This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - A salt rifle
1741
« on: February 06, 2015, 11:02:06 AM »
Gee, I couldn't have posibly found out without that pregnant red square showing me what letters I have to look at.
1742
« on: February 06, 2015, 10:53:28 AM »
Shiny Pokemon still have their meaning. They are rare Pokemon with minor color changes to their pallet. They are nice easter eggs and are still a commodity amount traders. Matsuda Method and other methods take hours and sometimes days to get even 1 Shiny Pokemon.
Shiny Charm is a decent motivator to complete the Pokedex and as such is a proper reward for collectors.
Some shinies have major changes to their pallet, such as Giratina.
Then we have Garchomp.
1743
« on: February 06, 2015, 10:31:30 AM »
They aim to please.
1744
« on: February 06, 2015, 09:49:27 AM »
Also OP- do you mean aysmmetrical more then unbalanced?
1745
« on: February 04, 2015, 10:47:27 AM »
I am conflicted. Spoiler Eh, downvote then.
1746
« on: February 04, 2015, 10:17:16 AM »
It would have a quite legitimate post until to the 'most advanced PETA vegans' part. The cow genocide bit made it a little too absurd.
Final verdict: 7.8/10
"Too much PETA"
Personal notion: Slight chance to become a copypasta.
1747
« on: February 03, 2015, 12:45:13 PM »
You know what?
I may.
Got stuff to do, but I may.
W/ or w/o voice chat?
without >.>
Okay, just tell me which server you may choose aftwerwards...
1748
« on: February 03, 2015, 12:43:03 PM »
tfw gravelord nito is a good guy
and you murdered him
And Sif :"(
When the hell is killing a dog a good thing?
it's not. You kill him to rob the grave of his best friend . It's awful
Why would you do that?!
For the greater good.
He does know you if you do the DLC however, and the intro scene to his fight changes if you helped him.
Actual spoilers for anyone interested in the story. Alternate Intro for the Sif fight Spoiler The whimpering... just... fucking hell. I swear; Dark Souls is the only game that truly captivates me emotionally.
1749
« on: February 03, 2015, 12:18:03 PM »
As long it's stable throughout the game it's all good.
Well, it won't actually phase me since I don't even own those consoles.
1750
« on: February 03, 2015, 12:11:37 PM »
You know what?
I may.
Got stuff to do, but I may.
W/ or w/o voice chat?
1751
« on: February 02, 2015, 04:29:03 PM »
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0KAzGkpXr5i
And you didn't just type this out because...?
(he has autism)
and youre fucking pedophile but dont see you communicating with the blood from your prison rape prolapse
Okay then.
1752
« on: February 02, 2015, 04:23:02 PM »
Also knowing me helps too.
Which I don't. I have no idea who you are.
And now we are at the core of the problem. It is obviously you.
1754
« on: February 02, 2015, 04:19:06 PM »
Did you really take this seriously?
How am I supposed to know? Some people genuinely believe the things you were replying with. I can't read your fucking mind.
Man, you must be the master ruseman. You sure showed me by...saying things that people actually think.
Maybe I am wrong but I think there's a point where it begins to be quite obvious. The constant ad hominems, figuratively talking shit and my last comment about 'spreading autism for money' should have been enough of an indicator. Also knowing me helps too.
1755
« on: February 02, 2015, 04:13:47 PM »
Genuinely I won't care as long as you're good.
If you're fine by now I don't see any great reason to argue with you about this since I won't change your opinion about it given your stance.
1756
« on: February 02, 2015, 03:54:20 PM »
Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you specif user I can't call out because of forum rules. I didn't laugh like this for over three years. Fucking hell man, I can't. My stomach is hurting. Did you really take this seriously? Haaah!Again, thank you. And this concludes my first and worst shitpost on sep7agon. Thank you.
1757
« on: February 01, 2015, 05:38:37 PM »
I dare you, I double dare you, say yee one more goddamn time!
1759
« on: February 01, 2015, 08:57:23 AM »
Prometheans were badass mother fuckers.
No idea why they named the spooky skull robots after them.
The first beings composed were Forerunner Warrior-Servants- who willingly sacrficed biological form to assist the Didact. Hence, why Prometheans- it was only when the Didact needed more that he began composing humans, unwillingly.
the didact even wished to have been oen himself, but notes that he has a resistance to the flood after experimenting on himself to find a cure for the flood.
