Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - A salt rifle

Pages: 1 ... 161718 1920 ... 60
511
Gaming / Re: The only Bloodborne thread I am aware exists
« on: March 01, 2016, 05:47:31 AM »
Bloodborne captured the atmosphere and level design well. I just thought it was eh when compared to Bloodborne.

512
The Flood / Re: excuse me, verbatim?
« on: February 29, 2016, 10:22:09 AM »
Verb can you explain to me why nihilism is bad

I'm not in support of it in any way, but I feel like I don't understand enough to support anti-nihilistic views and would like to learn

Thx

Nihilists believe nothing matters in the universe. A baby could be stabbed to death with an Arby's spork until its guts hang out of its brain, and it wouldn't matter.

I think that effectively explains why he's so adamantly against it.
Spoiler

513
Deactivate yourself.

514
Gaming / Re: I've never played Nier.
« on: February 28, 2016, 01:02:27 PM »
stop robot abuse now
Robots are humans tooand better at it as well.

515
The fact that I know people who recite this shit unironically and without context makes me die inside.

Makes you what inside
I should start rereading my posts...

516
The fact that I know people who recite this shit unironically and without context makes me die inside.

517
The Flood / Re: #BringBackLemon2K16
« on: February 24, 2016, 09:42:56 PM »
Pretty sure he's dead by now.
Imagine if he really is, and we wouldn't really even know for sure.
If I was dead, I wouldn't tell anyone about it too.

518
The Flood / Re: ITT: We're the Sep7agon Comment Section
« on: February 20, 2016, 02:38:42 PM »
Ender like this post.

519
The Flood / Re: ITT: We're the Sep7agon Comment Section
« on: February 20, 2016, 02:33:06 PM »
With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

520
Gaming / Re: Would anyone be intrested in watching me stream something
« on: February 19, 2016, 04:50:43 PM »
It's not necessarily like people on here hate you.
They just often mock you because of your weird posting habits like needless exaggaration, obscuring of brand names and also occasional typos.

About streaming; I don't watch streams in general, so I guess you can deduce my answer from that.

521
The Flood / Re: Bring back the print button.
« on: February 17, 2016, 07:18:25 PM »

522
Gaming / Re: Do you hoard in videogames
« on: February 17, 2016, 07:16:09 PM »
As soon as there's a potential use for the items I collect, yes I do.
Otherwise I have no problem with getting rid of things in games.

523
That's what he gets for being one of the biggest shitbags around. People used to kick the shit out of people who were far-right, we just did it digitally.
Memeing around at the speed of sound.

524
The Flood / Re: Challenger and verb's avatars need to go
« on: February 17, 2016, 07:04:43 PM »
Here we go.

525
The Flood / Re: Challenger and verb's avatars need to go
« on: February 17, 2016, 07:03:42 PM »
Chally's avatar is no different to someone saying
FUCK ANIME

We don't stop anyone from posting FUCK ANIME so why would we stop someone from having it in an avatar?

Swearing is a non-issue.

I don't see people supersizing the f word as much as I see his avatar floating around, especially when he's spamming an otherwise cordial discussion with his crazy frog memes.

Swearing is clearly an issue in public areas, work for example.
Eh it happens a fair bit, really browsing sep7 at work carries it's own risks.

We clean up the NSFW pictures, gifs and the like but swearing isn't something we gank. Chally's avatar might be obnoxious to some, but it's not breaking any rules.

Why have the nsfw tag at all if no one is going to use it? Why have moderation at all if you're going to allow swear words to be used frequently? Why do anything that I don't like?
1) Albeit rarely, people are using it to post content that is otherwise not allowed to be posted like gore or porn.
2) Because there's a fucking distinction between getting a goddamned point across  with swear words and personally insulting someone, you cunt.
3) Because not everyone cares about what you like and they are going to do things regardless of your opinion.

I know this was supposed to be rhetorical but I still wanted to argue these points.

I've been personally insulted this entire thread and mods haven't done anything about it.
No, you've been called names. Direct but impersonal insults that attack you on a superficial level. They are just harsher words than those you're used to from the playground.

I haven't been insulted, they've just used insults to hurt my feelings... Ok, got it.
The concept is no bit different from calling you a doodoo head.

As soon as you're devalued as a person and/or harassed it falls into moderation territory.
For now, how you feel about it doesn't matter.

526
The Flood / Re: Challenger and verb's avatars need to go
« on: February 17, 2016, 06:56:58 PM »
Chally's avatar is no different to someone saying
FUCK ANIME

We don't stop anyone from posting FUCK ANIME so why would we stop someone from having it in an avatar?

Swearing is a non-issue.

