15451
The Flood / Re: Why Do Meteors Always Land In Craters?
« on: September 29, 2014, 09:31:14 AM »
#illerminerty
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 15451
The Flood / Re: Why Do Meteors Always Land In Craters?« on: September 29, 2014, 09:31:14 AM »
#illerminerty
15452
Serious / Re: Holy shit look at this fucking cancer« on: September 29, 2014, 09:29:51 AM »Bra, look at Ba Sing Se. It's a representation of ancient Chinese cities back like during the Shang and Zhou Dynasty times; each area of the city is walled*cough*gaara*cough* mr-gets snipedUgh, those people exist...You would be that guy who has a meme as his profile picture...Least I don't have a picture of a Chinese cartoon character as mine No fookin shit m8, that doesn't make it a chinese cartoon/animu though. It's like saying that because the water tribe portrays the inuits/eskimos it's an arctic cartoon. It's a yank one, so suck it up. 15453
Serious / Re: Holy shit look at this fucking cancer« on: September 28, 2014, 10:10:14 PM »*cough*gaara*cough* mr-gets snipedUgh, those people exist...You would be that guy who has a meme as his profile picture...Least I don't have a picture of a Chinese cartoon character as mine *cough cough cough* Avatar =/= Chinese Cartoons. Get it right at least you scrublord. 15454
Serious / Re: Conspiracy Theories that you think might be, or are true.« on: September 28, 2014, 10:08:07 PM »Bro, you know better than this...Whilst we don't have access to the cores, there is nothing stopping individuals from taking their own samples - apart from the funding to drag their ass across the arctic, the scientific knowhow to take, record and interpret the data themselves and the will to do it.Except for the government which would stop you and sweep the "incident" under the rug as instrumentation failure that got you and your group killed. Oh I do, I also know who this is. I'm just playing along out of boredom. 15455
Serious / Re: Conspiracy Theories that you think might be, or are true.« on: September 28, 2014, 09:33:02 PM »Whilst we don't have access to the cores, there is nothing stopping individuals from taking their own samples - apart from the funding to drag their ass across the arctic, the scientific knowhow to take, record and interpret the data themselves and the will to do it.Except for the government which would stop you and sweep the "incident" under the rug as instrumentation failure that got you and your group killed. ![]() 15456
Serious / Re: Conspiracy Theories that you think might be, or are true.« on: September 28, 2014, 09:26:04 PM »The default is not that "evidence" is always true until proven wrong. I'll give you another hypothetical. If I were to say I have evidence that says reincarnation is real, is it automatically real until you disprove it, or do I first have to prove it? I didn't say that it was automatically correct, I said that you should provide evidence to refute their evidence and claims. To dismiss them as wrong, without having evidence to back up the claim to the contrary - is simply idiotic, something that you would expect from someone who lives and breathes Fox News. Whilst we don't have access to the cores, there is nothing stopping individuals from taking their own samples - apart from the funding to drag their ass across the arctic, the scientific knowhow to take, record and interpret the data themselves and the will to do it. 15457
Serious / Re: Holy shit look at this fucking cancer« on: September 28, 2014, 09:17:42 PM »
It's Islam being discussed on facebook, it's basically flypaper for nutjobs with an axe to grind against Ayrabs.
