This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Kinder Graham
Pages: 1 ... 424344 4546 ... 243
1291
« on: December 20, 2014, 12:52:29 PM »
beeing dis much of a homo erectus 
1292
« on: December 20, 2014, 12:42:11 PM »
These videos are for autistic autism lords.
It's a good job I'm getting you the box set for Christmas, then.
1293
« on: December 20, 2014, 12:40:36 PM »
I assume you're playing early access
Would you say it plays like Halo 4 or more like 2/3/arena feel? Basically, is it better than Halo 4 or what
Way, way, way better than Halo 4. It certainly has that arena feel, but with a much heavier emphasis on mobility.
Alright, that's great to hear. Knew it would have been better when learning Bravo became their community manager
1294
« on: December 20, 2014, 12:38:07 PM »
This one is not one of the better ones...
Fuck you.
There previous series before this one was utter shit, however.
Ima let you finish, but the battle between Rasputin, Stalin, Lenin, Gorbachev, and Putin was the best in ERB history
1295
« on: December 20, 2014, 12:36:48 PM »
I assume you're playing early access
Would you say it plays like Halo 4 or more like 2/3/arena feel? Basically, is it better than Halo 4 or what
1296
« on: December 20, 2014, 12:34:42 PM »
I'll stuff your stocking if you know what I mean
1297
« on: December 20, 2014, 12:32:38 PM »
1298
« on: December 20, 2014, 12:32:19 PM »
Great to hear your Secret Nigg- I mean Santa went well!
1299
« on: December 20, 2014, 12:31:16 PM »
OH ME GAWD STAHP COPEYENG MEH :^(((((
1300
« on: December 20, 2014, 12:30:06 PM »
if it's a single-parent or low-income situation then I can see why a parent would end the life of their disabled child; it's a heavy burden, challenging, and requires a LOT of mental strength to raise one
1301
« on: December 20, 2014, 10:58:13 AM »
1302
« on: December 20, 2014, 10:55:29 AM »
I would love to see a Farge v. Piers debate
Oh fuck me piers would be absolutely #buttrekt
PLS MAEK INTO ERB EPISODE. WILL GIVE 69 UPBOATS
1303
« on: December 20, 2014, 10:54:28 AM »
No moreso than playing Halo makes you shoot up schools.
It's the correlation =/= causation shit once again, people who are in the sort of criminal culture described will find rap music appealing. But just because 20 Pence says that he's gonna put a bullet in any honkey with a mullet, doesn't mean that the average person who listens to that music is suddenly going to go out and cap a few rednecks.
Watching violent films doesn't make you violent.
Playing violent games doesn't make you a school shooter.
Reading Mein Kampfy Chair doesn't make you a nazi.
and listening to rap doesn't make you go out and start snorting coke, shooting white people and beating up hookers.
It doesn't, but it can influence a person. There exists a big difference; when I learned about Communism in school, it influenced me to become one for many years
Money can influence people to either do good, or to do bad
Power can influence people to do good, or to do bad
Intelligence can influence a people to do good, or to do bad
I went to schools that were majority black and can safely say the lyrics of mainstream rap, such as sex, crime, and drugs, can have a level of influence on youth. These rappers are the same role models these kids look up to and when they see them doing crime and talking about it, that will in turn have an influence
Sure, just about everything influences people.
I would say that having a shitty home environment, no father figure, no job prospects and being shot like animals in the street by the police and being third class citizens has more of an influence than some brainless twonk going 'nigganigganigganigga' into a mic.
You are however right about people using them as rolemodels, which is tied into not having a father figure/having something worse than no dad as a father.
So /thread then? After all, Meta stated the specific word of influence
1304
« on: December 20, 2014, 10:52:33 AM »
Based Farage with prep time
1305
« on: December 20, 2014, 10:51:18 AM »
I would love to see a Farge v. Piers debate
1306
« on: December 20, 2014, 10:50:43 AM »
This makes much sense when thinking about how birds know where to migrate to and such
1307
« on: December 20, 2014, 10:45:27 AM »
I love how she insists to dodge the issue that Farge is simply saying that women with families have it difficult and she some how thinks that's discrimination. Having a difficult situation=/=impossible situation
1308
« on: December 20, 2014, 10:36:28 AM »
No moreso than playing Halo makes you shoot up schools.
