Quote from: Snake on February 23, 2015, 12:30:04 PM

I don't really like the games but I wouldn't say no to a remaster (which I think in context translates to "current-gen port").

No reason to say no, that would piss off the fans for no reason.

Ftfj

Meh semantics

>working out
>Sep7

what the fuck, man?

DD is literally the coolest thing ever.

Marry her.

I don't want biological children anyway. They're likely somewhat grown up at that point, which is even better.

Oh my god that's hilarious.

Quote from: Gama I The American Pleb on February 22, 2015, 03:50:16 PM

So this person named Kinder walks up to this gay person named RC and says to this person "I'm a big guy".

Probably the closest we'll get to "gold", but it was predictable.

Quote from: Snake on February 22, 2015, 09:22:40 AM

Quote from: SecondClass on February 22, 2015, 04:51:03 AM

The real SecondClass

You joking about it doesn't make it seem like any less of a possibility.

I'm onto you.

Spoiler

Seriously, though, just PM my Bnet main if you're that concerned about it.

Nevermind. I can't find the correct link.

ye but I don't have a special title or anything.

Why not?

Personally, I find other forms of cookware to be much more attractive. I mean, come on. Pots vs. pans? Pots, no question.

Yes.

Quote from: Sandtrap on February 22, 2015, 10:06:15 AM

Quote from: Numb Digger on February 22, 2015, 09:57:18 AM

Quote from: Sandtrap on February 22, 2015, 09:51:23 AM

You know, I'm really glad that my math teacher seriously fucked around with my concept of mathematical symbols because the only fucking sign I understand in there is "equal," alongside a loose vague idea of sex symbols.

And since being equal is a delusion I'd wager this is some feminist tier shit propaganda or it's Dustin talking about special snowflake syndrome.

It's saying men are superior to females.

Well I guess if that was true then men would be able to grow a miniature replica of our species inside of us and then proceed to nuture it for about 9 months and then shoot it out like a football all while cursing like a sailor and ripping apart the first object that comes into contact with our hands even if it's the docs nuts.

Oh heyo. We don't. Certainly not superior. Just different is all.

No, it's true. Even the feminists admit it.

Holy shit I'm using that.

Also just a side bar about one of your comments, the catholic church recognizes evolution and the Big Bang as real

I think it's just evolution, not the Big Bang. But I could be wrong.

But if you think about it, evolution contradicts Adam and Eve. Since we know evolution occurs, Adam and Eve is one of two things: non-literal or false. If the Catholic Church was to claim it was false (didn't happen), they would be rejecting the whole point of Jesus Christ: correcting the sins caused by man.

So, of course, they say it's non-literal. Which again, rejects the whole point of Jesus Christ.

Evolution and Judaic-based religions cannot coexist. End of story.

[We're derailing the thread, I just wanted to clarify my point.]

Quote from: Snake on February 22, 2015, 02:30:39 AM

Quote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 02:25:30 AM

Quote from: Snake on February 22, 2015, 02:21:57 AM

Quote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 02:09:24 AM

Lol my girlfriend was super hardcore religious when we met, head of the fellowship of Christian athletes, went to church on Sunday's, was afraid of going to hell for shit like sex, didn't believe in evolution...

After 3 years of dating me she's now skeptically agnostic


to me the only things that are non negotiable are
1) physical attraction: a relationship just won't work if you think they're ugly
2)non-sexual emotion attraction: you should want to be around the person. Talk to them, learn about them, connect with them and not just want to bang them
3)willingness to compromise, this is a must for both people

Those are pretty generic, eh..?

The reason I put stuff like religious philosophy and such is because if the partner's have conflicting ideologies than it creates a negative atmosphere for raising children, which I view to be the most important part of being in a marriage. That sort of thing should be hammered out beforehand.

well that was kinda the point. I don't think there's a set of criteria for s relationship. If you have the 3 things I said you'll be okay.  What if you meet the love of your life only to find out she's allegic to dogs? You just gunna dump her for one thing she has no control over?

The dog shit was just to fit the 3 limit. Besides, you can love dogs without having one. Obviously if I meet the love of my life, a dog won't come between us. Unless I already have a dog, then it's just not in the cards.

But the other two? Yeah, those would be deal breakers.

Quote

Also

Quote

eh?

So Canada

I had to edit this part out because it made absolutely no sense. It's late.

But in all honesty, I hear a lot of international people use "eh" the way Canadians stereotypically do.

I was just messing with ya, I actually hear Americans from the north use eh way more than I've ever heard Canadians use it, but I only know like... 5 Canadians



But back on topic, what if she was religious but didn't try to push her beliefs on you or your theoretical kids? Like she believed in God, maybe said a quick prayer before meals, occasionally went to church, but didn't try to push that on you?

Yeah, I knew you were joking. I just didn't have a clever response at 5 AM in the morning lol.

But on-topic...
It goes deeper than that, though. A lot of my views on life are extremely non-religious, and I just don't see a religious person holding those views. Things like anti-natalism or evolution really change how you see the world.

I mean, if by the slightest chance a potential (for example) Christian female subscribed to evolution, and said that Genesis wasn't literal, that would make her an idiot, and I wouldn't be attracted to her. She allows the Bible to dictate her life but she doesn't take the entire religion's catalyst literally? That makes no sense.

It's not so much "Oh, you're religious? I don't like you." that's the problem. It's that being religious by default, is typically an indication to a lack of intelligence or critical-thinking.

I'm not saying that all religious people = idiots, obviously. Turkey and Goji are both far smarter than I and they're religious. But the chances that a teenage girl can defend her beliefs as well as experienced, nerdy male keyboard warriors like the two I just brought up are slim to none. Not to mention, the chances that I'm attracted to girls in general to the point of considering a relationship are slim to none.


In conclusion:

It's not that I don't let myself get involved romantically with religious people, it's that I don't want to. Being religious is inherently unattractive to me.

"The Boss."

You know, I've only ever played Metal Gear Solid 1, but can we just agree that Hideo Kojima sucks at naming characters?

Yeh.

Hot Coldmann.
Tom Oh, whose codename happens to be Major Zero.


Although, to be fair, The Boss's actual name is "The Joy", which fits in perfectly with her team, most of which are named after emotions (except for The Pain and The End, for some reason.)

The Boss's only called "The Boss" because Snake needed to surpass her to become Big Boss, which is another poor name.

Quote from: Snake on February 22, 2015, 02:33:43 AM

I love how careful you were in the wording of your OP.

Can't have people thinking you pre-order, now can you?

Someone's still upset.

I didn't word anything carefully. I said what I said because there's other games to get that are higher on my list.

>being this Lemon

Stay Lemon, Lemon.