This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Anonymous (User Deleted)
Pages: 1 ... 222324 2526 ... 212
692
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:44:05 PM »
That was not 'proof' by any stretch of the imagination.
>here's a list of things that makes alcohol consumption dangerous, inadvisable, and an overall poor life choice
>this is why drinking alcohol is bad--any questions?
>"LOL THAT DIDN'T PROVE ANYTHING"
>"um, okay--would you care to explain how?"
>"LOLNEOP I'M JUST GAN POST DA MEMZ"
[citations needed]
693
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:35:11 PM »
lol so it would improve if he drank
LEL I'M GONNA RESPOND TO HIS TYPO INSTEAD OF THE ARGUMENT BECAUSE I R TEH DEBATING MASTURRR LOL
Kick this kid from Serious.
694
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:34:19 PM »
don't blow a gasket now, lad
>"I'm making a claim that is bolstered by facts and logic. Prove me wrong."
>"but sirr, u must have teh birden of pr00f!!! xD"
>"Um, okay? I presented you my proof already, but since you missed it the first time, here it is again."
>"LELELELE don't blow a gasket now, lad xdDDSasdas"
Kick this kid from Serious.
That was not 'proof' by any stretch of the imagination.
695
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:29:49 PM »
He legitimately believes they're one in the same Morality is objective, but this subject has zip to do with morality.
You're not immoral if you drink--you're just a fucking idiot.
"factually"
I suppose this guy must have been pretty dumb, too?
If the most intelligent person who ever lived could have his intelligence represented by the number 1,000,000, it would drop to 999,999,000 if he drank.
In other words, intelligent people are capable of doing bumfuck retarded-ass shit.
lol so it would improve if he drank
696
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:26:32 PM »
the burden of proof is on you because you made the original assertion of objective reality.
Except I already have, five hundred billion times in the past.
Why would something as trivial as to whether someone wants to drink or not be an issue to him? That's what I don't understand.
Why would people who put harmful chemicals into their bodies for "fun" be an issue to me?
Why would people who voluntarily reduce themselves to an incoherent mess be an issue to me?
Why would people who fuck around with the most important organ in their body be an issue to me?
Why would people who can't function in social situations unless they take this substance be an issue for me?
Why would people who use this dangerous substance to cope with their depression be an issue for me?
Why would getting addicted to said substance be an issue for me?
Why would acute liver failure be an issue for me?
Why would people risking prison for the underage possession/consumption of said substance be an issue for me?
Why would the potential domestic abuse or otherwise violent behavior caused by imbibing said substance be an issue for me?
Why would living in a universe where people think it's a smart idea to relinquish their sobriety for cheap, temporary thrills be an issue for me?
i have no idea
i should really quit being so uptight, amirite? XD
Prove me wrong.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
Why would something as trivial as to whether someone wants to drink or not be an issue to him? That's what I don't understand.
Why would people who put harmful chemicals into their bodies for "fun" be an issue to me?
Why would people who voluntarily reduce themselves to an incoherent mess be an issue to me?
Why would people who fuck around with the most important organ in their body be an issue to me?
Why would people who can't function in social situations unless they take this substance be an issue for me?
Why would people who use this dangerous substance to cope with their depression be an issue for me?
Why would getting addicted to said substance be an issue for me?
Why would acute liver failure be an issue for me?
Why would people risking prison for the underage possession/consumption of said substance be an issue for me?
Why would the potential domestic abuse or otherwise violent behavior caused by imbibing said substance be an issue for me?
Why would living in a universe where people think it's a smart idea to relinquish their sobriety for cheap, temporary thrills be an issue for me?
i have no idea
i should really quit being so uptight, amirite? XD
don't blow a gasket now, lad
698
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:22:23 PM »
the burden of proof is on you because you made the original assertion of objective reality.
Except I already have, five hundred billion times in the past.
Why would something as trivial as to whether someone wants to drink or not be an issue to him? That's what I don't understand.
Why would people who put harmful chemicals into their bodies for "fun" be an issue to me?
Why would people who voluntarily reduce themselves to an incoherent mess be an issue to me?
Why would people who fuck around with the most important organ in their body be an issue to me?
Why would people who can't function in social situations unless they take this substance be an issue for me?
Why would people who use this dangerous substance to cope with their depression be an issue for me?
Why would getting addicted to said substance be an issue for me?
Why would acute liver failure be an issue for me?
Why would people risking prison for the underage possession/consumption of said substance be an issue for me?
Why would the potential domestic abuse or otherwise violent behavior caused by imbibing said substance be an issue for me?
Why would living in a universe where people think it's a smart idea to relinquish their sobriety for cheap, temporary thrills be an issue for me?
i have no idea
i should really quit being so uptight, amirite? XD
Prove me wrong.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
699
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:19:21 PM »
They're not harming you or anyone else. You get unhappy all by yourself.
Because it's.. factually stupid
how many times do we have to tell you that this isnt true before you get it through your thick skull that your personal feelings dont equate to objective truth?
I can't prove my own argument right, so you have to prove it wrong.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
700
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:15:13 PM »
They're not harming you or anyone else. You get unhappy all by yourself.
Because it's.. factually stupid
how many times do we have to tell you that this isnt true before you get it through your thick skull that your personal feelings dont equate to objective truth?
He legitimately believes they're one in the same, but he'd never actually admit as much because, you know, pseudointellect.
