Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Azumarill

Pages: 1 ... 505152 5354 ... 255
1531
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 08:44:51 PM »
and they said i had a stick up MY ass
You're much worse than I am.

1532
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 08:44:18 PM »
Either he hates me so much he won't respond to me, or he's in love with me and that's why he's so angry because he's being embarrassed in front of me.

I think we all know which one it is ;^)
alright, ill humor you. the fuck do you want from me bub?

1533
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 08:37:18 PM »
Because you're over here talking shit about me over some bs that had nothing to do with you?
because you said some goofy shit, and i found it amusing--sue me
fuck you too.

1534
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 08:34:12 PM »
lmao why are you always so bitter and cringy
did you see the thread where he unironically used the term "roflstomped" while arguing with someone about his halo skills
Lick my nuts. That kid is a fucking moron. Wrote a shitty review full of false information and you're all up in my shit because I responded to him calling me out.
it's only game
No shit?
why u hav 2 be mad
Because you're over here talking shit about me over some bs that had nothing to do with you?

1535
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 08:32:02 PM »
lmao why are you always so bitter and cringy
did you see the thread where he unironically used the term "roflstomped" while arguing with someone about his halo skills
Lick my nuts. That kid is a fucking moron. Wrote a shitty review full of false information and you're all up in my shit because I responded to him calling me out.
it's only game
No shit?

1536
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 08:29:53 PM »
lmao why are you always so bitter and cringy
did you see the thread where he unironically used the term "roflstomped" while arguing with someone about his halo skills
Lick my nuts. That kid is a fucking moron. Wrote a shitty review full of false information and you're all up in my shit because I responded to him calling me out.

1537
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 08:28:27 PM »
I take it you go around changing your big values you think are right based on who else believes them, then

Idiots sometimes believe correct things and geniuses sometimes believe idiotic things. Welcome to earth.
Midget isn't an idiot. He's a troll. He has bad opinions on purpose.

You're being had.
Aren't you only assuming that he isn't an idiot because you know he likes to get reactions out of people? I've never seen him say anything lucid or intelligent. There's no proof that he might not be retarded so why should we assume that he isn't? What if he really is as fucking stupid as he pretends to be and he just also happens to be a genuine jackass?

He's fairly intelligent when he's talking about his profession as an EMT.
Remind me to never call an ambulance. Anyone who acts the way he does on a regular basis can't be worth much.
lol
why you so uptight, bro? You're always like a puckered virgin asshole in a gay nightclub.
thats a pretty specific metaphor*. also, go fuck yourself =^]

*simile

1538
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 08:14:11 PM »
I take it you go around changing your big values you think are right based on who else believes them, then

Idiots sometimes believe correct things and geniuses sometimes believe idiotic things. Welcome to earth.
Midget isn't an idiot. He's a troll. He has bad opinions on purpose.

You're being had.
Aren't you only assuming that he isn't an idiot because you know he likes to get reactions out of people? I've never seen him say anything lucid or intelligent. There's no proof that he might not be retarded so why should we assume that he isn't? What if he really is as fucking stupid as he pretends to be and he just also happens to be a genuine jackass?

He's fairly intelligent when he's talking about his profession as an EMT.
Remind me to never call an ambulance. Anyone who acts the way he does on a regular basis can't be worth much.

1539
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 08:10:45 PM »
I take it you go around changing your big values you think are right based on who else believes them, then

Idiots sometimes believe correct things and geniuses sometimes believe idiotic things. Welcome to earth.
Midget isn't an idiot. He's a troll. He has bad opinions on purpose.

You're being had.
And guess what - trolls spout contraversial opinions to get attention. I never said the things I believe aren't contraversial; the ideas ahead of their time usually are.
controversial

1540
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 08:10:20 PM »
I take it you go around changing your big values you think are right based on who else believes them, then

Idiots sometimes believe correct things and geniuses sometimes believe idiotic things. Welcome to earth.
Midget isn't an idiot. He's a troll. He has bad opinions on purpose.

You're being had.
Aren't you only assuming that he isn't an idiot because you know he likes to get reactions out of people? I've never seen him say anything lucid or intelligent. There's no proof that he might not be retarded so why should we assume that he isn't? What if he really is as fucking stupid as he pretends to be and he just also happens to be a genuine jackass?

