Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Azumarill

Pages: 1 ... 515253 5455 ... 255
1561
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 06:44:09 PM »
It's not a Halo thread until Azu finds an excuse to flop his dick out on the table.
It's not a Halo thread until some halftard posts something patently wrong about the games. I just don't like when people spread bad information is all, and it so happens that a lot of the people on this forum who post about Halo are thumbless morons. All I'm doing is giving people a reality check =]

1562
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 06:33:56 PM »
Quote
Reach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplay
i disagree
Quote
that offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned,

Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different.
what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?

Quote
There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything.

False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.
*Sigh*  Invasion is literally the only mode where you can choose your loadout. You spent way too much time in customs. Paradiso was an awesome, map. It was vehicle focused map. Spire offered many types of engagements.
I could easily beat you.
Invasion was not the only loadout playlist, what the fuck are you talking about? I almost never played custom games. Those maps were fucking garbage.

And, just for the record.

Your Reach page on HTR.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=dbd%20halo%20legend

And here's mine.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=oh%20typhlosion

Notice a difference? I do. You're terrible.
did you just stat check someone for a forum argument in the year of our lord 2010+3x2

wew
Problem? He's bad and I can prove it with math. It's relevant to OP, too, since it's quite obvious that he doesn't really understand the game. Bad player, bad review.

1563
Also, what oath was broken?
well, all the watchmen who killed jon were oathbreakers. so is arya in a sense, since she was finishing her penance for breaking her oath to the FM/many faced god last season.

1564
The Flood / Re: Game of Thrones just FUCKING CONFIRMED it!!!
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:40:25 PM »
Cleganebowl already happened, in book/season 1. It won't be happening ever again because it's thematically inappropriate (that might and probably wont stop DnD but Game of Thrones isnt canon anyway). Fuck cleganebowl and fuck all the get hype sheep.

1565
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:33:03 PM »
Quote
Reach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplay
i disagree
Quote
that offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned,

Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different.
what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?

Quote
There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything.

False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.
*Sigh*  Invasion is literally the only mode where you can choose your loadout. You spent way too much time in customs. Paradiso was an awesome, map. It was vehicle focused map. Spire offered many types of engagements.
I could easily beat you.
Invasion was not the only loadout playlist, what the fuck are you talking about? I almost never played custom games. Those maps were fucking garbage.

And, just for the record.

Your Reach page on HTR.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=dbd%20halo%20legend

And here's mine.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=oh%20typhlosion

Notice a difference? I do. You're terrible.
Gotta love how you can't name any of these "other playlists" with loadouts. Stats don't mean shit. Boost grifball all you want. I am better than you.
Super slayer, fiesta, for two. Idk why you're so latched onto this. Having loadouts period, even "just" the armor abilities, was a huge step away from classic Halo arena-style gameplay. Stats do mean something. In my experience, the people who say they don't tend to be very bad. I never played Grifball. If you actually bothered to look you'd see that my winrates in Team Objective, Big Team Battle, Squad/Team/Super slayer are all above 85%. I've got a high skill 50 on HTR and you're not even high skill 40. Your KDA is garbage and mine is good. AND you have 10 more days played than me. What's that say? I earned my stats by roflstomping people like you all day err day for years.
Fiesta wasn't even an online playlist... being given free equipment/armor ability at the start of the game is a big step away. This was my first online fps - you assuming I can fix those stats.... lol. Having 10 more days than you shows I enjoyed the game. I am better than you, just accept it.
I started playing Halo online in 2009. One year before Reach came out. That's a piss poor excuse for being bad. You're delusional and retarded, like every other Reach shill I've ever met.

1566
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:30:16 PM »
roflstomping
this is getting embarrassing
He's the one who wrote a shitty shill review for one of the worst FPS games in recent memory.

1567
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:25:58 PM »
Quote
Reach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplay
i disagree
Quote
that offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned,

Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different.
what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?

Quote
There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything.

False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.
*Sigh*  Invasion is literally the only mode where you can choose your loadout. You spent way too much time in customs. Paradiso was an awesome, map. It was vehicle focused map. Spire offered many types of engagements.
I could easily beat you.
Invasion was not the only loadout playlist, what the fuck are you talking about? I almost never played custom games. Those maps were fucking garbage.

