1981
The Flood / Re: Art Hub
« on: October 04, 2017, 01:14:43 AM »
If Kimimaro was in Shippuden:
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1982
Gaming / Re: Cuphead« on: October 04, 2017, 01:07:54 AM »The game itself is the progeny of Destiny hype. That's the point of this conversation. No, it isn't. The game came out a year before Destiny's release and was in development before Destiny was even announced. The concepts that make the two ever more similar were introduced before Destiny's mold was known, so it's impossible DE would have known what to copy. It's a coincidence. 1984
Gaming / Re: Idiot videogame logic« on: October 03, 2017, 11:44:44 PM »For a long time in Halo I would never fire my gun and just melee everything to save ammo. Damn you an XSEAN go way back huh 1985
Gaming / Re: Cuphead« on: October 03, 2017, 11:42:33 PM »But they're still making it. Jesus christ. Obviously they are making money. The argument we're having is that they're not making money via cashing in on Destiny's hype. Keep up. Let me recap for you: Jono says Warframe is a shit game that tried to cash in on the Destiny hype. I claim the game did no such thing because it would be impossible; it is a free game. You came in and said something real intelligent like, "They're making money somehow, the game wouldn't exist if they weren't." as if that's news to anyone. Noticing you don't watch Rick and Morty, and are thus of lower intelligence, I reiterate to clarify that Warframe could only cash-in on the Destiny hype if players felt obligated to spend money on Platinum, which they would only do if they were enthralled enough with the game to deem it worthy of purchase, at which point would I argue that they are no longer simply playing the game in wait for Destiny, but because they are enjoying it. You then followed up with saying that free things like Facebook make money, so clearly all free things can make their money back by simply existing. (This is, by the way, contradictory to your next brilliant response.) Unfortunately, you overlooked that Warframe contains NONE of the methods social media sites use to make money, like advertisements and sponsorships, which I point out to you. So again, if you're not spending money on Platinum, the developers aren't making money. Players who played Warframe in anticipation of Destiny did not spend money on Platinum. So, Warframe is making no money by cashing in on Destiny's hype. And finally, you respond that the developers must be making money somehow or the game would cease to exist, which is so far from the point of the argument that I felt a "Previously On" segment like this was required. All good now? 1986
The Flood / Re: Art Hub« on: October 03, 2017, 11:24:40 PM »
I need better pencil crayons... but the ones I want are hella expensive
1987
Gaming / Re: Awesome alt. Game Covers« on: October 03, 2017, 02:36:33 PM »
Jak 2 did the really cool thing where they had the game's main cover art on the front
and on the reversible side you have a map of the entire city and the outer regions which was super helpful for the directionless child I was sadly they didn't include it in the greatest hits version and dropped the idea for every other game in the future except daxter on the psp 1988
Gaming / Re: Awesome alt. Game Covers« on: October 03, 2017, 02:30:47 PM »
Second Son did a good job, though
However a "PS4" logo in the spine wouldn't have been out of line 1989
Gaming / Re: Awesome alt. Game Covers« on: October 03, 2017, 02:29:58 PM »
Sometimes game's do this thing where they have art on the inside of the cover that you can reverse but I hate it when there's no title or platform mention. Breath of the Wild does it, and the art is a million times cooler but I hate that it doesn't say "Breath of the Wild" or "nintendo Switch" anywhere on it.
That being said the default cover art isn't terrible 1990
Gaming / Re: Awesome alt. Game Covers« on: October 03, 2017, 02:26:53 PM »i actually prefer america's dark souls cover to the japanese one nahhh if you look the main character is supposed to be walking away from us, but he's holding his shield in the right hand, and he's also leaning towards us like that's the direction he's moving.it's really awkward. 1991
Gaming / Re: Awesome alt. Game Covers« on: October 03, 2017, 02:24:16 PM »Standard Cover Art: Damn that second one is so cool. 1993
Gaming / Re: Cuphead« on: October 03, 2017, 11:41:28 AM »So what you're saying is they're cashing in.You say it didn't used to be like Destiny, but as the game got older, it became more like it. You don't seem to get that they're not making money if you don't spend any. 1996
Gaming / Re: Cuphead« on: October 02, 2017, 11:13:42 PM »You say it didn't used to be like Destiny, but as the game got older, it became more like it. The two aren't linked. The similarities between Destiny and Warframe arose during the year after Warframe's release and stopped appearing after Destiny's. If anything Destiny has taken more cues from Warframe after its release. Quote Someone cashing in on something doesn't have anything to do with what the end user may or may not spend. You can't "cash in" on something if you're not making money. That's what "cashing in" means. That's why "cash" is in the sentence. Quote Facebook is free, but they're sure as shit cashing in on people's desire to broadcast themselves. The difference is Facebook makes money just by you using it thanks to ad revenue and sponsorships. Warframe doesn't make a dime unless you choose to spend money. Quote The question isn't, "Am I spending money?", it's, "Are they making money?" And if all you're doing is playing the game to satiate your desire for Destiny without spending money on Platinum (in-game currency), the answer is "No." Quote That doesn't have to be a negative accusation, so there's really no reason to get up in arms about the fact that someone is cashing in on a fad. I'm just saying the accusation is false. Destiny often gets unfavourably compared to Warframe because Warframe is the free underdog that people tend to overlook. I'd say Warframe is better because it has far more depth and it's just more fun on a fundamental level but it's also more work to stay on-top of the meta and it's less accessible. 1997
The Flood / Re: fuck sports« on: October 02, 2017, 09:29:55 PM »Hockey has to be the whitest thing of all time. well i mean white people are more prominent in northern areas whereas other sports can be played in all climates still the best sport 👌 1998
The Flood / Re: fuck sports« on: October 02, 2017, 08:59:17 PM »
Hockey is easily the best sport. It's so fucking intriquite but entertaining. There's physicality and finesse all wrapped into one.
