Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Anonymous (User Deleted)

Pages: 1 ... 149150151 152153 ... 212
4501
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:25:48 PM »
Please make sure to have a serious discussion in this thread and provide evidence to support your claims rather than using personal opinions in place of rebuttals

Coming from the guy making an irrelevant comment adding nothing to the discussion.

I'm notifying you of what we expect in the Serious Board. Excessive commenting with no evidence but simply personal opinions is hindering actual discussion.

Now, back on topic please.

What you expect is constantly changing. Also, I have at least provided proof of my claims. Even if someone wasn't, how is that hindering anyone else from having a conversation? That makes no sense, especially when you can mute them and not have to look at their posts at all. Your comment was the only one here not on topic. Glorious.

Provide links, articles, charts, something more than simply your own views.
The type of discussion you are having is simply baiting other users and calling them wrong.

If the trolling and derailing continues, you will get a warning.

I did, which you'd know had you actually read this thread. I've explained how they are wrong.

Thanks for admitting you're delusional. Trolls are mythical creatures and you are the only one here derailing the thread, which isn't even a locomotive in the first place. Also, will this be my first of 18 warnings like everyone else get, or is it just going to be more bias?
You've gone off the rails -____-

You tried to explain your points, and they were promptly refuted. Calling me "delusional" isn't helping your case.

the only one refuted here was yourself, which is why even you admitted you were wrong earlier.
You keep claiming I admitted being wrong, but where did that happen?

Read the first page. How did you allegedly refute me?
How did I not refute you?
Well, Camnator made the claim that the overwhelming majority of police officers would not let someone go if they were in the possession of illegal drugs, he specifically stated heroin in that incident but specifically stated marijuana later. Your problem was that he changed the specific illegal drug when in reality that wasn't what the main point was.

Seriously, why is Camnator banned for this? I admit he's not the most reasonable in how he responds to people at times, but he linked more sources than Kupo did, and Kupo was pretty much just saying "Nope, you're wrong, I don't believe you".
Really? This has to be bait.

His claim was irrelevant to the discussion and didn't really have a purpose except to change the subject. It's really not difficult to see how I refuted his "arguments."

And then he took it to a different thread for no apparent reason. He derailed this thread, was completely off-topic another one--both in Serious, where this behavior is frowned upon. What else needs to be said?

4502
Is ☠ the symbol for verb shitposts? =]
Something like that >.> it's neato

4503
The Flood / Re: LOL look at this picture I found of a certain fat user
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:21:22 PM »
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden.

4504
The Flood / Re: DO NOT POST IN THIS THREAD
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:16:05 PM »
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden.

How cute.
fite me newfriend

no items
fox only
final destination

4505
The Flood / Re: DO NOT POST IN THIS THREAD
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:12:59 PM »
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden.

4506
The Flood / Re: OTHER TYPICAL EUROPEAN
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:11:45 PM »

4507
The Flood / Re: I just dropped in
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:10:26 PM »
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden.

4508
The Flood / Re: Long distance relationships?
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:07:08 PM »
It's certainly not easy  :'(

4509
The Flood / Re: Around The World
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:04:38 PM »
Spoiler
YouTube

Begin comment chain.
did listen lol

good choice  8)
♪ Everyone knows it's Kupo!



"That's me!"
making me sound adorable :3
I reward good posters.
Why thank you  :D

4510
The Flood / Re: Around The World
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:01:16 PM »
Spoiler
YouTube

Begin comment chain.
did listen lol

good choice  8)
♪ Everyone knows it's Kupo!



"That's me!"
making me sound adorable :3

4511
The Flood / Re: Why are all of you such pussies?
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:57:54 PM »
What the hell are you talking about?

4512
The Flood / Re: Around The World
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:52:48 PM »
Spoiler
YouTube

Begin comment chain.
did listen lol

good choice  8)

4513
The Flood / Re: Hey now, you're an all star
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:50:24 PM »
wut

4514
The Flood / Re: guYS I JUST REALIZED THAT EUROPE
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:35:47 PM »
NEWSFLASH: Europe is not a country :O

OAK IS A TYPE OF TREE
HE'S ALSO A PROFESSOR

4515
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:32:16 PM »
It's really obvious who does and does not understand transgenderism and related trans issues.

