This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Kinder Graham
Pages: 1 ... 187188189 190191 ... 243
5641
« on: September 18, 2014, 10:24:20 PM »
ziggurat of kinder, betch
5642
« on: September 18, 2014, 10:12:41 PM »
so like am i the alien
5643
« on: September 18, 2014, 09:59:33 PM »
Anyone who says door has clearly never seen me in drag.
*raises hand*
5644
« on: September 18, 2014, 09:17:27 PM »
omg
FUCKING YES
5645
« on: September 18, 2014, 09:16:58 PM »
Splash of Color
Luck of the Irish
5646
« on: September 18, 2014, 08:36:15 PM »
You can't control your citizens as they destroy your cities.
Your primary hedonistic religion was founded so that your fatass king could divorce and murder his wife.
Your imperialism caused 99% of the problems in the world.
Directly responsable for the world's slave trade....
UK helped create Afganistan fearing Russian Imperialism.
The UK's indifference to the famine Ireland suffered in the mid-19th century.
UK did nothing to stop France from drafting the Treaty of Versailles.
UK helped draw up the borders in Africa after withdrawing causing decades of tribal warfare.
Historic responsibility for the Kashmir dispute.
Thousands of British children shipped to Australia and other Commonwealth countries between the 1920s and 1960s.
Currently... Drug abuse, violent crime, teenage delinquency, family breakdown, welfare dependency, poor urban environments, educational failure, poverty, the loss of traditional values, teenage pregnancy, dysfunctional families, binge drinking, children who kill: all have been cited as proof that we have a broken society.
Tony Blair in 1995 asked us to look at "the wreckage of our broken society" and, using the now-familiar language of rights and responsibilities, called for a new civic society where everyone played a part. The phrase then really came into its own in the Conservative leadership campaign in 2005, first from Liam Fox and then with David Cameron taking up the term in his leadership acceptance speech. It is now strongly associated with Iain Duncan Smith's work for the Centre for Social Justice and the Conservative's Social Justice Policy Group, and the promise to "mend Britain's broken society" became a dominant theme of the Conservative general election campaign.
But the picture is clearly more mixed than some commentators suggest. There are undoubtedly some serious social problems in Britain, and whilst some things have got worse, many have improved. Moreover, perceptions of some problems are increasingly wide of the mark.
Wars Britain started:
Breton War, 1076-1077
Vexin War 1087
Rebellion of 1088
Wars in the Vexin and Maine 1097-1098
Anglo-Norman War 1101 Anglo-Norman War 1105-1106
Anglo-French War 1117-1120
Wars of Henry II of England and Philip II of France
Stephen and Matilda conflict
Saintonge War (1242)
War of Saint-Sardos (1324)
Hundred Years' War (1337-1453)
War of the League of Cambrai
Anglo-French War (1627-1629)
The Crusades
The Eighty Years' War (1568-1648)
War of the Grand Alliance (Nine years war) (1688-1697) (formerly the League of Augsburg)
Williamite War in Ireland (1689-1691)
King William's War (1689-1697)
War of the Quadruple Alliance (1718-1720)
Seven Years' War (1756-1763)
American Revolutionary War (1775-1783)
Second Hundred Years' War (1688 and 1815)
The Boxer Rebellion (1900-1901)
World War I (1914-1918)
World War II (1939-1945)
The Suez Crisis (1956)
As well as several conflicts in: India Palestine Malaya Suez Canal Zone Kenya Cyprus Suez 1956 Borneo Aden Radfan Oman Dhofar Northern Ireland the Falklands War Sierra Leone And counting...
Face it, everyone (Europe, Asia, Africa, America, etc.) would all have been a lot better off had the UK never existed, you're all nothing but limey hedonistic fucks who would all be going to hell if it existed.
5647
« on: September 18, 2014, 08:12:52 PM »
Hm, I used another account on b.old and made a copypasta of something about making fun of Britain. Probably can't find it in all honesty
do you remember the alt's username
or at least part of it
http://halo.bungie.net/Account/Profile.aspx?memberID=9898631Found my old account. Oh gawd the cringe from reading my posts (._.)
