Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Anonymous (User Deleted)

Pages: 1 ... 111213 1415 ... 212
361
The Flood / Re: John Stamos has decided to run for senate
« on: March 06, 2016, 07:38:21 AM »
officer, arrest this man

362
water cooling

Note: It's a dual PSU build
you'll have a broken computer in like a day

363
The Flood / Re: Democratic Debates
« on: March 02, 2016, 08:23:55 PM »
imma help u out OP

YouTube

364
Serious / Re: *Official Sep7agon Presidential Poll*
« on: March 02, 2016, 01:07:05 PM »
"I've made a huge mistake."




keks at GOP implosion

365
The Flood / Re: Just went on a date
« on: February 29, 2016, 06:53:52 PM »
>girls


366
Serious / Re: John Oliver's Donald Trump segment
« on: February 29, 2016, 06:51:35 PM »
Disspointed he didnt mention how Sanders and Clinton are scarier than Trump.

367
The Flood / Re: HAHAHA FUCK ALL OF YOU STUPID FAGGOTS
« on: February 27, 2016, 09:05:28 PM »
this is nice thread

368
The Flood / Re: I remember why I stopped watching breaking bad
« on: February 27, 2016, 08:38:12 PM »
imo Marie was infinitely more insufferable

369
The Flood / Re: Wait, so why was Kupo blacklisted?
« on: February 27, 2016, 08:37:07 PM »
gg nice slap on the wrist despite like, this entire shitflinging thread

Spoiler


here's another PM

you do NOT have my permission to share this PM

but i'm sending you this PM anyway, because i KNOW you're gonna be dumb enough to share it
(and get yourself banned--again)

merry christmas

Reminder NOT to share the last PM I sent you.

Or this one.

Don't do it.



Firstly, by setting the conditions, you can dishonestly set the bar preposterously high to handwave any evidence brought against you, like you're doing now.
Just like you're setting the bar preposterously low to handwave any evidence brought against YOU. Like you're doing now.

What's your point.
Quote
Anyone reading this can use the search bar, or ask members on this site, specifically the staff who've cleaned up after you like LC, Psy, Yu, Icy
The last time I was banned was in May.

Fucking May. Seven fucking months ago. Almost eight.

What EXACTLY is the function of holding old shit over people's heads?
How is that fair? How is that not setting the bar preposterously low? How is that being honest?
Quote
or the folks who've been harassed by you, such as Septy and myself.
I've never harassed you, Septy, or anyone. Ever.

For someone who obviously wants to see improvements in my behavior, the type of shit you're doing is just going to make me hate you even more. Calling me an "awful person" just because I said a few mean words to you over the Internet does not help anything. It does not encourage improvement. It's not conducive to good behavior. It does not make me want to be friendly with you at all.

All it does is make me resent you, and want to be even less friendly with you.

So before you try to give me a lecture--about ANYTHING--look at yourself and see if you're even mature enough to handle that sort of thing. If you want to see progress, this is the absolute wrong way of going about it.

You're a petty child.

Grow the FUCK up.

Kupo

You didn't "win" anything. You got yourself banned after you made yourself out to look like a total asshole. More people ended up on my side than yours, and ultimately, you got smacked, and I didn't.

You proved nothing. You proved that if you poke and prod at someone enough with false accusations--someone who is known to be an "easy target" when it comes to his temper--they're going to lash out at you. That's all you proved.

Try the same experiment on anyone else. Accuse people of doing shit they haven't done, bringing up old wrongdoings, and exaggerate their true circumstances--and see if they don't get angry about it. So because I didn't react in a way that is completely out of character for me, that apparently means that I'm "fake." That it's impossible for me to be truly "nice." And that "nice Verbatim" is all just a "ruse."

Because I get angry when people ACTIVELY TRY TO MAKE ME ANGRY.

You didn't win. I didn't win, either.
We're two fucking idiots on a forum getting up in arms over stupid, petty, irrelevant bullshit.

In any case, I'm glad you're banned. Any chances of us ever patching things up are now gone.
And it's your fault. Congratulations.

Way to not take into account all of the insults doled out towards ME, you lying fucking cocksucker.

Get cancer.

370
saw this and knew I had to post it


371
This wasn't some secret or surprise - she's had the support of these delegates since (at least) early fall - Bernie Sander's youth supporters just don't understand the concept and are only now in an outrage over it.