If you don't know what you're talking about, it's generally a good idea not to debate about it.
This isn't a debate, it's a discussion. Transgenders who embrace the disorder are sick. They have no place in a civilized society.
And how does someone being transgender negatively affect anybody else?


Something doesn't have to affect others to be sick or idiotic. Transgenders have a disorder, simple as that, and it should be treated, not embraced.
If it doesn't affect you in any way, why do you care? What possible purpose would it serve other than wasting society's time?


And why do I care? The main reason is that I'm a somewhat ethical person.
Either this is bait or you're really that deplorable. ._.

The rest of your argument completely contradicts that, though. If you were ethical, you really wouldn't care. It has nothing to do with you, does not affect you or anyone else in any way... it's completely unethical to punish something that's harmless and morally acceptable.
HAAHAHAHAA!!! You just said cops are fine when they arrest people for cannabis! Dang, sometimes you people amaze me at how quickly you prove yourselves wrong.
That's completely irrelevant, and not to mention incorrect.

It's more than relevant, as it discredits you as a hypocrite since you contradicted yourself. It's not at all incorrect, either.

These are direct quotes from you...

"it's completely unethical to punish something that's harmless and morally acceptable."

"Regardless of whether it's unjust, they're not necessarily wrong for doing their jobs unless it strongly violates moral boundaries or their own conscience."
"Arresting someone for having drugs is hardly deplorable compared to, I don't know, beating peaceful protesters with nightsticks"

Thanks for making it easy.
This is irrelevant because it's harassment because you lost the other argument -___-

There is no law in the United States that bans transgenderism. There is no double standard in my reasoning.

Thanks for humiliating yourself. You horribly lost in that thread, you could never even make an actual argument. There is no just law banning cannabis, either.
Great job successfully refuting my point (not).

But there are laws banning cannabis, regardless of how you feel about them.

4516
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:29:25 PM »
Please make sure to have a serious discussion in this thread and provide evidence to support your claims rather than using personal opinions in place of rebuttals

Coming from the guy making an irrelevant comment adding nothing to the discussion.

I'm notifying you of what we expect in the Serious Board. Excessive commenting with no evidence but simply personal opinions is hindering actual discussion.

Now, back on topic please.

What you expect is constantly changing. Also, I have at least provided proof of my claims. Even if someone wasn't, how is that hindering anyone else from having a conversation? That makes no sense, especially when you can mute them and not have to look at their posts at all. Your comment was the only one here not on topic. Glorious.

Provide links, articles, charts, something more than simply your own views.
The type of discussion you are having is simply baiting other users and calling them wrong.

If the trolling and derailing continues, you will get a warning.

I did, which you'd know had you actually read this thread. I've explained how they are wrong.

Thanks for admitting you're delusional. Trolls are mythical creatures and you are the only one here derailing the thread, which isn't even a locomotive in the first place. Also, will this be my first of 18 warnings like everyone else get, or is it just going to be more bias?
You've gone off the rails -____-

You tried to explain your points, and they were promptly refuted. Calling me "delusional" isn't helping your case.

the only one refuted here was yourself, which is why even you admitted you were wrong earlier.
You keep claiming I admitted being wrong, but where did that happen?

Read the first page. How did you allegedly refute me?
How did I not refute you?

4517
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:28:23 PM »
Please make sure to have a serious discussion in this thread and provide evidence to support your claims rather than using personal opinions in place of rebuttals

Coming from the guy making an irrelevant comment adding nothing to the discussion.

I'm notifying you of what we expect in the Serious Board. Excessive commenting with no evidence but simply personal opinions is hindering actual discussion.

Now, back on topic please.

What you expect is constantly changing. Also, I have at least provided proof of my claims. Even if someone wasn't, how is that hindering anyone else from having a conversation? That makes no sense, especially when you can mute them and not have to look at their posts at all. Your comment was the only one here not on topic. Glorious.