Also as far as I can remember Master Chief mostly (maybe only?) fought human prometheans in H4 as it is visible by their digital human skull when they scream. I wonder if there's a clear difference between human prometheans and promethean prometheans. Are the latter actually seen in-game?
1760
« on: February 01, 2015, 08:43:33 AM »
1761
« on: February 01, 2015, 08:30:26 AM »
I like when people say the gameplay isn't unique so that's why they don't like it
Unless you're playing fucking octodad no games gameplay is unique
Literally my only complaint about the game is the fact that Ellie could fucking stitch up Joel when he was impaled.
My biggest complaint is what they showed at E3 vs. what we got. The AI shown prior to release was phenomenal, the one featured in the game reminds me of Hodor on LSD.
If the comment I read is right in the E3 video you get ammo by emptying the rounds from the gun instead of just picking it up. That would have been great for a survival based game.
Not only that, but the AI flanked you, hid from you, realised when your magazine was empty and charged you accordingly.
Watch from 3:25 onward. Look how the enemy AI sneaks up on you. Just something to think about.
Apparently, TLOU's AI was entirely scrapped a few months before release, but what are you gunna do.
And this is what we have now. Funny, ain't it?
1762
« on: January 31, 2015, 05:25:49 PM »
1763
« on: January 22, 2015, 01:47:40 PM »
For some reason it's funnier when an intelligent old man says things like this.
I thinks it's because of the way he pronounces it.
It creates a contrast between the niveau of his articulation and the (lack of) niveau of the comments he received.
Explain to me how you're using this word 'niveau' here... I looked it up but I don't quite understand. I want to learn.
If you want to know the meaning of (how I understand) it; It may be used to describe the proficiency of someone in a certain activity.[also meaning: level, standard]
E.g.: Marc has a higher niveau in english writing than Peter, because he uses complex but accurate sentence structures and formal grammar (while Peter lacks in this regard.)
In the case of Dawkins; his speech is on a high niveau because he doesn't swallow vowels and because of his emphasised pronunciation.
If you were asking yourself why I used it instead of another word:
I've just been hearing and using it in this and similar contexts, so I've not really been thinking about why I used it in this particular instance.
So... I'd say I used it just because it's part of my vocabulary - and sounds better than 'level'.
I just wanted to know how you were using it. Is that a common or correct way?
Since I've been taught it that way, I'd dare to say yes.
1764
« on: January 22, 2015, 01:30:15 PM »
This is even more nonsensical than the 'when mum isn't home' videos.
1765
« on: January 22, 2015, 01:03:40 PM »
Relevant. [Edit]: And better.
1766
« on: January 22, 2015, 01:01:39 PM »
I... what.
It looks like it has been taking steroids but the steroids were actually some car affecting mutagens.
1767
« on: January 22, 2015, 12:57:51 PM »
For some reason it's funnier when an intelligent old man says things like this.
I thinks it's because of the way he pronounces it.
It creates a contrast between the niveau of his articulation and the (lack of) niveau of the comments he received.
Explain to me how you're using this word 'niveau' here... I looked it up but I don't quite understand. I want to learn.
If you want to know the meaning of (how I understand) it; It may be used to describe the proficiency of someone in a certain activity.[also meaning: level, standard] E.g.: Marc has a higher niveau in english writing than Peter, because he uses complex but accurate sentence structures and formal grammar (while Peter lacks in this regard.) In the case of Dawkins; his speech is on a high niveau because he doesn't swallow vowels and because of his emphasised pronunciation. If you were asking yourself why I used it instead of another word: I've just been hearing and using it in this and similar contexts, so I've not really been thinking about why I used it in this particular instance. So... I'd say I used it just because it's part of my vocabulary - and sounds better than 'level'.
1768
« on: January 22, 2015, 12:32:47 PM »
For some reason it's funnier when an intelligent old man says things like this.
I thinks it's because of the way he pronounces it. It creates a contrast between the niveau of his articulation and the (lack of) niveau of the comments he received.
1769
« on: January 22, 2015, 12:14:45 PM »
Go watch the video you fuckkity fuck fuckers.
1770
« on: January 20, 2015, 11:04:40 AM »
You've been rused by the master ruseman.
Shut up newbie
No.
|
Show Posts