It's not like this is some new concept to the primary.
>.> it was never relevant to me so far, back in 2012 I knew I was voting for Obama regardless. (No way in heck I'd vote for R*Money after the stuff he pulled)

I can't say I'm a fan of such blatant establishment favoritism, though. Superdelegates only exist to help the establishment, anyway.

372
All thanks to superdelegates. (AP)
Quote
The Latest: How delegate count shakes out after NH primary     
Feb. 9, 2016 11:20 PM

ESTMANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) — The Latest developments from the 2016 presidential campaign, with the focus Tuesday on the New Hampshire primary (all times local):

11:18 p.m.

Bernie Sanders will win at least 13 of the Democratic delegates in New Hampshire and Hillary Clinton will win at least nine. Two delegates haven't yet been allocated.

In the overall race for delegates, Clinton has 394, thanks in large part to endorsements from superdelegates — party officials who can support the candidate of their choice.
Sanders has 42 delegates.

It takes 2,382 delegates to win the Democratic nomination for president.

373
Serious / Re: Nearly Two Weeks Ago, I was Sexually Assaulted
« on: February 10, 2016, 11:06:32 AM »
conflating [non-consensual] inappropriate groping under the vague banner of 'sexual assault'
They are not the same... how?
Because I think we should be proportional in how we treat these crimes. Groping is quite evidently not as equally bad as tying someone down and force fucking them in the arse/vagina non-consensually, in the same way that battery is not as bad as murder despite both being morally reprehensible.
...that's why sexual assault charges aren't rape charges.
Everyone seems to conflate the two.
That's news to me.

374
Serious / Re: Nearly Two Weeks Ago, I was Sexually Assaulted
« on: February 10, 2016, 11:02:16 AM »
conflating [non-consensual] inappropriate groping under the vague banner of 'sexual assault'
They are not the same... how?
Because I think we should be proportional in how we treat these crimes. Groping is quite evidently not as equally bad as tying someone down and force fucking them in the arse/vagina non-consensually, in the same way that battery is not as bad as murder despite both being morally reprehensible.
...that's why sexual assault charges aren't rape charges.

375
Serious / Re: Nearly Two Weeks Ago, I was Sexually Assaulted
« on: February 10, 2016, 10:37:33 AM »
conflating [non-consensual] inappropriate groping under the vague banner of 'sexual assault'
They are not the same... how?

376
The Flood / Re: "Naan-Die-Oh"
« on: February 10, 2016, 08:35:57 AM »
roses are red
violets are blue
お前はもう
死んでいる

377
Serious / Re: Nearly Two Weeks Ago, I was Sexually Assaulted
« on: February 10, 2016, 08:05:09 AM »
Is that sexual assault? Sounds like the guy just groped you, no offence.

Terms of legal code here in the states, yeah. Sexual assault is generally a big umbrella term used, with more specific examples and stuff under it.
Oh right.

Well as shitty as your experience was, I don't really agree with your laws. Touching someone inappropriately is not at all comparable to full blown penis-in-the-orifice nonconsensual sex.
Luckily, that's rape, not sexual assault
Hoo boy here we go, another progressive dictionary definition meme. Epic.
Why is it unsurprising that a conservative is downplaying sexual assault?


378
The Flood / Re: Someone needs to moderate some mods and admins
« on: February 09, 2016, 10:46:39 PM »
who watches the watchmen?

379
Gaming / Re: After 5 YEARS of trying I FINALLY caught a Shiny Rayquaza
« on: February 09, 2016, 10:37:58 PM »
in all my years of Pokemon, I've never encountered a single shiny

the only ones I have are all events or non-legit (thanks CK >.>)

380
Gaming / Re: Metal Gear Solid Discussion Thread
« on: February 09, 2016, 10:20:47 PM »
bump

whatever happened to those posts with custom soundtrack suggestions or whatever?

381
Gaming / Re: Daily reminder that Cheat is STILL PLAYING DESTINY.
« on: February 09, 2016, 10:03:54 PM »
I just bought it today for $15

who's ready to help me Become Legend™?