And, just for the record.

Your Reach page on HTR.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=dbd%20halo%20legend

And here's mine.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=oh%20typhlosion

Notice a difference? I do. You're terrible.
Gotta love how you can't name any of these "other playlists" with loadouts. Stats don't mean shit. Boost grifball all you want. I am better than you.
Super slayer, fiesta, for two. Idk why you're so latched onto this. Having loadouts period, even "just" the armor abilities, was a huge step away from classic Halo arena-style gameplay. Stats do mean something. In my experience, the people who say they don't tend to be very bad. I never played Grifball. If you actually bothered to look you'd see that my winrates in Team Objective, Big Team Battle, Squad/Team/Super slayer are all above 85%. I've got a high skill 50 on HTR and you're not even high skill 40. Your KDA is garbage and mine is good. AND you have 10 more days played than me. What's that say? I earned my stats by roflstomping people like you all day err day for years.

1568
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:19:40 PM »
Quote
Reach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplay
i disagree
Quote
that offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned,

Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different.
what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?

Quote
There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything.

False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.
*Sigh*  Invasion is literally the only mode where you can choose your loadout. You spent way too much time in customs. Paradiso was an awesome, map. It was vehicle focused map. Spire offered many types of engagements.
I could easily beat you.
Invasion was not the only loadout playlist, what the fuck are you talking about? I almost never played custom games. Those maps were fucking garbage.

And, just for the record.

Your Reach page on HTR.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=dbd%20halo%20legend

And here's mine.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=oh%20typhlosion

Notice a difference? I do. You're terrible.

1569
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:13:46 PM »
still disagree
Your loss.
loss of what

it wasnt a bad game

it just didnt feel like the halos that came before it
It clearly feels like classic halo. One of the reasons it's population was the biggest of any halo.
just because cod has a million players doesnt make it the best game in the world

it was also a lot of peoples first halo
also, reach didnt beat halo 3 in population. i think OP is genuinely misinformed. poor guy.


I was going of legit sources. https://halo.bungie.net/stats/reach/online.aspx
Halo 3 had an average of 221 million games played per month, Reach had an average of 263 million games played per month. Get your facts straight.
did you miss the part where they only measured reach for 15 months and had a 77 month sample size for halo 3?

http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/after-a-year-halo-3-had-a-peak-population-of-1-1m-reach-had-900k.453494221/

halo 3 was doing better a year after its release than reach did. and even going by that stat you clearly misunderstood, its quite hilarious that reach lost that much of the halo playerbase to h3 during its heyday.

1570
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:08:15 PM »
also there was bloom in every halo

it was only in reach they had a visual indicator for it
not true. there was bullet spread in every halo. bloom was a new mechanic that actively increased that spread the faster you fired (semi-auto)/longer you fired (automatic). that was not in the other games.

1571
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:07:06 PM »
still disagree
Your loss.
loss of what

it wasnt a bad game

it just didnt feel like the halos that came before it
It clearly feels like classic halo. One of the reasons it's population was the biggest of any halo.
just because cod has a million players doesnt make it the best game in the world

it was also a lot of peoples first halo
also, reach didnt beat halo 3 in population. i think OP is genuinely misinformed. poor guy.


1572
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:04:24 PM »
Quote
Reach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplay
i disagree
Quote
that offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned,

Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different.
what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?

Quote
There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything.

False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.

1573
bookfags are mad.

Honestly, I didn't care much for dual-wield Arthur Dayne.  Sure it looked badass, but at the same time it would've been nice to see Dawn in action.  Since it hasn't appeared, though, I reckon the sword won't have much of an impact on the overall narrative in the books.  The ToJ scene was fine otherwise, though.  And Ned Stark is a cunt for cutting down an already-dead Dayne.

The rest of the episode was just alright.  I enjoyed watching Thorne and Olly being hanged, and it's good to see Jon finally leaving the Wall.  I am kind of upset that D&D decided that the Umbers sided with Ramsay, seeing as the Greatjon was the biggest Stark/King in the North fanboy and SmallJon died protecting his king in the books.

EDIT:  Actually, the sword that Dayne had in his right hand might've been Dawn.  When he plants it in the dirt before the fight, you can see a sunrise symbol on the pommel. 

