2131
Serious / Re: Democratic Primary Debate #1
« on: October 13, 2015, 08:10:26 PM »
O'malley
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 2132
Serious / Re: Democratic Primary Debate #1« on: October 13, 2015, 08:08:53 PM »
chafee is a fucking keebler elf
2133
Serious / Re: Democratic Primary Debate #1« on: October 13, 2015, 08:04:07 PM »
oh my fuck... was Bernie born in Brooklyn?
2134
Serious / Re: Democratic Primary Debate #1« on: October 13, 2015, 08:03:15 PM »
Hilary "the factory worker" Clinton
2136
Serious / Re: Democratic Primary Debate #1« on: October 13, 2015, 07:33:23 PM »for some reason i want Joe Biden to come on top. he will show one way or another he will 2137
Serious / Re: Democratic Primary Debate #1« on: October 13, 2015, 07:29:39 PM »
for some reason i want Joe Biden to come on top.
2138
Serious / Re: Global poverty to fall to 10pc by end of 2015« on: October 13, 2015, 07:15:09 PM »
how can we fix this?
2139
The Flood / Re: isn't it funny how i can just say "episode 7"« on: October 13, 2015, 07:13:44 PM »
what?
2141
The Flood / Re: ITT: Das unboxes memes« on: October 13, 2015, 03:56:39 PM »that bali reminds me of this monstrosity I ownNugha how many cats have you sacrificed with that thing? that bali reminds me of this monstrosity I ownoh my was this choreographed? 2142
The Flood / Re: ITT: Das unboxes memes« on: October 13, 2015, 03:50:40 PM »
that bali reminds me of this monstrosity I own
2143
Gaming / Re: "Fallout 3 was good, Skyrim still sets a benchmark..." | 28 Days - Fallout 4« on: October 13, 2015, 06:25:42 AM »
will fallout 4 work on Windows 3.1x?
2145
The Flood / Re: If the 50 states went to war, which would win?« on: October 12, 2015, 11:13:33 PM »
California has a shit load of military bases tho.
so does Virginia 2146
The Flood / Re: Just a doodle I made..« on: October 12, 2015, 10:55:49 PM »
mail it to Beau Biden
2147
The Flood / Re: SNAP INTO A SLIM JIM BROTHER« on: October 12, 2015, 07:57:41 PM »
forgot how insane this fuk was.
YouTube 2148
Gaming / Re: Glassed planets have bad records | 15 days to Halo 5 | No spoilers allowed« on: October 12, 2015, 07:50:36 PM »
lol dafuq is this?
2149
The Flood / Re: What's a good way to get rid of stress« on: October 12, 2015, 06:25:13 PM »Workout OH FUCK 2150
The Flood / Re: What's a good way to get rid of stress« on: October 12, 2015, 06:17:10 PM »
Workout
Sex Rape 2151
The Flood / Re: At which age« on: October 12, 2015, 11:35:39 AM »Oh, well thank you for telling me good friend.Arnold Schwarzenegger should adopt the English translation of his last nameWhich is? No problem buddy, I always enjoy spreading new information to kind hearted and compassionate friends. You think your words hold weight in this world? With a wave of my finger I can make everything you cherish cease to exist. Your inbred homosexual blood line will be wiped off the fucking planet. 2152
The Flood / Re: At which age« on: October 12, 2015, 11:28:37 AM »Arnold Schwarzenegger should adopt the English translation of his last nameWhich is? BLACK NIGGER, more or less. don't ever threaten me on the net again. 2153
The Flood / Re: At which age« on: October 12, 2015, 11:25:56 AM »
Arnold Schwarzenegger should adopt the English translation of his last name
2154
Serious / Re: Which statement seems more true?« on: October 12, 2015, 02:23:51 AM »Do you have anything that supports your theory?Well, I don't have a theory--I have a hypothesis, so I'm going purely by intuition alone. It seems clear to me, but I could be wrong. I just really think that I'm right. Cool shit, I'll do some research from your perspective tmmrw if I have the time and get back to you if I find something interesting. Don't know if Michigan is in the eastern time zone but as you can see it's getting a bit l8. I think I'm gonna pack it up for tonight. 2155
Serious / Re: Which statement seems more true?« on: October 12, 2015, 02:12:51 AM »Some fun stuff in here.I mean, like, proof proof. Some kind of research paper or something. I don't know if I really want to read a Wikipedia article on the subject, because Wikipedia isn't really great at the whole "concrete empirical evidence" thing. Umm you can sort through the articles referenced within wikipedia if you want. The physical/mental development of the human body is proof within itself. I'm just stating a general scientific consensus based on research and observation. Look up some behavioral experiments or research a bit of embryonic development if you're really interested. Do you have anything that supports your theory? 2156
Serious / Re: Which statement seems more true?« on: October 12, 2015, 01:53:55 AM »We can't disagree, because what you're saying is biologically impossible.Got proof, or?... Some fun stuff in here. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_development Along with the other wikipedia article I posted 2157
Serious / Re: Which statement seems more true?« on: October 12, 2015, 01:44:41 AM »What I'm trying to say is that there is no root. There cannot be personality without interaction.Then we fundamentally disagree. I say there IS a root. We can't disagree, because what you're saying is biologically impossible. 2158
Serious / Re: Which statement seems more true?« on: October 12, 2015, 01:40:49 AM »But that's what I've been saying, though. If you cut your self down to its root, excluding all environmental factors, leaving only the very concept of your individuality intact, then... there you have it. That's the "I".That's a bit disingenuous tbhThe countless factors that create an ever layered individual personality from pre birth to the moment we die cannot be credited to the mind alone.Not if you exclude all those factors. What I'm trying to say is that there is no root. There cannot be personality without interaction. And the very concept of individuality is based on the fact that we can interact with reality. 2159
Serious / Re: Which statement seems more true?« on: October 12, 2015, 01:36:12 AM »The countless factors that create an ever layered individual personality from pre birth to the moment we die cannot be credited to the mind alone.Not if you exclude all those factors. Then you would be excluding the development of personality itself. 2160
Serious / Re: Which statement seems more true?« on: October 12, 2015, 01:31:30 AM »I don't agree that our bodies are part of us. Our bodies are nothing. You could have a different body, and you'd still be the same person. You could have no body, and you'd still be the same person. Don't think that's true, the biological nature of personality itself isn't static. The countless factors that create an ever layered individual personality from pre birth to the moment we die cannot be credited to the mind alone. Let's take the scenario of a human mind independent from a body. Ignoring the fact that the body itself helps produce the neuropeptides that influence emotion, the brain itself would develop a completely different thought process due to a lack of sensory interaction. It may not even recognize the concept of self. You can't really use the example of changing a shirt in this case. If your embryonic mind was transplanted into a different physical body a difference as minute as skin color, or a physical disability would dramatically alter the development of personality based on social perception alone. And if yu were somehow able to meet this individual, they would indeed have a different personality. TLDR: personality itself is built upon physical interaction with reality and is constantly layered upon different experiences. |