5648
« on: September 18, 2014, 07:55:33 PM »
Hm, I used another account on b.old and made a copypasta of something about making fun of Britain. Probably can't find it in all honesty
5649
« on: September 18, 2014, 07:43:17 PM »
http://media.fm99.com/pod9-18-2014prostrate2.mp3So, this morning the sports guy on the show got a prostate exam while on-air. 5:40 is where it starts. First few minutes is an interview with the doctor. But this is too damn funny and the type of shit they do nearly everyday. Few years back they would host fishing tournaments right next door to PETA lol Post shit your news station does
5650
« on: September 18, 2014, 07:37:02 PM »
we need a forum plumber
Do we have any Polish users?
>is partially polish ohfuckme.jpg
5651
« on: September 18, 2014, 07:16:50 PM »
5652
« on: September 18, 2014, 07:06:00 PM »
http://www.totalxbox.com/65390/bungie-say-destiny-will-be-a-great-action-game-not-an-mmo/I've seen it for a while, but increasingly over the past week since it launched. People have been complaining that it's too short to be an MMO or not challenging enough to be one. They've seriously forgotten, and even failed to learn that Bungie NEVER intended it to be an MMO. They intended it to be an action game at heart. Of course, it does borrow MMO elements but only to improve the experience of the typical shooter we play every year. If people actually viewed it as an action-adventure shooter type of deal with some MMO elements then the ratings could easily improve
5653
« on: September 18, 2014, 07:02:15 PM »
Destiny does not have shit on Borderlands.
It was inspired by borderlands
I know, and Borderlands is better. Destiny is trying to be something it is not, which is an MMO. I would love Destiny a lot more if it actually had social features instead of just being able to see other people and dance with them. What the hell is the point of that? Allow me to invite those players to my fireteam, allow us to trade items, and give us a player store in the tower where players can sell their items for reasonable prices to others.
http://www.totalxbox.com/65390/bungie-say-destiny-will-be-a-great-action-game-not-an-mmo/Bungie has never called Destiny an MMO. They said they're building an action game at it's core, which Destiny perfectly emulates. All this hype of it being an MMO was started by uneducated fans. It borrows MMO-like elements but the focus is only a slimmer of that
5654
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:55:30 PM »
, nicer people
Unless you're gay, lesbian, trans, black, jewish, protestant, russian, japanese, vietnamese, canadian, mongoliod, native, cuban, mexican, actual mexican, puerto rican, slavic, and or a self identifying Apache gunship.
wut
Maybe like a century ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/us/25south.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&
>taking that post seriously
>taking what i posted as taking your post serious checkmate, Nimitz class carrier
5655
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:54:43 PM »
Unless the Empire is going to repeal the ban on Talos and re-engage the dominion within about two decades, the Stormcloaks are the better option.
What really matters is that Talos is protected. Talos is reinforcing the Wheel and helping to hold the Mundus together right now.
Talos is more important than the survival of some empire that only follows in the footsteps of the one that was metaphysically relevant.
The Empire could have re-engaged the Dominion if it was not for Ulfric. The Dominion wanted there to be a civil war in order to weaken the Empire, and Skyrim
5656
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:51:16 PM »
, nicer people
Unless you're gay, lesbian, trans, black, jewish, protestant, russian, japanese, vietnamese, canadian, mongoliod, native, cuban, mexican, actual mexican, puerto rican, slavic, and or a self identifying Apache gunship.
wut Maybe like a century ago http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/us/25south.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&
5657
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:47:36 PM »
Pfffft anything south of my Canadian border is a fat southerner to me.
Bite me, ehh?
>mfw canadia has rednecks :p
mfw every where has hicks.
Canadian hicks don't fuck their mothers. Checkm88
>mfw australia is filled with rednecks
5658
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:46:41 PM »
>mfw ulfric was brainwashed by elves
>mfw ulfric doing what elves want
FOR THE EMPIRE!
5659
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:45:15 PM »
Pfffft anything south of my Canadian border is a fat southerner to me.
Bite me, ehh?
>mfw canadia has rednecks :p
5660
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:42:10 PM »
Yes, aside from the heat
Better food, nicer people, and better emphasis on family and community
Yeah like when they disown their kids if they're gay after giving them a beating.
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL CRY ABOUT IT
Yeah like when it happens in the north also LOOOOOOOOOOOOL SUCK A DICK
5661
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:38:24 PM »
when he forgets to put the condom on -.-
5662
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:36:53 PM »
>me when i see part of my name in op' screencap 
5663
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:29:09 PM »
Yes, aside from the heat
Better food, nicer people, and better emphasis on family and community
5664
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:12:24 PM »
Finally Obama does something decent
5665
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:11:22 PM »
Nope
And profiting still happens under socialism
. . .
