South East

:/

(ﾉ◕ω◕)ﾉ～『✧~*DICKS*~✧』

The only pie I accept is cherry.

I'll pop your cherry

Did the second test

There is no clear indication that you might have a
psychopathic / antisocial personality disorder.
You reached, however, 62.50% of Factor 1 which captures the core personality traits of psychopathy that define the interpersonal and affective deficits of this personality disorder (e.g. shallow affect, superficial charm, manipulativeness, lack of empathy) and that are correlated with narcissistic personality disorder, low anxiety, low empathy, low stress reaction and low suicide risk. But Factor 1 is also associated with extraversion and positive affect - affected persons usually score high on scales of achievement and well-being, so some aspects of the personality disorder may even be beneficial for the psychopath (in terms of nondeviant social functioning or if it comes to profit from manipulation or lies).
You reached, however, 27.78% of Factor 2 which captures the traits of antisocial behavior (e.g. criminal versatility, impulsiveness, irresponsibility, poor behaviour controls, juvenile delinquency) and is associated with reactive anger, social deviance, sensation seeking, anxiety, increased risk of suicide, low socio-economic status, criminality, and impulsive violence.
You might have certain traits of antisocial or psychopathic personalities but certainly not in a form that would justify a personality disorder diagnosis according to the

There are strong indications that you might have a
histrionic personality disorder.
There is, however, no scientific test to confirm this diagnosis other than to verify the symptoms by subjective means. Thus, some people may be wrongly diagnosed as having the disorder while others with the disorder may not be diagnosed - with the result that treatment is often only prompted by depression associated with dissolved romantic relationships. Medication does little to affect this personality disorder, but may be helpful with symptoms such as depression. Psychotherapy may be of benefit and will aim at self-development through resolution of conflict and advancement of inhibited developmental lines

You meet 80% of the range of general personality disorder criteria.
However, there are no clear indications of you having a psychopathic/antisocial, narcissistic or histrionic disorder, so there might be another problem not captured by this test.
Thus, is strongly recommended you seek a professional diagnosis to be sure what exactly you are dealing with.
It might turn out useful to print the previous page including your selections and take it to a psychotherapist, psychiatrist or psychologist

>histrionic

toplel

Quote from: Kinder Skellington on October 07, 2014, 05:32:51 PM

You can stay mad

Seat belt laws don't infringe on anything. In fact, not wearing a seat belt and dying infringes on the right to life. You're telling ME to refer to the Constitution? That's hilarious because I know it far better, and it's interpretations, better than you ever will. They actually did have authority to draw their weapons because they thought the man was reaching for a gun and said he was getting his ticket after reaching. And a traffic stop is probable cause; probable cause is the concept of having enough evidence to make a case for arrest. Not wearing a seat belt is illegal and the observation of a person not wearing it is probable cause to perform a traffic stop

I absolutely will. The problem is not enough people are outraged which is why these thugs keep getting away with murder.

They infringe upon our freedoms to do with our own bodies whatever we so choose. You have every right to take your own life and the government has no authority to prevent you. you obviously don't know much at all about the Constitution. I know the Constitution very well. They had no authority to threaten the man's family with their firearms. The man was NOT a threat, and that is the only time you can draw to defend yourself. Their thoughts are irrelevant. They had no probable cause of any crime. Seat belt laws are illegal and do not apply to free people.

"The policy of the American government is to leave their citizens free, neither restraining nor aiding them in their pursuits."

"A free people claim their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate."
-Thomas Jefferson

Guess what? People have children. Not having them in seat belts will result in them dying. That's why those laws exist. I know it better than you do because all you do is cherry pick it and have no understanding interpretations from the Constitution made by the courts. Actually, their thoughts ARE relevant because how can somebody determine if their life is in danger without thinking? Reaching for something can lead a person to think a gun is going to be pulled and thus puling out your weapon to anticipate a possible gun is what you do. They did have probable cause because not wearing a seat belt IS probable cause that a crime is being committed. Seat belt laws are not illegal because they are laws and passed legally; it's a direct contradiction that a law is illegal. Anything that's stated in a state's code/law book is illegal and if it's not in it then it's perfectly legal

Those quotes for one have no relation to a seat belt law and secondly, the Constitution is the law, not what Jefferson says

Continue to make incoherent response due to your botched lobotomy and low Halo Wars K/D, homo sapein

Quote from: Kinder Skellington on October 07, 2014, 05:18:57 PM

Not wearing a seatbelt is a crime. Stop trying to cherry pick laws and what not. If it's true that the law in that place says people have to exit a car then the guy was not following directions, or the law, and also was reaching in the back of a car for something, so of course cops will draw their weapons. A traffic stop IS a probable cause and is a law violation; that lady is stupid

*waits for cam's crying*

No, it's not. The crime is the unjust law infringing upon freedoms. You absolutely SHOULD ignore unjust laws. He had no obligation to listen to criminals. Refer to the furth and fifth amendment to the Bill of Rights. They had no authority to draw their firearms and in doing so threatened his life which is a serious crime. The man clearly said he was getting his ticket. A traffic stop is probable cause of nothing, especially when the stop was phony. I have not cried in a long time. The only stupid people that day were the police. Seat belt laws are nothing more than a form of theft to generate revenue for the state.

