This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - nosejob
Pages: 1 ... 171819 2021 ... 68
541
« on: November 22, 2015, 12:15:09 PM »
I'd prefer you stay, but do what you want.
At the end of the day it's just a website, if you don't feel like coming on anymore there's no need to make a grand exit. Just take a break if you feel sick of being here and come back when you're ready.
542
« on: November 22, 2015, 10:34:02 AM »
>Likes one direction
>calls them her "sons"
>thinks two of the members are gay together
>Ship name = Larry
>Watches videos that prove they are gay
>reads fan fiction about them being gay
>constantly tells my family about them being gay
>no one cares
I want to kill her.
543
« on: November 22, 2015, 10:25:59 AM »
They better not end the dlc run. They must be making truckloads off these characters, they'd be stupid to stop.
Sakurai has stated that he "can't keep the team forever," it's gonna stop eventually. Also, the 3DS has a big system limitation compared to the Wii U so they'll have to stop once they realize the 3DS can't handle any more (at least with fighters).
Guess that makes sense. Sad that it has to end anyhow.
544
« on: November 22, 2015, 07:14:06 AM »
They better not end the dlc run. They must be making truckloads off these characters, they'd be stupid to stop.
545
« on: November 22, 2015, 07:12:11 AM »
Lol the part 3 musical is the best.
546
« on: November 22, 2015, 07:11:28 AM »
Arena shooters are overrated fam. Quake is trash, but UT is pretty decent.
547
« on: November 22, 2015, 07:09:20 AM »
I had some good times with it. Mine never broke thankfully.
It lasted a bit too long imo. The last few years were pretty dreadful as far as how games were running/looking, but still it's a great console. I'll always remember how awesome Christmas was the year I got it.
548
« on: November 22, 2015, 07:05:12 AM »
Definitely
549
« on: November 21, 2015, 06:38:20 AM »
Sounds fun m8
550
« on: November 20, 2015, 08:28:07 PM »
I personally haven't played it, but from what I understand it suffers from the same issue as Titanfall in that it's very barebones and lacks content.
If 9 mp modes, 3 co-op modes, and a little over a dozen maps is lacking in content.
It is.
Especially when the game from 10 years ago had more and better content. Modes, maps, and co-op in this game are dreadful as well.
lolwut
Battlefront 2 had 18 maps at launch. That's 3 more than the reboot and all of the ones that weren't battlefront one remakes were pretty shit. Battlefront 2 had 7 mp game modes as opposed to the reboots 9. GC was just a dressed up instant action playlist, same with the "campaign".
If we want to start talking effective game modes Battlefront really only had one, conquest. In the reboot you can at least get a match in every game mode. Granted this is at launch though so it's possible that it may be whittled down to 3 as time goes on. However this is still 3x more game modes than battlefront 1 and 2.
I should also add that the first map pack is free and adds another 3 maps to the game so that'll bring it on par with 2 for map count.
Saying lolwut doesn't make you right. This game has no diversity. Say what you want about galactic conquest and campaign, but people loved them, and that's why they are mad its gone. Same with space battles and the clone wars era.
Also like I said, the content that IS in this game isn't even good. Maps are horrible, and its pathetic that they limited 13 maps to only 4 planets; meaning less variety. Ultimately, the design choice was made to create more opportunity for dlc, and that sucks. There is no need to have maps dedicated to the ice caves from hoth, or the droid shit from tatooine. So even if you aren't wrong in saying that the game has enough content (which I definitely don't think it does), the game still is severely lacking in variety. Where is jabba's pallace? Naboo? Tantive IV? Dagobah? Space battles?
Of course saying lolwut doesn't make me right. That's why I supported it with facts.
So 9 different game modes is lacking in variety? This isn't halo 5 where all but two are a variant of slayer. This isn't Battlefront 2 where 3 of the 7 game modes were different versions of CTF.
>no need to have a dedicated map to the ice caves in hoth or the smugglers den
>wants a dedicated map for jabbas apartment and cramped as shit ship IV
uwotm8
The maps you listed also suck ass other than Dagobah.
Dogfight is better than spacebattles. I've had more fun playing that than I ever did playing ship boarding battles.
The 9 game modes dont offer anything exciting or diverse though. Most of them do boil down into tdm (or a slight variant) and the ones that don't (droid run) are just plain garbage.