15458
Serious / Re: Conspiracy Theories that you think might be, or are true.« on: September 28, 2014, 09:14:36 PM »So if I were to ask you to disprove an invisible giant tea cup floating in space, and you told me it was my job to first prove it, then by your own logic you would be "weaselling," simply by taking the logical route.You cannot prove a negative, duh. However there is plenty of warranted skepticism against government studies, which is why I'm not going to take their word for it. Until they can show me their evidence clearly laid out, I'm not just going to swallow it—like a sheep.Because there isn't any evidence for global warming. You are the one dismissing the claim with no basis for why you do so, other than 'you don't trust the gubermunt' You are the one making the negative claim here by claiming that the evidence is falsified or straight up propaganda. I ask for your proof of this claim, you weasel out of it and deflect towards the dawkins argument over the invisible teapot/teacup. So yeah, Weaselling. Either show your proof that their evidence is all bullshit, or your claim has no basis to stand upon. Mistrust without proof is not sufficient evidence with which to make a claim. So once more time - Show me your evidence that they are lying, any other argument is evading the point and is therefore - Weaselling. 15459
Serious / Re: Name one thing atheists can do that religious people can't« on: September 28, 2014, 09:11:23 PM »Religious people who believe in reincarnation don't believe in a deity.Not believe in a deity.>Reincarnation I hate pulling out the dictionary on stuff like this, but an Atheist is specifically someone who does not believe in a God or Gods, so not believing in a God but believing in Reincarnation makes you an Atheist. It doesn't however make you Areligious (A lack of religious belief/practise). An Areligious person wouldn't believe in a God, Reincarnation or any other associated belief system. But Atheists are specifically people who do not believe in a deity, so the thing that Atheists can do that Religious people can't is not believe in a deity. 15460
Serious / Re: Conspiracy Theories that you think might be, or are true.« on: September 28, 2014, 09:06:41 PM »You cannot prove a negative, duh. However there is plenty of warranted skepticism against government studies, which is why I'm not going to take their word for it. Until they can show me their evidence clearly laid out, I'm not just going to swallow it—like a sheep.Because there isn't any evidence for global warming. >Weaselling. 15461
Serious / Re: Name one thing atheists can do that religious people can't« on: September 28, 2014, 09:02:02 PM »Go to Hell Lol, are you seriously implying that religious people can't go to hell? 15462
Serious / Re: Name one thing atheists can do that religious people can't« on: September 28, 2014, 08:57:22 PM »Not believe in a deity.>Reincarnation How is that relevant? 15463
The Flood / Re: Royal-blooded Floodians unite!« on: September 28, 2014, 08:48:46 PM »I'm just a half breed from a bastard and a tramp. Mixed Genes are Best Genes. 15464
Serious / Re: Name one thing atheists can do that religious people can't« on: September 28, 2014, 08:47:22 PM »
Not believe in a deity.
15465
Serious / Re: Conspiracy Theories that you think might be, or are true.« on: September 28, 2014, 08:43:37 PM »Because there isn't any evidence for global warming. There is plenty of evidence, whether you choose to accept it as valid or not is the question. And as for this part 'You cannot prove that their word is legit.' The exact same thing can be said of those who claim it is a myth, what is to say that those who wish to maintain the status quo aren't lying for their paychecks? Infact, it's not just paychecks but billions upon billions of dollars in the fossil fuel energy market. Which would and should be shut down hard if we'd actually like to see the human race make it to 2100 without living on a completely inhospitable planet. But no, that's just the Solar Panel New World Order at work. And if you wish to actually discuss this further then answer this question, without weaseling out of it either. You make the claim that the evidence given forth by an overwhelming majority of scientists on the planet is false, I ask - Where is your proof that it is false? Where is your evidence to the contrary? Where are the studies carried out over 60 years showing the rate of Co2 in the atmosphere falling rather than rocketing past any other level in history? Where are the studies and lab experiments that show that burning fossil fuels do not release Carbon Dioxide? Hell, you can actually do that one yourself at home. With a basic chemistry set it has to be said. 15466
Gaming / Re: Destiny 'DLC' Is Locked On Disc« on: September 28, 2014, 08:15:10 PM »Spoiler Quote My theory so far... I try not to take the piss out of people for stuff like this but could you actually fit the shaft any further down your throat? 15467
The Flood / Re: A Suggestion for Moderation On This Forum« on: September 28, 2014, 08:10:26 PM »It could work for the master ninjas, but it wouldn't fit as well for LC and I. Weeell, I'd be more of a Court Shrink than a judge and a Lord Commissar is already in effect Judge, Jury and Executioner >_> And I'm strangely attached to the Mister part <.< But if LC wants to become JC then that's his call >.> 15468
Gaming / Re: Destiny 'DLC' Is Locked On Disc« on: September 28, 2014, 08:09:23 PM »
Why am I not fucking surprised.
