This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mad Max
31
« on: March 30, 2016, 12:36:14 AM »
Except for the fact that things like being anti-abortion and anti-lgbt rights are literally part of the Republican platform.
LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS DONT REAL GUYS
was that supposed to be a sentence?
32
« on: March 30, 2016, 12:28:20 AM »
thanks for illustrating perfectly how Republicans are the party of restriction of liberty and rights.
You still haven't addressed why those things would matter, though.
because you can't have democracy without freedom. Might as well be North Korea without it.
33
« on: March 30, 2016, 12:06:30 AM »
I'd prefer liberals be condescending towards others instead of conservatives actively denying rights to others.
Thanks for proving my point.
Except nothing I said was wrong. The Republican party is the party of restricting rights and freedoms.
We could talk about why that is objectively not true, but then you'd just accuse Republicans of allowing too many dangerous rights and freedoms.
Instead I'm going to ask you why rights and freedoms matter.
Please remind me which party wants to overturn the SCOTUS rulings on Roe v Wade
The Republicans, in order to protect what they see as a child's right to life.
and Obergefell v Hodges. I'll give you that, and I'll also point out that gay marriage doesn't matter. Like, at all.
Please remind me which party cut the Voting Rights Act? I'll have to admit that I don't know enough about the VRA or the politics around it to comment, but I doubt it's as simple as the "Basically Republicans don't want blacks to be able to vote" shit Huffpost tried to sell me when I googled it.
Remind me which party wants to require ID to vote. This is just being reasonable, and I'd argue that that doesn't go far enough.
At least Democrats don't have the gall to claim to be the party of liberty and freedom while acting directly against those values. They do though.
Rights and freedoms matter because that's the foundation of our country. And then you'll probably turn around and tell me the 2nd amendment is outdated, and the removal of native americans was a genocide, and the founding fathers were actually bad guys because they owned slaves. There's a lot more to the founding of the United States than those "rights and freedoms" that YOU and your faction consider legitimate. Do not appeal to it unless you are willing to address or embrace those discrepancies.
We are not longer the United States of America if we turn away from rights and freedoms.
lmao you sound like Rand Paul
thanks for illustrating perfectly how Republicans are the party of restriction of liberty and rights.
34
« on: March 29, 2016, 11:04:07 PM »
This is not a case of bad apples spoiling the tree. Just because every Republican in the state of Mississippi wants to kill all blacks doesn't mean every Republican in Wyoming wants too but that's what your posts are implying. Even if negative opinions represent a majority, you can't just say that everyone in that party is in their for those reasons. That would be incredibly false.
So states like North Carolina and Indiana and Georgia are acting in the best interests, freedoms, and rights of their people with their recent laws against abortion and LGBT protections?
It's not limited to federal politics. Except for the fact that things like being anti-abortion and anti-lgbt rights are literally part of the Republican platform.
35
« on: March 29, 2016, 10:59:09 PM »
But Republicans think that absurd cost and damage to the economy is worth not having those damn wetbacks taking our jobs.
Many do, yes, and they need to learn that they're wrong.
>Republicans >Admitting they're wrong >Literally ever
36
« on: March 29, 2016, 10:58:15 PM »
Correction: Republican Federal Politicians are in the business of doing that. Federal representatives are the most out of touch with their constituents, and if you were to poll every single person who is registered under the party you would get more than enough that aren't about restricting freedoms to make that statement false. You might even get members of the party that are part of the minority groups that you claim are being attacked by said party.
Political parties and the people in them aren't as black and white as you're trying to make it out to be.
Except nothing I said was wrong. The Republican party is the party of restricting rights and freedoms. So states like North Carolina and Indiana and Georgia are acting in the best interests, freedoms, and rights of their people with their recent laws against abortion and LGBT protections? It's not limited to federal politics.
37
« on: March 29, 2016, 10:54:44 PM »
I'd prefer liberals be condescending towards others instead of conservatives actively denying rights to others.
I'm not even sure what this means. Is this a meme?
38
« on: March 29, 2016, 10:51:09 PM »
I'd prefer liberals be condescending towards others instead of conservatives actively denying rights to others.
Thanks for proving my point.
Except nothing I said was wrong. The Republican party is the party of restricting rights and freedoms.
We could talk about why that is objectively not true, but then you'd just accuse Republicans of allowing too many dangerous rights and freedoms.
Instead I'm going to ask you why rights and freedoms matter.
