Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Azumarill

Pages: 1 ... 626364 6566 ... 255
1891
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:58:55 PM »
I've never understood how someone can develop such a taste for alcohol that any sort of hard liquor tastes good to them, even in mixed drinks. All alcoholic beverages are worse to me than a non-alcoholic counterpart with roughly the same ingredients. Getting drunk is a bad idea, but I wouldn't be so against doing it to myself if the process of getting drunk didn't involve drinking something that tastes like melted rubber and kerosene.
depends on the liquor. ive had some frozen mixed drinks that taste like HEAVEN, and ive had framboise that tastes better than most sodas ive had.

1892
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:35:42 PM »
Quote
I think a fine is enough punishment.
Whatever. I'd rather rip their limbs off and feed them to dogs, but you know, whatever works.
Dude, seriously, what the fuck is going on with you? Shit like this makes me feel like the people around you are in danger. If it were Loaf saying this it would be different, but you tend to mean what you say- get help, please, before you hurt someone.
LOL Fuck off dude. Calm down.
Tell me why I shouldn't be concerned about this, please.

1893
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:32:33 PM »
Quote
I think a fine is enough punishment.
Whatever. I'd rather rip their limbs off and feed them to dogs, but you know, whatever works.
Dude, seriously, what the fuck is going on with you? Shit like this makes me feel like the people around you are in danger. If it were Loaf saying this it would be different, but you tend to mean what you say- get help, please, before you hurt someone.

1894
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:23:25 PM »
To which one might counter- Do you really need a high capacity thirty-shot assault bottle?
SHALL
NOT
BE
INFRINGED
no personal attacks in serious, but shitposting like this is OK

 :o

1895
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:19:03 PM »
They're not harming you or anyone else. You get unhappy all by yourself.
Because it's.. factually stupid
how many times do we have to tell you that this isnt true before you get it through your thick skull that your personal feelings dont equate to objective truth?
How many times do I have to tell you that saying this doesn't demonstrate that what I'm saying isn't the objective truth?

Prove me the fuck wrong.
the burden of proof is on you because you made the original assertion of objective reality.

1896
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:12:54 PM »
They're not harming you or anyone else. You get unhappy all by yourself.
Because it's.. factually stupid
how many times do we have to tell you that this isnt true before you get it through your thick skull that your personal feelings dont equate to objective truth?

1897
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 04:01:46 PM »
my god, dude. stop trying to tell other people that we're supposed to live in misery. life already sucks enough, so fucking what if i want to get trashed and forget my woes every once in a while?
You'll forget them--and then you'll remember them.

How about doing something that will actually ameliorate your woes in some way?

Instead of slowly killing yourself?
im slowly dying, period. i get drunk once every few months. its hardly going to become a major cause of illness for me. im much more likely to become ill due to cancer or all the horrible processed/sugar laden food ive eaten for my entire life, or killed in a car accident.

getting drunk, or getting high off pot (which i do much more often), makes me feel better in the moment, because the now is what really matters to me. if i am able to relieve my stress, even momentarily, then it feels good. my time on this earth is fleeting and ultimately meaningless; id like to do things that make me feel good instead of wallowing in my own existential misery and telling other people that they should do the same.

1898
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 03:57:38 PM »
The drinking age should always reflect the age of majority. There is nothing inherently wrong with drinking responsibly. Getting dangerously intoxicated as verb is implying is obviously bad, but it's not the norm that he seems to believe it is.
well, it depends on the circle you travel in. fraternity/sorority culture is usually pretty supportive of dangerous binge drinking for example.


and this isnt directly related to the above, but just so we have a handy source for future reference:

http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/alcohol-facts-and-statistics

Quote
Adults (ages 18+): 16.6 million adults ages 18 and older3 (7.0 percent of this age group4) had an AUD in 2013. This includes 10.8 million men3 (9.4 percent of men in this age group4) and 5.8 million women3 (4.7 percent of women in this age group4).

