Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Kinder Graham

Pages: 1 ... 119120121 122123 ... 243
3601
Serious / Re: >mfw nogunz
« on: November 02, 2014, 09:51:50 PM »

3602
Serious / Re: >mfw nogunz
« on: November 02, 2014, 09:50:24 PM »
>mfw most cheap sks is oriental shit
>mfw wasr 10 cheap and best ak coming from romance country

3603
The Flood / Re: So what happened to Iron Man?
« on: November 02, 2014, 07:22:17 PM »
Idk, where the fuck did Crouton go as well? He was really active
LOL

Bet he died of old age or something. Fucking creepy thinking how he an be 40 and grapes is like 13

3604
Serious / Re: UKIP poll
« on: November 02, 2014, 07:06:30 PM »
Yes

Non-britbongistanian

3605
Serious / Re: The two party regulation is stupid
« on: November 02, 2014, 03:45:30 PM »
If you have the Libertarians, you should have the Greens too.
Even though I despise the Green Party more so than the Democrats, all parties should be on the ballot

3606
Serious / Re: People who assume they're right in an argument
« on: November 02, 2014, 03:43:35 PM »
should have followed her home, snatched her into an alley way held her down and shoved it right in there
Is she fat is the question to ask

Edit: Play nice.

3607
Serious / The two party regulation is stupid
« on: November 02, 2014, 03:41:33 PM »
http://wtvr.com/2014/10/31/watch-u-s-senate-libertarian-candidate-robert-sarvis-offers-his-views-on-current-issues/

Quote
Election day is five days away and the candidates have been appearing on CBS-6 News at 7.
Over the past several weeks, we’ve heard from the two major party candidates in the race for U.S. Senate, the incumbent Democrat Sen. Mark Warner and his Republican challenger Ed Gillespie .

Thursday we heard from Robert Sarvis, the Libertarian candidate.  Sarvis had been excluded from debates with Warner and Gillespie because he had not previously polled at least 15%, a barrier that frequently prevents third party candidates from getting the attention of the electorate.

He offers his take on some of the contentious issues of the day, including drones, the Affordable Care Act and government regulation.

Click on the video player above.

The Republicans and Democrats do their hardest to keep politics a monopoly split between them. Their 15% policy and ignoring of popular 3rd parties restrict American political knowledge, leaving the people who vote for them a small number

3608
The Flood / Re: An attractive girl/guy is drunk
« on: November 02, 2014, 03:25:56 PM »
I'd get accused of rape. So...maybe.
Not if they were above the level of .08%. Well, you could but it would more than likely be dismissed because she didn't meet the legal requirement of being drunk

3609
Serious / Re: China manufacturing growth slows
« on: November 02, 2014, 03:13:15 PM »

3610
Serious / Re: How is China NOT communist?
« on: November 02, 2014, 03:12:04 PM »
Because you can totally trust the CIA to not be biased against China.

3611
Serious / Re: China manufacturing growth slows
« on: November 02, 2014, 03:09:48 PM »
Further proof Communism doesn't work.
lolwut?

China isn't communist

3612
Serious / Re: Obama's stimulus package was bigger than FDR's New Deal
« on: November 02, 2014, 03:08:53 PM »
Government should prioritize the people first in the form of tax breaks, reductions, and even tax free weekends.

3613
The Flood / Re: Only 52 days left!
« on: November 02, 2014, 02:51:45 PM »
Happy Birthday Jesus!
Not his actual DOB. It's estimated around spring or summer time he was born based on research and I believe a certain crop growing at the time, which could only exist in one of those climates

3614
The Flood / Re: ATTENTION VEGANS.
« on: November 02, 2014, 01:05:02 PM »
vegans are killing the planet. People who eat meat eat cows, thus reducing the amount of harmful methane gas in the atmosphere


3615
The Flood / Re: So I visited America last year
« on: November 02, 2014, 12:55:32 PM »
Visiting the USA isn't worth going through the TSA.
It's made out to be far worse than it really is. You should definitely visit if you can.