It's the correlation =/= causation shit once again, people who are in the sort of criminal culture described will find rap music appealing. But just because 20 Pence says that he's gonna put a bullet in any honkey with a mullet, doesn't mean that the average person who listens to that music is suddenly going to go out and cap a few rednecks.
Watching violent films doesn't make you violent.
Playing violent games doesn't make you a school shooter.
Reading Mein Kampfy Chair doesn't make you a nazi.
and listening to rap doesn't make you go out and start snorting coke, shooting white people and beating up hookers.
It doesn't, but it can influence a person. There exists a big difference; when I learned about Communism in school, it influenced me to become one for many years Money can influence people to either do good, or to do bad Power can influence people to do good, or to do bad Intelligence can influence a people to do good, or to do bad I went to schools that were majority black and can safely say the lyrics of mainstream rap, such as sex, crime, and drugs, can have a level of influence on youth. These rappers are the same role models these kids look up to and when they see them doing crime and talking about it, that will in turn have an influence
1309
« on: December 20, 2014, 09:48:08 AM »
swiggity swooty im coming for that bumpity
1310
« on: December 20, 2014, 09:38:16 AM »
Don't make me lock this thread, you both also just got back from a ban.
Knock it off.
Just go ahead and lock it to make it simple
1311
« on: December 20, 2014, 09:37:18 AM »
Yup, because if you can't have a rifle with a 30 round mag we should just bring slavery back and remove free speech.
Here's the thing, no weapon ensures your freedom. In fact, the way the world is right now, tyranny is too subtle to actually get people riled up about to shoot up the government. Corporations, banks, and politicians get stronger and richer everyday, and all people like you seem to care about is how big if a gun you can buy to compensate for your tiny dick or some shit.
You guys want change? Play the game right. Get into banking, become a politician, get in the corporate world. Educate yourself on what really goes on behind the scenes. We need to revolt, no doubt about it. But we need to do it just as subtly as they take away our freedom and our money. You don't kill these people, you replace them and change the way things work when you have the power and the money.
And yes, If I can't have similar rifles the military uses, then people can't have free speech or live freely. The Second Amendment is what enforces the rest of the Constitution as it tells the government "you violate these God-given rights then you will be put 6 feet under"
you're at a romney level of detachment from reality
Nice name change
1312
« on: December 20, 2014, 09:33:35 AM »
Yup, because if you can't have a rifle with a 30 round mag we should just bring slavery back and remove free speech.
Here's the thing, no weapon ensures your freedom. In fact, the way the world is right now, tyranny is too subtle to actually get people riled up about to shoot up the government. Corporations, banks, and politicians get stronger and richer everyday, and all people like you seem to care about is how big if a gun you can buy to compensate for your tiny dick or some shit.
You guys want change? Play the game right. Get into banking, become a politician, get in the corporate world. Educate yourself on what really goes on behind the scenes. We need to revolt, no doubt about it. But we need to do it just as subtly as they take away our freedom and our money. You don't kill these people, you replace them and change the way things work when you have the power and the money.
Here comes the pathetic "hur hur smal dick" remark. Seriously, come up with a more intellectual approach. Sounds like what some kid in special ed would say
Calm down son.
And yes, If I can't have similar rifles the military uses, then people can't have free speech or live freely. The Second Amendment is what enforces the rest of the Constitution as it tells the government "you violate these God-given rights then you will be put 6 feet under" Actually it was written so folks could fight off the Europeans.
So if you can't have something you don't need, people can't have basic human rights?
That's funny, I never knew the Chinese succeeded in reforming the government back in the 70s despite them not having guns. Oh wait America in 2014 is the same as China in the 70's?
No, you kill them. Look at what happened with Napoleon (God rest his mighty soul): He was exiled back managed to come back and gain momentum and take over again. You remove these people? They still have connections and they still have wealth hidden on foreign soil. You cut the head of the snake's body, not cut off it's tail
Good luck with that.