1541
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 04:42:24 PM »
>he does illegal things
>people surprised he is in jail

Lol, at least he is not homeless anymore.
Now he's got 3 square meals a day, a roof over his head, and TONS of eligible bachelors to choose from. Entire situation is probably too good for him TBQH.

1542
The Flood / Re: Wait solonoid is in jail?
« on: May 11, 2016, 04:30:06 PM »
Good. He needed a reality check.

1543
Serious / Re: Emma Watson listed in Panama Papers
« on: May 11, 2016, 01:40:31 PM »
I believe the privacy concern.
I don't believe there isn't monetary benefit.
She probably handed power of attorney and financial responsibility over to someone else a long time ago. Still.. pretttttyyy suspect....

1544
The Flood / Re: Rate the avatar above you and explain your own
« on: May 10, 2016, 01:33:55 PM »
Vomitchan.jpg

i dont think i removed her
hey, she'd make a good hatefuck.

1545
The Flood / Re: Rate the avatar above you and explain your own
« on: May 10, 2016, 01:31:15 PM »
You're not keeping Mari in your rotation are you?

thanks for ruining it
i dont think i removed her

1546
The Flood / Re: Rate the avatar above you and explain your own
« on: May 10, 2016, 01:27:18 PM »
0/10 using promotional art of a recently announced game

idiot

rude
thanks for ruining it

1547
Gaming / Re: Pokemon Sun and Moon starters
« on: May 10, 2016, 01:23:26 PM »
ROOTHOOT

1548
The Flood / Re: Game of Thrones just FUCKING CONFIRMED it!!!
« on: May 10, 2016, 01:21:56 PM »
Cleganebowl already happened, in book/season 1. It won't be happening ever again because it's thematically inappropriate (that might and probably wont stop DnD but Game of Thrones isnt canon anyway). Fuck cleganebowl and fuck all the get hype sheep.
The whole gravedigger malarkey didn't happen in the show though, so they could just inexplicably have the Hound return to fight for the Faith.
Not that that would be any better, but still.
he could randomly show up with septon meribald or something. im actually leaning towards the potential scenario where cersei just slaughters the high sparrow and faith militant.

1549
The Flood / Re: Rate the avatar above you and explain your own
« on: May 10, 2016, 01:37:18 AM »
8/10

idk i have a lot

1550
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 08:01:39 PM »
Quote
Reach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplay
i disagree
Quote
that offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned,

Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different.
what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?

Quote
There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything.

False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.
*Sigh*  Invasion is literally the only mode where you can choose your loadout. You spent way too much time in customs. Paradiso was an awesome, map. It was vehicle focused map. Spire offered many types of engagements.
I could easily beat you.
Invasion was not the only loadout playlist, what the fuck are you talking about? I almost never played custom games. Those maps were fucking garbage.

And, just for the record.

Your Reach page on HTR.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=dbd%20halo%20legend

And here's mine.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=oh%20typhlosion

Notice a difference? I do. You're terrible.
did you just stat check someone for a forum argument in the year of our lord 2010+3x2

wew
Problem? He's bad and I can prove it with math. It's relevant to OP, too, since it's quite obvious that he doesn't really understand the game. Bad player, bad review.
1v1 Bro
Pay for my xbox live and Reach download and sure. If not, I cannot acquiesce. And, once again, the "1v1 me bro" thing is one of those things people say when they're really fucking bad and can't defend themselves with stats or logic.
Wow... why don't you have XBL or Reach?
I had a disc copy of Reach from when it came out but I dunno where it is now. I haven't had xbox live in a little over a year because I don't play console games anymore.

1551
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 07:36:33 PM »
I'd say he understands it fine, for reach at least. Sure, you can't generalise and say that reach was the perfect cookie cutter halo formula, but it was still a good game in it's own right. OP likes it, you don't but because you have a higher body count that... invalidates his experience and opinions?
He didn't say it like that though. He said that it "offers the classic Halo gameplay." It doesn't. I'm allowed to criticize that. I only brought up his stats because he responded to my first post in a weird way. Check a few posts up where I quoted it.
Oh I saw that and I don't see any issues there

it's statchecking that is what drew me into this

There are better ways of discussing something with someone than resorting to pulling up stats from a game they played years ago. Address his points and make your own case where you disagree, but you don't need to resort to the lolbadkid arguments that makes discussing multiplayer games a pretty futile endeavour.
I did do that. Look through the thread and you'll see that I did address his arguments. My only other choice when he says something that fucking stupid is for me to go buy xbox live and reach and challenge him to a 1V1 bro. I had mathematical proof that he was acting like a moron readily available, and you expect me not to use it? Puhhhleeeaaassse. I could have just laughed it off but I don't like it when thumbless retards go around saying things like that.


