This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - BaconShelf
Pages: 1 ... 295296297 298299 ... 358
8881
« on: December 29, 2014, 07:01:43 PM »
why the actual fuck is half of that post in brackets
The account that posted it is an RP account, of a Forerunner Ai Trying to establish contact with the domain. Brckets are terms where ea near example is used to replace a forerunner word.
8882
« on: December 29, 2014, 06:57:39 PM »
You are 5.6% Evil.
You are 28.2% Chaotic.
Alignment: True Neutral
You do whatever seems like a good idea at the time. You don't feel any strong inclination towards good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Some may say that you lack conviction, while others might admire you for your capability of remaining unbiased. You likely prefer good versus evil in society, since good people tend to make better neighbors and rulers, but you are not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way.
You are the stereotypical “Balancer.” You act in a way that is natural to you without prejudice or compulsion.
Examples of charactersand people who fit into the same alignment as you include Linus Torvalds, Dr. Strangelove, Scott Evil, Mr. Spock, and the nation of Switzerland.
Guys I'm Switzerland.
8883
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:56:01 PM »
>not being banned on waypoint
Baconshelf is a god among men.
Nah, I just don't go there. I only go when I need to, in this case enquiring about halo channels functionality (or lack thereof)
I inquired about how their moderating system was poor and needed to be reworked. Then I got told off by brown nosers and banned.
Yeah. They don't like being called out. Though after the latest site update, I think some of the more draconian ones have backed off a bit for whatever reason.
8884
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:45:04 PM »
Disagreements with mods and having a general hatred of the community.
Ok, thanks.
8885
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:41:27 PM »
Seriously, I don't know.
8886
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:25:19 PM »
>not being banned on waypoint
Baconshelf is a god among men.
Nah, I just don't go there. I only go when I need to, in this case enquiring about halo channels functionality (or lack thereof)
8887
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:14:40 PM »
So I wrote a post a while back on Halo Archive explaiing how plasma could be used within the covenant in anti-gravity, propulsion and some other cool stuff. Anyway, it got shared on waypoint and I got a response from 343i: For clarification and edification:
All UNSC and Covenant vessels make extensive use of [repulsors-lifters] inside of gravity well [lattices], which can be operated in a [traction caterpillar] mode to generate limited amounts of [pseudothrust]. Inefficient [cylic gravity] plates with short-range [effector fields] are also utilized by Covenant ground vehicles.
This is a rudimentary technology [bridge] to refined application of [twist-torsion] impulse plates for [high-thrust] travel usable outside of the supporting [lattice] of a planet's gravity well. Though recent human vessels make some use of this [art], based on [copy-of-copy] designs utilized by the Covenant, standard propulsion systems use a form of [inertial-electrostatic-fusion] [torch] drive that is quite [ingenious-clever-lucky] in its application of high-order [manifolds] to mitigate energetic [backblast]. www.halowaypoint.com/en-us/forums/db05ce78845f4120b062c50816008e5d/topics/reality-of-halo-plasma/401b13b9-f097-45f3-a0a3-227d8f7d130a/posts?page=1#post5The post is weird because catalog is suppsoed to be this forerunner AI that's attempting to link back with the Domain and has limited access to the networks of the UNSC and Covenant. For a while it answered questions from fans on waypoint in that style, where the brackets are meant to be it trying to use english words for a forerunner term, like Halo 3 terminals.
8888
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:10:11 PM »
Are you actually a numb digger or just a mildly unreceptive digger?
A mildly unreceptive digger is probably a more appropriate term.
On a scale of -∞ to ∞, how much more appropriate?
∞ much appropriate
To 67 decimal places, please.
∞.67
The additional 65 decimals please.
∞.6710293456671029345667102934566710293456671029345667102934567102934
May I see your calculations? Right now, you'd be doing very poorly on a maths test.
My calculations came from the behavior of electrons operating on the quantum scale, to be specific.
I'll need proof of that.
I cannot give you visual proof, since visible light passes through objects at that scale.
Then give nonvisual proof.
Here is the equation, if that's any help.
Very good. I shall inspect this over a glass of brandy and a cigar.
8889
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:09:27 PM »
OT: I guess it's just another thing to thank media portrayals for.
You don't see the downsides to the 'illness' a character has, usually, or it's done in such a sickly arty manner that it makes me want to break something.
It happens so often that I can't remember the actual one but it's roughly like this; grey filter on the camera, guy wearing a trenchcoat/greatcoat sort of thing, wandering around the city with his head hung down low, *sigh* every few seconds, mournful looks at XYZ, sad music, rain. Etc.