I would like to go someday <.<
Which state?

Undecided really, although wherever Yosemite park is is where I'd probably like to go the most >.>
Come to Virginia and I can show you around the places your ancestors used to own and where they surrendered like figs :p
Will you then sue him for thousands of dinars?
ftfy
That triggered me.
I'll see you in Court, buddy.
will there be dancing lobsters?

3616
The Flood / Re: So I visited America last year
« on: November 02, 2014, 12:52:32 PM »
Visiting the USA isn't worth going through the TSA.
It's made out to be far worse than it really is. You should definitely visit if you can.

I would like to go someday <.<
Which state?

Undecided really, although wherever Yosemite park is is where I'd probably like to go the most >.>
Come to Virginia and I can show you around the places your ancestors used to own and where they surrendered like figs :p
Will you then sue him for thousands of dinars?
ftfy

3617
The Flood / Re: So what's so bad about the KKK?
« on: November 02, 2014, 12:51:33 PM »
Kinder's Kandy Korner

Spoiler
cus kids in german is kinder

3618
The Flood / Re: So I visited America last year
« on: November 02, 2014, 12:49:54 PM »
Visiting the USA isn't worth going through the TSA.
It's made out to be far worse than it really is. You should definitely visit if you can.

I would like to go someday <.<
Which state?

Undecided really, although wherever Yosemite park is is where I'd probably like to go the most >.>
Come to Virginia and I can show you around the places your ancestors used to own and where they surrendered like figs :p

3619
The Flood / Re: An attractive girl/guy is drunk
« on: November 02, 2014, 12:37:14 PM »
Would do a breath analyzer test on her. If not above .08% then good to go
If you think a girl would fuck you after breathalysing her, you're definitely a virgin.
Nah, if she's blonde and dumb, I'd tell her it's a game

3620
The Flood / Re: An attractive girl/guy is drunk
« on: November 02, 2014, 12:35:13 PM »
Would do a breath analyzer test on her. If not above .08% then good to go

3621
The Flood / Re: So I finally got banned.....
« on: November 02, 2014, 12:33:39 PM »
Pssshh, I've been banned more than almost any user on the site.

Just ask True; he'll vouch for that.
Wait.......why are you here?

3622
The Flood / Re: So I visited America last year
« on: November 02, 2014, 12:28:57 PM »
>new york
>cowboy hat

lolwut

3623
The Flood / Re: So I visited America last year
« on: November 02, 2014, 12:27:17 PM »
Visiting the USA isn't worth going through the TSA.
Why the hell do you think I've never gone on foreign vacations? I'd fucking love to travel to Germany, Turkey, Dubai, and Italy but ain't dealing with TSgay

3624
Serious / Re: Why are you against the legalization of medical cannabis?
« on: November 02, 2014, 12:19:04 PM »
Only against the possibility of a person showing up high to work

3625
Serious / Re: >be honest Sikh dude
« on: November 02, 2014, 12:13:25 PM »
I think the thing that scares me the most about the "ban guns" mentality, is how ignorant you have to be to not understand how easy it is to make a gun.

That said I don't agree with either side of the argument/spectrum.
That, and banning guns would just resort in people using other methods to kill
Not even. There are so many guns in circulation that banning them wouldn't change anything, if anything crime would increase.

And that's the problem. It's far easier to get a gun illegally in America than it is in the UK. That's really what needs to be attacked, along with some better background checks especially on mental health.
Well of course. I was just going by a hypothetical situation where guns somehow were not in circulation, just as how a person can't get hold of an Apache helicopter. People will always find ways to kill each other and it's extremely idiotic to make attempts at banning all guns because there are so many in circulation

Of course, restricting the ability for law-abiding citizens won't solve anything. There is no sure way to eliminate all illegal guns, but it can possibly be controlled. Part of that is tightening prison time and punishment for those that commit gun crime, along with eliminating plea bargains of those being prosecuted. Another way would be to charge the ATF for the whole Op: Fast and Furious seeing as how they put a lot of guns on the illegal market   

3626
Serious / Re: >be honest Sikh dude
« on: November 02, 2014, 11:29:26 AM »
I think the thing that scares me the most about the "ban guns" mentality, is how ignorant you have to be to not understand how easy it is to make a gun.

