Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Cindy

Pages: 1234 56 ... 60
91
Serious / Re: Sorry, Liberals, bigotry didn't elect Donald Trump
« on: December 29, 2016, 06:11:24 PM »
He won because of his hard stance on immigration, White people know minorities tend to be treated like shit hence they do not want to become one.
Literally the most backwards-ass logic I've ever heard
Prove me wrong kike.
You ever heard that statistic that, like, people who cheat on their significant others are also the most suspicious and untrusting of their significant others because they think that, since they're cheaters, everyone else must also be?

Just 'cus you're a bigoted piece of shit doesn't mean the rest of the world follows suit.

92
Serious / Re: Sorry, Liberals, bigotry didn't elect Donald Trump
« on: December 29, 2016, 03:57:36 PM »
He won because of his hard stance on immigration, White people know minorities tend to be treated like shit hence they do not want to become one.
Literally the most backwards-ass logic I've ever heard

93
Serious / Re: Sorry, Liberals, bigotry didn't elect Donald Trump
« on: December 29, 2016, 06:06:03 AM »
Not voting for a guy because his hateful and disrespectful attitude towards women, racial minorities, and LGBT individuals is, like, the definition of privilege.
I don't see how. When you vote in a man with these beliefs he's going to make policies based on those beliefs.
I had an autismo moment and missed, like, a key phrase of that sentence.

"Because they won't be affecting you so they're not that big of a deal" was meant to be in there somewhere.
How wouldn't they affect us?
If you're a straight, white, cis male and you vote for Donald Trump with a lot of the reasoning being, "yeah, I acknowledge that he promotes horribly bigoted attitudes towards women, racial minorities, and LGBT individuals, but I just don't think it's that big of a deal," then that is the epitome of privilege, is what I'm saying.

I'm not sure if you're just not understanding what I'm trying to say or I'm not understanding what you're asking. I'm saying that the logic of the people who say this is that it it wouldn't effect them or that it isn't a very big deal - which they only think because they are not the directly effected parties. Ergo, this is the sort of thing people are referring to when they say "privilege" in a social context.

94
Serious / Re: Sorry, Liberals, bigotry didn't elect Donald Trump
« on: December 29, 2016, 04:11:41 AM »
Not voting for a guy because his hateful and disrespectful attitude towards women, racial minorities, and LGBT individuals is, like, the definition of privilege.
I don't see how. When you vote in a man with these beliefs he's going to make policies based on those beliefs.
I had an autismo moment and missed, like, a key phrase of that sentence.

"Because they won't be affecting you so they're not that big of a deal" was meant to be in there somewhere.
Drugs?
The site won't let me link youtube videos with timestamps

95
Serious / Re: Trump announces job creation policy
« on: December 29, 2016, 04:06:53 AM »
I'd bet it's just a video of him saying "GET A JOB, YA FILTHY HIPPIE!"

96
Serious / Re: Sorry, Liberals, bigotry didn't elect Donald Trump
« on: December 29, 2016, 04:00:47 AM »
Not voting for a guy because his hateful and disrespectful attitude towards women, racial minorities, and LGBT individuals is, like, the definition of privilege.
I don't see how. When you vote in a man with these beliefs he's going to make policies based on those beliefs.
I had an autismo moment and missed, like, a key phrase of that sentence.

"Because they won't be affecting you so they're not that big of a deal" was meant to be in there somewhere.

97
Serious / Re: ancaps btfo
« on: December 28, 2016, 03:58:14 AM »
I disagree with this guy's message, though

I think spider capitalists would be a good idea

98
Serious / Re: ancaps btfo
« on: December 28, 2016, 03:55:07 AM »
Nah, different guy

Just had a similar facial structure and mannerisms

99
Serious / Re: ancaps btfo
« on: December 28, 2016, 03:54:38 AM »
Wait a minute

Is this that "soccer is against God" guy?

100
Serious / Re: ancaps btfo
« on: December 28, 2016, 03:36:44 AM »
Dunno if that video is a meme or not

But

You shouldn't need a vidya to tell you how dumb AnCaps are

101
Serious / Re: Post the best speeches in history
« on: December 28, 2016, 03:35:12 AM »
Quote
Ich frage euch - wollt ihr den totalen Krieg? Wollt ihr ihn, wenn nötig, totaler und radikaler, als wir ihn uns heute überhaupt erst vorstellen können?

