it doing this for a long ass time.

1971
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 06, 2016, 04:41:10 PM »
Bayonet Charges
Flamethrowers
Massed Artillery
Gas
Flamethrowers
Bayonets
Cavalry Charges
Flamethrowers

;-;7 the JSDF war crimes division will have it's work cut out ;-;7

1972
This is a srs issue for the srs forum, psy
I would agree, if it pertained to the God-Emperor (PBUH)

but this is Sep7 and we run this shit with bias in our hearts and lies on our lips

sooooooooooooooooooooooo
into the flood it goes

1973
"1 like"
Mr Psychologist likes this
Mr Psychologist likes this
MynameisCharlie likes this
Das likes this
Incan likes this
That's why i don't like to move it

but at least everyone can like it twice now e.e

1974
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 06, 2016, 04:31:40 PM »
I wonder if the engineer can repair a horse
i feex

wrench feex hoss

1975
I know I should move this to the flood

but i don't want to

life is hard

1976
The Flood / Re: KHANDEEP wins mayor of London
« on: May 06, 2016, 12:56:28 PM »


UKIP on the right

1977
Gaming / Re: PC stuff round 2
« on: May 06, 2016, 12:41:55 PM »
why do you have 2 970s
er
I think one is just the product code or something, it's only the one

Either way the one in the OP isn't looking like something I'll be going for because after a bit of shopping around it looks like I can get a 980 for the same kind of price. I'm just poking around at different places for the moment though, but depending on how things go I might be able to get an i7/980 build for quite a reasonable price <.<

1978
yo mah b

now i ain't sayin it her fault
but you don't be backtalkin mah shit

1979
Serious / Re: OFFICIAL CLINTON HATE THREAD
« on: May 06, 2016, 11:23:11 AM »
image is massive gj psy
That hashtag actually got up to 150k before Twitter stopped people from seeing it.

wew lad
I saw a screenshot of 493k yesterday and I did think about posting it but they'd already removed it from trending because the shill machine marches on.

1980
Gaming / Re: New Battlefield World Premiere
« on: May 06, 2016, 10:24:11 AM »
Alt-WW1 yes please

Death Korps of Krieg here we come ;-;7

Pages: 1 ... 646566 6768 ... 569