Provide links, articles, charts, something more than simply your own views.
The type of discussion you are having is simply baiting other users and calling them wrong.

If the trolling and derailing continues, you will get a warning.

I did, which you'd know had you actually read this thread. I've explained how they are wrong.

Thanks for admitting you're delusional. Trolls are mythical creatures and you are the only one here derailing the thread, which isn't even a locomotive in the first place. Also, will this be my first of 18 warnings like everyone else get, or is it just going to be more bias?
You've gone off the rails -____-

You tried to explain your points, and they were promptly refuted. Calling me "delusional" isn't helping your case.

the only one refuted here was yourself, which is why even you admitted you were wrong earlier.
You keep claiming I admitted being wrong, but where did that happen?

4518
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:27:43 PM »
It's really obvious who does and does not understand transgenderism and related trans issues.

If you don't know what you're talking about, it's generally a good idea not to debate about it.
This isn't a debate, it's a discussion. Transgenders who embrace the disorder are sick. They have no place in a civilized society.
And how does someone being transgender negatively affect anybody else?


Something doesn't have to affect others to be sick or idiotic. Transgenders have a disorder, simple as that, and it should be treated, not embraced.
If it doesn't affect you in any way, why do you care? What possible purpose would it serve other than wasting society's time?


And why do I care? The main reason is that I'm a somewhat ethical person.
Either this is bait or you're really that deplorable. ._.

The rest of your argument completely contradicts that, though. If you were ethical, you really wouldn't care. It has nothing to do with you, does not affect you or anyone else in any way... it's completely unethical to punish something that's harmless and morally acceptable.
HAAHAHAHAA!!! You just said cops are fine when they arrest people for cannabis! Dang, sometimes you people amaze me at how quickly you prove yourselves wrong.
That's completely irrelevant, and not to mention incorrect.

It's more than relevant, as it discredits you as a hypocrite since you contradicted yourself. It's not at all incorrect, either.

These are direct quotes from you...

"it's completely unethical to punish something that's harmless and morally acceptable."

"Regardless of whether it's unjust, they're not necessarily wrong for doing their jobs unless it strongly violates moral boundaries or their own conscience."
"Arresting someone for having drugs is hardly deplorable compared to, I don't know, beating peaceful protesters with nightsticks"

Thanks for making it easy.
This is irrelevant because it's harassment because you lost the other argument -___-

There is no law in the United States that bans transgenderism. There is no double standard in my reasoning.

4519
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:21:55 PM »
Please make sure to have a serious discussion in this thread and provide evidence to support your claims rather than using personal opinions in place of rebuttals

Coming from the guy making an irrelevant comment adding nothing to the discussion.

I'm notifying you of what we expect in the Serious Board. Excessive commenting with no evidence but simply personal opinions is hindering actual discussion.

Now, back on topic please.

What you expect is constantly changing. Also, I have at least provided proof of my claims. Even if someone wasn't, how is that hindering anyone else from having a conversation? That makes no sense, especially when you can mute them and not have to look at their posts at all. Your comment was the only one here not on topic. Glorious.

Provide links, articles, charts, something more than simply your own views.
The type of discussion you are having is simply baiting other users and calling them wrong.

If the trolling and derailing continues, you will get a warning.

I did, which you'd know had you actually read this thread. I've explained how they are wrong.

Thanks for admitting you're delusional. Trolls are mythical creatures and you are the only one here derailing the thread, which isn't even a locomotive in the first place. Also, will this be my first of 18 warnings like everyone else get, or is it just going to be more bias?
You've gone off the rails -____-

You tried to explain your points, and they were promptly refuted. Calling me "delusional" isn't helping your case.

4520
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:19:39 PM »
Please make sure to have a serious discussion in this thread and provide evidence to support your claims rather than using personal opinions in place of rebuttals

Coming from the guy making an irrelevant comment adding nothing to the discussion.

I'm notifying you of what we expect in the Serious Board. Excessive commenting with no evidence but simply personal opinions is hindering actual discussion.

Now, back on topic please.

