This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Anonymous (User Deleted)
Pages: 1 ... 148149150 151152 ... 212
4471
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:36:41 PM »
4472
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:28:35 PM »
Defense is your Pokémon's resistance to physical attacks.
Defence is to remove a fence.
4473
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:27:39 PM »
Also, who's in it
Me, Yuta, Icy maybe, and Psy.
And me. Yutaka told me to not be busy today >.> When are we doing this?
4474
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:16:30 PM »
HOLY FUCK SUPER METROID IS ON REWARDS RIGHT NOW~!!!!
That's probably going to be my last Nintendo Reward 
4475
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:11:30 PM »
4476
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:04:18 PM »
4477
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:59:58 PM »
First off, allow me to take a moment to laugh at linking "Breitbart" It is pretty hilarious considering you've linked MSNBC and HuffPost innumerable times in the past.
Breitbart.com is objectively worse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSNBC_controversies
Yeah I don't know about that.
MSNBC was also the news outlet that had the cumnugget Matt Binder on air and took everything he had to say as the gospel truth and refused to give any credence to gamergate arguments. Top notch journalistic practices right there.
Not being open to debate on Gamergate is hardly as bad as believing in a fictional terrorist organization. You have failed your readers if you refuse to acknowledge utter falsehoods.
Actually taking everything in such a black and white manner is the antithesis of good journalism. Reputable journalism is supposed to analyze, investigate and consider two sides of the argument in an egalitarian manner. That's why I respect David Pakman on his reporting on Gamergate despite him being relatively left leaning. He remains non partisan and neutral.
Not sure why you're trying to compare Gamergate with ISIS anyway.
Because you did.
No I brought up an example of poor journalistic practices within MSNBC and multiple major discrepancies within their reports to bring attention to the fact that they're just as bad, if not perhaps worse, than Breitbart.
It was you that conflated the two together, actually.
If you're going to compare two news sources, you have to compare the facts themselves, or else what's the point? We can't have some invisible boundary that's like 'let's look at these separately and give them equal negative value' because that's dishonest.
Exactly.
Which is why I linked multiple controversies for MSNBC whereas you linked one for Breitbart. If you'd like to find a different way to quantify Breitbart and MSNBC's bias then you're more than welcome to try.
Well, Breitbart has a few but there's not as many. I guess when you're not a 24/7 news channel, there's a lot less that can go wrong >.> Although I feel like generally, MSNBC tries to pretend that it's more neutral than it really is. Breitbart.com has never pretended to not be biased, I don't think.
4478
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:49:10 PM »
First off, allow me to take a moment to laugh at linking "Breitbart" It is pretty hilarious considering you've linked MSNBC and HuffPost innumerable times in the past.
Breitbart.com is objectively worse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSNBC_controversies
Yeah I don't know about that.
MSNBC was also the news outlet that had the cumnugget Matt Binder on air and took everything he had to say as the gospel truth and refused to give any credence to gamergate arguments. Top notch journalistic practices right there.
Not being open to debate on Gamergate is hardly as bad as believing in a fictional terrorist organization. You have failed your readers if you refuse to acknowledge utter falsehoods.
Actually taking everything in such a black and white manner is the antithesis of good journalism. Reputable journalism is supposed to analyze, investigate and consider two sides of the argument in an egalitarian manner. That's why I respect David Pakman on his reporting on Gamergate despite him being relatively left leaning. He remains non partisan and neutral.
Not sure why you're trying to compare Gamergate with ISIS anyway.
Because you did.
No I brought up an example of poor journalistic practices within MSNBC and multiple major discrepancies within their reports to bring attention to the fact that they're just as bad, if not perhaps worse, than Breitbart.
It was you that conflated the two together, actually.
If you're going to compare two news sources, you have to compare the facts themselves, or else what's the point? We can't have some invisible boundary that's like ' let's look at these separately and give them equal negative value' because that's dishonest.
4479
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:45:41 PM »
4480
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:44:16 PM »
dat picture quality.
4481
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:43:25 PM »
First off, allow me to take a moment to laugh at linking "Breitbart" It is pretty hilarious considering you've linked MSNBC and HuffPost innumerable times in the past.
Breitbart.com is objectively worse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSNBC_controversies
Yeah I don't know about that.
MSNBC was also the news outlet that had the cumnugget Matt Binder on air and took everything he had to say as the gospel truth and refused to give any credence to gamergate arguments. Top notch journalistic practices right there.