Instead of seeing him just lying on the floor shrieking and crying for no apparent reason. Or avoiding people relentlessly (and not for comedic effect). Or my equally favourite one, is how it only takes a friend shaking them and saying 'pull yourself together' to get them off the sofa and put a spring back in their step.
Ugh.
Then you have shit like Dexter/Sherlock which glamorises psychopaths/sociopaths to such an absurd degree, I still enjoy it (Dexter far more than sherlock) but it's pretty... ehh...
Usually they are protrayed as anti-heroes/misguided/noble at heart, instead of actual psychopaths. One makes for good TV and the other makes for a nightmare in a courtroom <_<
[rambling continues]
Sherlock has always had that comedic effect in certain parts though, where most of the time, stuff Sherlock says is partially to provide comedic effect in him having to correct everything people say to him and so forth.
I mean, is a "high-functioning sociopath" even a real thing?
I don't think it's a real term, but the parallel that comes to mind would be 'mildly sociopathic' <.<
Yeah. Well, I guess the high functioning refers to intelligent, and sociopath is sociopath. So intelligent sociopath.
8890
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:08:15 PM »
BaconShelf
Omg I love wingdings I forgot it existed
8891
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:07:11 PM »
Are you actually a numb digger or just a mildly unreceptive digger?
A mildly unreceptive digger is probably a more appropriate term.
On a scale of -∞ to ∞, how much more appropriate?
∞ much appropriate
To 67 decimal places, please.
∞.67
The additional 65 decimals please.
∞.6710293456671029345667102934566710293456671029345667102934567102934
May I see your calculations? Right now, you'd be doing very poorly on a maths test.
My calculations came from the behavior of electrons operating on the quantum scale, to be specific.
I'll need proof of that.
I cannot give you visual proof, since visible light passes through objects at that scale.
Then give nonvisual proof.
8892
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:06:23 PM »
You should go for something that's a bit less of an eyesore, like this: B̷̲̝͙̮̘̜͖̜̦̻̝̤̭̐͗̊ͯ̿͟͡͞aͯ͑̃̄ͬ̀̎̒̾͒̒ͦ͒̆̅͗̾͏̭̲͖̹͉̻̗͇̞͈̪̘̮͟ĉ̷̲̗͓͙̘͈̫̹̫͕̠͖̪̝͙̭̟͍͒̈́̇̊̏͡͡ọ̢̫̹͇͉ͤ̒̃͌ͯ̄̋̔͂ͧ͌ͧ͛̐́̄͢͟͞n̢̞̩̲̖̪̗̜̹̹̳̲̺͔͕̖̗̮͂́́͛ͮͬ͌͋́̚̕͢ͅͅS̛̰̦̻͕̗͓͈͔̫͎̬̺͍͚̩̟̄̓ͤ̈́͛̌ͦͫ͂͒͛̏ȟ̷͎̝̹͔̟̫͕̗̻̗̞̬́̈̎̇ͩ̽̽̑͆ͩ̔̔̾̀͢͜ẻ̵̴̡̧͍̩̪̲̩̯̙͚̤̳̓͛́̚l̵̢̘͉̼͉͗ͯ̾̓͑ͬ͢f̶̹͓̫̻̲͇̘ͤ̌̅̊̅ͮ̒̃ͫ̓̆ͦ͒̏͡
What about BACONSHELF
8893
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:02:56 PM »
Are you actually a numb digger or just a mildly unreceptive digger?
A mildly unreceptive digger is probably a more appropriate term.
On a scale of -∞ to ∞, how much more appropriate?
∞ much appropriate
To 67 decimal places, please.
∞.67
The additional 65 decimals please.
∞.6710293456671029345667102934566710293456671029345667102934567102934
May I see your calculations? Right now, you'd be doing very poorly on a maths test.
My calculations came from the behavior of electrons operating on the quantum scale, to be specific.
I'll need proof of that.
8894
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:01:06 PM »
It is bacon shelf nigger
See signature.
See signature as well
Tl;DC
(Toomany links, didn't click)
I only have two dough 
And I'm lazy.
8895
« on: December 29, 2014, 05:00:41 PM »
Did a bunch of posts get deleted?
8896
« on: December 29, 2014, 04:58:47 PM »
It is bacon shelf nigger
See signature.
See signature as well
Tl;DC (Toomany links, didn't click)
8897
« on: December 29, 2014, 04:58:07 PM »
Are you actually a numb digger or just a mildly unreceptive digger?