And I'm even less surprised at DeeJ's circlejerk lapping it up like the cattle that they are ._. It's getting harder and harder to convince myself to actually buy it when I get the money to. 15469
The Flood / Re: A Suggestion for Moderation On This Forum« on: September 28, 2014, 08:07:12 PM »
It could work for the master ninjas, but it wouldn't fit as well for LC and I.
Judge Mr Psychologist is a bit of a mouthful and Judge Lord Commissar would also be have the same problem of two prefixes/titles. 15470
The Flood / Re: Royal-blooded Floodians unite!« on: September 28, 2014, 08:03:53 PM »Ancient Irish King from a long time ago <.<I thought it was -static-ui-static-? Yes it is, and with the number of times a certain someone has linked my profile I'm almost tempted to not bother hiding it at this point. But meh. You are correctish though, my name which you can see is traceable all the way back to the 400/500s to a King who was the brother of the High King. (I think) Although for the most part of the last 1500 years my family (On that side) has been historians, clerks, clerics, priests, vicars and generally scribes >.> 15471
The Flood / Re: Royal-blooded Floodians unite!« on: September 28, 2014, 07:26:50 PM »If we actually talked like that it'd be hilarious What do you mean, of course we talk like that <.< 15472
The Flood / Re: Royal-blooded Floodians unite!« on: September 28, 2014, 07:24:48 PM »
Ancient Irish King from a long time ago <.<
Ruled the middle bit of ireland for a while >.> His sons and their sons are traced all the way down to my family's name, but because it's a pretty rare/distinct one I'm not too keen on the idea of linking the relevant article, mostly because it has my family name in it .-. 15473
The Flood / Re: We need to collate a list of Comms Officer's names« on: September 28, 2014, 06:52:13 PM »Sir this thread is directly violating the rules of this website for it is singling out and attacking a user Don't start Necroing. There is enough of that shit on Bungie. 15474
The Flood / Re: UN Game VI« on: September 28, 2014, 06:00:53 PM »
+++British Update inbound+++
15475
Serious / Re: Is fundamentalism growing?« on: September 28, 2014, 05:59:22 PM »Nah, Saudi Arabia is the big piece of land under Iraq with Yemen and Oman to the south of thatBecause there are Muslim countries that don't have groups like ISIS I know that now, I only realised when I took a closer look at my map >.> 15476
Serious / Re: Is fundamentalism growing?« on: September 28, 2014, 05:55:32 PM »>kuffarBecause there are Muslim countries that don't have groups like ISIS ![]() 15477
The Flood / Re: I've started yet another shit storm (part 2)« on: September 28, 2014, 05:53:51 PM »Because that's their relationship. There's no reason he posted that on Twitter other than simple spite.Wow at all the likes this bullshit got. OP is a fucking idiot for getting involved in another person's private business. I can't say I agree, but I understand your point. 15478
Serious / Re: Is fundamentalism growing?« on: September 28, 2014, 05:52:35 PM »Because there are Muslim countries that don't have groups like ISIS Well fook my ignorance, I genuinely thought that the two were the same country and that it was an interchangeable name. Bladdy hell. 15479
Serious / Re: If you don't like "under God" don't say it« on: September 28, 2014, 05:51:10 PM »Sounds a lot like history is repeating itself I wouldn't take it quite that far, but I do find the whole idea of a 'mandatory' pledge in the supposed land of the free quite amusing >.> 15480
Serious / Re: Is fundamentalism growing?« on: September 28, 2014, 05:48:28 PM »Play nice m80s, the discussion is fine but kerb the AdHoms pls.U WOT M8 ![]() IT BONGARONG NOW M8 |