Please remind me which party wants to overturn the SCOTUS rulings on Roe v Wade and Obergefell v Hodges. Please remind me which party cut the Voting Rights Act? Remind me which party wants to require ID to vote. Oh right, not the Democrats. At least Democrats don't have the gall to claim to be the party of liberty and freedom while acting directly against those values. Rights and freedoms matter because that's the foundation of our country. We are not longer the United States of America if we turn away from rights and freedoms.
39
« on: March 29, 2016, 10:45:27 PM »
I'd prefer liberals be condescending towards others instead of conservatives actively denying rights to others.
Thanks for proving my point.
Except nothing I said was wrong. The Republican party is the party of restricting rights and freedoms.
40
« on: March 29, 2016, 06:57:15 PM »
>Two wrongs make a right
Wew lad.
I'd prefer liberals be condescending towards others instead of conservatives actively denying rights to others.
I never said one was right, I was saying one is less shitty. I thought Republicans hated all that "muh feelz" shit from the SJW-left. Why do they care about people being condescending?
41
« on: March 29, 2016, 06:43:10 PM »
I'd prefer liberals be condescending towards others instead of conservatives actively denying rights to others.
42
« on: March 29, 2016, 02:44:02 PM »
But Republicans think that absurd cost and damage to the economy is worth not having those damn wetbacks taking our jobs.
43
« on: March 28, 2016, 02:01:59 PM »
44
« on: March 18, 2016, 11:50:43 AM »
>voting for someone who publicly announced they would commit war crimes
lol
45
« on: March 18, 2016, 10:06:10 AM »
Um..neither? Learn something useful.
46
« on: March 17, 2016, 11:52:02 PM »
Way to be civil Verb.
Insults and being a general asshole aren't going to result in intelligent discussion.
>intelligent discussion >The Flood lol
47
« on: March 17, 2016, 11:50:44 PM »
Because I have zero faith in the American people, this is obviously our future. Who would he pick, and would they be confirmed?
48
« on: March 17, 2016, 07:54:23 PM »
I love when Sep7 tries to talk about transgenderism.
I love how this is all you can ever say when there's a thread like this.
Because there's nothing to be said. Attempting to convince retards that transgenderism is not a mental disorder is a fool's errand.
49
« on: March 17, 2016, 04:28:33 PM »
I love when Sep7 tries to talk about transgenderism.
50
« on: March 16, 2016, 10:50:56 AM »
Bye Felicia.
51
« on: March 16, 2016, 10:50:06 AM »
Seems like a solid choice. Too bad it's all for nothing.
52
« on: March 13, 2016, 03:00:41 PM »
If you own a gun, what do you care if someone knows you own a gun?
53
« on: March 12, 2016, 02:53:48 PM »
"You can talk about anything you want"
LOL
Can we talk about how any race can be racist, it doesn't require a position of power?
..No?
oh ok.
zzz, theres an important distinction between racist thought/action as a fundamental concept and the presence of institutional racism as an extension of a dominant race/ethnicity's power
You're right. But there's a not-insignificant number of people from the Sapphire crew that insist that racism = hatred + power.
55
« on: March 11, 2016, 07:53:37 PM »
"You can talk about anything you want"
LOL
Can we talk about how any race can be racist, it doesn't require a position of power?
..No?
oh ok.
Can I at least put an insult on the insult thread?
"No, you might offend someone"
I wonder how they feel about being critical of Jews who basically hold airplanes hostage because they don't want to sit next to women. They're probably fine with that...right? [I actually got a warning and a thread removed on b.net for that one, lol]
56
« on: March 11, 2016, 07:50:18 PM »
"You can talk about anything you want"
LOL
Can we talk about how any race can be racist, it doesn't require a position of power? ..No? oh ok.
57
« on: March 11, 2016, 07:45:55 PM »
lol. every few weeks I get an invite on b.net to join them.  I have like 7 of those
58
« on: March 11, 2016, 07:43:00 PM »
-Abolish the IRS
-Repeal Obamacare
-Put Hillary in prison
-Make firearm regulation illegal
-Build a wall between the US and Mexico
I found Trump's alt.
59
« on: March 10, 2016, 02:29:52 PM »
I can't believe we're still using this useless thing
Me neither. The very fact that some states can opt-out of DST proves how arbitrary and useless it really is.
60
« on: March 10, 2016, 02:25:04 PM »
but it's different depending on where you live
so do you mean the US or UK or some other place?
and if it's he US, which state?
these are important questions
I didn't think the UK did DST. The US does it, except AZ and HI, I think.
|
Show Posts