701
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:13:10 PM »
factually
702
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:11:30 PM »
wut 
703
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:05:51 PM »
The drinking age should always reflect the age of majority. There is nothing inherently wrong with drinking responsibly. Getting dangerously intoxicated as verb is implying is obviously bad, but it's not the norm that he seems to believe it is.
well, it depends on the circle you travel in. fraternity/sorority culture is usually pretty supportive of dangerous binge drinking for example.
and this isnt directly related to the above, but just so we have a handy source for future reference:
http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/alcohol-facts-and-statistics
Adults (ages 18+): 16.6 million adults ages 18 and older3 (7.0 percent of this age group4) had an AUD in 2013. This includes 10.8 million men3 (9.4 percent of men in this age group4) and 5.8 million women3 (4.7 percent of women in this age group4).
Youth (ages 12–17): In 2013 an estimated 697,000 adolescents ages 12–176 (2.8 percent of this age group7) had an AUD. This number includes 385,000 females6 (3.2 percent of females in this age group7) and 311,000 males6 (2.5 percent of males in this age group7).
>.> Safety-wise, it's for the better. But legally, it's questionable, I think. Firstly, obviously, the age of majority is legal adulthood, period. Secondly, regarding the folks who could drink at 18 and then couldn't, the government can grant rights but it can't take them away. Thirdly, placing a restriction or taking away a right on the basis of what might happen in a minority of cases doesn't really work as a valid argument, partly because the majority shouldn't have to be punished for the irresponsibility of the minority.
704
« on: January 19, 2016, 03:55:02 PM »
The drinking age should always reflect the age of majority. There is nothing inherently wrong with drinking responsibly. Getting dangerously intoxicated as verb is implying is obviously bad, but it's not the norm that he seems to believe it is.
705
« on: January 19, 2016, 03:50:39 PM »
You're quite clearly implying that they only have to be held to the standard of a snopes article, which is bullshit. Viral videos should be generally taken with a grain of salt. Even if the basic claims may have be valid, there can a ton of ways to exaggerate the claims, and it's usually not worth the effort to debunk it. See below. You're also judging the entirety of the website on one article by one author. It doesn't account for more fact-based articles like this or this or this. Snopes has often been accused of political bias, but these claims are shaky at best. Because snopes didn't move heaven and earth to debunk a barrage of alleged migrant clips doesn't mean that there's bias to be found. Given that the video is viral and not, like, being picked up by the mainstream media likely means that snopes simply didn't care to put in a major effort. They could, but the early evidence (and your own lack of), plus their reluctance to actually put a true/false icon like their other articles, seems to indicate they're being reasonably fair with the little amount of effort put into it compared to their other articles. What's your point? It's a very short article and the part that attempts to debunk the video is even shorter That's the entire point of this discussion, snopes and you are claiming the whole thing's bullshit without doing anything to back that claim up. Snopes already made a few points. But my point is also about the bigger problem with debunking the video:  The video doesn't make any claims though, it's literally a compilation of videos of events that happened. You'd have to be mentally incompetent to reach that conclusion after watching the video. Wrong, the video is also about Muslims already living in European countries, which you or snopes would only know about if you actually watched the video.
"With Open Gates" That title heavily implies refugees. 18 seconds into the video: "Germany is facing a drastic number of refugees" 45 seconds: "...migrants who had already been flooding into Europe for decades"
706
« on: January 18, 2016, 08:07:09 PM »
did CIS ever send you ass pics?
707
« on: January 18, 2016, 07:39:40 PM »
708
« on: January 18, 2016, 07:38:46 PM »
He's a jock with no ass.
how is that even possible
709
« on: January 18, 2016, 11:05:52 AM »
inb4 people can't detect satire
oh
not when it's poorly-executed and presented as though it isn't satire
it gets more obvious the longer it goes on
710
« on: January 18, 2016, 10:46:47 AM »
711
« on: January 18, 2016, 10:43:12 AM »
712
« on: January 18, 2016, 10:42:05 AM »
It's what's left of an old volcano that emerged from the sea about 7 million years ago. How is it possible for that island to be older than the Earth? I take it God created the Earth around it?
is this just a bad joke
713
« on: January 18, 2016, 10:34:45 AM »
I like NPR for these sorts of articles.
*scrolls down to the picture*
NOPE
714
« on: January 18, 2016, 10:26:17 AM »
Coming up next: Bush, Cruz, Rubio, Trump
icy pls
?
The candidates I care most about >.>
715
« on: January 18, 2016, 10:12:03 AM »
Coming up next: Bush, Cruz, Rubio, Trump
icy pls
716
« on: January 18, 2016, 09:57:51 AM »
brrr
it's very cOLD in this thread
717
« on: January 18, 2016, 09:32:21 AM »
the UK be all like 'muh hurt feelings  '
718
« on: January 18, 2016, 01:06:28 AM »
I have only seen the cheating troll team video.
Fucking lol
Funny thing was that people have known these maps were breakable for a while now. Really it's 343i's fault for not fixing the kill boundaries.
Mi Seng (missing) Chi Teng (cheating) Hai Deng (hiding) Ai Chel Ji (HLG) Ho Lee Fuk Wi Tu Lo
719
« on: January 17, 2016, 10:45:49 PM »
720
« on: January 17, 2016, 10:40:05 PM »
Does Midget even count?
He's legit dumb but he turns it up to 11 when he's here, because one certain user still takes his bait.
Pages: 1 ... 222324 2526 ... 212
|
Show Posts