A mildly unreceptive digger is probably a more appropriate term.
On a scale of -∞ to ∞, how much more appropriate?
∞ much appropriate
To 67 decimal places, please.
∞.67
The additional 65 decimals please.
∞.6710293456671029345667102934566710293456671029345667102934567102934
May I see your calculations? Right now, you'd be doing very poorly on a maths test.
8898
« on: December 29, 2014, 04:55:28 PM »
Are you actually a numb digger or just a mildly unreceptive digger?
A mildly unreceptive digger is probably a more appropriate term.
On a scale of -∞ to ∞, how much more appropriate?
∞ much appropriate
To 67 decimal places, please.
∞.67
The additional 65 decimals please.
8899
« on: December 29, 2014, 04:54:07 PM »
It is bacon shelf nigger
See signature.
8900
« on: December 29, 2014, 04:53:36 PM »
Are you actually a numb digger or just a mildly unreceptive digger?
A mildly unreceptive digger is probably a more appropriate term.
On a scale of -∞ to ∞, how much more appropriate?
∞ much appropriate
To 67 decimal places, please.
8901
« on: December 29, 2014, 04:52:55 PM »
y/n
8902
« on: December 29, 2014, 04:52:09 PM »
Are you actually a numb digger or just a mildly unreceptive digger?
A mildly unreceptive digger is probably a more appropriate term.
On a scale of -∞ to ∞, how much more appropriate?
8903
« on: December 29, 2014, 04:49:51 PM »
Are you actually a numb digger or just a mildly unreceptive digger?
8904
« on: December 29, 2014, 04:37:03 PM »
OT: I guess it's just another thing to thank media portrayals for.
You don't see the downsides to the 'illness' a character has, usually, or it's done in such a sickly arty manner that it makes me want to break something.
It happens so often that I can't remember the actual one but it's roughly like this; grey filter on the camera, guy wearing a trenchcoat/greatcoat sort of thing, wandering around the city with his head hung down low, *sigh* every few seconds, mournful looks at XYZ, sad music, rain. Etc.
Instead of seeing him just lying on the floor shrieking and crying for no apparent reason. Or avoiding people relentlessly (and not for comedic effect). Or my equally favourite one, is how it only takes a friend shaking them and saying 'pull yourself together' to get them off the sofa and put a spring back in their step.
Ugh.
Then you have shit like Dexter/Sherlock which glamorises psychopaths/sociopaths to such an absurd degree, I still enjoy it (Dexter far more than sherlock) but it's pretty... ehh...
Usually they are protrayed as anti-heroes/misguided/noble at heart, instead of actual psychopaths. One makes for good TV and the other makes for a nightmare in a courtroom <_<
[rambling continues]
Sherlock has always had that comedic effect in certain parts though, where most of the time, stuff Sherlock says is partially to provide comedic effect in him having to correct everything people say to him and so forth. I mean, is a "high-functioning sociopath" even a real thing?
8905
« on: December 29, 2014, 04:10:39 PM »
Who are your favorite pornstars?
Also when is anarchy?
You don't want to know
Dec 31st @ 8PM CST - Sunday
Most of us aren't going to be in it when it happens tho.
why not?
New Year's Eve...you know, celebrating the new year and stuff?
I'm not.
8906
« on: December 29, 2014, 04:08:01 PM »
Yep. One of my friends had one.
8907
« on: December 29, 2014, 03:59:32 PM »
Eat it and consume its power.
One does not simply gain the power of adorableness.
That's why I was born with it
>weeb
>adorableness
Don't make me laugh.
Tru, Casper, Koala, and Tcocks agree.
DEAL WITH IT
>implying their opinions are worth something
>implying implications
kek
I'm going to kill you, m8.
m9
M9 Beretta
m80 firecracker 
8908
« on: December 29, 2014, 03:51:49 PM »
Eat it and consume its power.
One does not simply gain the power of adorableness.
That's why I was born with it
>weeb
>adorableness
Don't make me laugh.
Tru, Casper, Koala, and Tcocks agree.
DEAL WITH IT
>implying their opinions are worth something
>implying implications
kek
I'm going to kill you, m8.
m9
8909
« on: December 29, 2014, 03:50:57 PM »
Because he left John no other choice. #gitrekt
8910
« on: December 29, 2014, 03:49:11 PM »
No. Never had a girlfriend (Unless you counted a two week thing when I was 13) and I never plan on having any kind of relationship. Don't see the point.
Pages: 1 ... 295296297 298299 ... 358
|
Show Posts