And your argument that Jabba's palace and Tantive 4 suck is wrong when a) those areas both have much more meaning to the movies than ice caves/smugglers den and b) people loved playing on them. Besides, what I listed were just a few examples. Planets (environments) battlefront 2 has: 18 Planets reboot has: 4
Can you not see how that is a problem? Whether or not you enjoyed those maps is irrelevant, they add more "star wars" to the game, and they add more variety. Game mode number is also irrelevant when they suck and you are still playing in the same spaces.
So let me get this straight. You want maps that take place in "iconic" locations over maps that play well? Well that's just a matter of personal preference then. I kinda prefer my multiplayer maps to lend themselves to a good mp experience instead of a hallway clusterfuck.
Yeah, the lack of variety in locations is a bit disappointing. However the argument here is that the reboot "doesn't have enough content". I've demonstrated that it has about the same amount of content as the previous title. A few less maps, but a few more game modes. After the first DLC (which is free) it'll have more content than its predecessor.
game type break down Supremacy - tug of war/conquest hybrid that relies on the capture of territories to win
walker assault - both sides simultaneously attack and defend various points throughout the map. Objectives are the main priority however the ability to just straight up outkill your opponent can have a major effect on how this plays out.
Droid Run - moving territories from halo really
Blast - TDM
Dog Fight - TDM in the air with a heavy emphasis on protecting/destroying the enemies vip shuttle when it appears for a big chunk of bonus points
Cargo - CTF
Drop Zone - TDM with some sort of pseudo-territories elements thrown in
Hero Hunt - Basically juggernaut from Halo
Hero Battle - Basically VIP from Halo, but with VIPs that can and want to fight instead of run away and hide in the corner
Battlefront 2 had
Conquest - self explanatory Battlefield clone
Hunt - gimmick mode that nobody played because it was native species that serve as a minor annoyance in 90% of the maps vs actual soldiers
1 flag CTF
2 Flag CTF
Space Assault - A handfull of people get to fly around in ships while everyone else plays corridor shooter 2005
Assault - A fun gimick mode where everyone is one of the stupidly overpowered hero units
Space 1 flag CTF - CTF but in space
The maps should take iconic locations, AND make balanced maps out of them. Battlefront 2 didn't have incredible map balance, but they were in iconic locations, which made them fun and exciting. The reboot accomplishes neither of those. It takes fragments of planets we've seen in the movies (with the exception of sullust) and then makes mediocre maps out of them. A lot the maps are unbalanced, and the rest are just flat out boring. Not a single map stands out like hoth or endor did in 2. It's just a whole lot of meh.
Walker assault on Endor is really the only map i'd say is unbalanced. However walker assault on Hoth does have super shitty spawns for phase 2. Every other map is fine balance wise.
Iconic locations don't mean shit if the maps are just downright frustrating to play due to a myriad of poor design decisions. Hoth was the one of those two that stood out and it was a Battlefront 1 map. Endor was piss and unremarkable.
It seems you find iconic locations to be "fun and exciting" while I find well designed maps to be "fun and exciting" though so that's where we reach an impasse.
Well I would argue that none of the battlefront 2 maps were poorly designed to the point of causing frustration, and if that's the case then I wonder why you bought a battlefront game in the first place. I'll agree to disagree that the reboot has good maps. Even if they are balanced, they aren't memorable or even fun to play in any way.
551
« on: November 20, 2015, 07:55:14 PM »
I personally haven't played it, but from what I understand it suffers from the same issue as Titanfall in that it's very barebones and lacks content.
If 9 mp modes, 3 co-op modes, and a little over a dozen maps is lacking in content.
It is.
Especially when the game from 10 years ago had more and better content. Modes, maps, and co-op in this game are dreadful as well.
lolwut
Battlefront 2 had 18 maps at launch. That's 3 more than the reboot and all of the ones that weren't battlefront one remakes were pretty shit. Battlefront 2 had 7 mp game modes as opposed to the reboots 9. GC was just a dressed up instant action playlist, same with the "campaign".
If we want to start talking effective game modes Battlefront really only had one, conquest. In the reboot you can at least get a match in every game mode. Granted this is at launch though so it's possible that it may be whittled down to 3 as time goes on. However this is still 3x more game modes than battlefront 1 and 2.
