Quote from: Cindy Claus on December 14, 2015, 10:48:00 AM

Uh, okay

I still disagree with you on this to some degree, but

That still has nothing to do with "billions of moderates"

Look, you can call me names and get pissy all you want, but the point remains that "billions of moderates" has nothing to do with this point that you're making.

Nobody's calling you names. Stop playing the victim.

And yet I'm still right

When are you going to get it through your head that it's not just about terrorism, but their borderline barbaric culture caused by their religion.

Uh, okay

I still disagree with you on this to some degree, but

That still has nothing to do with "billions of moderates"

Look, you can call me names and get pissy all you want, but the point remains that "billions of moderates" has nothing to do with this point that you're making.

Quote from: Cindy Claus on December 14, 2015, 10:06:32 AM

"Things aren't a problem if they don't directly effect me."

False. I care more about things that don't affect me than you do.

a y y l m a o

Uh, huh, that's, uh...f-fucking fire, f-fam. S-squad giving you mad flame a-amirite?

Quote from: Cindy Claus on December 14, 2015, 08:39:22 AM

a y y l m a o

You agree with Loaf.

Just take that in.

While that pains me, your argument is basically, "Things aren't a problem if they don't directly effect me."

Unless you're hiding an mortality potion and the means to mass produce it then what you said is completely false, a culture cannot survive without reproducing.

Yes but the focus on having children in order to continue family lines and as though it's a necessity needs to stop. We're having more overpopulation issues than we are the inverse (despite what places like Japan and Russia might lead you to believe), so there doesn't need to be as much of a pressure by society to have kids.

Have 'em if you wanna, but you're not exactly doing anything bad by not having kids.

You still haven't answered why it's a good thing. And what I was trying to say was that you don't call this kind of sex "sex" but "casual sex", the prefix changes the meaning and I don't see how it implies the sex is good, but I can see how it implies it's of a lower quality/standard than normal sex.

Well that's just a stupid way of bringing in implications. I say "casual sex" as a differentiator because just saying "sex" could imply any time. I'm purposefully segmenting it into categories to talk about one specific category. "Sex" does not imply "sex in a relationship" or "sex for the purpose of reproduction," it just implies two people sticking things inside each other. Getting specific doesn't necessitate that said specifics are worse.

You're the one saying reproduction isn't necessary, that's verb's line. You should already know that something being fun is not a justification for it because anything can be fun. And you haven't explained at all how it isn't harmful, both to the individual and society.

No, Verb's line is that we shouldn't have any kids because it's bad for the environment. Saying that kids are no longer necessary for every family to have is miles away from antinatalism or however you spell it.

And there's no burden of proof necessary on me to explain why society shouldn't shame two consenting adults agreeing to something that hurts neither one of them and is typically looked at as a fun thing. If they were going on murdering sprees or causing harm to other, that would obviously be different. I'm not saying that we should start putting up billboards encouraging people to have one night stands in bars, just that we shouldn't shame people who do exactly that.

I specifically said "having sex with a woman that has fucked other men" I will never fuck a man so there's no inherent disgust, but If the guy's fucked more than a few then I have to wonder what he's doing with his life and/or if he has some reason for not being in a stable relationship. I may hold men and women to different standards but don't mistake that for me not holding either group to any standard.

Can't it just be that someone enjoys casual sex rather than the more structured environment of a relationship? Why does someone have to be "wrong" to enjoy things differently than you?

As for my disgust, first off sticking my dick where another man, or multiple men, have stuck theirs (and might have came in as well) is fucking disgusting and a health risk. Then I have to wonder why the women allowed it to happen: is she easy? is she bad at choosing men? does she have some serious baggage to her? does she just like to fuck whoever, and so i wont even be with her for long? You see I'm a man that's only interested in a woman if I can see myself marrying her and starting a family, and there is not a single answer to "why has she fucked so many men" that could possibly make me attracted to her or value her more.

Well, okay, that's preferential. I think it's weird that you think like that, but you probably see the way that I think is weird, so touche. Still, though, that's a fully subjective way of looking at things. I'm not saying that you need to be forced to have one night stands or to bang chicks that pick up a different guy every other day of the week, I'm just saying that society, as a whole, should not look down on that kind of behavior in a generalized sense.

you should've made it clear you were talking about Hollywood. Fuck Hollywood.

Eh, it really just extends to media and pop culture in general, but fair.

"Hey I'm in an open relationship, anyone want to fuck my girlfriend for me?"
That's what a cuckold is, that's what your advocating for.

I mean, if someone wants to be a cuck then I think that's weird as hell but, hey, more power to them.

But open relationships/polyamory and cuckolding are two very different things. One is a separation of romance and sex and the other is a kink focused on humiliation and D/s relationships. They're not really comparable.

Progression is all well and good as long as it's necessariy for improvement. Which most progressive movements (which are almost synonymous with modern Liberalism) are not.

a y y l m a o

Quote from: Cindy Claus on December 13, 2015, 09:25:30 PM

Quote from: challengerX on December 13, 2015, 09:20:33 PM

Quote from: Cindy Claus on December 13, 2015, 09:19:39 PM

I think I've reported like...two things ever

Before or after your terrible disease

I was referring to your liberalism

GOT EM

And you think I wouldn't respond with the exact same image?

dreidel*

hey cindy

have you been internalising a really complicated situation in your head

Bre, Monique says you're dumb

Completely unrelated to the rest of the thread but what's the smallest dick you would take?

Idk I'm not picky

I'd say like three inches. Smaller than that and it's pretty pointless.

Entirely unrelated to the rest of this thread, but how the fuck do I edit my nameplate and the border around my avatar?

Make a shitpost
It's sure to stand out

Done and done

how about something funny or insightful

for a change

You agree with me on more things that you'd like to admit you share with a junkie whore, let's be real

I'd respond but it's really just not worth the effort at this point. Call this a victory or w/e but I can only talk with a brick wall for so long because it gets tiring.