That said I don't agree with either side of the argument/spectrum.
That, and banning guns would just resort in people using other methods to kill

3627
Serious / Re: Should The United States of America Revolt?
« on: November 02, 2014, 11:20:48 AM »
So when the government was Partially shutdown, people were roaming the streets yelling anarchy and making the LA riots look like a walk in the part, huh? State and local governments would still be fully operational

Let me fix that for you.

A total lack of any central would create absolute chaos.
Talk to majority of Americans who don't read into things. They would have thought the government was fully shutdown. Yet those same people still kept on with their daily lives. What really showed is that people are capable of making rational decisions and not go primitive; no anarchy, no riots, none of that. People can live without a strong central government, and a strong central government is a huge evil

3628
The Flood / Re: So a fox just showed up at my back door
« on: November 02, 2014, 10:17:07 AM »
You were visited by Elegiac.
Damn it! Stole my response!

3629
Serious / Re: Should The United States of America Revolt?
« on: November 02, 2014, 10:04:29 AM »
Yes. Anarchy and a period without a government is far better than our current system.

#sarcasm
So when the government was shutdown, people were roaming the streets yelling anarchy and making the LA riots look like a walk in the part, huh? State and local governments would still be fully operational

3630
Serious / Re: Should The United States of America Revolt?
« on: November 02, 2014, 08:31:12 AM »
Why would we.

Government tyranny out of control.
but it isnt

Plenty would argue it is.

A few backwoods, inbred secessionist retards and their mother's neckbeards don't count as "plenty" out of the millions of Americans.
Fucking what?

If you actually support the government mass collecting personal data without probable cause or a warrant or if you support the idea the government can detain a person indefinitely through the NDAA then fucking leave this country. Same shit we fought the British over and it will be the same thing we fight over again

I don't, actually, so don't put your words into my mouth.  But you and Camnator are thinking about running around like little Cliven Bundies wanting to spill blood, which--given today's military tech compared to the Revolutionary War's--would be a fucking DISASTER.  You'd end up blowing at least half the country apart just because you live under an imaginary threat of the NDAA (show me where a person's been detained indefinitely please?).  Also the NDAA has been around way before Obama.

But if you guys feel like charging with your homemade explosives and store-bought guns against the might of the military, have fun with the drone bombs crashing on your heads.

(And just for your information, I'm not against the idea of a revolution, I'm just against the idea of a bloody one.  Just look at the fucking TEA Party before the Republicans hijacked it and took over.)

Seeing as how you've had no mention that what the government is doing is wrong, alongside a response in a another thread with you saying "muh constitution", then things point in that direction. Great way of avoiding the mass information collection there, which is very unconstitutional. Here's an interesting tidbit, the military swears an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. Not only that, but the military is just ordinary people and they will be the ones who would support and help everybody else against the government. And don't give me that modern day military tech also because the groups of people in the middle-east have been fighting against fucking NATO countries for the past decade and they still have yet lost. Don't forget that the government can't just kill American citizens as it's a deprivation of 5th Amendment rights and the government can't strip natural-born citizens of their citizenship either. Why would the government release they've been depriving people of Constitutional rights by detaining them? And there's a provision in NDAA that allows detention which has only been passed under Obama

As I said, government can't kill us. They only can if we're actively attacking them. Sleeping at night means we're not showing a threat and killing us would deprive us our Constitutional rights; we'd be martyrs

All revolutions end up with some blood spilled. Having a blood-less one will accomplish nothing. This is the very reason why we have the 2nd Amendment: To only protect ourselves, but to forcefully defend the rest of the Constitution

Pages: 1 ... 119120121 122123 ... 243