I should also add that the first map pack is free and adds another 3 maps to the game so that'll bring it on par with 2 for map count.
Saying lolwut doesn't make you right. This game has no diversity. Say what you want about galactic conquest and campaign, but people loved them, and that's why they are mad its gone. Same with space battles and the clone wars era.
Also like I said, the content that IS in this game isn't even good. Maps are horrible, and its pathetic that they limited 13 maps to only 4 planets; meaning less variety. Ultimately, the design choice was made to create more opportunity for dlc, and that sucks. There is no need to have maps dedicated to the ice caves from hoth, or the droid shit from tatooine. So even if you aren't wrong in saying that the game has enough content (which I definitely don't think it does), the game still is severely lacking in variety. Where is jabba's pallace? Naboo? Tantive IV? Dagobah? Space battles?
Of course saying lolwut doesn't make me right. That's why I supported it with facts.
So 9 different game modes is lacking in variety? This isn't halo 5 where all but two are a variant of slayer. This isn't Battlefront 2 where 3 of the 7 game modes were different versions of CTF.
>no need to have a dedicated map to the ice caves in hoth or the smugglers den
>wants a dedicated map for jabbas apartment and cramped as shit ship IV
uwotm8
The maps you listed also suck ass other than Dagobah.
Dogfight is better than spacebattles. I've had more fun playing that than I ever did playing ship boarding battles.
The 9 game modes dont offer anything exciting or diverse though. Most of them do boil down into tdm (or a slight variant) and the ones that don't (droid run) are just plain garbage.
And your argument that Jabba's palace and Tantive 4 suck is wrong when a) those areas both have much more meaning to the movies than ice caves/smugglers den and b) people loved playing on them. Besides, what I listed were just a few examples. Planets (environments) battlefront 2 has: 18 Planets reboot has: 4
Can you not see how that is a problem? Whether or not you enjoyed those maps is irrelevant, they add more "star wars" to the game, and they add more variety. Game mode number is also irrelevant when they suck and you are still playing in the same spaces.
So let me get this straight. You want maps that take place in "iconic" locations over maps that play well? Well that's just a matter of personal preference then. I kinda prefer my multiplayer maps to lend themselves to a good mp experience instead of a hallway clusterfuck.
Yeah, the lack of variety in locations is a bit disappointing. However the argument here is that the reboot "doesn't have enough content". I've demonstrated that it has about the same amount of content as the previous title. A few less maps, but a few more game modes. After the first DLC (which is free) it'll have more content than its predecessor.
game type break down Supremacy - tug of war/conquest hybrid that relies on the capture of territories to win
walker assault - both sides simultaneously attack and defend various points throughout the map. Objectives are the main priority however the ability to just straight up outkill your opponent can have a major effect on how this plays out.
Droid Run - moving territories from halo really
Blast - TDM
Dog Fight - TDM in the air with a heavy emphasis on protecting/destroying the enemies vip shuttle when it appears for a big chunk of bonus points
Cargo - CTF
Drop Zone - TDM with some sort of pseudo-territories elements thrown in
Hero Hunt - Basically juggernaut from Halo
Hero Battle - Basically VIP from Halo, but with VIPs that can and want to fight instead of run away and hide in the corner
Battlefront 2 had
Conquest - self explanatory Battlefield clone
Hunt - gimmick mode that nobody played because it was native species that serve as a minor annoyance in 90% of the maps vs actual soldiers
1 flag CTF
2 Flag CTF
Space Assault - A handfull of people get to fly around in ships while everyone else plays corridor shooter 2005
Assault - A fun gimick mode where everyone is one of the stupidly overpowered hero units
Space 1 flag CTF - CTF but in space
The maps should take iconic locations, AND make balanced maps out of them. Battlefront 2 didn't have incredible map balance, but they were in iconic locations, which made them fun and exciting. The reboot accomplishes neither of those. It takes fragments of planets we've seen in the movies (with the exception of sullust) and then makes mediocre maps out of them. A lot the maps are unbalanced, and the rest are just flat out boring. Not a single map stands out like hoth or endor did in 2. It's just a whole lot of meh.
552
« on: November 20, 2015, 06:58:56 PM »
This thread is sad af
553
« on: November 20, 2015, 06:56:33 PM »
what rhymes with dill
Shill
554
« on: November 20, 2015, 05:27:24 PM »
I personally haven't played it, but from what I understand it suffers from the same issue as Titanfall in that it's very barebones and lacks content.
