7411
The Flood / Re: lolChina
« on: July 09, 2015, 04:46:27 AM »
fucking weebs
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 7412
The Flood / Re: This was posted on b.net today I was wondering if this is how sep7agon feels« on: July 09, 2015, 04:01:31 AM »I've never been a part of b.net nor have I really played many Halo games, but that's still really fucked up! No wonder my fiancé refuses to buy the new games. He has all of the older games, a master chief helmet, one of the movies, and a few of the Halo books. Damn they just failed at their finest. They don't make Halo anymore, and this isn't anything to do with the new halo games. This is to do with Destiny. 343i now makes Halo and they have a massively different approach to the series, which isn't welcome for some. 7413
The Flood / Re: This was posted on b.net today I was wondering if this is how sep7agon feels« on: July 09, 2015, 04:00:22 AM »I'm willing to bet they reuse Marty's destiny music throughout the whole franchise which he got anyway Unrelated news, but Marty founded a new studio a couple weeks ago. Was it posted here? 7414
Septagon / Re: Why is the notification button so small?« on: July 09, 2015, 03:57:32 AM »This is one of the small things I'd like to change, although a lot of the stuff that needs changing is in the nav bar (especially on mobile). To be honest, we need a dedicated mobile site rather than a cut-down version of the pc site. The mobile version really doesn't run well, and crashes a lot on my ipod. 7415
Septagon / Re: pop up ads« on: July 09, 2015, 03:55:21 AM »Are you using Tapatalk chrome on laptop. 7416
The Flood / Re: post here and i'll give you my uncensored, 100% honest opinion« on: July 09, 2015, 03:50:15 AM »
Go for it.
7417
The Flood / Re: Fuck Nasty, post here if you want my opinion of you« on: July 09, 2015, 03:49:39 AM »
Go for it.
7418
Serious / Re: Is it wise for humanity to be broadcasting its location into space?« on: July 08, 2015, 01:28:39 PM »If there's a species advanced enough to exterminate us chances are they already know of our existence.And they would probably kill us if we advance too far in technology. If they were sufficiently advanced to be able to have interstellar travel as a common thing, such as a Kardashev Type-II or Type-III civilisation, they probably wouldn't even acknowledge our existence. 7419
Serious / Re: Is it wise for humanity to be broadcasting its location into space?« on: July 08, 2015, 12:58:12 PM »
For another viewpoint; think about the fact that humans will not even leave the solar system in our lifetimes. We may see someone land on Mars or Europa or Titam, but that's a one off in of itself.
7420
Serious / Re: Is it wise for humanity to be broadcasting its location into space?« on: July 08, 2015, 12:52:03 PM »Why can't we just find a planet capable of sustaining life, find a way to get there, and start living there? No. At least not within our lifetimes, or our children's lifetimes. The technology is completely beyond us. To make a wormhole between two points, you'd still need to go to where the wormhole will be first and activate it, so it would still take thousands of years. So, no hyperspace jump or slipspace travel, sadly. 7421
Septagon / pop up ads« on: July 08, 2015, 12:02:36 PM »
I have had two pop-ups (Both for asda, funnily enough) in the last five minutes.
I don't know if they're meant to be enabled, but I seem to remember hearing they weren't. So yeah. 7422
Serious / Re: Is it wise for humanity to be broadcasting its location into space?« on: July 08, 2015, 12:00:06 PM »Why can't we just find a planet capable of sustaining life, find a way to get there, and start living there? We have found several potential candidates, we know how to get there. But it would take at least 4,000 yeas to reach the nearest one at the maximum estimate for achieveable human speed with 21st century technology(approx. 300km/s, with gravitational slingshots). Tau Ceti is still 6 light-years away, and that 300km/s is not even .001 of a percent of c. 7423
Serious / Re: Is it wise for humanity to be broadcasting its location into space?« on: July 08, 2015, 11:48:45 AM »
There are very few potentially lifebearing planets within a 60ly radius, and we can't really prevent sending signals into space unless we somehow cease all radio communication across the planet.