I don't see people supersizing the f word as much as I see his avatar floating around, especially when he's spamming an otherwise cordial discussion with his crazy frog memes.

Swearing is clearly an issue in public areas, work for example.
Eh it happens a fair bit, really browsing sep7 at work carries it's own risks.

We clean up the NSFW pictures, gifs and the like but swearing isn't something we gank. Chally's avatar might be obnoxious to some, but it's not breaking any rules.

Why have the nsfw tag at all if no one is going to use it? Why have moderation at all if you're going to allow swear words to be used frequently? Why do anything that I don't like?
People do use it though, for threads about NSFW content.

I.e a discussion about bodily functions in lurid detail would have the NSFW tag, someone just saying 'fuck shit gooks yeehaw' isn't considered to be a problem. Swearing is a perfectly normal part of language, within appropriate settings. Sep7 isn't a formal discussion group, it's not your grandma or your employer so people are able to swear as freely as they please.

Censoring swearwords is silly, but naru will always be a fracking mondayman.

There is a difference between discussion and a three inch avatar with the f word emblazoned on it.
Yes, it's the size but that's about it.

Otherwise it's not different from posting FUCK ANIME in 72pt size.

FUCK ANIME

I can scroll right past that tho, and when chally posts walls of text (which he is known for, also that stupid frog meme) his avatar is on the screen for a longer time. I could just ignore challenger's posts but he's one of my favorite users.
Then disable user avatars, it's that simple.

527
The Flood / Re: Challenger and verb's avatars need to go
« on: February 17, 2016, 06:51:20 PM »
Chally's avatar is no different to someone saying
FUCK ANIME

We don't stop anyone from posting FUCK ANIME so why would we stop someone from having it in an avatar?

Swearing is a non-issue.

I don't see people supersizing the f word as much as I see his avatar floating around, especially when he's spamming an otherwise cordial discussion with his crazy frog memes.

Swearing is clearly an issue in public areas, work for example.
Eh it happens a fair bit, really browsing sep7 at work carries it's own risks.

We clean up the NSFW pictures, gifs and the like but swearing isn't something we gank. Chally's avatar might be obnoxious to some, but it's not breaking any rules.

Why have the nsfw tag at all if no one is going to use it? Why have moderation at all if you're going to allow swear words to be used frequently? Why do anything that I don't like?
1) Albeit rarely, people are using it to post content that is otherwise not allowed to be posted like gore or porn.
2) Because there's a fucking distinction between getting a goddamned point across  with swear words and personally insulting someone, you cunt.
3) Because not everyone cares about what you like and they are going to do things regardless of your opinion.

I know this was supposed to be rhetorical but I still wanted to argue these points.

I've been personally insulted this entire thread and mods haven't done anything about it.
No, you've been called names. Direct but impersonal insults that attack you on a superficial level. They are just harsher words than those you're used to from the playground.

528
The Flood / Re: Challenger and verb's avatars need to go
« on: February 17, 2016, 06:45:46 PM »
Chally's avatar is no different to someone saying
FUCK ANIME

We don't stop anyone from posting FUCK ANIME so why would we stop someone from having it in an avatar?

Swearing is a non-issue.

I don't see people supersizing the f word as much as I see his avatar floating around, especially when he's spamming an otherwise cordial discussion with his crazy frog memes.

Swearing is clearly an issue in public areas, work for example.
Eh it happens a fair bit, really browsing sep7 at work carries it's own risks.

We clean up the NSFW pictures, gifs and the like but swearing isn't something we gank. Chally's avatar might be obnoxious to some, but it's not breaking any rules.

Why have the nsfw tag at all if no one is going to use it? Why have moderation at all if you're going to allow swear words to be used frequently? Why do anything that I don't like?
People do use it though, for threads about NSFW content.

I.e a discussion about bodily functions in lurid detail would have the NSFW tag, someone just saying 'fuck shit gooks yeehaw' isn't considered to be a problem. Swearing is a perfectly normal part of language, within appropriate settings. Sep7 isn't a formal discussion group, it's not your grandma or your employer so people are able to swear as freely as they please.

Censoring swearwords is silly, but naru will always be a fracking mondayman.

There is a difference between discussion and a three inch avatar with the f word emblazoned on it.
Yes, it's the size but that's about it.

Otherwise it's not different from posting FUCK ANIME in 72pt size.

FUCK ANIME

529
The Flood / Re: Challenger and verb's avatars need to go
« on: February 17, 2016, 06:34:43 PM »
Chally's avatar is no different to someone saying
FUCK ANIME

We don't stop anyone from posting FUCK ANIME so why would we stop someone from having it in an avatar?

Swearing is a non-issue.

I don't see people supersizing the f word as much as I see his avatar floating around, especially when he's spamming an otherwise cordial discussion with his crazy frog memes.