Nun, Volk, steh auf und Sturm brich los!

102
Serious / Re: Sorry, Liberals, bigotry didn't elect Donald Trump
« on: December 28, 2016, 03:29:49 AM »
Not voting for a guy because his hateful and disrespectful attitude towards women, racial minorities, and LGBT individuals is, like, the definition of privilege.

Besides, most people don't argue that Trump won because he's racist and sexist, just that those aspects a) helped win over the "alt right" types that usually vote third party and b) encouraged a more hateful attitude within voters themselves.

He won because, despite the fact that he can't compose a sentence more verbose than something written by a five year old, he talks big and makes grandiose promises - way more so than pretty much any other candidate ever. Sure, most candidates have little slogans that they use to, like, show "allegiance" or just to sell bumper stickers (I'm with her, change, etc), but Trump's entire campaign policy could be boiled down to slogans and name-calling that his hardcore followers loved latching onto and repeating ad nauseum. BUILD THE WALL. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. CROOKED HILLARY. LYIN' TED. And so on. It's easier to parrot general ideas than actual policies, and that won him over a HUGE amount of votes.

On top of that, all the "muh benghazi" shit and the leaked emails tempted "on the fence" sort of people to vote Trump. Never mind the sort of fact that Trump settled on a fraud lawsuit just days after his election and was accused of multiple charges of sexual assault and rape - one on a minority - Clinton's scandals got thrown around about ten times more efficiently.

Basically, the best reason Trump won is that he made it "hip" and "in" to be republican, branching off all the recent social unrest around "pc culture', whatever the hell that means.

103
Five bucks says it's just a publicity thing and they'll "change their minds" later down the line.

104
Serious / Re: Why abortion should be legal
« on: December 09, 2016, 01:33:08 AM »
White people made achievements in history so HEH, that means we're the superior race. It's just facts, kiddo. The blacks haven't achieved anything!

What, slavery? That wasn't ME. I didn't enslave anybody! Why are you trying to make me take credit for things I didn't do???

105
Serious / Re: Pizzagate
« on: December 08, 2016, 01:23:19 AM »
I like pizza :3
don't rape kids idiot

106
Serious / Re: Why abortion should be legal
« on: December 08, 2016, 01:22:31 AM »
"Haha stupid dumb sand niggers sucked at math" - he says, using arabic numerals to reinforce his points

107
Serious / Re: Pizzagate
« on: December 07, 2016, 10:02:00 AM »

108
Serious / Re: Hol up, *smacks lips* so you be sayin...
« on: December 07, 2016, 03:40:43 AM »
>Europeans descended from north africans

And this is...news to some people?

109
Serious / Re: Why abortion should be legal
« on: December 07, 2016, 03:38:16 AM »
The fact that society evolved from male leaders means nothing. That simply came around as a perpetuation of a tribalistic "the women stay home and take care of the kids, the men go out and hunt or protect the women and children mindset". After that, a patriarchal mindset was already ingrained in society, and societal roles and expectations don't exactly fall off easy.

The whole "all women secretly just want a big strong man to provide everything for them" is stupid, kinda gross, and sexist in both directions. Society often conditions women to act as lesser beings than men, but that doesn't mean that it's inherently true.

Also, much of the diffusion of matriarchal societies in the past was due to the spread of western cultures and imperialism/colonialism. Asia and Africa saw many female leaders throughout their history. Of course, so did Europe, but for some reason nobody likes to talk about the fact that people like Queen Victoria, Catherine the Great, and Queen Isabella were some of the greatest leaders that their respective countries/empires ever saw.

Just because something has happened for a long time doesn't mean that it's the way which things should continue to happen.

110
Serious / Re: Mark Carney warns of growing disillusionment with capitalism
« on: December 06, 2016, 09:25:16 PM »

111
Serious / Re: Pizzagate
« on: December 06, 2016, 08:19:14 PM »
Oy vey.
shhhh, nobody's mentioned god's chosen people yet. You'll scare away Epstein if you start speaking Yiddish.

Your beliefs perplex me.
Sophistry is the best way to light up a forum. I haven't even posted the really conspiratorial stuff, like:

I haven't even posted the greatest new conspiracy of 2016

There's about as much evidence of Justin being Castro's son, as there is of Pizzagate, to put things in perspective.
>The police sketch meme

HAHAHA

Why would the podestas attempt to abduct the children themselves?

