This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mr. Psychologist
Pages: 1 ... 395396397 398399 ... 569
11881
« on: December 14, 2014, 08:12:15 PM »
Finally something interesting
You realise this makes you look like a terrible human being right?
11882
« on: December 14, 2014, 06:48:45 PM »
Who the fuck is buying body armour anyway?
If I were in somewhere like Ferguson, I'd honestly want one too.
and the grand majority are police officers killing civilians.
Yes, thousands and thousands of people are killed by police every year
I know you guys start shaking in your boots and wetting yourselves when you see black folks get angry and protest, but calm the fuck down. Or you know, it has nothing to do about color but the fact Ferguson is being looted and destroyed from it's own people that make it dangerous as of current
No there aren't thousands of people killed per year. I didn't say that at all, I said the majority of people being killed are police on civilian.
Really? Because I haven't heard of widespread killings to warrant enough fear to buy and wear body armor.
In 2012, there were 8,855 total firearm-related homicides in the US. The average number of people shot by police annually is around 400. Tell me how 400 is a majority compare to over 8,000
Just because there no killings, that doesn't mean people can't be prepared. I guess people can't have smoke detectors if their house never caught on fire; I guess people can't have insurance if they've never gotten into an accident; I guess people shouldn't wear have first aid kits if they've never gotten hurt. People prepare for all sorts of situations, and this is no different
Tell me when I ever said anything about the entire country? I've been talking about Ferguson and how there are little to no deaths there in the first place. Damn son, you have some serious reading comprehension problems.
A smoke detector is nowhere near the same as body armor. You might as well wear it all the time if you're that paranoid. A fire could happen at any moment, same with a natural disaster. You don't, however, live in a war zone. Calm down, put the safety on, take the body armor off. The protestors aren't coming for you. Yet.
Yep, I have a reading comprehension issue over reading something you never specifically stated
But the people in Ferguson do. Want me to post pictures of businesses being looted or cars being burned for you? Or do you want me to post the link of the FBI arresting two people on gun charges and planning to detonate bombs in Ferguson? Yeah, the city is peaceful and the protestors are politely handing out flowers to everybody
I was extremely specific.
There hasn't been a level of violence to justify buying body armor. Body armor won't stop a bomb either. Not to mention, bomb scares are pretty frequent, should everybody just wear juggernaut suits to be safe?
Drop the subject bro. Stop going off topic every thread because you want to argue with me. It's getting really old.
If a mod is reading this, if Kinder and Challenger continue to talk about Ferguson, I'd like the thread locked.
This thread is about a government attempt to restrict citizens' access to body armor, not police violence or the protestors.
While the State's use of violence against the populace is very relevant to its attempts to render that population defenseless, we've gone over Ferguson enough. It can do no good for this thread.
Alrighty, noted.
Don't make me lock this.
11883
« on: December 14, 2014, 06:42:25 PM »
Ehhh
I've had one ages ago and it was pretty sickly. Not really my sort of thing.
Why can't I edit my own thread?
You can't? What about posts?
11884
« on: December 14, 2014, 06:38:38 PM »
Ehhh
I've had one ages ago and it was pretty sickly. Not really my sort of thing.
11885
« on: December 14, 2014, 06:34:39 PM »
If a mod is reading this, if Kinder and Challenger continue to talk about Ferguson, I'd like the thread locked.
This thread is about a government attempt to restrict citizens' access to body armor, not police violence or the protestors.
While the State's use of violence against the populace is very relevant to its attempts to render that population defenseless, we've gone over Ferguson enough. It can do no good for this thread.
Alrighty, noted.
11886
« on: December 14, 2014, 06:22:37 PM »
It's daft to buy body armour unless you fully expect to be shot at in the street.
That's probably the most likely place for a person to be shot at.
It was a figure of speech <.<
11887
« on: December 14, 2014, 06:04:25 PM »
putting hummus in a man's anus, What the fuck is it with torturers and shoving things into people's anuses? I mean seriously, you can't get much more closeted than this.
11888
« on: December 14, 2014, 06:03:07 PM »
It's daft to buy body armour unless you fully expect to be shot at in the street.
That being said, there isn't anything wrong with the purchase of it in the slightest. It shouldn't be illegal by any means .-.
11889
« on: December 14, 2014, 05:37:19 PM »
11890
« on: December 14, 2014, 05:35:42 PM »
Shrek
Breaking Bad
 Shrek is the best anime.
11891
« on: December 14, 2014, 05:34:04 PM »
I never thought I'd live to see it.
The day I had to move a thread of Meta's into the serious forum. The world has gone mad.
You fool. . .
I was trying to guide them into a new Age of Culture!
The meta containment serious board exists for a reason <.<
11892
« on: December 14, 2014, 05:11:21 PM »
11893
« on: December 14, 2014, 05:11:10 PM »
I never thought I'd live to see it.
The day I had to move a thread of Meta's into the serious forum. The world has gone mad.
11894
« on: December 14, 2014, 05:00:13 PM »
At the turn of the 19th Century <.<
The glory days of the British Empire.
