This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Azumarill
Pages: 1 ... 212223 2425 ... 255
661
« on: January 16, 2017, 04:02:22 PM »
shouts outs to baccano OP
662
« on: January 16, 2017, 03:55:35 PM »
Don't fall for the Jojo memes, that anime will turn you gay. (speaking from experience)
 confirmed joseph turned me gay too
663
« on: January 16, 2017, 03:39:39 PM »
I'm seconding the suggestions of Black Lagoon and Baccano and I'll throw Cowboy Bebop in there as it's great for beginners
Black Lagoon is about pirates in the South China Sea in the late 90s/early 2000s. It's kind of like the anime equivalent of a Tarantino film, there's lots of gun porn and foul mouthed ruffian characters with a bit of nihilism and cultural criticism thrown in.
Baccano is about a group of immortals/people who come into contact with these immortals in early 20th century America. The anime version has that Pulp Fiction style narrative where scenes don't appear in the order they actually happen within the timeline.
Cowboy Bebop is about a crew of bounty hunters who travel around the Milky Way in the future. It deals with themes of existential ennui & nihilism, among others. It's got a great bluesy/jazzy soundtrack (so does Baccano but Yoko Kanno just added a special something to Cowboy Bebop) and some great fight choreography. Lots of cool gun-fu.
Also that show Hunter x Hunter is REALLY good but it's pretty long so I wouldn't recommend it for someone who's just trying to test the waters of chinese childrens' cartoons.
664
« on: January 16, 2017, 12:15:21 AM »
What about Inuyasha?
I unironically used to watch this in my youth
I know
as far as shounen goes inuyasha isnt terrible. plot aside ive always thought rumiko takahashi came up with some really great designs (sesshomaru being my go-to example)
665
« on: January 15, 2017, 11:22:25 PM »
dont worry itll make you hate it soon enough
666
« on: January 15, 2017, 11:17:34 PM »
jesus fucking christ ITS BROKEN
667
« on: January 15, 2017, 11:14:19 PM »
Death to Capeshit! The Western will rise again!
We can live in hope, but westerns without wayne and eastwood would be a shadow of their former selves.
3:10 to Yuma was excellent
it's been snce 2007 since we've had a real good western
668
« on: January 15, 2017, 10:54:16 PM »
Reminds me of that one Wachowski brother that transitioned to a girl and then went lesbian lol
I thought both of them did.
they've both transitioned but i'm not sure about both of them being lesbians
669
« on: January 15, 2017, 10:04:23 PM »
Basically if the idea of having a female body gives you a boner, you're AGP.
it doesnt give me a boner
670
« on: January 15, 2017, 09:56:07 PM »
why would you want to transition into a girl if you're not one mentally?
i dont/never have had feelings of gender/sexual dysphoria but if you took me to a doctors office tomorrow and told me that i had the option to upload my consciousness to a cyborg body id choose a feminine model. the "why" of it isnt entirely clear to me though
You wanna flick that bean don'tcha
honestly not really
671
« on: January 15, 2017, 09:50:12 PM »
why would you want to transition into a girl if you're not one mentally?
i dont/never have had feelings of gender/sexual dysphoria but if you took me to a doctors office tomorrow and told me that i had the option to upload my consciousness to a cyborg body id choose a feminine model. the "why" of it isnt entirely clear to me though
672
« on: January 15, 2017, 08:35:26 PM »
edit: you know what fuck it im not gonna bother
673
« on: January 11, 2017, 07:07:48 PM »
all 60 of mine
674
« on: January 11, 2017, 06:47:33 PM »
I'll give you the tapping his foot thing but you can fuck all the way off if you're bothered by someone clearing their throat in a bathroom.
Unless what Das says is true, and now that I think about it that does seem pretty suspect..
675
« on: January 10, 2017, 08:33:20 PM »
So... fake news can come from multiple intelligence agencies, but we should totes trust random sites posting stories on FaceBook?
Got it.
honestly i dont care if all this turns out to be fake the concept of trump hating the obamas so much that he hires hookers to piss on a bed they slept in is beyond hilarious and will make it all #worth
676
« on: January 10, 2017, 08:23:46 PM »
batman with prep, jackie without prep
677
« on: January 10, 2017, 08:15:43 PM »
678
« on: January 10, 2017, 08:10:39 PM »
that apology really is sincere, by the by. im willing to admit mistakes, but i maintain that you have been overreacting to a minor sleight.
679
« on: January 10, 2017, 08:08:35 PM »
ah fuck you and your edits gringo
shrugs
680
« on: January 10, 2017, 08:04:39 PM »
i sincerely apologize for the sleights i made.
681
« on: January 10, 2017, 07:59:52 PM »
worth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guys
Because my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post.
You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point.
The two aren't comparable.
oh no its the end of the world
Me explaining to you why you're an idiot does not mean I think it's a big deal.
You're making something of a habit of stupidity. I'd advise against it.
i didnt originally respond to the second part of your post because i dont consider the point you made to be invalid. they dont need martyrs to motivate them, but that's not what i was saying- the idea is that a cause can be made stronger with a martyr, even if the change is subtle. if you dont consider that to be a big enough issue to waive the death penalty, so be it. im not trying to evangelize my belief that he should be kept alive and made to labor. i didnt come in here looking to argue with people over whether we should kill this piece of shit or make him work.
chally nitpicking the way i responded to you was unnecessary and the two of you are really acting quite petty. fuck you too pal.
You don't want to argue yet you come in here with your snarky tone and condescend to us.