Also, remember that the photons spread over a wider area and become dimmer, so the radio signals that may be encountered even on tau ceti c would be the radio equivalent of looking at a far-away star. Besides, I'm pretty sure any species out there with a space military and empire would have very few reasons to go to war outside of sport. Water, hydrocarbons and minerals are hardly an uncommon resource in the universe. If there is a civilisation within a few hundred light years, then habitable planets are common enough that Earth's habitability is not war-worthy (Assuming they have a 1G gravity, 100KPa pressure and Earth-Normal atmosphere). So you'd have to ask what is so special about Earth in this circumstance to merit going to war- and even so, interstellar travel takes thousands of years. We'd see an invasion fleet coming decades in advance, and it's unlikely an artifical ship would have anywhere near the population that Earth does, meaning they wouldn't have the resources or troops to commit to full-scale invasion across the entire planet. Especially one as militaristic as our own. but a space empire is unfeasible anyway, there'd just be remote colony worlds that operate almost entirely on their own with occasional transports and courier service; if an uprising happened on planet X, then planet Y would not even find out for at least half a decade, giving the rebels on planet X an abundant amount of time to dig in and prepare for the grand imperial fleet of Y to come and sort things out. Which is why, really, space warfare wouldn't work or exist like we see in sci-fi and why you wouldn't get big empires beyond a rough alliance of individual planets that agree to trade and open borders. So, long story short, we don't really need to worry. All of that doesn't take into account the fact that a species evolving to our level or beyond within a distance reachable within a hundred light years is nigh-on impossible. We would know it by now if there was. Or the guv'ment would, anyway. 7424
Gaming / Re: Anybody know if the CMT SPV3 Mod for Halo CE is out yet?« on: July 06, 2015, 10:29:02 AM »For Halo CEA there should have been an extra campaign mode that adds things from the other games into it. That would justify it more and to me it would make it fit better in the lore due to latter editions. In Halo Reach we have Brutes but in Halo CE we don't see them even though Reach takes place before it. The same fleet that we encountered in Halo CE was the same one from Reach which would have Brutes. Thee were multiple fleets at Reach. Thel's wasn't the only one. 7425
The Flood / Re: How Can We Even Trust Atoms?« on: July 06, 2015, 10:21:37 AM »99% of an atom is the space between the subatomic particles.Isn't the space between the atoms quantum fluctuations? No. It's the space between the quarks that make up stuff like protons and neutrons, the space between protons and neutrons and the space between the nucleus and electrons. I mean, if you scaled an atom up to the size of a solar system (the nucleus being the star), the furthest electron would be several times the radius of said system away from the nucleus (Like, many tiems the distance of Pluto to Sol) 7426
Gaming / Re: Halo 5's not having split screen« on: July 06, 2015, 05:56:14 AM »The demo was finished just weeks before e3 and has even worse performance than the beta, and the game is going gold in a few months. It's also heavily scripted and probably quite diferent from the actual game. Remember Long Night of solace from Reach at E3 or Infinity at Halo 4 E3? They all had a lot of scripted stuff added to show off the new features in the game. So, yeah. I wouldn't take anything as indicative of quality until the release. 7427
Gaming / Re: Halo 5's not having split screen« on: July 06, 2015, 05:52:15 AM »
That's a demo build. The Halo 5 beta was from mid-2014, so I hardly expect E3 to be the newest up-to-date build of the game. 7428
The Flood / Re: You guys have any tips on raising a doge?« on: July 06, 2015, 05:50:13 AM »
Also, if you let it up on the furniture now, be prepared to let it do that forever. Once it is used to it, you won't be able to stop it doing it. If you'd rather it not get up on the furniture, don't let it up or it will think that's allowed and okay.
7429
The Flood / Re: You guys have any tips on raising a dog?« on: July 06, 2015, 05:49:00 AM »
Reward them rather than shout at them. Like, make them want to do something because they know they'll get rewarded and it's good, rather than doing it out of fear of being hit or shouted at. If you do excessively shout or hit animals, that's when they become dangerous and mor likely to attack you or others, regardless of breed.
I mean, obviusloy tell them and make it clear when they've done bad, but for fucks sake never hit them or kick them or some shit. I'm not implying you do, but it's something I absolutely despise and, as far as I'm concerned, should be given the same punishments as if you did the same thing to a person. 7430
The Flood / Re: How do dogs travel around the sun 7 times faster than us?« on: July 06, 2015, 05:40:21 AM »
It's actually relativity; they'r closer to the ground so they are moving faster relative to us. Therefore, they experience time differently.
7431
The Flood / Re: How Can We Even Trust Atoms?« on: July 06, 2015, 05:31:09 AM »99% of an atom is the space between the subatomic particles.To others, it's pure energy. fuck you 7432
The Flood / Re: How Can We Even Trust Atoms?« on: July 06, 2015, 05:26:08 AM »
99% of an atom is the space between the subatomic particles.
Therefore, 99% of everything is nothing. 7433
The Flood / Re: If there are 360 degrees in a circle« on: July 06, 2015, 05:24:56 AM »
There's 360 degrees in a circle
stars are circles stars can reach several million degrees there are not 360 degrees in a circle 7434
Gaming / Re: So I downloaded ACIV...« on: July 05, 2015, 05:46:51 PM »
Thank you everyone.
Honestly, I only got the game because we haven't had a good pirate game since Sid Meier's Pirates. Damn that was a good game. 7435
Gaming / So I downloaded ACIV...« on: July 05, 2015, 06:01:24 AM »
...an I have no idea what is happening. I was a pirate and now I'm in some offie building or something.
Can someone explain what all this is about? 7437
The Flood / Re: Great, now the U.S.A is now the U.S.G« on: July 01, 2015, 12:25:33 PM »
10,000 of 300 million+ people is going to change the flag, obviously
7438
Gaming / Re: Sad news for Kojima (even if he was a bit of an ass)« on: July 01, 2015, 12:21:51 PM »
Wasn't the newest metal gear shit anyway?
7439
Gaming / Re: Can Someone Give Me A Brief Description of Halo 5: Guardians?« on: July 01, 2015, 10:04:08 AM »A dozen characters that are well-established in the expanded universe but completely nonexistent in the games so far will be introduced, while the main character of the series will be relegated to a mysterious secondary role, as you venture through a series of settings and plot points that are again thoroughly explored in the novels in a You say this like it's a bad thing. Nope, it's a 50/50 split campaign like Halo 2. lol 7440
Serious / Re: Walmart refuses to make a Confederate flag cake. . .« on: July 01, 2015, 09:59:04 AM »okay faggot, listen upthe fact that you guys aren't bothered by flying a flag that represents racism, violence, and hatred speaks more about the south than anything else. there's a reason you guys are terrible at everything. maybe there's something in the water down there.No, it definitely hasn't been a thing here. Kids flew the stars and bars on their pickup trucks going to school senior year.All this Confederate flag controversy is so stupid. It takes you this long to suddenly be offended?The Confederate flag nonsense has been an issue since the Civil War. It only now has been boiling over because of current events combined with the fact that it isn't 1863 anymore. If the American flag should be banned, why is this still around? |