What you expect is constantly changing. Also, I have at least provided proof of my claims. Even if someone wasn't, how is that hindering anyone else from having a conversation? That makes no sense, especially when you can mute them and not have to look at their posts at all. Your comment was the only one here not on topic. Glorious.
Camnator, you haven't provided any proof at all, and then you belittle other users for their rebuttals. That is not appropriate behavior for this board.

I have provided proof, and nearly everyone here belittles everyone, yes, even you. When the behavior of the board is set in stone and not such a joke then I shall acknowledge it. Just as I never followed any unjust cannabis laws, I also don't follow any nonsensical rule that can't even be enforced evenly. You offered no rebuttal, you only proved yourself wrong.

It wasn't one instance of corruption, these things in the video happen nearly every day.
Regardless of how you feel about the (very reasonable) rules of this board, you are still obligated to follow them.

And yes, it was a single incident, unless that video is somehow a montage of multiple separate incidents.

4521
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:18:47 PM »
It's really obvious who does and does not understand transgenderism and related trans issues.

If you don't know what you're talking about, it's generally a good idea not to debate about it.
This isn't a debate, it's a discussion. Transgenders who embrace the disorder are sick. They have no place in a civilized society.
And how does someone being transgender negatively affect anybody else?


Something doesn't have to affect others to be sick or idiotic. Transgenders have a disorder, simple as that, and it should be treated, not embraced.
If it doesn't affect you in any way, why do you care? What possible purpose would it serve other than wasting society's time?


And why do I care? The main reason is that I'm a somewhat ethical person.
Either this is bait or you're really that deplorable. ._.

The rest of your argument completely contradicts that, though. If you were ethical, you really wouldn't care. It has nothing to do with you, does not affect you or anyone else in any way... it's completely unethical to punish something that's harmless and morally acceptable.
HAAHAHAHAA!!! You just said cops are fine when they arrest people for cannabis! Dang, sometimes you people amaze me at how quickly you prove yourselves wrong.
That's completely irrelevant, and not to mention incorrect.

4522
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:15:00 PM »
It's really obvious who does and does not understand transgenderism and related trans issues.

If you don't know what you're talking about, it's generally a good idea not to debate about it.
This isn't a debate, it's a discussion. Transgenders who embrace the disorder are sick. They have no place in a civilized society.
And how does someone being transgender negatively affect anybody else?


Something doesn't have to affect others to be sick or idiotic. Transgenders have a disorder, simple as that, and it should be treated, not embraced.
If it doesn't affect you in any way, why do you care? What possible purpose would it serve other than wasting society's time?


And why do I care? The main reason is that I'm a somewhat ethical person.
Either this is bait or you're really that deplorable. ._.

The rest of your argument completely contradicts that, though. If you were ethical, you really wouldn't care. It has nothing to do with you, does not affect you or anyone else in any way... it's completely unethical to punish something that's harmless and morally acceptable.
Letting a sick person believe he's not sick, and refusing to help him, is unethical.
>"sick"


4523
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:14:08 PM »
Please make sure to have a serious discussion in this thread and provide evidence to support your claims rather than using personal opinions in place of rebuttals

Coming from the guy making an irrelevant comment adding nothing to the discussion.

I'm notifying you of what we expect in the Serious Board. Excessive commenting with no evidence but simply personal opinions is hindering actual discussion.

Now, back on topic please.

What you expect is constantly changing. Also, I have at least provided proof of my claims. Even if someone wasn't, how is that hindering anyone else from having a conversation? That makes no sense, especially when you can mute them and not have to look at their posts at all. Your comment was the only one here not on topic. Glorious.
Camnator, you haven't provided any proof at all, and then you belittle other users for their rebuttals. That is not appropriate behavior for this board.

And a single incident of police brutality is hardly evidence that all police actions are brutality. That's poor reasoning even by your standards.

4524
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 10:12:24 PM »
It's really obvious who does and does not understand transgenderism and related trans issues.