You can stay mad

Seat belt laws don't infringe on anything. In fact, not wearing a seat belt and dying infringes on the right to life. You're telling ME to refer to the Constitution? That's hilarious because I know it far better, and it's interpretations, better than you ever will. They actually did have authority to draw their weapons because they thought the man was reaching for a gun and said he was getting his ticket after reaching. And a traffic stop is probable cause; probable cause is the concept of having enough evidence to make a case for arrest. Not wearing a seat belt is illegal and the observation of a person not wearing it is probable cause to perform a traffic stop

Joseph Kony

He revealed Mr Psychologist's Facebook. I told him that was really lame of him to do, Psycho said it was like the third time he did it, and I told Comms to get a life and to stop wasting time like that.

He really took it to heart and asked for a permaban, and thanked me. He also called Kinder a nagger in his goodbye message.

Oh, and Slash permabanned him because he threatened to post CP if nobody permabanned him. Nobody wanted to permaban him at first.

Nigger is an insult? comms gunna comms I suppose

And we are...?

That kid in the back of class who repeats what the cool kids say to look cool. We still wear lights up sketchers, jean shorts, and cheesy t.v show shirts to class and have tuna sammiches for lunch

Quote from: Meta Cognition on October 07, 2014, 12:03:03 PM

Because Hamas isn't worse, right? RIGHT?

Don't be dumb.

How about we drop both

And create a new secular state that doesn't engage in genocide

I nominate Turk-

ohwait.jpg

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/obama-netanyahu-meet-iran-deadline-looms-25881769

In a striking public rebuke, the Obama administration warned Israel on Wednesday that plans for a controversial new housing project in east Jerusalem would distance Israel from "even its closest allies" and raise questions about its commitment to seeking peace with Palestinians.

The harsh criticism came just hours after President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met at the White House. Obama spokesman Josh Earnest said the president privately raised his concerns with Netanyahu though the two leaders made no mention of the matter in their public comments to reporters.

"This development will only draw condemnation from the international community," Earnest said. "It also would call into question Israel's ultimate commitment to a peaceful negotiated settlement with the Palestinians."

Netanyahu pushed back against the criticism, according to reporters traveling with him Wednesday, saying that people should have all of the information before making such statements. He also said that while Obama did raise the issue of settlements in their meeting, the discussion did not focus on specific cases.

An Israeli official confirmed the accuracy of Netanyahu's comments to his traveling press corps. The official would discuss the matter only on condition of anonymity.

The new 2,500 unit project that stoked U.S. anger is contentious because it would complete a band of Jewish areas that separate Jerusalem from nearby Bethlehem. The U.S. has repeatedly criticized Israeli construction in east Jerusalem, casting it as damaging to efforts to secure an elusive peace accord with the Palestinians.

The White House also condemned what it called the recent occupation of residential buildings in Silwan, an Arab neighborhood in east Jerusalem where several hundred hard-line Israeli settlers have moved in recent years. Earnest called the move was "provocative" and said it would "escalate tensions at a moment when those tensions have already been high."

Appearing before reporters earlier, Obama and Netanyahu betrayed little of the U.S. displeasure projected by the White House spokesman, as well as officials at the State Department. While the two leaders have long had a tense relationship, each took a polite and cordial tone in their brief public remarks.

Still, areas of discord were evident, most notably Obama's frustration with Palestinian civilian deaths in during the summer war in Gaza and Israel's wariness of U.S.-led nuclear negotiations with Iran.

Sitting alongside Netanyahu, Obama said leaders must "find ways to change the status quo so that both Israel citizens are safe in their own homes, and schoolchildren in their schools, from the possibility of rocket fire but also that we don't have the tragedy of Palestinian children being killed as well."

More than 2,100 Palestinians — the vast majority of them civilians, according to the United Nations — and more than 70 Israelis were killed during the 50-day war in Gaza.

Officials said much of Obama and Netanyahu's private discussions centered on Iran. The U.S. and its negotiating partners — Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China — have until Nov. 24 to reach a deal with Iran on its nuclear program, and all sides say significant gaps remain.

Hopefully this is the beginning and people learn how much of a monster Israel really is

I agree. There should be religion classes in all schools.

If all religions are taught, then I don't see the issue but still, not a good idea. You can take religion classes in college

I feel strongly about nothing. Everything just pisses me off.

Verby, get off Dustin's account

Whos the communist now, bitch.

>mfw receiver is american made

toplel