I am calm
Sure you are munchkin :^)
And the colonies were European owned; the colonists were Englishmen and citizens, the English government was theirs. Not only that, but gun ownership was very common back then and the founding fathers also owned guns, so they felt to include guarantee ownership since it was that ownership that saved their asses and created a new nation. The 2A was written to protect against tyranny, foreign or domestic America in 2014 is the same as it was 400 years ago?
Nice dodging right there m8 You're the only one dodging anything. Answer the question.
K
NSA is watching friend :^)
Nice rebuttal. I stomp on your logic and you can't come up with anything else but "MUH AGE MUH AGE" How am I dodging if I responded to your question?
1313
« on: December 20, 2014, 09:30:44 AM »
It has an effect, just like any other environment would have on an individual
1314
« on: December 20, 2014, 09:28:44 AM »
Yup, because if you can't have a rifle with a 30 round mag we should just bring slavery back and remove free speech.
Here's the thing, no weapon ensures your freedom. In fact, the way the world is right now, tyranny is too subtle to actually get people riled up about to shoot up the government. Corporations, banks, and politicians get stronger and richer everyday, and all people like you seem to care about is how big if a gun you can buy to compensate for your tiny dick or some shit.
You guys want change? Play the game right. Get into banking, become a politician, get in the corporate world. Educate yourself on what really goes on behind the scenes. We need to revolt, no doubt about it. But we need to do it just as subtly as they take away our freedom and our money. You don't kill these people, you replace them and change the way things work when you have the power and the money.
Here comes the pathetic "hur hur smal dick" remark. Seriously, come up with a more intellectual approach. Sounds like what some kid in special ed would say
Calm down son.
And yes, If I can't have similar rifles the military uses, then people can't have free speech or live freely. The Second Amendment is what enforces the rest of the Constitution as it tells the government "you violate these God-given rights then you will be put 6 feet under" Actually it was written so folks could fight off the Europeans.
So if you can't have something you don't need, people can't have basic human rights?
That's funny, I never knew the Chinese succeeded in reforming the government back in the 70s despite them not having guns. Oh wait America in 2014 is the same as China in the 70's?
No, you kill them. Look at what happened with Napoleon (God rest his mighty soul): He was exiled back managed to come back and gain momentum and take over again. You remove these people? They still have connections and they still have wealth hidden on foreign soil. You cut the head of the snake's body, not cut off it's tail
Good luck with that.
I am calm And the colonies were European owned; the colonists were Englishmen and citizens, the English government was theirs. Not only that, but gun ownership was very common back then and the founding fathers also owned guns, so they felt to include guarantee ownership since it was that ownership that saved their asses and created a new nation. The 2A was written to protect against tyranny, foreign or domestic Nice dodging right there m8 K
1315
« on: December 20, 2014, 09:20:38 AM »
Hitler was VOTED to power,
Are you fucking kidding me?
His party got just 44pc of the vote in 1933 and that was just after he got appointed Chancellor by Hindenburg and after his efforts to suppress socialist and social democratic parties.
My mistake there
1316
« on: December 20, 2014, 09:12:47 AM »
Yup, because if you can't have a rifle with a 30 round mag we should just bring slavery back and remove free speech.
Here's the thing, no weapon ensures your freedom. In fact, the way the world is right now, tyranny is too subtle to actually get people riled up about to shoot up the government. Corporations, banks, and politicians get stronger and richer everyday, and all people like you seem to care about is how big if a gun you can buy to compensate for your tiny dick or some shit.
You guys want change? Play the game right. Get into banking, become a politician, get in the corporate world. Educate yourself on what really goes on behind the scenes. We need to revolt, no doubt about it. But we need to do it just as subtly as they take away our freedom and our money. You don't kill these people, you replace them and change the way things work when you have the power and the money.
