This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Anonymous (User Deleted)
Pages: 1 ... 181920 2122 ... 212
571
« on: January 27, 2016, 08:12:34 PM »
572
« on: January 27, 2016, 08:06:53 PM »
You don't seem very mature
pot calling the kettle black
573
« on: January 27, 2016, 08:05:55 PM »
I do love seeing the GOP implode.
574
« on: January 27, 2016, 07:30:09 PM »
because
H Y P E
Y
P
E
575
« on: January 27, 2016, 04:37:54 PM »
>implying we can't say anything objective about well-being never did AFAIK Human success/flourishing/well-being/whatever is non-arbitrary.
Yes, it is. Well maybe not.
576
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:52:10 PM »
Not for slave owners or Stalin supporters.
consequentially bad for aggregate well-being.
Guess who decides that.
577
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:41:04 PM »
Jokes on you, Macs can't get viruses.
The way they're built with quality parts means that viruses can't worm their way through the machine like they can on windows computers.
it looks like you've won
578
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:37:18 PM »
My name isn't Bob.
All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
Are you trying to tell me Jabba the Hutt isn't real?
excluding that part
579
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:36:44 PM »
It's okay for a run or two, but I don't enjoy as much as I once did.
It's the shame the series went downhill like it did. Crysis 2 was a slog, and by all accounts that I've heard, Crysis 3 was somehow, bafflingly, the worst in the series.
580
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:30:30 PM »
My name isn't Bob.
All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
581
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:25:56 PM »
At what point does this obsession with aggregate good preclude slavery, Stalinism, or other collectivist nonsense?
The point where you realise that slavery, Stalinism and collectivist nonsense has been pretty clearly consequentially bad for aggregate well-being.
The point I'm making is about operations it may be necessary to conduct on the margins of knowledge, in order to better inform our various decision-making processes.
Not for slave owners or Stalin supporters. I think perspective is a key issue here. OT: I don't see how it being secret or not matters so much as the rationale and accomplishments of it... not that I'm endorsing it or anything.
582
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:21:57 PM »
***NEW TEST QUESTION***
#9. People would care to impersonate your IP address solely to get you banned from a backwater Internet forum.
a) true
b) false
583
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:20:32 PM »
1. no
2. false
3. false
4. false
5. false
6. false
7. false
8. true
please see new question #9, jimmy
584
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:15:05 PM »
also christmas ended
fuck off
make me
585
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:14:16 PM »
Take the following quiz and post your answers, and I'll tell you if you need to git gud:
1. Bob lost files stored in THE CLOUD. Would system restore get them back?
a) yes
b) no
2. Turning off the computer screen is the same thing as turning off the computer.
a) true
b) false
3. Installing video games causes viruses that slow your computer down.
a) true
b) false
4. Having antivirus makes your computer invincible.
a) true
b) false
5. Java is the same thing as JavaScript.
a) true
b) false
6. "password" and "123456" are good passwords.
a) true
b) false
7. You can download more RAM to speed up your computer.
a) true
b) false
8. Other people can impersonate your IP address.
a) true
b) Jabba the Hutt
Please hand in your test on the way out.
586
« on: January 27, 2016, 03:01:04 PM »
what is the meaning of this
also christmas ended
587
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:44:59 AM »
objectively
I mean, using this word constantly (and inappropriately) doesn't make your arguments any more or less opinionated.
Except I'm using it appropriately.
I've proven sexuality to be objectively undesirable by any rational standard. Nobody has proven me wrong.
You've never proven it objectively, and personal feelings are not facts. No one's 'proven you wrong' by your standards because you have a major habit of moving goalposts. Saying 'objectively' a lot doesn't change the fact that it's not objective.
588
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:38:57 AM »
objectively
I mean, using this word constantly (and inappropriately) doesn't make your arguments any less opinionated.
589
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:35:02 AM »
ew no
the transparency reminds me of bungleboards
bungle's one of the most poorly designed forums i've ever seen
i was scarred by it and this post triggers me
590
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:33:18 AM »
nice damage control
You lose.
591
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:31:19 AM »
No one legally forced them to censor their own game. Well, yeah. That doesn't necessarily mean they'd agree to it, though.
not that i care--if they disagree, they're wrong
The fact remains that they chose to censor it of their own accord. if they disagree, they're wrong
now that's just childish 'logic'
592
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:30:03 AM »
Didn't you just say a few days ago that satire needs to be obvious? Uh. No?
ot when it's poorly-executed and presented as though it isn't satire
Well-executed =/= obvious.
And that video was obviously satire--I just chose not to watch it past the thirty-second mark.
You're really dumb.
nice damage control
593
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:26:32 AM »
It's clear that you're not exaggerating. I just said that a clear example of censorship wasn't censorship, simply because it's better off. The implication being that most people consider censorship a bad thing--so any example of "good" censorship must not be censorship. That's the exaggeration, and it's painfully obvious.
I didn't find it obvious. Didn't you just say a few days ago that satire needs to be obvious? inb4 people can't detect satire
oh
not when it's poorly-executed and presented as though it isn't satire
the apparently not-presented-as-satire satirical video in question being this:
594
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:21:16 AM »
And it's not like anybody forced Nintendo's hand, for one thing; they agreed to it. Do you have proof of this?
Because if they agreed to remove it for the Western release, then people should absolutely not be crying over this.
There's no defense.
No one legally forced them to censor their own game.
595
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:13:10 AM »
damage control Damage control.
"I fell for an obvious Das-tier exaggeration."
i didn't think you were actually serious with the 'damage control' reply
and like, I'm otherwise agreeing with you anyway
Probably the shittiest possible application of that image, ever.
You fell for an obvious exaggeration and are now trying to make me look bad, when YOU look bad.
Damage control. Get fucked, repeatedly.
But no, it's absolutely wonderful that you agree with me. I'm ecstatic.
It's clear that you're not exaggerating. But I'm a bit weirded out that you're overreacting about two words  this is out of character for you Spoiler usually it takes a bit more than that to get you this mad
596
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:07:20 AM »
I'd prefer an opt-in/out setting instead. Well, I don't disagree, but that's a bit silly, too. The opt-in/op-out setting is simply making the choice not to use the creepy-ass feature. Or not purchasing the game.
Yeah, I think it should be a choice.
597
« on: January 27, 2016, 08:56:53 AM »
OT: Seriously though, I'm fine with something like the FE change, although I'd prefer an opt-in/out setting instead.
I don't like the thought of 'censorship is okay when something weirds me out', but this particular event seems like such a trivial issue, especially when there's much worse censorship going on in the world. And it's not like anybody forced Nintendo's hand, for one thing; they agreed to it.
I'm still a bit conflicted, though.
598
« on: January 27, 2016, 08:43:08 AM »
being gay
599
« on: January 27, 2016, 08:16:06 AM »
objectively
God damn it Kupo don't start shitting up the thread.
he already admitted this thread's a shitpost though
Damage control.
"I fell for an obvious Das-tier exaggeration."
But it's not. That thread is not this thread.
he's making the same argument in both threads though
600
« on: January 27, 2016, 08:13:36 AM »
objectively
God damn it Kupo don't start shitting up the thread.
he already admitted this thread's a shitpost though I only said that because I knew it would trigger people.
Damage control.
"I fell for an obvious Das-tier exaggeration."
Pages: 1 ... 181920 2122 ... 212
|
Show Posts