does bungie really think that many people have reached level 550 yet

if they have, what the fuck have they been doing

what level are you?

every 10 levels = 1 level from vanilla D1

I was 26 when I first did VoG

most people are 530+ doing the raid

Warden of Nothing is easily my favourite strike in the series. So much fun.

the boss fight kinda sucks tho

The Lost Sector next to the Thieves' Landing spawn is the best thing in the entire series.

Reminds me of those easter egg rooms from Halo

This DLC feels like a little more classic Bungie to me.

This game is fun.

The Godfather 3 would have been a lot better with Wynona Ryder as originally planned.

I'm getting it on PC.

Good game everyone get it on PC

Quote from: Eli on August 28, 2018, 01:12:10 PM

Pretty fucked up. Huge Human Rights violation to make any group of people repeat the Communist Party songs ad nauseum.

At this point I don't think the Chinese give a dam about human rights violation.

It was a joke.

Quote from: Eli on August 18, 2018, 06:35:14 AM

what the fuck

the fight itself is also interesting for several reasons, because the abyss is such a weirdly perfect location to have the fight—it removes all depth perception, making it so the kings look farther away than they really are (which i always thought was an interesting effect) and allows both parties to have free movement, since there's literally nothing to keep your eye on but the boss itself

having more kings spawn the longer you take to defeat them is also an interesting mechanic

i'm honestly struggling to think of what not to like about it, really, unless you just don't like tougher bosses

even the music, which tends to range from bad-to-mediocre in this game, was one of the better themes

no

ive just never once seen you use an exclamation mark before

he bought them to his own accord at complete random

anything else worthy of mention? i'd love to find some original dbz vhs tapes

It's literally the worst definition of harassment.

It's a perfectly good definition. Canada has been using it for years in courts of law.

No, it's not. First of all, Jono did not repeat his message repetetally.

Repeatedly*

If we take what Jono said as true, Jono only stated that "God is not a woman" and he did it only once. It's him voicing his perception of God, be it for joke or not, be it truth or not. There is nothing harassing about it.

He went out of his way to message the person after the fact. I'd say that's the second attempt.

Second, what Jono wrote has a useful purpose, since Jono at the very least acknowledged musician that opponent has as the name, as well as the song.

Acknowledging an artist is not a useful purpose (or a regular purpose, I don't think you know what the word means), it's the method he chose to annoy the person. The purpose was to annoy, and he did that by acknowedging the artist.

Third, if you are already picking your nickname as someone's musician name, you are automatically give people reason to react in positive or negative way.

This is what we call "victim blaming." Don't do it.

1. "God is not a woman" is also aknowledging song, so it wasn't only intended to annoy.

You can acknowledge a song with an intention to annoy. They're not mutually exclusive, and even then, the primary purpose was still to annoy the player.

2. Well, plot twist: because it's not a harassment.. And it's not my definition, it's USA law.

Yeah, because American law is supremely just and absolutely flawless.

Canada is just America, but better in everyway, and this is no exception.

Also you're not American so I don't know why you resort to that definition.

Of course, Microsoft or Bungie can define their definition of harassment, after all it's their game, but my point is that no way I would treat that as harassment, because it creates an example, a standart upon which you can ban anyone who literally just references other player name or says that God is not a woman, or not a man, or w/e.

I don't care what you would treat as harassment. You cannot ban anyone who says "god is not a woman" because context is important. If I'm having a philosophical conversation with a friend about the gender of God, I'm not going to get banned if I message him, "I conclude that God isn't a woman." However, the intention of Jono's message to Ariana Grande was to incicte some kind of negative reaction, therefore, it is harassment. End of story.

And that's why your definition of harassment is literally the worst, because anything under it can be interpreted as a harassment,

...what? How does "something that is REASONABLY ought to be known" = "anything could be harassment."

It's reasonable that Jono would know his message was going to illicit some kind of response (it was literally his intention), therefore it is harassment. This is where a thing called rule of law and context come into play.

because even my response can be taken as a provocation, an attempt to gain a moral ground over you and by your definition you can ban people just because they say something unwanted to you, which is ridiculous.

It could be taken as provocation, sure, but it is clearly not unwanted because I keep responding to you and consenting to the argument. You can only be banned for saying unwanted things to people that they obviously do not want to hear. Randomly saying something I disagree with isn't going to get you banned. Going out of your way to say something I do not want to hear when you know I don't want to hear it is harassment, and should get you banned.

If I had a username of something popular and you sent me a reference to it in a PM, I wouldn't feel harassed.

Like if I was called Master Chief and you sent me "cod is better than Halo", I would just ignore you unless I was like 12 - in which case I would report you because such a wrong statement would trigger me.

It doesn't matter if you feel harassed or not. We're not arguing whether or not the user was justified in being harassed (even though under most legal definitions, they were). We're arguing whether the comment constituted a harassment charge under the legal definition. Which it did.

Quote from: challengerX on August 01, 2018, 10:19:26 PM

I'm not offended by anything. It's just funny to me how Jono doesn't see how his unwanted and hostile message is harassment and you're white knighting for him. He's a big big boy he can reply by himself.

I'm arguing against the fact your standard of harassment is so pathetically low.

there is no standard of harassment. its harassment, by definition. "anything that is know or reasonably ought to be known to be unwanted" is harassment. end of story.

Imagine thinking that making a reference to some shitty pop song to someone obsessed about said pop singer is harassment

it is harassment.

Imagine not using discord to talk while you play games in 2018.