I thought they picked them up from the pizza parlor????

112
Serious / Re: Mark Carney warns of growing disillusionment with capitalism
« on: December 06, 2016, 08:17:11 PM »
How would the NAP be enforced?
Like speed limits, by aircraft.
But how would anyone enforce the NAP without violating the NAP?

113
Serious / Re: Mark Carney warns of growing disillusionment with capitalism
« on: December 06, 2016, 04:05:32 PM »
How would the NAP be enforced?

114
The Flood / Re: Arguing with older conservatives about legalizing pot
« on: December 06, 2016, 03:56:54 PM »
Is Cindy one of those good looking traps
No, I'm just a good looking guy because I'm pre-everything, unfortunately

115
The Flood / Re: Arguing with older conservatives about legalizing pot
« on: December 06, 2016, 02:34:29 AM »
Okay well, uh

It's also really fuckin' easy to get weed right now

Yep. Build the wall, secure the border. Crack down on drug trafficking so we can focus on getting rid of the home grown stuff.
But why, nigga?

For what purpose, Master Chief?

Drugs are bad. Alcohol is bad. The only reason why prohibition didn't work is because they flipped a switch instead of easing the populace into it. Those in power werw also not entirely supportive of it. Values the country reflect from the values of our president.
no medical aid if you become addicted
Addicts need aid. If they were treated like ailing patients more so than criminals, a lot of them would be more open to try kicking their addiction.
If you get to that point, you can rot, suffer, and die for all I or anyone else should care.
Doctors mistreat many patients who are none-the-wiser allowing them to become addicted to synthetic opiods and benzodiazepines throughout this country. Are you suggesting these people, having been mistreated by the medical professionals they are supposed to be able to trust, deserve their suffering and possibly even death for having been lead to the point of addiction?

Key note, I said there's an exception to those who undergo the whole mess unwillingly.

As for those docs that perpetrate that crap? You take them out back, and you shoot them. No bullshit, no suspensions or pay cuts or short trips to prison.
God damn you niggas is crazy

116
The Flood / Re: Arguing with older conservatives about legalizing pot
« on: December 06, 2016, 02:33:43 AM »
Okay well, uh

It's also really fuckin' easy to get weed right now

Yep. Build the wall, secure the border. Crack down on drug trafficking so we can focus on getting rid of the home grown stuff.
But why, nigga?

For what purpose, Master Chief?

Drugs are bad. Alcohol is bad. The only reason why prohibition didn't work is because they flipped a switch instead of easing the populace into it. Those in power werw also not entirely supportive of it. Values the country reflect from the values of our president.
no medical aid if you become addicted
Addicts need aid. If they were treated like ailing patients more so than criminals, a lot of them would be more open to try kicking their addiction.

Of course, then they have to deal with doctors putting them on suboxone, methadone, and benzodiazpines, only to have them become addicted those medications instead.

Call it harsh but I'm sorry. People sign up willingly for drugs when they know damn well what the cost will be. In this day and age there's programs and information and a million reasons why not to delve into the world of drugs. If you walk through that door willingly then as far as I'm concerned, you forfeit aid or remorse.

The only exception to this I hold is for people who become addicted unwillingly, as there's scummy mother fuckers out there that do that to people.
Nobody who loses a foot to krokodil got there by going, "Gosh golly gee, I sure would like to get hooked on some synthetic heroin!"

117
Serious / Re: Mark Carney warns of growing disillusionment with capitalism
« on: December 06, 2016, 01:53:26 AM »
:insert smug anime face retort here:

118
Serious / Re: Mark Carney warns of growing disillusionment with capitalism
« on: December 06, 2016, 01:50:26 AM »
No, I just hate ancaps with a fiery passion, so I had to make sure you weren't pants on head retarded

119
The Flood / Re: Arguing with older conservatives about legalizing pot
« on: December 06, 2016, 01:48:01 AM »
Okay well, uh

It's also really fuckin' easy to get weed right now

Yep. Build the wall, secure the border. Crack down on drug trafficking so we can focus on getting rid of the home grown stuff.
But why, nigga?

For what purpose, Master Chief?

120
The Flood / Re: Arguing with older conservatives about legalizing pot
« on: December 06, 2016, 01:31:38 AM »
Okay well, uh

It's also really fuckin' easy to get weed right now

Pages: 1234 56 ... 60