If you don't know what you're talking about, it's generally a good idea not to debate about it.
This isn't a debate, it's a discussion. Transgenders who embrace the disorder are sick. They have no place in a civilized society.
And how does someone being transgender negatively affect anybody else?


Something doesn't have to affect others to be sick or idiotic. Transgenders have a disorder, simple as that, and it should be treated, not embraced.
If it doesn't affect you in any way, why do you care? What possible purpose would it serve other than wasting society's time?


And why do I care? The main reason is that I'm a somewhat ethical person.
Either this is bait or you're really that deplorable. ._.

The rest of your argument completely contradicts that, though. If you were ethical, you really wouldn't care. It has nothing to do with you, does not affect you or anyone else in any way... it's completely unethical to punish something that's harmless and morally acceptable.

4525
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:41:23 PM »
It's really obvious who does and does not understand transgenderism and related trans issues.

If you don't know what you're talking about, it's generally a good idea not to debate about it.
This isn't a debate, it's a discussion. Transgenders who embrace the disorder are sick. They have no place in a civilized society.
And how does someone being transgender negatively affect anybody else?


Something doesn't have to affect others to be sick or idiotic. Transgenders have a disorder, simple as that, and it should be treated, not embraced.
If it doesn't affect you in any way, why do you care? What possible purpose would it serve other than wasting society's time?


4526
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:38:34 PM »
I did prove it. You claimed cops would not arrest people for drugs, and I showed you they do, a lot. Cannabis is not illegal, the unjust laws are the only thing illegal. It infringes upon our freedoms which they have no authority to do. No one should enforce unjust laws. Are cops just dummies that do whatever they are told no matter how wrong they know it is?
But I never made that claim. Ever. You just threw that accusation into one of your responses to me. Regardless of whether it's unjust, they're not necessarily wrong for doing their jobs unless it strongly violates moral boundaries or their own conscience.

Infringing upon freedoms DOES violate moral boundaries. You just admitted you were wrong. Also, are you really saying I put it into your responses? Let's review...

I began with, "I've had a few offers to be a cop, and there's a reason I never took it. I can deal with pathetic people, I can even deal with having to take on multiple drunks, but I could never sacrifice my principle and infringe upon people like cops do. You spend your day robbing from mostly productive people."
1) Stop lying about your alleged job offers
2) Arresting someone for having drugs is hardly deplorable compared to, I don't know, beating peaceful protesters with nightsticks
3) You're only proving yourself wrong by *attempting* to continue this argument.

You're wrong, again.
Not at all.

1. You can get over your obsession. I have some friends that constantly bug me into trying to join, at the same time I try and get them out of the corruption, which to their credit even they acknowledge exists and are not happy about. Also, the person I got my guard card through was devastated when I told him I never had the intention of ever becoming a cop.
2. Both are extremely wrong, as it often times leads to the officers murdering the victims, sometimes they even receive a vacation after. Nice job trying to make it less of an issue than what it is because you realize you were wrong and are now embarrassed.
3. You've offered me no actual argument, you've only been showing how naive, obsessed and pathetic you are.

You're wrong.
1) I sincerely, honestly doubt your claims about the cop job offer.

2) lol. Nothing about those statements are even remotely true.

3) I have refuted every point you've brought up. Also, name-calling has no place in Serious.

4527
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:35:28 PM »
It's really obvious who does and does not understand transgenderism and related trans issues.

If you don't know what you're talking about, it's generally a good idea not to debate about it.
This isn't a debate, it's a discussion. Transgenders who embrace the disorder are sick. They have no place in a civilized society.
And how does someone being transgender negatively affect anybody else?


4528
The Flood / Re: Top Custom nameplates?
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:29:12 PM »
RC once had a really cool .gif one but I don't know what happened to it

4529
Gaming / Re: Really terrible games with great soundtracks?
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:27:45 PM »
The Sonic Adventure games admittedly weren't that good but had some catchy tunes. I can't listen to them without a gigantic rush of nostalgia.

City Escape
YouTube

4530
The Flood / Re: Yo, busta
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:25:45 PM »
didn't listen lol

Pages: 1 ... 149150151 152153 ... 212