Quote
Youth (ages 12–17): In 2013 an estimated 697,000 adolescents ages 12–176 (2.8 percent of this age group7) had an AUD. This number includes 385,000 females6 (3.2 percent of females in this age group7) and 311,000 males6 (2.5 percent of males in this age group7).

Quote
Nearly 88,0009 people (approximately 62,000 men and 26,000 women10) die from alcohol-related causes annually, making it the third leading preventable cause of death in the United States.9

1899
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 03:53:22 PM »
Because it causes happiness, which isn't stupid.
LOL

Happiness is practically the definition of stupidity.

If you're happy, you're probably doing something wrong.
my god, dude. stop trying to tell other people that we're supposed to live in misery. life already sucks enough, so fucking what if i want to get trashed and forget my woes every once in a while?

1900
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 03:32:26 PM »
not getting into this. ive learned my lesson when it comes to arguing about this stuff. and id probably get warned/banned if i said what i really wanted to say.
You obviously lack conviction, then.
and you look cute today.

1901
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 03:28:33 PM »


Paging Dr. House...
not getting into this. ive learned my lesson when it comes to arguing about this stuff. and id probably get warned/banned if i said what i really wanted to say.

1902
The Flood / Re: You are, all of you, Kiddos
« on: January 19, 2016, 02:50:05 PM »
what a horrible shitpost.

1903
Gaming / Re: Strategic Butt Coverings - Tropes vs Women in Video Games
« on: January 19, 2016, 02:48:59 PM »
>dragons reducing themselves to human form so casuals can fap to them


reeeee
i dont mind ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

1904
But that doesn't mean she's going to stop making videos.

Quote
That's a shame.

1905
Bleh

I go to the coal region too often to take anyone who mentions white privilege seriously.

Aren't the Appalachians like a third world country in terms of poverty rates and standard of living?
Yes. They're also the single most discriminated-against group in the country.
[citation needed]
Yes, because a media source is going to report something so awkward to say as "Appalachians discriminated against". In fact, a sociologist would look into it so there's something to report, too.
"i dont have a source"
"I'm too lazy to look into it myself and I demand you back up everything you say with media. Unless the media source has an agenda counter to my own, in which case I will discount it anyway"

How about no. One only needs to look into the pop-culture perception of poor southerners, and Appalachians in particular, to understand this. They're literally the only group you can make fun of without being targeted by the PC crowd.
i do not deny that poor southerners, especially "hillbillies" in the appalachians, are culturally discriminated against- as a southerner with family in the appalachians, and having worked volunteer duties for poor families in the appalachians, ive experienced this firsthand.

you made an assertion, its not unreasonable for me to ask that you provide a citation. burden of proof is on you when you say something like "the single most discriminated-against group in the country." so dont get all asshurt at me when i ask you to put up or shut up kiddo.

1906
Bleh

I go to the coal region too often to take anyone who mentions white privilege seriously.

Aren't the Appalachians like a third world country in terms of poverty rates and standard of living?
Yes. They're also the single most discriminated-against group in the country.
[citation needed]
Yes, because a media source is going to report something so awkward to say as "Appalachians discriminated against". In fact, a sociologist would look into it so there's something to report, too.
"i dont have a source"

1907
Bleh

I go to the coal region too often to take anyone who mentions white privilege seriously.

Aren't the Appalachians like a third world country in terms of poverty rates and standard of living?
Yes. They're also the single most discriminated-against group in the country.
[citation needed]

1908
Gaming / Re: Strategic Butt Coverings - Tropes vs Women in Video Games
« on: January 19, 2016, 02:09:12 PM »
I never got the less armour = better stats thing some games seem to have. All less armour would do is make you more mobile, not give you better damage protection.

I never really got Skyrim's female model for the Steel Plate armour, either.


Boob armour is the shittiest thing. Armor doesn't have to be realistic to a T, but damn at least try to make me believe that it makes sense.

Well there's suspension of disbelief for something that looks cool like other high-tier armours on skyrim,then there's just total bullshit

Kind of like how some Halo 3 and Reach spartan armours weren't the most practical but there was a suspension of disbelief, but Halo 4 and 5 are utterly ridiculous in their designs.
Even then, I'm a bit ehhh about it. If I'm a warrior in TES and wearing demonic armour, I want to be a badass knight of D A R K N E S S, not a discarded playboy photoshoot.

