Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Anonymous (User Deleted)

Pages: 1 ... 212223 2425 ... 212
661
The Flood / Re: poor Jeb
« on: January 20, 2016, 10:05:29 PM »
Carly Rae Jeb-son

hey I just met you
and this is craaaazy
here's a turtle
vote for me m-maybe?

662
The Flood / Re: Thread about potatoes
« on: January 20, 2016, 10:00:45 PM »
motha

fuckin

baked potatoes

663
The Flood / Re: poor Jeb
« on: January 20, 2016, 09:56:57 PM »
being the smart brother doesn't make you smart

664
Serious / Re: 2016 election
« on: January 20, 2016, 09:50:44 PM »
oh look, a PSU thread


665
The Flood / Good news, everyone!
« on: January 20, 2016, 07:08:13 PM »


I've invented a device that
Code: [Select]
makes you read this in another voice

666
Ep VIII delayed until December 15th, 2017.

>tfw no more Star Wars on the 40th anniversary
At least it's not like 5 months after Rogue One anymore. Makes more sense to space them out evenly IMO (plus that's just what I'd prefer).

Although it'll now be competing with Avatar 2 at the box office, it's a smart move by Disney. Previously, they'd have been competing with themselves with Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 in May 2017.

667
The Flood / Re: I ACTUALLY THNK JIM IS PRETTY ENOUGH
« on: January 20, 2016, 06:55:09 PM »
HE COULD PROBABLY BE THE HOTEST 6'3" TWINK ON THE FORUM IF HE TRIED
you know, I always forget Jim's a twink tbh

He looks like Jack Black.
Are you stalking me

But no I haven't looked like Jack Black since I was 14 and wore Iron Maiden t shirts and had hair down to my shoulders.
Now you look like young Bill Hader.


ew no, more like


668
Depends on the game. I don't know until I play it.

GTA IV got tiresome. I got sick of GTA V after I'd finished the story missions.

Ocarina of Time's overworld is alright enough, and excellent for what it was, but Wind Waker's world blows it out of, uh, the water.

Assassin's Creed 2, Brotherhood, and Revelations were binge-fests for me. Same with Wind Waker. Burnout Paradise and Mass Effect took some time, partly due to the learning curve, but I came to adore them. I especially liked the Mako exploration, even though it generally sucked--it had good elements to it, I just want it improved. MGSV and Just Cause 2 get repetitive, but I tend to binge those once I've gotten into them after taking a break for a while.

Oblivion, Skyrim, and Minecraft are fine when they're new, or when I get a new mod to try it, but once I've gotten tired of it all, I can't go back.

Assassin's Creed 3 just flat-out sucked, and killed my remaining interest in the series after Revelations' story blunders. I never finished it.

669
The Flood / Re: >he hasn't heard of Jerry Paper
« on: January 20, 2016, 01:32:41 PM »
A E S T H E T I C
E
S
T
H
E
T
I
C

670
Gaming / Re: Rented Dragon's Dogma Dark Arisen. What to expect?
« on: January 20, 2016, 10:39:01 AM »
I've been a bit interested in this game. My first impression was that it's a bit weird, but I've heard nothing but good things about it. I have almost no idea what it's about or how it plays aside from fantasy/dragons.

671
The Flood / Re: Why Are Gamer Girls So Desirable?
« on: January 20, 2016, 10:28:12 AM »
I figure it's because neckbeards like Roman feel they don't have to change as much about themselves to actually, like, date a girl, and seemingly not that many girls are geeks in the first place.

672
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 20, 2016, 10:17:20 AM »
wait, did we actually make progress in this thread?



I can't speak for alcoholism, but years ago I used to be (more than) a bit adamantly against smoking (see: Verb in this thread), since my dad smoked at least a pack a day and looks about 10 years older than he really is. Nothing ever worked in the long term, and he's still making excuses about it after all these years. I've resigned myself to some sort of reluctant acceptance of smoking in general, without entirely giving up on it.

Alcohol was never much of a problem here (outside of the awkwardness of a beer can in daylight with guests over) since he dropped that pretty quickly, and never got hammered in the first place.

673
The Flood / Re: doges barking in their sleep ;-;7
« on: January 19, 2016, 11:19:22 PM »
my dog did that tonight while the tv was on

I always wonder what they're dreaming about.

674
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 08:56:30 PM »
Pathetic. You're a lost cause and I'm done here.
Never has a mirror more desperately needed to be put down.
KEK

675
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 06:19:02 PM »

676
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 06:18:07 PM »
All I have fucking done in this thread is explain to you people PRECISELY what I think about alcohol consumption.
And then presented those thoughts as fact and refused to present anything else supporting your case.