Or you could not?

You'll never win someone over with an antagonistic argument, so unless you aren't actually seeking to do anything other than have a spat with someone it's kind of silly.
Never say never. Sometimes they get it, shut up, and let me explain where they went wrong. Sometimes they double down on the stupidity and wait for people to come protect them from the truth.
But again that's a pretty hostile stance to be bringing into a conversation.

What happens if after all of that, you realise that in actual fact you were incorrect in the first place? Hypothetically speaking.

There is a lot to be said for talking to someone politely and as an equal.
If I were to realize that I were factually incorrect I would apologize for not properly sourcing my information. Or was that a rhetorical question? I think you know better, so it should have been. Idk why you're chastising me for this. He's the one who came at me with that weird "I could beat your ass any day" attitude. Yeaaahhh I was a bit condescending in my first post, maybe I baited him a little bit, but he still said it. AND he's the one who had their facts wrong. Hop off bro.

1552
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 07:23:14 PM »
I'd say he understands it fine, for reach at least. Sure, you can't generalise and say that reach was the perfect cookie cutter halo formula, but it was still a good game in it's own right. OP likes it, you don't but because you have a higher body count that... invalidates his experience and opinions?
He didn't say it like that though. He said that it "offers the classic Halo gameplay." It doesn't. I'm allowed to criticize that. I only brought up his stats because he responded to my first post in a weird way. Check a few posts up where I quoted it.
Oh I saw that and I don't see any issues there

it's statchecking that is what drew me into this

There are better ways of discussing something with someone than resorting to pulling up stats from a game they played years ago. Address his points and make your own case where you disagree, but you don't need to resort to the lolbadkid arguments that makes discussing multiplayer games a pretty futile endeavour.
I did do that. Look through the thread and you'll see that I did address his arguments. My only other choice when he says something that fucking stupid is for me to go buy xbox live and reach and challenge him to a 1V1 bro. I had mathematical proof that he was acting like a moron readily available, and you expect me not to use it? Puhhhleeeaaassse. I could have just laughed it off but I don't like it when thumbless retards go around saying things like that.


Or you could not?

You'll never win someone over with an antagonistic argument, so unless you aren't actually seeking to do anything other than have a spat with someone it's kind of silly.
Never say never. Sometimes they get it, shut up, and let me explain where they went wrong. Sometimes they double down on the stupidity and wait for people to come protect them from the truth.

1553
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 07:14:31 PM »
That's because there's a direct correlation between how good someone is at Halo and their opinion on the games, usually. I've been around for long enough to be able to tell when I'm speaking to someone who I probably would have held the objective on if I had played against them. Bad Halo players tend to never have anything useful to say about the games beyond things that are extremely obvious. And TBQH I like poking fun at them. it's almost as fun as spawn trapping.
I respectfully disagree. Anybody who is switched on and played several matches in each playlist would have just as good an understanding on playlist loadouts as the next person, regardless of how skilled a player they are inherently. When it comes to things like discussing Power spawn times and fall damage reduction, competitive experience is invariably necessary to have any authority in the discussion, sure, but for something as simple as this you don't need to be one of the top 1,500  Team Objective players to have a reasonable grasp on what playlist had loadouts.
Well, that's the thing- he didn't have a reasonable grasp on that. He kept saying weapon loadouts weren't in matchmaking. They were. I don't think my positions here are terribly outlandish. Honestly, I'm surprised you guys are going through all the trouble to defend OP. His review was terrible and he said a ton of things that were false. This forum has never seemed too keen on being a hugbox before, why protect OP from the truth now?