That's what I meant with suspension of disbelief. Spikes on armour is worse than useless, but I can generally suspend that because evil demons and setting.
Ah, I thought you were talking about like "+5 mystical bra of protection" kinds of high-leveled items. There's a definite line between fantastical and fap-bait.


this cloth robe in wow is pretty much exactly that
Yeah, fuck that. I can deal with the "armour hinders magic" mentality, but fuck sexstats.


if it makes you feel any better it looks fucking hilarious on male models
I mean, if it was just sleeveless like that male model then I wouldn't mind. It's all the extra lack-of-covering that's retarded about it.

Sexy has a certain place in the world; armor isn't one of them.
meh wow has a habit of doing that with females



> this is alexstrasza, the life-binder, dragon guardian of life on azeroth in her humanoid form

1909
Gaming / Re: Strategic Butt Coverings - Tropes vs Women in Video Games
« on: January 19, 2016, 02:05:01 PM »
I never got the less armour = better stats thing some games seem to have. All less armour would do is make you more mobile, not give you better damage protection.

I never really got Skyrim's female model for the Steel Plate armour, either.


Boob armour is the shittiest thing. Armor doesn't have to be realistic to a T, but damn at least try to make me believe that it makes sense.

Well there's suspension of disbelief for something that looks cool like other high-tier armours on skyrim,then there's just total bullshit

Kind of like how some Halo 3 and Reach spartan armours weren't the most practical but there was a suspension of disbelief, but Halo 4 and 5 are utterly ridiculous in their designs.
Even then, I'm a bit ehhh about it. If I'm a warrior in TES and wearing demonic armour, I want to be a badass knight of D A R K N E S S, not a discarded playboy photoshoot.

That's what I meant with suspension of disbelief. Spikes on armour is worse than useless, but I can generally suspend that because evil demons and setting.
Ah, I thought you were talking about like "+5 mystical bra of protection" kinds of high-leveled items. There's a definite line between fantastical and fap-bait.


this cloth robe in wow is pretty much exactly that
Yeah, fuck that. I can deal with the "armour hinders magic" mentality, but fuck sexstats.


if it makes you feel any better it looks fucking hilarious on male models

1910
Gaming / Re: Strategic Butt Coverings - Tropes vs Women in Video Games
« on: January 19, 2016, 02:02:16 PM »
I never got the less armour = better stats thing some games seem to have. All less armour would do is make you more mobile, not give you better damage protection.

I never really got Skyrim's female model for the Steel Plate armour, either.


Boob armour is the shittiest thing. Armor doesn't have to be realistic to a T, but damn at least try to make me believe that it makes sense.

Well there's suspension of disbelief for something that looks cool like other high-tier armours on skyrim,then there's just total bullshit

Kind of like how some Halo 3 and Reach spartan armours weren't the most practical but there was a suspension of disbelief, but Halo 4 and 5 are utterly ridiculous in their designs.
Even then, I'm a bit ehhh about it. If I'm a warrior in TES and wearing demonic armour, I want to be a badass knight of D A R K N E S S, not a discarded playboy photoshoot.

That's what I meant with suspension of disbelief. Spikes on armour is worse than useless, but I can generally suspend that because evil demons and setting.
Ah, I thought you were talking about like "+5 mystical bra of protection" kinds of high-leveled items. There's a definite line between fantastical and fap-bait.


this cloth robe in wow is pretty much exactly that

1911
Gaming / Re: Strategic Butt Coverings - Tropes vs Women in Video Games
« on: January 19, 2016, 01:56:00 PM »
I never got the less armour = better stats thing some games seem to have. All less armour would do is make you more mobile, not give you better damage protection.

I never really got Skyrim's female model for the Steel Plate armour, either.


at least the daedric armor made sense



i think the standard steel armor (and the iron/banded armors) looked pretty normal too

Spikes never did it for me. It looks like something a 12 year old draws in the back of a schoolbook to me. Utterly impractical, but that's where the whole suspension of disbelief thing cones in.