Football can go die gg no re. Hockey > Baseball (Play) > Soccer > Basketball > Baseball (Watch) > Watching 2 coons wrestle over a tropical fruit skittles >>>>> Football 1999
Serious / Re: Shooting at Vegas, more than 50 dead.« on: October 02, 2017, 07:13:06 PM »you're too much of a pussy to pull the triggersnake liking this post makes me think he unironically wishes thatif only you were one of the victimsHillary really needs to just shut up. She's been running her mouth for a few months now and it's annoying. I mean she has a point, but the way she goes about everything is just ew. who said anything about me using a gun to kill you i'd strike you with the force of a thousand eclipses and you would disintegrate like the flake you are 2000
Serious / Re: Shooting at Vegas, more than 50 dead.« on: October 02, 2017, 06:36:41 PM »snake liking this post makes me think he unironically wishes thatif only you were one of the victimsHillary really needs to just shut up. She's been running her mouth for a few months now and it's annoying. I mean she has a point, but the way she goes about everything is just ew. if i was in a room with hitler, bin laden and you and i only had 2 bullets in my gun id fucking kill you 2001
Gaming / Re: Cuphead« on: October 02, 2017, 06:12:01 PM »Alls I sees is two similar games that are both making money, and which you've just told me one changed to emulate the other. Warframe didn't try to emulate Destiny, though. They just happen to be similar. But even if they did emulate Destiny, it's still a free-to-play game that you don't have to spend a dime on, and it does what it sets out to do better than Bungie does. So, it's still not cashing-in. 2002
Gaming / Re: Cuphead« on: October 02, 2017, 05:56:40 PM »Just because you aren't paying doesn't mean they aren't making money.They're making money somehow.Also that artstyle makes me want to throw up. It's stylised and animated well but now I know how people feel regarding Warframe.But Warframe is a shit game though that tried to cash in on the Destiny hype they only make money if you're enjoying the game via buying platinum -- something you wouldn't do if you're just waiting for destiny to be released. if you spent money on warframe during that time, i'd say the game transitioned from riding on the rails of destiny to forming its own source of interest within players. the point i'm trying to make is that warframe, especially in its early days, was so distinctly different from what it is today that it could hardly be called a destiny lookalike. today's game could be, but not 1.0 2003
The Flood / Re: Let's see them homescreens« on: October 02, 2017, 05:46:13 PM »is that class' sister no that's a dog 2004
The Flood / Re: Let's see them homescreens« on: October 02, 2017, 05:45:51 PM »If everything is pointless and you have to do something, you might as well do anything.People like personalization.seems pointlessif i used my phone, i'd have it set to whatever default it isWhy? ok 2005
The Flood / Re: Let's see them homescreens« on: October 02, 2017, 03:48:36 PM »People like personalization.seems pointlessif i used my phone, i'd have it set to whatever default it isWhy? it baffles me how after years of conversing and observing verbatim people still say stuff like this to him as if their likes make things less pointless to him 2006
The Flood / Re: RIP Tom Petty« on: October 02, 2017, 03:12:05 PM »
I guess death didn't back down.
2008
Gaming / Re: Cuphead« on: October 02, 2017, 11:23:47 AM »Why do you got to get so mad over little shit LMAOHe's just assmad that he can't draw as good as the guys who made the artAlso that artstyle makes me want to throw up. It's stylised and animated well but now I know how people feel regarding Warframe.Why do you hate it my son? im mean youre sitting here acting hostile cuz i said i didnt like what you like, bringing up how warframe is a bad game trying to piss me off and then come outta nowhere to insult what i choose to do in my free time and when i try to clarify to appease you im the one who gets labelled as mad 2009
Gaming / Re: Cuphead« on: October 02, 2017, 11:16:21 AM »The art style is like the biggest appeal of the game though lmao and it looks terrible to me ive been saying this since it was revealed idk why people have a problem with it all of a sudden the main appeal of the game is how well its animated, not its art style. the art style is actually completely unoriginal. 2010
Gaming / Re: Cuphead« on: October 02, 2017, 11:15:11 AM »They're making money somehow.Also that artstyle makes me want to throw up. It's stylised and animated well but now I know how people feel regarding Warframe.But Warframe is a shit game though that tried to cash in on the Destiny hype they cant cash in on another game's hype if its free |