Either it's Dawn, or he forgot to take off the Rollback sticker from Walmart
smalljon is totally pulling a fast one. no way is that shaggydog's head. the north remembers.

1574
it's just... a wider perspective?
ive felt much the same way about how my views have changed over the years. its weird to think about how different one might be today compared to x years or months ago, and not have ever really felt active change in ideology.

1575
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 02:02:26 PM »
still disagree
Your loss.
loss of what

it wasnt a bad game

it just didnt feel like the halos that came before it
it was a bad game.
as far as shooters go i wouldnt call it a halo game but it was still an okay game imo especially compared to some of the other games out there at the time
it had the best map creator for console FPS across all platforms at the time of release IIRC. even with all the drawbacks it had thats still a fair achievement. ZBNS had a very high skill cap too, possibly the highest since CE.

it definitely could have been a lot worse but when i think of "good games" reach just doesnt come to mind.
as a halo game its a big dissappointment

when did far cry 2 come out didnt that have a crazy map editor
i do remember some hype behind that but i never played FC2. if anyone knows of any other console FPS games from 2010 or before with good map editors chime in. im always ready for more reasons to shit on reach.

1576
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 01:59:01 PM »
Quote
Reach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplay
i disagree
Quote
that offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics.

Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games, or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded, but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them.

well they said this too

Quote
Reach introduced me to Halo multiplayer, to FPS multiplayer

which kinda invalidates their idea of "classic" halo gameplay
they could have played CE/2/3 at some point afterwards, which i'd have no way of knowing, hence the disclaimers.

1577
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 01:58:15 PM »
still disagree
Your loss.
loss of what

it wasnt a bad game

it just didnt feel like the halos that came before it
it was a bad game.
as far as shooters go i wouldnt call it a halo game but it was still an okay game imo especially compared to some of the other games out there at the time
it had the best map creator for console FPS across all platforms at the time of release IIRC. even with all the drawbacks it had thats still a fair achievement. ZBNS had a very high skill cap too, possibly the highest since CE.

it definitely could have been a lot worse but when i think of "good games" reach just doesnt come to mind.

1578
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 01:51:32 PM »
still disagree
Your loss.
loss of what

it wasnt a bad game

it just didnt feel like the halos that came before it
it was a bad game.

1579
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 01:50:38 PM »
Quote
Reach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplay
i disagree
Quote
that offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics.

Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games, or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded, but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them.

1580
if i were jon i would have socked olly in the nads before hanging him.

1581
LORD COMMANDER EDD

1582
The Flood / Re: Your top 3 shows of all time
« on: May 06, 2016, 01:16:24 AM »
xavier renegade angel

1583
Serious / Re: How fascist are you?
« on: May 03, 2016, 01:08:13 AM »
1.17

Bullshit, number twenty-five was a loaded question.
I didnt like 15 or 22.

1584
Serious / Re: How fascist are you?
« on: May 03, 2016, 01:05:23 AM »
Your F Score is: 2.43
You are a liberal airhead.

1585
most video hentai is awful. i prefer doujinshi.

1586
khal mongo goes from 'LOL' to 'oh okay i believe you' at the drop of a name (ok)
This bothered me as well.

"I'm Kelly C to Khal Drogo lmao"

"lol okay I won't rape you then seeing as how you don't have a shred of proof"

B R A V O
in the books she's captured by the khalasar of one of Drogo's old bloodriders, makes sense that he'd recognize her. im pretty sure Discount Drogo is an entirely original character but one can safely assume that he had heard tales of Drogo's silver haired Valyrian wife. he was the strongest Khal in the great grass sea after all. she went to vaes dothrak in season 1 so its safe to assume that word would have spread throughout the dothraki cultures by now. this isnt a big deal.
He seemed pretty intent on raping her brah. If he had any suspicions of who she really was then he certainly didn't display it. I mean, all it takes to convince a Khal is to tell him you use to be a human fleshlight for another Khal with literally no evidence? That's literally all it took?