1554
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 07:11:14 PM »
I'd say he understands it fine, for reach at least. Sure, you can't generalise and say that reach was the perfect cookie cutter halo formula, but it was still a good game in it's own right. OP likes it, you don't but because you have a higher body count that... invalidates his experience and opinions?
He didn't say it like that though. He said that it "offers the classic Halo gameplay." It doesn't. I'm allowed to criticize that. I only brought up his stats because he responded to my first post in a weird way. Check a few posts up where I quoted it.
Oh I saw that and I don't see any issues there

it's statchecking that is what drew me into this

There are better ways of discussing something with someone than resorting to pulling up stats from a game they played years ago. Address his points and make your own case where you disagree, but you don't need to resort to the lolbadkid arguments that makes discussing multiplayer games a pretty futile endeavour.
I did do that. Look through the thread and you'll see that I did address his arguments. My only other choice when he says something that fucking stupid is for me to go buy xbox live and reach and challenge him to a "1V1 bro" (lmfao). I had mathematical proof that he was acting like a moron readily available, and you expect me not to use it? Puhhhleeeaaassse. I could have just laughed it off but I don't like it when thumbless retards go around saying things like that.

1555
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 07:02:37 PM »
I'd say he understands it fine, for reach at least. Sure, you can't generalise and say that reach was the perfect cookie cutter halo formula, but it was still a good game in it's own right. OP likes it, you don't but because you have a higher body count that... invalidates his experience and opinions?
He didn't say it like that though. He said that it "offers the classic Halo gameplay." It doesn't. I'm allowed to criticize that. I only brought up his stats because he responded to my first post in a weird way. Check a few posts up where I quoted it.

1556
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 07:00:15 PM »
halo 1 was mediocre
in some aspects yeah. i agree. this is a pretty general statement though. lots of smaller things that feed into it. thats the kind of stuff im talking about.

1557
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 06:58:51 PM »
Also, I'd like to point out, OP said this

Quote
I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach.

in response to this

Quote
Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games, or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded

i would have left it at that if he hadnt responded the way he did

1558
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 06:52:47 PM »
People who don't jack off to snipedown, and farm for 50/0 K/Ds every match of war-zone aren't allowed to have an opinion. That is the only way anybody is allowed to enjoy themselves.

He actually believes this.
You're allowed to have an opinion. Go on, say something about any of the Halo games. I will humor you.

1559
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 06:51:21 PM »
It's not a Halo thread until some halftard posts something patently wrong about the games. I just don't like when people spread bad information is all, and it so happens that a lot of the people on this forum who post about Halo are thumbless morons. All I'm doing is giving people a reality check =]
I'm not arguing against you there. But in every situation where you've asserted somebody is wrong about x feature of a Halo title, you invariably bring up their stats compared to yours, as if their authority on understanding certain features of the game hinges solely on how they perform competitively.
That's because there's a direct correlation between how good someone is at Halo and their opinion on the games, usually. I've been around for long enough to be able to tell when I'm speaking to someone who I probably would have held the objective on if I had played against them. Bad Halo players tend to never have anything useful to say about the games beyond things that are extremely obvious. And TBQH I like poking fun at them. it's almost as fun as spawn trapping.

1560
Gaming / Re: Halo: Reach - Review - By me
« on: May 09, 2016, 06:49:18 PM »
Quote
Reach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplay
i disagree
Quote
that offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned,

Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different.
what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?

Quote
There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything.

False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.
*Sigh*  Invasion is literally the only mode where you can choose your loadout. You spent way too much time in customs. Paradiso was an awesome, map. It was vehicle focused map. Spire offered many types of engagements.
I could easily beat you.
Invasion was not the only loadout playlist, what the fuck are you talking about? I almost never played custom games. Those maps were fucking garbage.

And, just for the record.

Your Reach page on HTR.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=dbd%20halo%20legend

And here's mine.
http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=oh%20typhlosion

Notice a difference? I do. You're terrible.
did you just stat check someone for a forum argument in the year of our lord 2010+3x2

wew
Problem? He's bad and I can prove it with math. It's relevant to OP, too, since it's quite obvious that he doesn't really understand the game. Bad player, bad review.
1v1 Bro
Pay for my xbox live and Reach download and sure. If not, I cannot acquiesce. And, once again, the "1v1 me bro" thing is one of those things people say when they're really fucking bad and can't defend themselves with stats or logic.

Pages: 1 ... 505152 5354 ... 255