If I came across as dismissive, it was because you took any further challenge or questioning of your logic as some sort of total rebuttal as opposed to, I don't know, seeking further evidence?
I don't understand what further evidence you need.
So instead of refusing to present more evidence, just present more evidence.
Quote
I don't understand what further evidence you need.
How can I give you further evidence if I don't even know what the fuck it is you're looking for?
"Here's my opinion, and if this isn't enough proof for you, too bad"

Is that clear enough?

677
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 06:13:34 PM »
All I have fucking done in this thread is explain to you people PRECISELY what I think about alcohol consumption.
And then presented those thoughts as fact and refused to present anything else supporting your case.

If I came across as dismissive, it was because you took any further challenge or questioning of your logic as some sort of total rebuttal as opposed to, I don't know, seeking further evidence?
I don't understand what further evidence you need.
So instead of refusing to present more evidence, just present more evidence.

678
The Flood / Re: I meme'd my cat
« on: January 19, 2016, 06:12:55 PM »
your cats are adorable tbh

Ooo is that a straw?
Spoiler

Gimme straw pls
Spoiler

O hey watsup
Spoiler

LOLGIMMEDATFUCKINSTRAW
Spoiler
2cute

679
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 06:00:26 PM »
All I have fucking done in this thread is explain to you people PRECISELY what I think about alcohol consumption.
And then presented those thoughts as fact and refused to present anything else supporting your case.

If I came across as dismissive, it was because you took any further challenge or questioning of your logic as some sort of total rebuttal as opposed to, I don't know, someone seeking further evidence that supports what you said?

'This is all the proof you need, because it's right because I said so' comes across as childish and unable to handle the fact that people aren't simply left enlightened in your wake.

680
Serious / Re: The Above Average Effect
« on: January 19, 2016, 05:52:57 PM »
I tend to think of myself as below-average in most areas, to be honest.

681
The Flood / Re: I meme'd my cat
« on: January 19, 2016, 05:51:10 PM »
your cats are adorable tbh

682
The Flood / Re: Post Animated Characters Supporting Trump
« on: January 19, 2016, 05:38:18 PM »

683
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 05:28:51 PM »
You still can't prove that drinking alchohol is stupid aside from your personal feelings on the matter.
Except I have. And you've yet to respond as to why I'm wrong.
You haven't proven yourself anything close to right that isn't along the lines of "because I am," so it'd be a waste of my precious time.

684
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 05:20:20 PM »
Or you know, a misunderstanding, but you assume everyone must think the same way you do or else they're wrong.

But instead of understanding that, lol another straw man
And instead of defending alcohol consumption, lol another shitpost devoid of anything called an "argument"

You can't demonstrate that drinking alcohol isn't stupid--so I'm going to assume that you're wrong.

Also, learn what the fuck a straw man is, kid. You obviously don't know what it means.
You misrepresented my argument, so I called you out on it. You still can't prove that drinking alchohol is stupid aside from your personal feelings on the matter. There's nothing more to be said, child.

685
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 05:09:47 PM »
bad = wrong
"I'm going to twist the definitions of the words you're using in my favor, because I'm incapable of being honest."

Bad = anything I want it to be. In this case, bad = stupid.
Or you know, a misunderstanding, but you assume everyone must think the same way you do or else they're wrong.

But instead of understanding that, lol another straw man

686
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 05:04:59 PM »
this thread needs to stop



i have other things to do

687
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 05:03:30 PM »
You can't prove that harm is inherently wrong.
I never said "wrong."

I said STUPID.


Even then, I could probably prove that it's wrong quite easily.

It's axiomatic.

The ultimate imperative for us as a race is to be productive in some form or another.
It would be in our least interest, then, to prevent (or debilitate) ourselves from being productive in any way.
Harm is a form of debilitation; when you get drunk, you're debilitating yourself.
This is intrinsically wrong.

It is stupid to debilitate yourself. You should want your body to be performing at full capacity at all times.

Demonstrate to me why that is the wrong outlook.
Quote
I'm not sure why you said this has nothing to do with objective morality
Because it has absolutely nothing to do with morality.
ALCOHOL IS HARMFUL. HARM = BAD.
bad = wrong

688
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:54:25 PM »
Now for your other claims.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
Alcohol harms you. This is a fact.

Prove me wrong.
You can't prove that harm is inherently wrong. I'm not sure why you said this has nothing to do with objective morality, because it clearly has everything to do with it.

Pages: 1 ... 212223 2425 ... 212