6331
Gaming / Re: Realistic Fallout 4 Predictions
« on: August 28, 2014, 10:56:25 PM »
F3>NV
stay mad, pleb
stay mad, pleb
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 6331
Gaming / Re: Realistic Fallout 4 Predictions« on: August 28, 2014, 10:56:25 PM »
F3>NV
stay mad, pleb 6332
Gaming / Re: I COULD be playing Halo: Reach with my fellow Floodians right now.......« on: August 28, 2014, 10:55:46 PM »
Reach will be free on the 15th
6333
The Flood / Re: Drinking 'shine, ask me philosophical questions (or anything, fuck it)« on: August 28, 2014, 10:53:42 PM »Around sixWooo, another poor fag thank lawdy for this damn GI Bill or else I'd be broke college student and having to get a part time job (._.) speaking of which, I gots about $200 leftover from this book siphon. I could be a smart person and use that towards school supplies or I can buy some ammo >.> 6334
The Flood / Re: Drinking 'shine, ask me philosophical questions (or anything, fuck it)« on: August 28, 2014, 09:23:09 PM »
If matter can't be created or destroyed, how did the universe begin? For it to begin, something had to be here thus meaning the universe actually existed back then
checkmate atheists 6335
Serious / Re: Russia in Ukraine. Ron Paul edition.« on: August 28, 2014, 09:04:02 PM »
Fuck yes. Here comes WWIII
6336
The Flood / Re: Kinder's threatening to nuke the forum - or not, apparently« on: August 28, 2014, 04:51:58 PM »You think you can scare Comms?If I cared enough, then yes I could. I've scarred multiple friends after prank texting them to actually making them think they're involved in the middle of a gang conflict 6337
The Flood / Re: Kinder's threatening to nuke the forum - or not, apparently« on: August 28, 2014, 03:07:50 PM »Why the fuck would you even bother to bring it up, then?1. Because I can 2. To scare the creep 6338
The Flood / Re: Kinder's threatening to nuke the forum - or not, apparently« on: August 28, 2014, 02:34:35 PM »You can't possibly be serious.Icy threatened legal action against Rose before. Why can't I do it? Not like I'll go through with it 6339
The Flood / Re: Kinder's threatening to nuke the forum - or not, apparently« on: August 28, 2014, 02:30:58 PM »For this? Lol good luck.This isn't his first time He's followed me from Bnet, to Facebook, to the first offsite forum, and to here with sending me harassing PMs and messages. The history of him doing it can work in my favor 6340
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 02:28:52 PM »The second robbery didn't happen. And as for the other 2, they were small time robberies of small banks in small towns.I fucking love how you make outlandish statements regarding robberies don't happen and when I point out they do, you try to down play it. On top of that, you try to play the special pleading by moving the goal posts when I proved your statement that robberies don't happen as false. Get a life already Zomg! I didn't know you've gotten pulled over by over half of the U.S police force! Lol, are you SERIOUSLY trying to make this into a manner of race? That is a seriously new low for you. YOU, yes YOU are the reason why racism exists. Nobody brings it up but YOU. Instead thinking that the cop had a good reason to pull you over, you'll just disregard that by foaming at the mouth of your hur racesm 6341
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 02:21:03 PM »Talk about damage control.You just said you insulted. There is no thinking here because you admitted to it 6342
The Flood / Re: Kinder's threatening to nuke the forum - or not, apparently« on: August 28, 2014, 02:18:04 PM »
You know somebody is a man-child obsessed autistic when they go and try to forge a fake message. I just might have to file a restraining order if he keeps it up
6343
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 12:14:40 PM »
I didn't feel insulted, I simply recognized the act. I don't get or feel insulted because I don't give a fuck but I believe in the concept of returning the favor
6344
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 11:59:45 AM »
You know Meta, if I said the same thing to you, you'd reply with some excuse like damage control. So I'm going to be you and say you're just using damage control now
Oh and I'm not displaying cognitive dissonance. If somebody is going to insult my opinions or attempt to do so then I will in return. I don't get mad if they attempt to derail with insults but expect it back in return. It's a lesson that it'll happen in the world 6345
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 11:48:15 AM »
I don't insult people unless they insult me, which you did by saying "this is hilarious". I responded to such insult with my own
6346
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 11:40:21 AM »
In a sense, somewhat yes. I'll state my opinion and add to discussion. If others gets pissed off at it, it's not my fault they don't have self-control. At the end of the day I go to hed without giving a single fuck what anybody says about me becaude opinions are that, opinions; not facts.