I'm sure the book will provide a better explanation but the way they facilitated that scene was just really bad writing.
He probably didn't think much of her Valyrian looks until she started speaking in Dothraki and invoking Drogo's name. Widows of Khals are totally off limits. Makes complete sense to me.
I'm aware that widow Khals being off limits has a legitimate canonical backing to it. You don't need to tote this holier-than-thou attitude around. I'm just saying that it feels a tad contrived. Simmer.
I'm not toting around any attitudes bub. Also, "a tad contrived" is more reasonable than
Quote
the way they facilitated that scene was just really bad writing
by an order of magnitude. You should have led with that instead of incredulous hyperbole. Scene was fine.
Uh, yeah you kind of are, this post being a prime example. Not sure if this is some kind of subconscious thing but you have this really annoying tendency to nitpick people's posts and respond to them in a condescending manner.

What exactly is your problem here? I made a somewhat light hearted response to Mr Psy agreeing with his point and you felt it was somehow necessary to act like a sanctimonious prick about it?

Fuck outta here.
It's not really nitpicking if the entire backbone of your argument, being that the scene follows poor logic/has bad writing, doesn't seem to hold up when we examine reality. Keep throwing a temper tantrum if it makes you feel better though.
I think you might be clinically autistic.
oh man you really got me
Not even memeing tbh. The fact that you took the time out of your day to make a mountain out of a mole hill of all this doesn't exactly scream normal cognitive functioning to me.
y so asshurt?

1587
khal mongo goes from 'LOL' to 'oh okay i believe you' at the drop of a name (ok)
This bothered me as well.

"I'm Kelly C to Khal Drogo lmao"

"lol okay I won't rape you then seeing as how you don't have a shred of proof"

B R A V O
in the books she's captured by the khalasar of one of Drogo's old bloodriders, makes sense that he'd recognize her. im pretty sure Discount Drogo is an entirely original character but one can safely assume that he had heard tales of Drogo's silver haired Valyrian wife. he was the strongest Khal in the great grass sea after all. she went to vaes dothrak in season 1 so its safe to assume that word would have spread throughout the dothraki cultures by now. this isnt a big deal.
He seemed pretty intent on raping her brah. If he had any suspicions of who she really was then he certainly didn't display it. I mean, all it takes to convince a Khal is to tell him you use to be a human fleshlight for another Khal with literally no evidence? That's literally all it took?

I'm sure the book will provide a better explanation but the way they facilitated that scene was just really bad writing.
He probably didn't think much of her Valyrian looks until she started speaking in Dothraki and invoking Drogo's name. Widows of Khals are totally off limits. Makes complete sense to me.
I'm aware that widow Khals being off limits has a legitimate canonical backing to it. You don't need to tote this holier-than-thou attitude around. I'm just saying that it feels a tad contrived. Simmer.
I'm not toting around any attitudes bub. Also, "a tad contrived" is more reasonable than
Quote
the way they facilitated that scene was just really bad writing
by an order of magnitude. You should have led with that instead of incredulous hyperbole. Scene was fine.
Uh, yeah you kind of are, this post being a prime example. Not sure if this is some kind of subconscious thing but you have this really annoying tendency to nitpick people's posts and respond to them in a condescending manner.

What exactly is your problem here? I made a somewhat light hearted response to Mr Psy agreeing with his point and you felt it was somehow necessary to act like a sanctimonious prick about it?

Fuck outta here.
It's not really nitpicking if the entire backbone of your argument, being that the scene follows poor logic/has bad writing, doesn't seem to hold up when we examine reality. Keep throwing a temper tantrum if it makes you feel better though.
I think you might be clinically autistic.
oh man you really got me

1588
khal mongo goes from 'LOL' to 'oh okay i believe you' at the drop of a name (ok)
This bothered me as well.

"I'm Kelly C to Khal Drogo lmao"

"lol okay I won't rape you then seeing as how you don't have a shred of proof"

B R A V O
in the books she's captured by the khalasar of one of Drogo's old bloodriders, makes sense that he'd recognize her. im pretty sure Discount Drogo is an entirely original character but one can safely assume that he had heard tales of Drogo's silver haired Valyrian wife. he was the strongest Khal in the great grass sea after all. she went to vaes dothrak in season 1 so its safe to assume that word would have spread throughout the dothraki cultures by now. this isnt a big deal.
He seemed pretty intent on raping her brah. If he had any suspicions of who she really was then he certainly didn't display it. I mean, all it takes to convince a Khal is to tell him you use to be a human fleshlight for another Khal with literally no evidence? That's literally all it took?