*waves flag halfheartedly*
11895
« on: December 14, 2014, 04:45:41 PM »
OP is Kuroki.
This should have been thought through some more OP.
Obviously Isara's alt with the stupid quoting style.
FTFY
11896
« on: December 14, 2014, 04:45:13 PM »
Actually, illegal immigrants get more benefits than legal immigrants. My grandmother had to learn English from watching Sesame Street, yet here's some illegals that get free education and my grandmother got absolutely nothing
Considering your Grandmother likely came here before SCOTUS ruled that education had to be provided to all immigrant children...
Does it matter? She had the strict rule of no Spanish in the household, only English
And how is this at all relevant to immigration policy?
Oh wait, anecdotal claims aren't.
It's not ancedotal as this used to be a common occurrence
Okay, but how is it relevant to modern immigration policy?
Now stop me if I'm wrong, but are you actually trying to imply that the children of immigrants or children who immigrate to the country should be denied education - which is a fundamental human right.
Mr. P, please. You know the United States is above any of that trivial United Nations bullshit. Why should we have to deal with countries who are so beneath us?
The UN is shit
lol
I'll leave you with this. It's a topic for another day
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_United_Nations
So the criticisms are people taking issue with it's philosophy and the human rights declaration for being 'morally subjective' or people complaining that it doesn't have the firepower to enforce it's decrees. As far as criticisms of an organisation go, that's pretty mild.
11897
« on: December 14, 2014, 04:39:08 PM »
Hey!  And I'm not the one in charge of beverages, I believe that's DAS B00T. You should ask him >.>
11898
« on: December 14, 2014, 04:38:03 PM »
Atheism Spectrum Disorder 299.00 (F84.0)
Diagnostic Criteria
A. Persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction across multiple contexts, as manifested by the following, currently or by history (examples are illustrative, not exhaustive, see text):
1. Deficits in social-emotional reciprocity, ranging, for example, from abnormal social approach and failure of normal back-and-forth conversation; to reduced sharing of interests, emotions, or affect; to failure to initiate or respond to social interactions.
2. Deficits in nonverbal communicative behaviors used for social interaction, ranging, for example, from poorly integrated verbal and nonverbal communication; to abnormalities in eye contact and body language or deficits in understanding and use of gestures; to a total lack of facial expressions and nonverbal communication.
3. Deficits in developing, maintaining, and understanding relationships, ranging, for example, from difficulties adjusting behavior to suit various social contexts; to difficulties in sharing imaginative play or in making friends; to absence of interest in peers. It's scary how well this fits.
11899
« on: December 14, 2014, 04:34:26 PM »
Actually, illegal immigrants get more benefits than legal immigrants. My grandmother had to learn English from watching Sesame Street, yet here's some illegals that get free education and my grandmother got absolutely nothing
Considering your Grandmother likely came here before SCOTUS ruled that education had to be provided to all immigrant children...
Does it matter? She had the strict rule of no Spanish in the household, only English
And how is this at all relevant to immigration policy?
Oh wait, anecdotal claims aren't.
It's not ancedotal as this used to be a common occurrence
Okay, but how is it relevant to modern immigration policy?
Now stop me if I'm wrong, but are you actually trying to imply that the children of immigrants or children who immigrate to the country should be denied education - which is a fundamental human right.
Mr. P, please. You know the United States is above any of that trivial United Nations bullshit. Why should we have to deal with countries who are so beneath us?
The UN is shit
lol
11900
« on: December 14, 2014, 04:33:02 PM »
Actually, illegal immigrants get more benefits than legal immigrants. My grandmother had to learn English from watching Sesame Street, yet here's some illegals that get free education and my grandmother got absolutely nothing
Considering your Grandmother likely came here before SCOTUS ruled that education had to be provided to all immigrant children...
Does it matter? She had the strict rule of no Spanish in the household, only English
And how is this at all relevant to immigration policy?
Oh wait, anecdotal claims aren't.
It's not ancedotal as this used to be a common occurrence
Okay, but how is it relevant to modern immigration policy?
Now stop me if I'm wrong, but are you actually trying to imply that the children of immigrants or children who immigrate to the country should be denied education - which is a fundamental human right.
Immigrants? Perfectly fine
Illegals? They have education back where they came from
Ah yes, 'back where they came from'. Where have I heard this before now...
11901
« on: December 14, 2014, 04:31:18 PM »
This should have been thought through some more OP. Obviously Isara's alt with the stupid quoting style.
11902
« on: December 14, 2014, 04:29:30 PM »
Actually, illegal immigrants get more benefits than legal immigrants. My grandmother had to learn English from watching Sesame Street, yet here's some illegals that get free education and my grandmother got absolutely nothing
Considering your Grandmother likely came here before SCOTUS ruled that education had to be provided to all immigrant children...
Does it matter? She had the strict rule of no Spanish in the household, only English
And how is this at all relevant to immigration policy?
Oh wait, anecdotal claims aren't.
It's not ancedotal as this used to be a common occurrence
Okay, but how is it relevant to modern immigration policy? Now stop me if I'm wrong, but are you actually trying to imply that the children of immigrants or children who immigrate to the country should be denied education - which is a fundamental human right.
