This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mad Max
Pages: 1 ... 252627 2829 ... 251
781
« on: August 20, 2015, 05:52:12 PM »
You obsess over death wayyyyy too much. You're constantly whining about it. When it's time to die, why not take it like a man? Your constant obsession tells me you have a weak mind and aren't strong willed - you can't cope with it.
You're probably right. I'm not going to say that death and nonexistence doesn't terrify the hell out of me. If that's a symptom of a weak will, then that's that. Call me a defeatist, I wouldn't argue with that.
Instead of fearing it, you should embrace it. Conquer it and make it your bitch
Thinking that you can conquer death is straight up retarded tbh
In the sense that you can avoid it, yes. But mentally conquer it? I don't see why not.
I fear what I can't comprehend, and no one can truly understand nonexistence
>Implying death = nonexistence
Well, once you die, your consciousness ceases to exist, so yeah, it kinda does.
Have you ever died? Because if not, you're making stupid assumptions.
...and you have died?
782
« on: August 19, 2015, 08:20:40 PM »
You obsess over death wayyyyy too much. You're constantly whining about it. When it's time to die, why not take it like a man? Your constant obsession tells me you have a weak mind and aren't strong willed - you can't cope with it.
You're probably right. I'm not going to say that death and nonexistence doesn't terrify the hell out of me. If that's a symptom of a weak will, then that's that. Call me a defeatist, I wouldn't argue with that.
Instead of fearing it, you should embrace it. Conquer it and make it your bitch
Thinking that you can conquer death is straight up retarded tbh
In the sense that you can avoid it, yes. But mentally conquer it? I don't see why not.
I fear what I can't comprehend, and no one can truly understand nonexistence
>Implying death = nonexistence
Well, once you die, your consciousness ceases to exist, so yeah, it kinda does.
783
« on: August 19, 2015, 12:09:26 AM »
By the way, the age of consent in Florida is 18.
She's a fucking idiot and I have no pity for her.
Considering from what I've known of her, she had relationships with mostly 17 year old individuals. Her charges would have been different in most other states.
Interesting choice of map.
States with lower ages of consent are green, which is associated with "good"
States with higher ages of consent are red, which is associated with "bad"
Hmm.
And yet medical centers all round the world have red for their signs.
Well you don't go to the hospital when you're feeling good...
784
« on: August 19, 2015, 12:03:39 AM »
By the way, the age of consent in Florida is 18.
She's a fucking idiot and I have no pity for her.
Considering from what I've known of her, she had relationships with mostly 17 year old individuals. Her charges would have been different in most other states.
Interesting choice of map. States with lower ages of consent are green, which is associated with "good" States with higher ages of consent are red, which is associated with "bad" Hmm.
785
« on: August 19, 2015, 12:01:57 AM »
Interesting point made about unit cohesion and such.
Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?
IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.
the situation is hardly comparable
Why do you blue faggots feel the need to tie every issue to racism?
How is it not comparable? [Person X] is able to do a job. [Person Y] doesn't like [Person X] for a stupid reason out of anyone's control, Should [Person X] be barred from doing the job? No.
It's called being and adult and dealing with it. You'd think the big, mighty Army Rangers would be able to adapt to a situation, yeah?
if you honestly think males and females in a group setting behave comparably, you're retarded
I'm not sure you know how adults act around each other at all. If the male Army Rangers aren't able to control themselves like they're 13 year-old boys, maybe they shouldn't be Army Rangers.
do you seriously think the criticism boils down to just "they'll fugg"?
There's a myriad of cultural, social, and instinctual reasons here.
All the more reason to make Rangers only straight, white, Christian men. That way we don't upset anyone's cultural, social, and instinctual positions.
It's not about upsetting anyone
Just like you wouldn't put black soldiers in the 20s under the command of white officers who would use them as cannon fodder, so you don't throw women into the dynamic of a combat unit.
Fuck, if you can't recognize that the difference between genders is far more significant than the difference between ethnic groups within the same culture, you really need help.
I never said men and women weren't different. What I said was that if women can do a job, they should be allowed to. If the men in the unit are going to be pussies about it, that's their problem, not the ladies'.
786
« on: August 18, 2015, 11:03:07 PM »
Interesting point made about unit cohesion and such.
Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?
IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.
the situation is hardly comparable
Why do you blue faggots feel the need to tie every issue to racism?
How is it not comparable? [Person X] is able to do a job. [Person Y] doesn't like [Person X] for a stupid reason out of anyone's control, Should [Person X] be barred from doing the job? No.
It's called being and adult and dealing with it. You'd think the big, mighty Army Rangers would be able to adapt to a situation, yeah?
if you honestly think males and females in a group setting behave comparably, you're retarded
I'm not sure you know how adults act around each other at all. If the male Army Rangers aren't able to control themselves like they're 13 year-old boys, maybe they shouldn't be Army Rangers.
do you seriously think the criticism boils down to just "they'll fugg"?
There's a myriad of cultural, social, and instinctual reasons here.
All the more reason to make Rangers only straight, white, Christian men. That way we don't upset anyone's cultural, social, and instinctual positions.
787
« on: August 18, 2015, 10:58:01 PM »
Interesting point made about unit cohesion and such.
Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?
IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.
the situation is hardly comparable
Why do you blue faggots feel the need to tie every issue to racism?
How is it not comparable? [Person X] is able to do a job. [Person Y] doesn't like [Person X] for a stupid reason out of anyone's control, Should [Person X] be barred from doing the job? No.
It's called being and adult and dealing with it. You'd think the big, mighty Army Rangers would be able to adapt to a situation, yeah?
if you honestly think males and females in a group setting behave comparably, you're retarded
I'm not sure you know how adults act around each other at all. If the male Army Rangers aren't able to control themselves like they're 13 year-old boys, maybe they shouldn't be Army Rangers.
788
« on: August 18, 2015, 10:54:19 PM »
Interesting point made about unit cohesion and such.
Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?
IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.
the situation is hardly comparable
Why do you blue faggots feel the need to tie every issue to racism?
How is it not comparable? [Person X] is able to do a job. [Person Y] doesn't like [Person X] for a stupid reason out of anyone's control, Should [Person X] be barred from doing the job? No. It's called being and adult and dealing with it. You'd think the big, mighty Army Rangers would be able to adapt to a situation, yeah?
789
« on: August 18, 2015, 10:44:03 PM »
Interesting point made about unit cohesion and such.
Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?
IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.
790
« on: August 18, 2015, 10:41:53 PM »
The "rape or incest" compromise is bullshit anyway.
If a developing fetus is in fact a person, then the circumstances of their conception are irrelevant- they have a right to life.
If the fetus is not a person, it has no more or less right to life than any other, regardless of circumstances of conception.
Excellent point. That's why I maintain that a fetus is not a person. You're right that manner of conception doesn't make the fetus any more or less of a person.
791
« on: August 17, 2015, 07:07:58 PM »
He should have married her, because you can't rape your wife.
792
« on: August 13, 2015, 03:12:30 AM »
Please. I would welcome a Sanders/Kasich debate.
We could only be so lucky, dude. The Republicans won't win unless Rubio wins the general election though.
open hostility to one of the rights outlined in the Bill of Rights alienates a huge demographic.
which right are you referring to?
793
« on: August 12, 2015, 07:40:50 PM »
unfortunately something like this is never going to happen in the near future, because when the majority of americans hear the words "more taxes" they flip out and veto that policy to hell.
I would be PROUD knowing that my tax dollars are helping build the next generation of doctors, engineers, and scientists. Yes, even the humble writers and artists. Fuck anyone who wouldn't be. Like, FUCK them. Fuck them with every object within reach.
This brings up an interesting caveat; would you (or anyone else reading this) support free tuition for "essential" degrees like technical and medical fields, while disregarding others like arts?
I would.
794
« on: August 11, 2015, 10:08:07 PM »
Not sure why people are saying Sanders is the best proponent of BLM of all the candidates. Is it because he appears to be a hardcore liberal? He's actually completely avoided the subject and relegates apparent oppression solely to economic factors which he can fix with his nonsensical economic policy. He really just doesn't get what modern racial oppression is, and that really has nothing to do with whether he saw MLK's most famous speech in-person. Don't forget that this guy endorsed Jesse Jackson for president twice.
Meanwhile we've got Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio being far more outspoken about racial issues. I sympathize with a lot of liberal positions but I can't fathom how Sanders is so popular beyond his annoying viral marketing campaign.