I'm sure the book will provide a better explanation but the way they facilitated that scene was just really bad writing.
He probably didn't think much of her Valyrian looks until she started speaking in Dothraki and invoking Drogo's name. Widows of Khals are totally off limits. Makes complete sense to me.
I'm aware that widow Khals being off limits has a legitimate canonical backing to it. You don't need to tote this holier-than-thou attitude around. I'm just saying that it feels a tad contrived. Simmer.
I'm not toting around any attitudes bub. Also, "a tad contrived" is more reasonable than
Quote
the way they facilitated that scene was just really bad writing
by an order of magnitude. You should have led with that instead of incredulous hyperbole. Scene was fine.
Uh, yeah you kind of are, this post being a prime example. Not sure if this is some kind of subconscious thing but you have this really annoying tendency to nitpick people's posts and respond to them in a condescending manner.

What exactly is your problem here? I made a somewhat light hearted response to Mr Psy agreeing with his point and you felt it was somehow necessary to act like a sanctimonious prick about it?

Fuck outta here.
It's not really nitpicking if the entire backbone of your argument, being that the scene follows poor logic/has bad writing, doesn't seem to hold up when we examine reality. Keep throwing a temper tantrum if it makes you feel better though.

1589
khal mongo goes from 'LOL' to 'oh okay i believe you' at the drop of a name (ok)
This bothered me as well.

"I'm Kelly C to Khal Drogo lmao"

"lol okay I won't rape you then seeing as how you don't have a shred of proof"

B R A V O
in the books she's captured by the khalasar of one of Drogo's old bloodriders, makes sense that he'd recognize her. im pretty sure Discount Drogo is an entirely original character but one can safely assume that he had heard tales of Drogo's silver haired Valyrian wife. he was the strongest Khal in the great grass sea after all. she went to vaes dothrak in season 1 so its safe to assume that word would have spread throughout the dothraki cultures by now. this isnt a big deal.
He seemed pretty intent on raping her brah. If he had any suspicions of who she really was then he certainly didn't display it. I mean, all it takes to convince a Khal is to tell him you use to be a human fleshlight for another Khal with literally no evidence? That's literally all it took?

I'm sure the book will provide a better explanation but the way they facilitated that scene was just really bad writing.
He probably didn't think much of her Valyrian looks until she started speaking in Dothraki and invoking Drogo's name. Widows of Khals are totally off limits. Makes complete sense to me.
I'm aware that widow Khals being off limits has a legitimate canonical backing to it. You don't need to tote this holier-than-thou attitude around. I'm just saying that it feels a tad contrived. Simmer.
I'm not toting around any attitudes bub. Also, "a tad contrived" is more reasonable than
Quote
the way they facilitated that scene was just really bad writing
by an order of magnitude. You should have led with that instead of incredulous hyperbole. Scene was fine.

1590
khal mongo goes from 'LOL' to 'oh okay i believe you' at the drop of a name (ok)
This bothered me as well.

"I'm Kelly C to Khal Drogo lmao"

"lol okay I won't rape you then seeing as how you don't have a shred of proof"

B R A V O
in the books she's captured by the khalasar of one of Drogo's old bloodriders, makes sense that he'd recognize her. im pretty sure Discount Drogo is an entirely original character but one can safely assume that he had heard tales of Drogo's silver haired Valyrian wife. he was the strongest Khal in the great grass sea after all. she went to vaes dothrak in season 1 so its safe to assume that word would have spread throughout the dothraki cultures by now. this isnt a big deal.
He seemed pretty intent on raping her brah. If he had any suspicions of who she really was then he certainly didn't display it. I mean, all it takes to convince a Khal is to tell him you use to be a human fleshlight for another Khal with literally no evidence? That's literally all it took?

I'm sure the book will provide a better explanation but the way they facilitated that scene was just really bad writing.
He probably didn't think much of her Valyrian looks until she started speaking in Dothraki and invoking Drogo's name. Widows of Khals are totally off limits. Makes complete sense to me.

Pages: 1 ... 515253 5455 ... 255