6347
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 11:36:55 AM »
That irony. I'm not the one opinion bashing or hating. I'm the one trying to have a mature discussion but yoyr man-child instincts don't want to. Why I even bother posting in this circle jerk sub-forum is beyond me. Actually thinking about it, it's rather interesting to piss you all off with my opinions
6348
Serious / Re: 1,400 Child Rape Cases in One Town over 12 Years« on: August 28, 2014, 11:30:19 AM »
>fear of racism
And this is why being political correct, oversensitive, and other shit is a cancer that imoedes on society 6349
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 11:27:42 AM »
[ur]http://www.wkrn.com/story/26181586/police-man-robs-nashville-bank-carjacks-man-with-grandkids[/url]
http://www.jacksonsun.com/story/news/crime/2014/07/29/police-fbi-armed-bank-robbery/13331249/ http://www.chron.com/houston/article/Armed-bank-robbery-in-NW-Harris-County-5710787.php http://www.wcpo.com/news/local-news/kenton-county/covington/covington-bank-robbery-suspect-armed-and-dangerous Want me to continue? You're denial that armed bank robberies happening is very disturbing. You need need a prescription of reality check, kid Why should I provide evidence when you don't take the time to do so? Okay, so tjere's over 750k sworn officers. Most means over half, meaning you're saying that over 376k are bad. Can you be even more ignorant? Like I said, majority of cities don't have full-time SWAT meaning the cop that pulls you over during a traffic stop can be a SWAT member So you can use ad hominem but I can't? This forum needs to be renamed to Autism because you're along with Meta, Comms, Sentra, and Flee emits it far more than the radiation from Fukishima 6350
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 09:56:12 AM »Quote That's because only major cities need SWAT teams. You know who I am in favor of having rifles? The officers on the border and the department if fish and game officers because they can and do run into sticky situations where backup is nonexistent.My sides have reached the orbit of Pluto. Are you seriously this stupid to even think only major cities should have SWAT teams? You realize crime, especiallly hohostage situations, where SWAT is needed happens outside of major cities? Quote Just when I thought you couldn't make a bigger fool of yourself you go and say bank robberies don't happen. I'm dealing with some inner-xity fucktard who doesn't know jack shit about crime and law enforcement Lol, just make a retarded unsupported claim. That'll sure give you credibility! Quote I love how this wall here is just basically "You're wrong because I say so and some of my family members are cops."It's because you are wrong. If you honestly beleive that EVERY cop is some bad guy then you're wrong. It's a unsupported generalization. You're ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENT than Kiyo and her ramblings about how all Americans are bad 6351
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 09:04:03 AM »Have you even heard about the North Hollywood shootout? Two people decked themselves in protective armor and robbed a bank. The cops that responded only hand handguns, which did nothing against the body armor of the two suspects. In return, the criminals wounded over a dozen officers but luckily none of them were killed. So what did police do? They went to a nearby pawn store, asked to borrow some rifles, and then were able to take down the two suspects. Now, why isn't similar events happening now? Easy: Because police have the correct tools and no potential bank robber is going to attempt the same thing 6352
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 09:00:18 AM »Cops don't need rifles. We have SWAT for that.That's nice and all but only major cities with the money can only afford a full-time SWAT force. Everybody else has part-time SWAT which is made up of a varying amount of officers including K9 officers and patrol officers. You once again talk about shit you have no idea about It doesn't have to be Mexico. I ask for a third time, what rights are being violated because of officers having a rifle in the back of their trunk? Answer: No rights are being violated. Police are citizens and have a 2nd Amendment right in order to posses a rifle just like any other person can. Have you even heard about the North Hollywood shootout? Two people decked themselves in protective armor and robbed a bank. The cops that responded only hand handguns, which did nothing against the body armor of the two suspects. In return, the criminals wounded over a dozen officers but luckily none of them were killed. So what did police do? They went to a nearby pawn store, asked to borrow some rifles, and then were able to take down the two suspects. Now, why isn't similar events happening now? Easy: Because police have the correct tools and no potential bank robber is going to attempt the same thing Quote You're sacrificing liberty by allowing cops to become more aggressive and more suspicious. Give them weapons of war and the city will turn into a battlefield for them. They won't ask you to put your hands up, they'll just shoot. It's not about your fucking constitutional rights, it's about liberty itself.You seriously need get out of la-la hand. Cops are not some robotic bad people like you wanna think. Only a very small few are idiots but they do NOT reflect the hundreds of thousands of other officers. I have two uncles that are cops and they care about protecting their community and people. You need to grow the fuck out of your man-children angst attitude. Liberty is not being sacrificed by giving cops the correct tools. Nobody is giving them weapons of war. The city isn't being turned into a battlefield. And they will not shoot you. 6353
The Flood / Re: Cute bunny thread!« on: August 28, 2014, 08:52:27 AM »
*contemplates posting furry related porn*
6354
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 08:08:04 AM »That's EXACTLY his point. You want liberty but you're for the militarization of the police so they can oppress people even more.And I ask again, what rights are being infringed by giving cops rifle and armor? Nobody is being oppressed by giving cops the correct tools to do their job 6355
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 28, 2014, 12:10:05 AM »
@Door
Exactly how should I be the last person to use such statement? You're still bitching about me agreeing that police should have rifles and body armor? Please, tell me EXACTLY what right or law that violates. Hint: 4-letter word rhyming with ton 6356
Serious / Re: Let's have a little chat about the police state, shall we?« on: August 28, 2014, 12:06:48 AM »
@cheat. Yeah, you can't be stopped without reasonable suspicion or probable cause because to be detained, there needs to be a minimum of reasonable suspicion and without any proof you can't be detained. On top of that, if an anonymous person phones in a complaint about a "suspicious" individual selling druhs down at the corner, that is not enough proof for a cop to stop the guy but if the cop did, asks the guy if he can conduct a pat down, agrees, and does find drugs then the case will be thrown out due to the cop not having reasonable suspicion or probable cause to conduct the stop. It's no different than entering a person's home without a warrant and arresting any wanted persons inside
OT: So either cops take ttheir time, thus causing you and everybody else complain or they listen to the public by speeding thjngs up and still get complaints because they were not taking their time 6357
The Flood / Re: Guys this kid wants to kick my butt!« on: August 27, 2014, 10:35:13 PM »Box head.She has down syndrome...... 6359
The Flood / Re: What if Obama became the speaker for the traveler? (destiny)« on: August 27, 2014, 10:30:41 PM »
Fucking brilliant
6360
The Flood / Re: Urban Dictionary terms that make you LOL (GRAPHIC CONTENT)« on: August 27, 2014, 09:35:35 PM »
canadian
Expression for black people used by whites as "code" when they want to refer to blacks in a semi-derogatory manner without being detected in a group of people "Jeezus, look at all the Canadians out tonight." |