Be respectful and I'm more than happy to have a civil discussion with you about this subject and any other.
im being condescending and snarky in this thread? thats an interesting appraisal of the situation.
Reread the thread
ok i snarked to you a bit after your petty ass post. wow. how damning.
If you read from the beginning, you cut Meta's posts knowing you're basically ignoring his rebuttal to your statement then drawing a little arrow pointing to yourself. You're being snarky. Then you continued to be condescending with the rest of your replies.
What's funny is that you're surprised at our reactions and that you think we are the ones behaving that way. Honestly, you're projecting.
sigh refer to my response to meta.
682
« on: January 10, 2017, 07:59:30 PM »
i humored you
Why should I offer you anything given how you've been nothing but a condescending twat since you first replied?
You made a point about him being a martyr, I then challenged it and instead of saying "I don't disagree, I just don't think it's worth killing him" you gave me a non-response trying to feign some kind of disagreement. Challenger pointed out how you utterly ignored my argument, then you were like LOL GUYS META FUCKING IGNORED HALF OF MY POST TOO when your point about the 13th Amendment was an explicit follow on from the point about martyrdom. . .
I mean, what the fuck conversation are you reading? Because it's not the one I'm reading.
you asked who cared about him being a martyr and i put an arrow that pointed to me. that's all there is to that post. ive already addressed why i omitted the second part. the hostility is stifling proper communication. you're getting too worked up over this.
683
« on: January 10, 2017, 07:54:08 PM »
worth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guys
Because my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post.
You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point.
The two aren't comparable.
oh no its the end of the world
Me explaining to you why you're an idiot does not mean I think it's a big deal.
You're making something of a habit of stupidity. I'd advise against it.
i didnt originally respond to the second part of your post because i dont consider the point you made to be invalid. they dont need martyrs to motivate them, but that's not what i was saying- the idea is that a cause can be made stronger with a martyr, even if the change is subtle. if you dont consider that to be a big enough issue to waive the death penalty, so be it. im not trying to evangelize my belief that he should be kept alive and made to labor. i didnt come in here looking to argue with people over whether we should kill this piece of shit or make him work.
chally nitpicking the way i responded to you was unnecessary and the two of you are really acting quite petty. fuck you too pal.
You don't want to argue yet you come in here with your snarky tone and condescend to us.
Be respectful and I'm more than happy to have a civil discussion with you about this subject and any other.
im being condescending and snarky in this thread? thats an interesting appraisal of the situation.
Reread the thread
ok i snarked to you a bit after your petty ass post. wow. how damning.
684
« on: January 10, 2017, 07:51:54 PM »
worth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guys
Because my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post.
You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point.
The two aren't comparable.
oh no its the end of the world
Me explaining to you why you're an idiot does not mean I think it's a big deal.
You're making something of a habit of stupidity. I'd advise against it.
i didnt originally respond to the second part of your post because i dont consider the point you made to be invalid. they dont need martyrs to motivate them, but that's not what i was saying- the idea is that a cause can be made stronger with a martyr, even if the change is subtle. if you dont consider that to be a big enough issue to waive the death penalty, so be it. im not trying to evangelize my belief that he should be kept alive and made to labor. i didnt come in here looking to argue with people over whether we should kill this piece of shit or make him work.
chally nitpicking the way i responded to you was unnecessary and the two of you are really acting quite petty. fuck you too pal.
You don't want to argue yet you come in here with your snarky tone and condescend to us.
Be respectful and I'm more than happy to have a civil discussion with you about this subject and any other.
im being condescending and snarky in this thread? thats an interesting appraisal of the situation.
685
« on: January 10, 2017, 07:49:50 PM »
the two of you are really acting quite petty.
You thought it was "worth mentioning" that I liked one of his posts because he pointed out how you ignored my point in favour of answering a question that was obviously rhetorical. I then explained this to you.
I'm not the petty one here, mate.
id be more willing to entertain this rebuttal if you had responded to the rest of my post. i humored you and gave a full explanation of my stance with regard to the thread subject and my original post and im met with this- funny.
686
« on: January 10, 2017, 07:44:00 PM »
worth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guys
Because my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post.
You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point.
The two aren't comparable.
oh no its the end of the world
Me explaining to you why you're an idiot does not mean I think it's a big deal.
You're making something of a habit of stupidity. I'd advise against it.
i didnt originally respond to the second part of your post because i dont consider the point you made to be invalid. they dont need martyrs to motivate them, but that's not what i was saying- the idea is that a cause can be made stronger with a martyr, even if the change is subtle. if you dont consider that to be a big enough issue to waive the death penalty, so be it. im not trying to evangelize my belief that he should be kept alive and made to labor. i didnt come in here looking to argue with people over whether we should kill this piece of shit or make him work. chally nitpicking the way i responded to you was unnecessary and the two of you are really acting quite petty. fuck you too pal.
687
« on: January 10, 2017, 07:28:38 PM »
worth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guys
Because my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post.
You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point.
The two aren't comparable.
oh no its the end of the world
688
« on: January 10, 2017, 07:03:35 PM »
worth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guys
689
« on: January 10, 2017, 06:58:53 PM »
Shouldn't have given him and his ilk the satisfaction of his becoming a martyr.
Who cares?
<—
Nothing like cutting out chunks of people's posts to make it look like you have a good rebuttal.
What you do is the equivalent of cutting people off mid sentence and yelling over them. Congratulations, you have no manners.
NaCl im actually a perfect southern gentleman thank you very much =]
690
« on: January 10, 2017, 06:18:53 PM »
truly one of the wildest elections in american history
Pages: 1 ... 212223 2425 ... 255
|
Show Posts