If 9 mp modes, 3 co-op modes, and a little over a dozen maps is lacking in content.
It is.
Especially when the game from 10 years ago had more and better content. Modes, maps, and co-op in this game are dreadful as well.
lolwut
Battlefront 2 had 18 maps at launch. That's 3 more than the reboot and all of the ones that weren't battlefront one remakes were pretty shit. Battlefront 2 had 7 mp game modes as opposed to the reboots 9. GC was just a dressed up instant action playlist, same with the "campaign".
If we want to start talking effective game modes Battlefront really only had one, conquest. In the reboot you can at least get a match in every game mode. Granted this is at launch though so it's possible that it may be whittled down to 3 as time goes on. However this is still 3x more game modes than battlefront 1 and 2.
I should also add that the first map pack is free and adds another 3 maps to the game so that'll bring it on par with 2 for map count.
Saying lolwut doesn't make you right. This game has no diversity. Say what you want about galactic conquest and campaign, but people loved them, and that's why they are mad its gone. Same with space battles and the clone wars era.
Also like I said, the content that IS in this game isn't even good. Maps are horrible, and its pathetic that they limited 13 maps to only 4 planets; meaning less variety. Ultimately, the design choice was made to create more opportunity for dlc, and that sucks. There is no need to have maps dedicated to the ice caves from hoth, or the droid shit from tatooine. So even if you aren't wrong in saying that the game has enough content (which I definitely don't think it does), the game still is severely lacking in variety. Where is jabba's pallace? Naboo? Tantive IV? Dagobah? Space battles?
Of course saying lolwut doesn't make me right. That's why I supported it with facts.
So 9 different game modes is lacking in variety? This isn't halo 5 where all but two are a variant of slayer. This isn't Battlefront 2 where 3 of the 7 game modes were different versions of CTF.
>no need to have a dedicated map to the ice caves in hoth or the smugglers den
>wants a dedicated map for jabbas apartment and cramped as shit ship IV
uwotm8
The maps you listed also suck ass other than Dagobah.
Dogfight is better than spacebattles. I've had more fun playing that than I ever did playing ship boarding battles.
The 9 game modes dont offer anything exciting or diverse though. Most of them do boil down into tdm (or a slight variant) and the ones that don't (droid run) are just plain garbage. And your argument that Jabba's palace and Tantive 4 suck is wrong when a) those areas both have much more meaning to the movies than ice caves/smugglers den and b) people loved playing on them. Besides, what I listed were just a few examples. Planets (environments) battlefront 2 has: 18 Planets reboot has: 4 Can you not see how that is a problem? Whether or not you enjoyed those maps is irrelevant, they add more "star wars" to the game, and they add more variety. Game mode number is also irrelevant when they suck and you are still playing in the same spaces.
555
« on: November 20, 2015, 04:25:52 PM »
I personally haven't played it, but from what I understand it suffers from the same issue as Titanfall in that it's very barebones and lacks content.
If 9 mp modes, 3 co-op modes, and a little over a dozen maps is lacking in content.
It is.
Especially when the game from 10 years ago had more and better content. Modes, maps, and co-op in this game are dreadful as well.
lolwut
Battlefront 2 had 18 maps at launch. That's 3 more than the reboot and all of the ones that weren't battlefront one remakes were pretty shit. Battlefront 2 had 7 mp game modes as opposed to the reboots 9. GC was just a dressed up instant action playlist, same with the "campaign".
If we want to start talking effective game modes Battlefront really only had one, conquest. In the reboot you can at least get a match in every game mode. Granted this is at launch though so it's possible that it may be whittled down to 3 as time goes on. However this is still 3x more game modes than battlefront 1 and 2.
I should also add that the first map pack is free and adds another 3 maps to the game so that'll bring it on par with 2 for map count.
Saying lolwut doesn't make you right. This game has no diversity. Say what you want about galactic conquest and campaign, but people loved them, and that's why they are mad its gone. Same with space battles and the clone wars era. Also like I said, the content that IS in this game isn't even good. Maps are horrible, and its pathetic that they limited 13 maps to only 4 planets; meaning less variety. Ultimately, the design choice was made to create more opportunity for dlc, and that sucks. There is no need to have maps dedicated to the ice caves from hoth, or the droid shit from tatooine. So even if you aren't wrong in saying that the game has enough content (which I definitely don't think it does), the game still is severely lacking in variety. Where is jabba's pallace? Naboo? Tantive IV? Dagobah? Space battles?