382
The Flood / Re: TFW you get banned by Mr Psy
« on: February 09, 2016, 09:07:16 PM »
what was it?

383
Serious / Re: Hillary Clinton will win New Hampshire
« on: February 09, 2016, 08:38:08 PM »
OP got shrekt and is a liar

requesting permanent ban

384
Gaming / Re: Reminder: 1 year of Mythic Pokémon events starts tomorrow
« on: February 09, 2016, 05:29:15 PM »
Got two Mew codes earlier today, used one and saving the other for my brother just in case he needs it.

Time to SR for nature and stats >.>

385
Gaming / Re: Favorite Star Wars game?
« on: February 09, 2016, 11:23:07 AM »
Jedi Academy, Battlefront 2, and Rogue Squadron are my favorites in that order.

386
Gaming / Re: Reminder: 1 year of Mythic Pokémon events starts tomorrow
« on: February 09, 2016, 10:34:49 AM »
I think I still have the shiny Rayquaza for you since you weren't able to get it.

I've been SRing my Soul Silver for about 4 years trying to get a Shiny Rayquay and I have a question


The first time you walk into the room, your character just walks up to Ray automatically. I left the room because I need to go back and prepare, and then I went back there and saved in front of him. Does that affect my chances, or is it only in the actual battle itself that it's determined as shiny?
AFAIK it's determined in the battle in every Pokémon game.

Speaking of that particular Rayquaza in SoulSilver, I can't get it because my brother already transferred his Kyogre out of HeartGold  :'( and since the GTS shut down years ago, my chances of accomplishing that are pretty slim...

Ouch :(

Unless you have 2 DS's with HG and SS
There's a bunch of copies at the local game stores, but that would be hit-or-miss because I have no idea what's going to be on them until I play the game and check. And I'm pretty sure it only works with a Kyogre specifically from HG, so I can't just use the one I have in Emerald.

The nuclear option would be asking someone to mail me their cartridge >.>

Could just get them and start new games
Oh well yeah, there's that too. My only objection is that I have enough games on my to-do list already >.> and it'll take a while to get that far in the game. But yeah, I should probably get a copy while I can still get one easily.

387
Gaming / Re: Reminder: 1 year of Mythic Pokémon events starts tomorrow
« on: February 09, 2016, 10:31:20 AM »
I think I still have the shiny Rayquaza for you since you weren't able to get it.

I've been SRing my Soul Silver for about 4 years trying to get a Shiny Rayquay and I have a question


The first time you walk into the room, your character just walks up to Ray automatically. I left the room because I need to go back and prepare, and then I went back there and saved in front of him. Does that affect my chances, or is it only in the actual battle itself that it's determined as shiny?
AFAIK it's determined in the battle in every Pokémon game.

Speaking of that particular Rayquaza in SoulSilver, I can't get it because my brother already transferred his Kyogre out of HeartGold  :'( and since the GTS shut down years ago, my chances of accomplishing that are pretty slim...

Ouch :(

Unless you have 2 DS's with HG and SS
There's a bunch of copies at the local game stores, but that would be hit-or-miss because I have no idea what's going to be on them until I play the game and check. And I'm pretty sure it only works with a Kyogre specifically from HG, so I can't just use the one I have in Emerald.

The nuclear option would be asking someone to mail me their cartridge >.>

388
The Flood / Re: Star Wars: The Pants Awaken
« on: February 09, 2016, 10:27:48 AM »
I DO NOT FEAR THE PANTS AS YOU DO

389
Gaming / Re: Reminder: 1 year of Mythic Pokémon events starts tomorrow
« on: February 09, 2016, 10:27:00 AM »
I think I still have the shiny Rayquaza for you since you weren't able to get it.

I've been SRing my Soul Silver for about 4 years trying to get a Shiny Rayquay and I have a question


The first time you walk into the room, your character just walks up to Ray automatically. I left the room because I need to go back and prepare, and then I went back there and saved in front of him. Does that affect my chances, or is it only in the actual battle itself that it's determined as shiny?
AFAIK it's determined in the battle in every Pokémon game.

Speaking of that particular Rayquaza in SoulSilver, I can't get it because my brother already transferred his Kyogre out of HeartGold  :'( and since the GTS shut down years ago, my chances of accomplishing that are pretty slim...

390
The Flood / Re: Star Wars: The Pants Awaken
« on: February 09, 2016, 08:51:00 AM »
Only a Sith deals in pants.

Pages: 1 ... 111213 1415 ... 212