Not being open to debate on Gamergate is hardly as bad as believing in a fictional terrorist organization. You have failed your readers if you refuse to acknowledge utter falsehoods.
Actually taking everything in such a black and white manner is the antithesis of good journalism. Reputable journalism is supposed to analyze, investigate and consider two sides of the argument in an egalitarian manner. That's why I respect David Pakman on his reporting on Gamergate despite him being relatively left leaning. He remains non partisan and neutral.
Not sure why you're trying to compare Gamergate with ISIS anyway.
Because you did.
4482
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:38:48 PM »
First off, allow me to take a moment to laugh at linking "Breitbart" It is pretty hilarious considering you've linked MSNBC and HuffPost innumerable times in the past.
Breitbart.com is objectively worse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSNBC_controversies
Yeah I don't know about that.
MSNBC was also the news outlet that had the cumnugget Matt Binder on air and took everything he had to say as the gospel truth and refused to give any credence to gamergate arguments. Top notch journalistic practices right there.
Not being open to debate on Gamergate is hardly as bad as believing in a fictional terrorist organization. You have failed your readers if you refuse to acknowledge presenting utter falsehoods as fact.
4483
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:32:08 PM »
Relic and Coagulation and Lockout and Terminal are the first ones I think of, in that other.
4484
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:28:59 PM »
First off, allow me to take a moment to laugh at linking "Breitbart" It is pretty hilarious considering you've linked MSNBC and HuffPost innumerable times in the past.
Breitbart.com is objectively worse.
4485
« on: January 20, 2015, 11:09:39 AM »
I had some really good Sony ones a few years ago but I lost them. :/
4486
« on: January 20, 2015, 10:57:36 AM »
First off, allow me to take a moment to laugh at linking "Breitbart"
Second off, ISIS hasn't exactly made this goal elusive or hidden. Pretty sure they've flat out said this before.
Who cares about the source? It's not the source that matters
Gonna stop you right there. The source of a material always matters, because it directly impacts how the story is written, what details are used, etc. A conservative website is, most likely, going to cater to those in that party who feel we need a full scale war and elimination of these religious extremists.
Second off, ISIS can plan as much as they want - and yes, they can kill plenty of people. But to believe that they have the size and power to kill "hundreds of millions" is laughable. They are not that powerful - not at the moment.
You never fail to show your bias, Icy. Sorry I didn't pick out a liberally biased source so you wouldn't have to whine about it.
ISIS can plan, and that's dangerous. Currently they're far away from everyone else, but they're growing in strength and influence. What they do is either approved by the majority of Muslims elsewhere or just shrugged off. I can honestly see ISIS growing big enough to have a war (not just the bits of fighting in Iraq and Syria). To say they aren't a threat is absurd.
>Breitbart.com midge pls
4487
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:59:30 AM »
4488
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:25:26 AM »
reported for being too fabulous
4489
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:16:15 AM »
4490
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:07:49 AM »
yes
4491
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:32:26 AM »
tl;dr
Don't tell me about this, I really don't care. Complain to the mods about it. But as they'll tell you--just like I'm telling you--Camnator very clearly violated the rules of this board.
And since Camnator made the claims, he needs to prove them. He didn't and displayed constant logical fallacies and called me names. He tried to derail not one but two threads. Never mind that marijuana arrests and laws are completely irrelevant to this discussion.
Oh boy, I explain why what you're saying is hypocritical and wrong, then you just ignore all of it and say the same exact things again.
And to think, people still wonder why Camnator reuses the same joke insults all the time; it's because of things like this, it's mocking how you fail to respond intelligently and instead fall into repetition.
I explained everything to you. If you don't like that, then I feel sorry for you.
How are you not banned? You explained nothing other than that you don't comprehend what you're talking about.
I've done the exact opposite of everything you're accusing me of. Meanwhile, you're trying to debate a moderator decision with a normal member.
Since you clearly cannot read anything more than a paragraph, I'll be brief. I directed it at you too, I addressed topics you asked and pointed out contradictions in your argument.
I'll refer you to Rocketman's post
I'll refer you to my response to Rocketman's post.
>____> No. Just no. Goodbye. I'll let Rocket take care of this. 
4492
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:30:30 AM »
tl;dr
Don't tell me about this, I really don't care. Complain to the mods about it. But as they'll tell you--just like I'm telling you--Camnator very clearly violated the rules of this board.