Here comes the pathetic "hur hur smal dick" remark. Seriously, come up with a more intellectual approach. Sounds like what some kid in special ed would say And yes, If I can't have similar rifles the military uses, then people can't have free speech or live freely. The Second Amendment is what enforces the rest of the Constitution as it tells the government "you violate these God-given rights then you will be put 6 feet under" That's funny, I never knew the Chinese succeeded in reforming the government back in the 70s despite them not having guns. Oh wait No, you kill them. Look at what happened with Napoleon (God rest his mighty soul): He was exiled back managed to come back and gain momentum and take over again. You remove these people? They still have connections and they still have wealth hidden on foreign soil. You cut the head of the snake's body, not cut off it's tail
1317
« on: December 20, 2014, 09:05:00 AM »
So I because Hitler was brought up I'd just like to point out that gun rights were greatly expanded under his regime.
Except for Jews
Gun ownership under Hitler is anything but fair to say the least. The only thing improved was gun regulations only applied to handguns and completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as the possession of ammunition included
There were many in Germany who could have used their expanded gun rights to attempt a revolution. That never happened though and the fact remains that gun rights were greatly expanded under him. If you were part of the SS you got more rights than the average German, but the average German still benefitted greatly in the gun rights department.
Guns for Jews wouldn't have changed the end result of the holocaust in all likelihood.
Once again, gun rights play no part in determining what a government ends up being or doing. The people residing in the country/state/et cetera is what determined that.
And there were many in Germany that had great devotion to the Nazis. What people don't remember is that Hitler was VOTED to power, meaning the people wanted him to be Chancellor as they to felt Jews were responsible for the economic problems. But these same people that supported Hitler were also Catholic, as the population of Germany was largely Catholic. Hitler had plans to eradicate all religions from Germany but had to start with the Jews because for one nobody liked them and secondly, had no way to properly defend themselves.
As I told Nick, the Nazis saw them as superior and if the lowest of life, AKA Jews, managed to kill a Aryan then it would show the false propaganda Hitler had spread. His unquestionable support would have been challenged
How can the people do anything if they don't wield the proper tools to assert themselves? China is still under it's same government, despite protests back in the 70s. America, France, and Russia on the other hand made government changes because of access to guns
This argument about disproving the nazi propaganda is fucking retarded.
As far as I know Hitler never said Aryans were fucking immortal.
You would think hundreds of thousands of krauts getting wasted by slav untermenschen on the eastern front would do the job, were that the case.
The Aryans were known as the master race. A group of people that were not even considered people killing them off would devastate morale Guess what? Nazi defeats across the eastern and western fronts devastated morale for not only the people, but for the military also; there were even attempts to assassinate Hitler
1318
« on: December 19, 2014, 11:09:25 PM »
Oh look, it's the Republicans that scream about state's rights...fighting against state's rights...
gg
You mean how Democrats scream about government not getting involved in the bedroom, but will turn around and get involved in the doctor's office?
These states have very valid claims with supporting the Supremacy Clause at hand. If Colorado had legalized murder, would it still be wrong for Oklahoma to sue?
>Deflecting intensifies
Besides, this case could be a very huge step to looking at Federally legalizing marijuana if (and when, I polished my crystal ball) Colorado ends up winning.
Exactly how am I deflecting? You made a claim that I easily turned back around along with showing that this isn't about stepping on states rights, as the states don't have any authority above the Constitution
Where in the constitution is the government given the authority to regulate drugs and plants people possess and digest?
Supremacy Clause
That doesn't answer the question. Where is congress granted the power to regulate or prohibit drugs. Which enumerated power?
The Constitution doesn't exactly state drug laws, but it doesn't state many other things. Drug laws do fall under the scope of Supremacy, Commerce, and Necessary and Proper Clauses Do I support laws against pot? Hell no, but the feds do, even at the barest minimum, have power of the issue
1319
« on: December 19, 2014, 10:57:27 PM »
I never played ODST so this is good news. Glad I never bought it now
1320
« on: December 19, 2014, 10:54:47 PM »
Umm what? One of our more respected users on here is trans.
Noelle is a cool person OT: I would do anything to have sex with Sienna Grace
Pages: 1 ... 424344 4546 ... 243
|
Show Posts