Because Sanders has been a friend to civil rights for the better half of a century. He was at rallies with MLK Jr.
Jeb and Rubio hardly have that kind of history.
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/20-examples-bernie-sanders-powerful-record-civil-and-human-rights-1950s
I don't see how his actions in his youth explain his hesitation to speak about the issue today or vindicate his terrible plans for the economy.
What do his economic plans have to do with civil rights?
795
« on: August 11, 2015, 09:48:48 PM »
I cautiously support this. I absolutely support taxpayer-subsidized community college, because that also supports people who aren't on the college track and rather focus on trades.
796
« on: August 11, 2015, 09:46:30 PM »
Not sure why people are saying Sanders is the best proponent of BLM of all the candidates. Is it because he appears to be a hardcore liberal? He's actually completely avoided the subject and relegates apparent oppression solely to economic factors which he can fix with his nonsensical economic policy. He really just doesn't get what modern racial oppression is, and that really has nothing to do with whether he saw MLK's most famous speech in-person. Don't forget that this guy endorsed Jesse Jackson for president twice.
Meanwhile we've got Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio being far more outspoken about racial issues. I sympathize with a lot of liberal positions but I can't fathom how Sanders is so popular beyond his annoying viral marketing campaign.
Because Sanders has been a friend to civil rights for the better half of a century. He was at rallies with MLK Jr. Jeb and Rubio hardly have that kind of history. http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/20-examples-bernie-sanders-powerful-record-civil-and-human-rights-1950s
797
« on: August 11, 2015, 04:06:47 PM »
Didn't this happen like, a week ago?
798
« on: August 11, 2015, 04:06:03 PM »
How's the multiculturalism there?
are finnish swedes as cucked as swedish swedes?
The fuck does this sentence even mean?
799
« on: August 11, 2015, 01:28:42 AM »
BC pls
wouldn't touch that shit with a stick
Pretty sure if some teenager came sniffing around, they'd laugh you off.
What does that even me
It means "lol get lost kid"
You appear to be upset that I called it a shit car, when it is.
Buy an M3 for $40k, or save and get the C7.
Except neither of those is an awesome car I loved as a kid that I never thought I'd be able to afford.
800
« on: August 11, 2015, 01:11:44 AM »
BC pls
wouldn't touch that shit with a stick
Pretty sure if some teenager came sniffing around, they'd laugh you off.
What does that even me
It means "lol get lost kid"
801
« on: August 11, 2015, 01:08:28 AM »
BC pls
wouldn't touch that shit with a stick
Pretty sure if some teenager came sniffing around, they'd laugh you off.
802
« on: August 10, 2015, 04:35:39 PM »
What are we supposed to discuss?
yer mum
803
« on: August 10, 2015, 04:30:55 PM »
 lol
804
« on: August 10, 2015, 04:20:30 PM »
What are we supposed to be discussing?
The brilliance that is the Dodge Viper.
805
« on: August 10, 2015, 04:11:57 PM »
>dodge
I agree, but the Viper is the exception to the rule.
806
« on: August 10, 2015, 04:11:27 PM »
Isn't that just barely under the usual price for an 11 year old viper?
Kinda. It's more about them being harder to find than anything else.
807
« on: August 10, 2015, 04:06:45 PM »
808
« on: August 09, 2015, 02:33:24 AM »
GUISE SHE'S A WOMAN SO EVERYONE IS GOING TO VOTE FOR HER BECAUSE SHE'S A WOMAN
AM I RITE?!
809
« on: August 08, 2015, 05:42:50 PM »
Fox News, since they got like 20m+ viewers.
810
« on: August 08, 2015, 05:42:12 PM »
Why the fuck do tranny threads always go 3+ pages on here
Rewording because that ended up sounding the opposite way to the intention, gg psy
People feel compelled to discuss matters that don't really affect them beyond the way they let the issue affect them, that and transgender shit is the new gay marriage/abortion argument after those two dead horses were battered into such a fine pulp that a thread on either will usually just straight up repel all users.
The biggest problem is that most people are ill-informed about transgenderism and trans issues refuse to try to understand it and become very combative.
Pages: 1 ... 252627 2829 ... 251
|
Show Posts