556
« on: November 20, 2015, 02:23:03 PM »
Stickitinherpooper
557
« on: November 20, 2015, 02:17:22 PM »
Yeah it's good man.
558
« on: November 20, 2015, 02:13:51 PM »
Have they fucking added in team objective yet?
Team arena
559
« on: November 20, 2015, 02:10:36 PM »
I personally haven't played it, but from what I understand it suffers from the same issue as Titanfall in that it's very barebones and lacks content.
If 9 mp modes, 3 co-op modes, and a little over a dozen maps is lacking in content.
It is. Especially when the game from 10 years ago had more and better content. Modes, maps, and co-op in this game are dreadful as well.
560
« on: November 19, 2015, 10:03:44 PM »
We back
The problem has been fixed?
Pretty sure.
Really?
I'm still seeing the syncing data screen and having to use the game/app offline.
Might be a problem w/ you
561
« on: November 19, 2015, 09:20:12 PM »
We back
The problem has been fixed?
Pretty sure.
562
« on: November 19, 2015, 09:06:27 PM »
We back
563
« on: November 19, 2015, 07:51:55 PM »
I get that all the time but that's just my shiternet
Oh.....
Well it's been affecting me too much and I saw on the xbox site that XB1 has a purchase and content usage problem.
Yeah it's down.
564
« on: November 19, 2015, 06:56:26 PM »
Is my new gpu good?
https://pcpartpicker.com/user/EnderWolf/saved/KjWwrH
I've decided to follow your guys advice and get win10 from somewhere else.
750 ti can run anything, but most new games only at low-medium settings. It's alright, but I would go down to 8gb of ram and maybe get a slightly cheaper i5, and then get a better gpu.
Yeah, in like a year or so, you'll want to get more ram and maybe a better cpu; but if you are on a budget then go for a better gpu because that's where you'll see the most performance for your money.
I think I'm going to stick with 12, but what's the difference between the different i5's?
Different i5's have varying performance. The 4460 is around $170ish and does more than enough for what you seem to want. It's a great cpu.
alriht, thanks man
Yup, and here's a good vid comparing the two. https://youtu.be/t7wBle5AbhIOpen world games perform a few frames better on the 4690k and non open world games are nearly identical.
565
« on: November 19, 2015, 06:47:52 PM »
Is my new gpu good?
https://pcpartpicker.com/user/EnderWolf/saved/KjWwrH
I've decided to follow your guys advice and get win10 from somewhere else.
750 ti can run anything, but most new games only at low-medium settings. It's alright, but I would go down to 8gb of ram and maybe get a slightly cheaper i5, and then get a better gpu.
Yeah, in like a year or so, you'll want to get more ram and maybe a better cpu; but if you are on a budget then go for a better gpu because that's where you'll see the most performance for your money.
I think I'm going to stick with 12, but what's the difference between the different i5's?
Different i5's have varying performance. The 4460 is around $170ish and does more than enough for what you seem to want. It's a great cpu.
566
« on: November 19, 2015, 06:26:57 PM »
Angry Joe review discussion where?
567
« on: November 19, 2015, 05:43:14 PM »
568
« on: November 19, 2015, 05:38:11 PM »
Is my new gpu good?
https://pcpartpicker.com/user/EnderWolf/saved/KjWwrH
I've decided to follow your guys advice and get win10 from somewhere else.
750 ti can run anything, but most new games only at low-medium settings. It's alright, but I would go down to 8gb of ram and maybe get a slightly cheaper i5, and then get a better gpu. Yeah, in like a year or so, you'll want to get more ram and maybe a better cpu; but if you are on a budget then go for a better gpu because that's where you'll see the most performance for your money.
569
« on: November 18, 2015, 10:01:05 PM »
 Wonder if it'll make me pro
570
« on: November 18, 2015, 05:54:52 PM »
I feel your pain, my brother is the same way.
All he does is quote anything said on Vine.
WHAT ARE THOSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE? XD XD XDEEZNUTS
Pages: 1 ... 171819 2021 ... 68
|
Show Posts