What?
China
If China was socialist you wouldn't have people running around saying that socialism doesn't work.
Except China is Socialist and it proves Socialism doesn't work
China is fast becoming the largest economy in the world.
the government is becoming the largest economy
http://www.newstatesman.com/global-issues/2014/03/china%E2%80%99s-billionaire-politicians-quadruple-their-wealth
Except they don't make up "the economy". When you talk about a country's economy you're talking about everybody, not its billionaire politicians the government does not make the economy. There are a ton of rich criminals and people who are not affiliated with the government.
So how can economy talk about everybody aside from Chinese citizens like political officials who make up a large part of the economy? Really doesn't make sense. They're part of the economy; they own business or conduct business with international corporations which does business in China. They spend money in China, they earn money in China, and they invest money in China. They are part, and a nice size, of China's economy. If they weren't then the regular people would have more money
5666
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:07:09 PM »
Notice how I pointed out to GOVERNMENT, not ECONOMY. And China's economy is still a sub-genre of Socialism. Refer to one of my previous posts
It's Socialist. It's sub-form of Socialism can be whatever but it's still Socialist
You are joking. . . Aren't you?
You're not going to make reference to an entire politico-socio-economic system and then tell me you're only talking about the government.
The Chinese government can flaunt how socialist it "really is" all it wants, it just isn't true. It doesn't fit into a "sub-genre" of socialism, because it fits none of the proper criteria. It is, as I have said and demonstrated to you, State Capitalist. Like I say, being "constitutionally dedicated" to socialism doesn't necessarily make you some sort of socialist.
Just ask Tony Blair.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism#PoliticsIn this context, socialism has been used to refer to a political movement, a political philosophy and a hypothetical form of society these movements aim to achieve. As a result, in a political context socialism has come to refer to the strategy (for achieving a socialist society) or policies promoted by socialist organisations and socialist political parties; all of which have no connection to socialism as a socioeconomic system.
When discussing Socialism, you don't have to refer to both the economic and political ideas, because each has their separate type of meaning when viewed solely in a political or economic capacity
China is Socialist though. Don't feel like arguing any more over it
5668
« on: September 18, 2014, 05:41:17 PM »
Yes
Yes it is
https://www.nationstates.net/nation=single-party_socialist_state_of_china
Hell, even under Wikipedia it's government is stated as Single-Party Socialism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China
Do you just read the headlines of newspapers, instead of actually looking at the information properly?
The socialist market economy is the economic model employed by the People's Republic of China. It is based on the dominance of the state-owned sector and an open-market economy, and has its origins in the Chinese economic reforms introduced under Deng Xiaoping. The ideological rationale is that China is in the primary stage of socialism, an early stage within the socialist mode of production, and therefore has to adapt capitalist techniques to thrive. Despite this, the system has widely been cited as a form of state capitalism.[1][2]
Also, if you thought to follow up on the "socialist state" listing, you'd find this definition:
The term socialist state (or socialist republic) usually refers to any state that is constitutionally dedicated to the construction of a socialist society. You could call a British government with Ed Miliband at the helm a socialist state and probably get away with it. It has no descriptive value when it comes to any economic system.
Notice how I pointed out to GOVERNMENT, not ECONOMY. And China's economy is still a sub-genre of Socialism. Refer to one of my previous posts It's Socialist. It's sub-form of Socialism can be whatever but it's still Socialist
5669
« on: September 18, 2014, 05:38:24 PM »
Nope
And profiting still happens under socialism
. . .
What?
China
If China was socialist you wouldn't have people running around saying that socialism doesn't work.
Except China is Socialist and it proves Socialism doesn't work
China is fast becoming the largest economy in the world.
Your point? Does that mean the people, not the government, are successful? Hell no. There's plenty of poverty and poor people along with tremendous environmental disregard. What you mean is the government is becoming the largest economy, not the people
5670
« on: September 18, 2014, 05:13:22 PM »
Nope
And profiting still happens under socialism
. . .
What?
China
If China was socialist you wouldn't have people running around saying that socialism doesn't work.
Except China is Socialist and it proves Socialism doesn't work
Pages: 1 ... 187188189 190191 ... 243
|
Show Posts