This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Batch
Pages: 1 ... 163164165 166167 ... 271
4921
« on: October 09, 2015, 03:06:24 AM »
 These also exist.
4922
« on: October 09, 2015, 03:04:59 AM »
It's not like I'm wrong though
I'm an idiot because I like to play around with a bunch of salty tards?
4923
« on: October 09, 2015, 03:04:08 AM »
A mouse and keyboard isn't comfortable compared to a controller
I'm gonna give you a like simply because of how subjective this is.
Why?
I'unno, I'm a bitch.
Controllers fit snugly into your hands.
Mouse and keyboard is disjointed and awkward.
How? You have a mouse in one hand, which does your looking/directional positioning, shooting/attacking whatever, and something speical (right mouse button), then you have additional buttons if you need them. Then you have the keyboard, where in gaming terms you only really use WASD, QERF, the Space, Left CTRL and TAB key. Look down at your keyboard, you see where they are, your little finger is for Tab and CTRL, thumb is for Space and the middle there are for the rest, which are all snug together. The mouse is self explanatory. Please don't tell me you use the directional keys on the right side of the board?
4924
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:59:21 AM »
I like how Verb pounces straight on that like button.
He's on the prowl
4925
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:56:01 AM »
A mouse and keyboard isn't comfortable compared to a controller
So use a PC controller then.
no
Stop.
you replied to me
Sure
4926
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:55:40 AM »
60fps is objectively the only way to play
It isn't, though
Mate take your serious cap off. Let me trigger Verb a few more times.
"trigger"
sure
He gets flustered every time I use thr term 'objectively ' its fun.
literally hasn't happened in this thread
and he just called you an idiot in the other one
definitely "triggered" though
Geez you're both boring.
4927
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:54:22 AM »
Why did you need to bring up mods, now even more shit flinging will happen.
Because it's the only major advantage for why you'd play those games on PC over console.
Frames, graphics, some updates that can be free for it (left for dead, Skyrim), FASTER updates, etc.
But we'll be going in a giant circle. Listen to my music.
Lets not forget the fact you don't have to pay for a specific online service, mostly.
Yeahhh... Thankfully on PS4 I don't have to pay for PS+ with Final Fantasy 14 (the only game I play on my PS4 now).
When I get a job and get some dosh, I'm moving over to the PC with that. Still gonna use the controller though. It works masterfully.
Well thats the thing, some game require a controller, as it feels better, ever tried Assassins Creed or Dark Souls on a Keyboard and Mouse? I'll grate my own face instead thankyou.
4928
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:53:09 AM »
A mouse and keyboard isn't comfortable compared to a controller
So use a PC controller then.
no
Stop.
4929
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:52:19 AM »
Why did you need to bring up mods, now even more shit flinging will happen.
Because it's the only major advantage for why you'd play those games on PC over console.
Frames, graphics, some updates that can be free for it (left for dead, Skyrim), FASTER updates, etc.
But we'll be going in a giant circle. Listen to my music.
Lets not forget the fact you don't have to pay for a specific online service, mostly.
4930
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:50:28 AM »
A mouse and keyboard isn't comfortable compared to a controller
So use a PC controller then.
4931
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:43:37 AM »
Why did you need to bring up mods, now even more shit flinging will happen.
Because its a large selling point for a lot of PC gamers
4932
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:35:58 AM »
60fps is objectively the only way to play
It isn't, though
Mate take your serious cap off. Let me trigger Verb a few more times.
"trigger"
sure
He gets flustered every time I use thr term 'objectively ' its fun.
4933
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:31:12 AM »
60fps is objectively the only way to play
It isn't, though
Mate take your serious cap off. Let me trigger Verb a few more times.
4934
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:29:45 AM »
Oh wait no Bethesda made those games like that for artistic value.
4935
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:27:34 AM »
mods r bad
stop killing the industry you scum
Who else is going to fix Bethesda's games?
4936
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:26:42 AM »
Xür
4937
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:21:38 AM »
It wont even run Minecraft you fucking normie.
4938
« on: October 09, 2015, 02:18:43 AM »
This was fun lads.
60fps is objectively the only way to play
4939
« on: October 08, 2015, 10:15:06 PM »
I don't care. Whatever the developer wants.
3fps is the future I know :3
4940
« on: October 08, 2015, 10:14:31 PM »
This will prove nothing.
OT:
I don't care as long as its consistent. No one should care as long as its consistent.
It will prove what people want.
4941
« on: October 08, 2015, 10:09:21 PM »
Lets find out.
4942
« on: October 08, 2015, 10:06:31 PM »
Australia Post is bae
4943
« on: October 08, 2015, 10:05:06 PM »
Its better because it immerses the player to feel like they are a part of the game. You make it seem cinematic i may as well go watch a movie.
4944
« on: October 08, 2015, 10:04:01 PM »
So you really just have nothing to add?
There is a reason a game at such a slow FPS doesnt exist.
4945
« on: October 08, 2015, 09:59:36 PM »
So this is basically a debate about FPS now right?
You find me a game with something as low as 2fps and tell me thats fun. You may as well go read a book. The reason why higher FPS is objectively better is because you are in that world, you need to move and react in a second and that reaction needs to flow with you, the lower it gets the less you feel attached to the world. Sure you could make a game with a very low FPS. But it needs a reason, and it wont work any better then any other gimmick.
You cant expect someone to properly play any game that isnt an interactive book at such a slow speed.
4946
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:20:29 PM »
Ideally, it wouldn't.
Consoles limit what can be done.
Not if it's a good console.
Consoles as they are right now are just PCs, but limited. Obviously.
Thats not a good console then....because its limiting to what we can do.
Youre running around in circles here.
I'm saying we could MAKE a GOOD console that isn't limited. God fucking damn.
For that we need to have a console which can upgrade....then there will be all kind of consistency issues....we need a console at a graphical level higher then current PC at time of its release. Sure some console games look good now, but in the following years I dont think these boxes will keep up......this is kinda getting to the point that the lifespan of consoles will get shorter as tech is ever swiftly developing. Which is really leading to PCs being the end game.
4947
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:13:11 PM »
Ideally, it wouldn't.
Consoles limit what can be done.
Not if it's a good console.
Consoles as they are right now are just PCs, but limited. Obviously.
Thats not a good console then....because its limiting to what we can do. Youre running around in circles here.
4948
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:09:30 PM »
You really can't though. I am.
Framerate of movies and games aren't the same.
Movies don't suffer from stuff like input latency and visual feedback like games do, both of which are tied directly to the framerate. But I'm saying it's possible for game developers to say, "Artistically, I think it would be better if this game ran at a low frame rate."
Not because it's "more cinematic"--whatever that even means. But for other reasons. I don't know.
Wanting to give an authentic '80s gaming experience. I don't fucking know.
Pretty sure most arcade games stuck to pretty high framerates
4949
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:08:11 PM »
shut up batch nobody likes you k?
k
Who are you?
4950
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:04:51 PM »
Because it's easier on the eyes, it just feels physically better to experience. That's not objective.
It really is
Would you say that a game playing in 30fps is easier on the eyes than one running in 15?
Of course you would, because ~24fps is the threshold for what humans perceive as consistent motion
It doesn't matter to me if it's "easier on the eyes". If 15fps is what they chosen, then 15fps is better.
1fps would be better, if that was their artistic choice.
Oh okay you're trolling. Sure it maybe be their decision, but that doesnt mean that decision isnt completely dumb as fuck. Sure artistically its their choice. But damn there are a lot of shit artists in the world.
Pages: 1 ... 163164165 166167 ... 271
|
Show Posts