Swearing is clearly an issue in public areas, work for example.
Eh it happens a fair bit, really browsing sep7 at work carries it's own risks.

We clean up the NSFW pictures, gifs and the like but swearing isn't something we gank. Chally's avatar might be obnoxious to some, but it's not breaking any rules.

Why have the nsfw tag at all if no one is going to use it? Why have moderation at all if you're going to allow swear words to be used frequently? Why do anything that I don't like?
1) Albeit rarely, people are using it to post content that is otherwise not allowed to be posted like gore or porn.
2) Because there's a fucking distinction between getting a goddamned point across  with swear words and personally insulting someone, you cunt.
3) Because not everyone cares about what you like and they are going to do things regardless of your opinion.

I know this was supposed to be rhetorical but I still wanted to argue these points.

530
The Flood / Re: So why was that Neko or Nero guy or whatever banned
« on: February 17, 2016, 12:53:43 PM »
Oh boy, here we go.

531
Gaming / Re: Demon's Souls
« on: February 16, 2016, 12:16:59 PM »
>Calling it >Dead< Souls series

I'm fucking cringing.

532
Gaming / Re: Hardest game you've ever played?
« on: February 15, 2016, 10:46:27 AM »
Bayonetta on Infinite Climax mode.

533
The Flood / Re: Sports?
« on: February 15, 2016, 10:44:22 AM »
dark souls is life
Cheat should reimplement the print feature because I want to hang this on my wall.

534
Gaming / Re: Demon's Souls
« on: February 14, 2016, 03:32:13 AM »
After playing DaS I always wanted to try it out.

Problem was (and still is) that I don't own a PS3.
While I won't suggest buying a system for the game itself, I have to ask why you haven't purchased one by now. They're ridiculously cheap nowadays.
Because I never wanted one.

535
Gaming / Re: Demon's Souls
« on: February 14, 2016, 01:41:29 AM »
After playing DaS I always wanted to try it out.

Problem was (and still is) that I don't own a PS3.

536
Dark Souls
Alan Wake
Dragon's Dogma
Rayman Legends
The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth
Bayonetta
Max Payne 3
Deus Ex: Human Revolution
Shadow of Mordor (on PC - so it had the nemesis system)
Either Valiant Hearts or Undertale (swaying more towards Valiant Hearts)

Those te(leve)n games had the biggest impact on me. They are not in order.
I didn't play a lot of classics like MGS:2 and the like.

I'm going to sleep now so if there's any new ones I'll do them tomorrow.


You've given me a tough list man. I'm struggling, genuinely, to find anything positive to say here. Perhaps, PERHAPS
Rayman Legends could be considered good (even then it's a bit of a stretch) but the rest are close to irredeemable.
Fuck it. I'll give you a free pass on Shadow of Mordor that's alright.

Regardless you're a certified plebian, check out the battle for middle earth II, you might like that, plus it is a patrician's choice.
I have it - it's okay.

Also

>calling the TBoI:R iredeemable

537
Dark Souls
Alan Wake
Dragon's Dogma
Rayman Legends
The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth
Bayonetta
Max Payne 3
Deus Ex: Human Revolution
Shadow of Mordor (on PC - so it had the nemesis system)
Either Valiant Hearts or Undertale (swaying more towards Valiant Hearts)

Those te(leve)n games had the biggest impact on me. They are not in order.
I didn't play a lot of classics like MGS:2 and the like.

538
The Flood / Re: LMFAO THEISTS: 1, ATHEISTS: 0
« on: February 12, 2016, 07:19:15 PM »
Yeah sorry, I wasn't really helping you at all with decision-making, huh?

539
The Flood / Re: LMFAO THEISTS: 1, ATHEISTS: 0
« on: February 12, 2016, 07:10:28 PM »
Yes.

As it is stated in the Bible - and the Bible is absolute since it's God's word. It's circular logic and you'll just have to accept it, which will be the most difficult thing for you to do.

and what if i'm incapable of doing that

what then
Can't become Christian then, I guess.

If I may ask, what's the reason you want to become Christian?

540
The Flood / Re: LMFAO THEISTS: 1, ATHEISTS: 0
« on: February 12, 2016, 07:03:52 PM »
Yeah, that standard of evidence for Christianity is God - it's unarguable and absolute.

what about "God" is inarguable and absolute? that he exists?
Yes.

As it is stated in the Bible - and the Bible is absolute since it's God's word. It's circular logic and you'll just have to accept it, which will be the most difficult thing for you to do.

I mean, Rocket could do a far better job than me in explaining how the reasoning works. I'm not even religious, lol.

Pages: 1 ... 161718 1920 ... 60