And since Camnator made the claims, he needs to prove them. He didn't and displayed constant logical fallacies and called me names. He tried to derail not one but two threads. Never mind that marijuana arrests and laws are completely irrelevant to this discussion.
Oh boy, I explain why what you're saying is hypocritical and wrong, then you just ignore all of it and say the same exact things again.
And to think, people still wonder why Camnator reuses the same joke insults all the time; it's because of things like this, it's mocking how you fail to respond intelligently and instead fall into repetition.
I explained everything to you. If you don't like that, then I feel sorry for you.
How are you not banned? You explained nothing other than that you don't comprehend what you're talking about.
I've done the exact opposite of everything you're accusing me of. Meanwhile, you're trying to debate a moderator decision with a normal member.
Since you clearly cannot read anything more than a paragraph, I'll be brief. I directed it at you too, I addressed topics you asked and pointed out contradictions in your argument.
I'll refer you to Rocketman's post
4493
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:21:29 AM »
tl;dr
Don't tell me about this, I really don't care. Complain to the mods about it. But as they'll tell you--just like I'm telling you--Camnator very clearly violated the rules of this board.
And since Camnator made the claims, he needs to prove them. He didn't and displayed constant logical fallacies and called me names. He tried to derail not one but two threads. Never mind that marijuana arrests and laws are completely irrelevant to this discussion.
Oh boy, I explain why what you're saying is hypocritical and wrong, then you just ignore all of it and say the same exact things again.
And to think, people still wonder why Camnator reuses the same joke insults all the time; it's because of things like this, it's mocking how you fail to respond intelligently and instead fall into repetition.
I explained everything to you. If you don't like that, then I feel sorry for you.
How are you not banned? You explained nothing other than that you don't comprehend what you're talking about.
I've done the exact opposite of everything you're accusing me of. Meanwhile, you're trying to debate a moderator decision with a normal member.
4494
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:13:03 AM »
tl;dr
Don't tell me about this, I really don't care. Complain to the mods about it. But as they'll tell you--just like I'm telling you--Camnator very clearly violated the rules of this board.
And since Camnator made the claims, he needs to prove them. He didn't and displayed constant logical fallacies and called me names. He tried to derail not one but two threads. Never mind that marijuana arrests and laws are completely irrelevant to this discussion.
Oh boy, I explain why what you're saying is hypocritical and wrong, then you just ignore all of it and say the same exact things again.
And to think, people still wonder why Camnator reuses the same joke insults all the time; it's because of things like this, it's mocking how you fail to respond intelligently and instead fall into repetition.
I explained everything to you. If you don't like that, then I feel sorry for you.
4495
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:03:39 AM »
tl;dr
Don't tell me about this, I really don't care. Complain to the mods about it. But they'll tell you--just like I'm telling you--Camnator very clearly violated the rules of this board. And since Camnator made the claims, he needs to prove them. He didn't and displayed constant logical fallacies and called me names. He tried to derail not one but two threads. Never mind that marijuana arrests and laws are completely irrelevant to this discussion.
4496
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:58:34 PM »
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the like what how did I even make this a thing?
4497
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:54:01 PM »
Cr1TiKaL is the greatest YouTuber of All Time
4498
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:49:27 PM »
It's been known that there's no 4 player split screen for a while now.
Still thats fucking stupid, i rather play 4 spilt screen with my friends then fucking baby online.
Couch MP > Online
What do you expect from 343shit industries
I thought they were going to change there attitude, but now i see thats a mistake to be made, plus i read the 343i Halo comics, just when i thought the story of halo was going to be great, now we have the fucking moron from Spartan Ops making Halo 5 story, i really really really hope the story of Halo 5 is not shit, if it is then thats the last fucking straw i had with 343shit.
Reed writes Master Chief well. At the very least we're getting a decent character piece for Chief's side of the story.
Still, i'm not going to get my hype on Halo 5, i mean really, Eric Nylund who did Halo 4's story was great, i mean why not keep him instead of the moron from spartan ops, Eric Nylund is also making the story for Mass Effect 4, now thats the game i'm ready to get my hype on.
im not even going to get hype for ME4. after ME3 i dont think i can.
I'm trying my hardest right now. I really want another Mass Effect but only if it basically has nothing to do with the ME3 ending.
4499
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:42:52 PM »
seriously stop posting tasty looking food because i'm hungry now
4500
« on: January 19, 2015, 11:40:29 PM »
lol what i have i started?
Pages: 1 ... 148149150 151152 ... 212
|
Show Posts