I was very much a plain armour guy, guve me hide, leather, steel and iron any day over over-designed stuff. Well, the elven stuff looked cool, too. A focus on aesthetics but wasn't over-the-top ridiculous.
i only liked it because it had a cool color scheme and just so happened to be the best heavy armor in the game tbh, but at least it doesnt have spiky boobies

1912
Gaming / Re: Strategic Butt Coverings - Tropes vs Women in Video Games
« on: January 19, 2016, 01:42:44 PM »
I never got the less armour = better stats thing some games seem to have. All less armour would do is make you more mobile, not give you better damage protection.

I never really got Skyrim's female model for the Steel Plate armour, either.


at least the daedric armor made sense



i think the standard steel armor (and the iron/banded armors) looked pretty normal too

1913
Serious / Re: Batshit insane liquor laws
« on: January 19, 2016, 01:32:22 PM »
Not high enough, tbh.

Excise taxes should be raised, like, 2000%.

Just tax drinkers and smokers into oblivion.
Yeah, this definitely won't create a black market and make criminals rich resulting in a huge increase in violence across the country.
Yeah but fuck people who drink.

100,000,000,000% excise tax now.

Why exactly do you hate alcohol so much? Did you have some awful experience with it that caused you to become a militant teetotaler?
its one of those things he just wont back down on, better to leave it honestly. hes very unreasonable when it comes to people choosing not to be sober.

1914
Gaming / Re: Who was watching the Halo 5 online qualifiers?
« on: January 19, 2016, 11:21:31 AM »
I'm sure it was a very exciting match filled with lots of memorable moments from the amazing Halo 5 game.
h5 is really really solid for competitive gaming actually.

1915
The Flood / Re: Has anyone spoken unironically in public?
« on: January 18, 2016, 02:29:19 PM »
you're almost as bad as loaf. please fuck off forever.

Good use of irony but I'm looking for unirony, try readin the OP again so you understand what I mean

1916
The Flood / Re: Has anyone spoken unironically in public?
« on: January 18, 2016, 02:16:55 PM »
you're almost as bad as loaf. please fuck off forever.

1917
Serious / Re: Oh hey, there's a debate on
« on: January 17, 2016, 09:57:40 PM »
O'malley isn't getting a lot of time
i guess it reflects his poll numbers

1918
Serious / Re: Oh hey, there's a debate on
« on: January 17, 2016, 08:49:33 PM »
I kinda like o'malley in a "I'd settle for this guy over the Ruse Cruz" sort of way.
i like him better than anyone else in the race at the moment. its unfortunate that his poll numbers are so pathetic.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html

1919
The Flood / Re: I have a lot of respect for school shooters
« on: January 17, 2016, 08:29:35 PM »
I love how people are actually taking this seriously
im not taking the OP seriously, i just think loaf is a complete and total waste of space, absolutely worthless, and should kill himself

Now that's harsh man.
i dont care. he's fucking awful. i cant believe others actually tolerate him and i sincerely believe that he is a worthless piece of human trash.

He is fairly awful there's no denying that. I personally find him to be amusing so he doesn't really bother me too much. Other than his awful shitposting what else is there to really loathe about him?
theres nothing to like about him; thats my point. he exists solely to act as a terrible internet troll. theres nothing amusing about this situation in my mind. i view people like him with nothing but scorn; i cant even pity someone who refuses to speak in a lucid, intelligent manner, someone who has the mental capacity to contribute to a conversation but actively chooses to shit all over any semblance of decorum.

1920
The Flood / Re: I have a lot of respect for school shooters
« on: January 17, 2016, 08:16:28 PM »
I love how people are actually taking this seriously
im not taking the OP seriously, i just think loaf is a complete and total waste of space, absolutely worthless, and should kill himself

Now that's harsh man.
i dont care. he's fucking awful. i cant believe others actually tolerate him and i sincerely believe that he is a worthless piece of human trash.

Pages: 1 ... 626364 6566 ... 255