11903
« on: December 14, 2014, 04:26:08 PM »
Actually, illegal immigrants get more benefits than legal immigrants. My grandmother had to learn English from watching Sesame Street, yet here's some illegals that get free education and my grandmother got absolutely nothing
Considering your Grandmother likely came here before SCOTUS ruled that education had to be provided to all immigrant children...
Does it matter? She had the strict rule of no Spanish in the household, only English
And how is this at all relevant to immigration policy? Oh wait, anecdotal claims aren't.
11904
« on: December 14, 2014, 04:25:14 PM »
Everyone who isn't of Celtic descent should be ejected from the British Isles.
Yay, I get to stay! Normani eunt domus Saxonblut fak orf
11905
« on: December 14, 2014, 04:24:06 PM »
Well you based everything around muggings, so I'll imply what I please based on the information present at the given time
One example, that you extrapolated and distorted to imply that I had said that muggings were the only crime in the USA. I asked, are beheadings equivalent to muggings? One happens frequently in mexico, but not in the USA. Muggings are an issue no matter where you go. Beheadings generally are not. Depends on what areas in the U.S you're talking about. Cities like Detroit, Chicago, D.C, etc. are all corrupt and are in many aspects controlled by gangs. But again, they run low-income areas because of the people that live there. So Washington D.C is run by gangs? Your capital city? Okay. GJ. Corrupt sure, but the police aren't chugging down cartel money to look the other way while beheadings happen in the streets. Detroit is a failed city, not a failed country. And isn't Chicago near New York? (relatively speaking) so I'm not sure how overrun with mexicans it is. Or are you referring to the italian-american mafias? And they aren't? So you're telling me none of them come here and commit crime? That none of them send much of their money back to Mexico? Because if you think that, then you don't know the situation as I do Of course not, another silly implication you created. I'm saying that very very few of those 11 million people just jumped the border to start raising hell. And the ones that did are likely working for the cartels anyway. Immigrants send money back home, but they also spend money in the area that they live. I might not be quite as into economics as Meta, but immigrants do not drain economies in the way that conservative blogs might make them out to be. And what's the alternative? Support them under a system that doesn't have the strength to do so? Have you even seen some American schools or infrastructure? We have bigger problems to worry about than some guy in Mexico. The world isn't a communist fairy land, the world is unfair and harsh for many people, that's how life has, is, and will be. America isn't the world's mother; why don't you have the UK ship all of these illegals to your island? If you care about them so much, you take them The alternative is to turn those people into productive workers and not waste time demonising them as some malign growth on the underbelly of the country. Your infrastructure is shit because you like to blow trillions on having the world's biggest dick a gigantic and inefficient military. It's not a bad one by any means, it's just wasteful as fuck. Just like the UK. Actually, illegal immigrants get more benefits than legal immigrants. My grandmother had to learn English from watching Sesame Street, yet here's some illegals that get free education and my grandmother got absolutely nothing So because your grandma learned english from sesame street we should deny a proper education to children of illegal immigrants? I'm seeing something of a disconnect here. If they want to do so, then come in the country as legal. Is it that fucking hard to understand?
So streamline the process, stop making it so ridiculously difficult for people to immigrate legally. When they are fleeing from a warzone in all but name, their lives tend to take priority over months of waiting for the right paperwork to be scrapped over a spelling mistake.
11907
« on: December 14, 2014, 03:58:16 PM »
You think Daniel Day-Lewis is bad? Are you fucking retarded?
hurr le drink your milkshake is good acting XDD
The dude stays in character off the set. There's no one else of this generation that takes acting that seriously.
Probably because that's kind of dumb.
You're kind of dumb
At least I'm not that kind of dumb. Sure it's a great measure of dedication, but god damn he must be annoying to talk to when he's doing a film. 'Hey dan, want some coffee?' -Ye olde englishe gibberish about how they didn't have coffee in salem- 'Okaaaaay, so that's a no then?'
11908
« on: December 14, 2014, 03:52:07 PM »
You think Daniel Day-Lewis is bad? Are you fucking retarded?
hurr le drink your milkshake is good acting XDD
The dude stays in character off the set. There's no one else of this generation that takes acting that seriously.
Probably because that's kind of dumb.
11909
« on: December 14, 2014, 03:51:13 PM »
...
...
9001. Stanley Kubrik
No.
9001 A Flop Odyssey
yes
Full Metal Jacket
The Shining
A Clockwork Orange
no
First half is good then the second part drops dramatically in quality
Pretentious garbage
Horribly edited pretentious garbage
First part is very good, but yeah the second half isn't as good >.> The shining is pretentious? Ehh, I'm not really one who gets too finicky over films. If the content of the film is interesting to me then that's what counts. They are more interesting from a psychological perspective perhaps, but eh, I'm not going to shriek and fanboy over directing/editing of films <_<
11910
« on: December 14, 2014, 03:47:04 PM »
...
...
9001. Stanley Kubrik
No.
Kubrick is objectively shit
No. Full Metal Jacket wants a word with you m8.
Pages: 1 ... 395396397 398399 ... 569
|
Show Posts